Is B just that part of E that does no work?
- From: blackhead <larryharson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:25:25 -0700
B and E are two fields that act on charge, with the former doing no
work. So isn't B just that part of E which does no work? i.e. that
part of E which is normal to the velocity, v, of a charge and so could
be defined as E x v? So every E will have a B that is dependent upon
the path taken by a charge through it.
I want to calculate B for a straight wire using the above idea. I will
calculate the delayed E at a point due to the moving electrons, and
subtract that from E due to the stationary ions which should give zero
since a stationary charge experiences no force in practise. The
problem is why a moving charge, Q, experiences a force if E is zero
there? I suspect it's because it's E will have an effect on the
electrons in the wire because of the finite time it takes to effect
them, which in turn generate an E that effects Q so that an E normal
to v of Q is the net result.
Is this going to be a waste of time, so that I will end up with
something that conflicts with Maxwell's equations?
Thanks in advance.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is B just that part of E that does no work?
- From: blackhead
- Re: Is B just that part of E that does no work?
- From: Igor
- Re: Is B just that part of E that does no work?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Is B just that part of E that does no work?
- From: srp
- Re: Is B just that part of E that does no work?
- Prev by Date: Consuming more means dying sooner.
- Next by Date: Re: Is B just that part of E that does no work?
- Previous by thread: visit new videos of http://fabian20077.blogspot.com/
- Next by thread: Re: Is B just that part of E that does no work?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|