sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 31 Aug 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: virtual particles
  • From: PD
• Re: virtual particles
  • From: Blah
• Re: virtual particles
  • From: Blah
• Re: virtual particles
  • From: Blah
• Re: virtual particles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Radiance/Irradiance - Maya
  • From: ronviers@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: virtual particles
  • From: srp
• Re: Radiance/Irradiance - Maya
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Low Enriched Uranium Pitted Thermonuclear Bombs are Coming
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio
  • From: Rex
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Olc
• Quantum Gravity 174.2: More Re Dirac Mass vs PI-Expectation
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 174.1: Dirac Mass vs PI-Expectation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: IBM targets single-atom data storage
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Gravity 174.0: Symmetry, Antisymmetry, Dirac Mass, Entanglement
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio
  • From: Sam Wormley
• virtual particles
  • From: Blah
• Re: Counting photons [for Potter]
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Macro Micro Planck
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• math and universe - parts 3 and 4 - modified August 30,2007
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• the pseudoskeptic
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Radiance/Irradiance - Maya
  • From: ronviers@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What if...?
  • From: N
• Re: IBM targets single-atom data storage
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• IBM targets single-atom data storage
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Terrestrial volcanoes appear to have contributed to the rise of Oxygen
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Radiance/Irradiance - Maya
  • From: Andy Resnick
• You're working for ? ? ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Dwib
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Dwib
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: hanson
• Re: Quantum Gravity 174.0: Symmetry, Antisymmetry, Dirac Mass, Entanglement
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: geometric optics
  • From: John C . Polasek
• "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Olc
• Re: Magnetic Feild Strength Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: LIGHTS OUT AT SMITHSONIAN... Truth Be Damned
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Magnetic Feild Strength Question
  • From: Tom
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Androcles
• Re: University of Minnesota astronomers find gaping hole in the Uni...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: China freer than USA? :-)
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Macro Micro Planck
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Neutron stars warp space-time, U-M astronomers observe
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Neutron stars warp space-time, U-M astronomers observe
  • From: prinejohn41
• Quantum Gravity 174.0: Symmetry, Antisymmetry, Dirac Mass, Entanglement
  • From: OsherD
• Re: University of Minnesota astronomers find gaping hole in the Uni...
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Magnetic Feild Strength Question
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Radiance/Irradiance - Maya
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Radiance/Irradiance - Maya
  • From: ronviers@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Uncle Al
• Magnetic Feild Strength Question
  • From: Tom
• Re: If a number is too small to represent with the bits you have...
  • From: Pmb
• Without ignorance there'd be no choices, no changes, no motion.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• If a number is too small to represent with the bits you have...
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: PD
• Re: Radiance/Irradiance - Maya
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Androcles
• Radiance/Irradiance - Maya
  • From: ronviers@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Uncle Al
• Counting photons [for Potter]
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 837 August 29, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe
  • From: srp
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: hanson
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What if...?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: q-bit
• Spectral map with recursion
  • From: boson boss
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 837 August 29, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe
  • From: boson boss
• Re: What if...?
  • From: N
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Dwib
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Olc
• Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: geometric optics
  • From: dimitris
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Randy Poe
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 837 August 29, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 28 August 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: srp
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Randy Poe
• 125 J coil gun
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: China freer than USA? :-)
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: University of Minnesota astronomers find gaping hole in the Uni...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Perpetual Geomagnetic Motor
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: THE BLACK HOLE
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Macro Micro Planck
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Dark Matter, Who needs it?? Nature does
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Androcles
• EEFL light box--Up to 5000 lux slim light box in China!
  • From: jenny-edlite
• Douglas Kukucka appointed after rigorous screening process.
  • From: Promotions Group
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 28 August 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Giant Hole in Space?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Obit: Math man Atle Selberg dead at 90
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Student Age
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Fire Inside - Structural design with fire safety in mind
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Student Age
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: geometric optics
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: What if...?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What if...?
  • From: N
• Re: Quantum Gravity 171.8 Summary of Generalized Alternating Matrices and Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 171.8 Summary of Generalized Alternating Matrices and Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What if...?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Lightning Ball ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Use of Thorium as a nuclear fuel
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: PD
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: q-bit
• What if...?
  • From: N
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Physical Magnet Properties
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: PD
• Re: The place of science in this site
  • From: hg
• Re: Student Age
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physical Magnet Properties
  • From: mike . mcfall
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: q-bit
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: PD
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: PD
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: q-bit
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Student Age
  • From: PD
• Re: Lightning Ball ???
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: New Einstein Website
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Androcles
• Re: So You Want to be a Physicist?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: q-bit
• Re: Physical Magnet Properties
  • From: PD
• Re: Why not solar cell covered cars?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: So You Want to be a Physicist?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: New Einstein Website
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Physical Magnet Properties
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Use of Thorium as a nuclear fuel
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• "The Creation of a Universe and the Gravity Transformations"
  • From: Olc
• Re: Use of Thorium as a nuclear fuel
  • From: Ian Parker
• Physical Magnet Properties
  • From: mike . mcfall
• Re: Use of Thorium as a nuclear fuel
  • From: Robert S
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: University Of Minnesota Astronomers Find Gaping Hole In The Uni...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Lightning Ball ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: socratus
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Eric Gisse belongs in KIDDY Garden Physics
  • From: Y.Porat
• Eric Gisse belongs in KIDDY Garden Physics
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: New Einstein Website
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 171.7: More Re Constant Diagonal Matrices and Solitons
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 171.6: Constant Skew-diagonal Matrices and Solitons
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: q-bit
• Re: new perpetual motion prize
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio
  • From: Sam Wormley
• So You Want to be a Physicist?
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: new perpetual motion prize
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Use of Thorium as a nuclear fuel
  • From: Eric Gisse
• New Einstein Website
  • From: info
• Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: Student Age
  • From: Pmb
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Student Age
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: Eric Gisse
• The Exact Value of Newton's Gravitational Constant G
  • From: q-bit
• Re: geometric optics
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Quantum Theory- Carefully Type the Theory Classes
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Student Age
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Student Age
  • From: Uncle Al
• mysteries of saturn
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Student Age
  • From: panton_chrimaton
• Re: Student Age
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Student Age
  • From: Mark
• Re: Student Age
  • From: Mark
• Re: Student Age
  • From: Mark
• Re: Student Age
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Student Age
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Student Age
  • From: Mark
• Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio
  • From: hanson
• Re: Spin- as a Theory
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: The place of science in this site
  • From: Steve
• Re: Spin- as a Theory
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Quantum Theory- Carefully Type the Theory Classes
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Spin- as a Theory
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Spin- as a Theory
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Lightning Ball ???
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: You Know, MArs is Water NOT CO2, plue a NIST Neutron, General Service Announcment
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Spin- as a Theory
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio
  • From: Sam Wormley
• You Know, MArs is Water NOT CO2, plue a NIST Neutron, General Service Announcment
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Spin- as a Theory
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Why not solar cell covered cars?
  • From: z
• Re: Low energy neutrinos detected - confirming standard solar model
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Student Age
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Coefficient of Kinetic Friction
  • From: Igor
• Student Age
  • From: Mark
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: Igor
• Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio
  • From: nonsense
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: Igor
• Re: Vacuum Temperature
  • From: hanson
• Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Re: Cosmic collision may shed light on dark matter
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Cosmic collision may shed light on dark matter
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Cosmic collision may shed light on dark matter
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Energy of photons resulting from E&M modulation
  • From: rec.woodworking
• Re: geometric optics
  • From: dimitris
• Re: geometric optics
  • From: PD
• Re: Coefficient of Kinetic Friction
  • From: PD
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Olc
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Olc
• Re: Use of Thorium as a nuclear fuel
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why not solar cell covered cars?
  • From: moschops
• geometric optics
  • From: dimitris
• Re: Local and Non-local
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Coefficient of Kinetic Friction
  • From: iitaspirant2009
• Use of Thorium as a nuclear fuel
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: What *really* is Time?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Lightning Ball ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: new perpetual motion prize
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Entropy
  • From: kunzmilan
• Quantum Gravity 173.0: Genetics vs Big Bang
  • From: OsherD
• Re: new perpetual motion prize
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Energy of photons resulting from E&M modulation
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Playing games with association, dimensions, leakage into...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Vacuum Temperature
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Germans break speed of light
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Playing games with association, dimensions, leakage into...
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Low energy neutrinos detected - confirming standard solar model
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Germans break speed of light
  • From: hanson
• Re: Vacuum Temperature
  • From: hanson
• Re: Local and Non-local
  • From: Uncle Al
• Local and Non-local
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Playing games with association, dimensions, leakage into...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Cosmic collision may shed light on dark matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Playing games with association, dimensions, leakage into... Correction
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Pmb
• Playing games with association, dimensions, leakage into...
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Historic but quntitative Physics Text
  • From: Engineering Calculations
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Androcles
• Entropy
  • From: goombaj
• Re: What *really* is Time?
  • From: nonsense
• "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Tereh
• Re: Counterfactual assumptions yield nonsense. -- Tom Roberts
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Counterfactual assumptions yield nonsense. -- Tom Roberts
  • From: hanson
• Re: What *really* is Time?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Vacuum Temperature
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: A most elementary question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: A most elementary question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Vacuum Temperature
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Alternative solution to the Solar Neutrino Problem...
  • From: Androcles
• Alternative solution to the Solar Neutrino Problem...
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Germans break speed of light
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: How many treadwear miles do we REALLY get for every 100 UTQG points?
  • From: Jim
• Re: Energy of photons resulting from E&M modulation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Energy of photons resulting from E&M modulation
  • From: Sue...
• Energy of photons resulting from E&M modulation
  • From: rec.woodworking
• Re: Facts on Race for you racists
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: www.add2bestbuy.com Best Buy Encyclopedia
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: THE BLACK HOLE
  • From: Ian Parker
• www.add2bestbuy.com Best Buy Encyclopedia
  • From: 1stcobra2007
• Re: Perpetual Geomagnetic Motor
  • From: ageofmagnetizm
• Re: The Shapeshifting Statue of Liberty
  • From: Rex
• Re: The Shapeshifting Statue of Liberty
  • From: Rex
• Re: Quantum Gravity 171.5: Pythagorean Matrix and Dirac Operator Eigenvalues
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 171.5: Pythagorean Matrix and Dirac Operator Eigenvalues
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Counterfactual assumptions yield nonsense. -- Tom Roberts
  • From: hanson
• Re: Germans break speed of light
  • From: hanson
• Proff of time travel?
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Sending information with v>c ?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Hypergeometrical Universe Hyperon Assignments.
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Sending information with v>c ?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Germans break speed of light
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Sarfatti's Fireside Chat Aug 26 2007 C2C Talk Radio
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Debating Creationists
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: The Shapeshifting Statue of Liberty
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Shapeshifting Statue of Liberty
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: The Shapeshifting Statue of Liberty
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Counterfactual assumptions yield nonsense. -- Tom Roberts
  • From: hanson
• Re: Germans break speed of light
  • From: hanson
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• momentum principle
  • From: dimitris
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Einstein's Errors
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The Shapeshifting Statue of Liberty
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Debating Creationists
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Sarfatti's Fireside Chat Aug 26 2007 C2C Talk Radio
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Debating Creationists
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Sarfatti's Fireside Chat Aug 26 2007 C2C Talk Radio
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Shapeshifting Statue of Liberty
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Quantum Gravity 171.4: Gamma Matrix Squared is -I, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Cosmic collision may shed light on dark matter
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Poor design led to I-35W bridge collapse?
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Sending information with v>c ?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Shapeshifting Statue of Liberty
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The Shapeshifting Statue of Liberty
  • From: Rex
• Re: math is a physical process
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: GPS Satellites: Control Stations Tracking Of: How ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: new perpetual motion prize
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Anabolic Steroids and Children of America
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: GPS Satellites: Control Stations Tracking Of: How ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Tereh
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 24 Aug 07 Washington, DC
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Enormous Hole
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Sarfatti this Sunday - Talk Radio
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Book Review - Storm World: Hurricanes, Politics, and the Battle over Global Warming
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Debating Creationists
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Modified gravity fails at long distances
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Cosmic collision may shed light on dark matter
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: EPR paradox (Entangled states)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: GPS Satellites: Control Stations Tracking Of: How ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: You lose it to China, China loses it to us :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: You lose it to China, China loses it to us :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Exporting terrorism, I guess :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Germans break speed of light
  • From: BioFreak
• GPS Satellites: Control Stations Tracking Of: How ?
  • From: Robert11
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.94: Von Neumann's Entropy Defeated By 2 + 2 = 4
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Vacuum Temperature
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Book suggestions....
  • From: Front Office
• Re: Debating Creationists
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Can a box's weight change due to internal change?
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: mjb
• EPR paradox (Entangled states)
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Quantum Gravity 171.3: Dirac and Pauli Matrices As Generalized Alternating Sign Matrices
  • From: OsherD
• Re: University of Minnesota astronomers find gaping hole in the Universe
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Cosmic collision may shed light on dark matter
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: University of Minnesota astronomers find gaping hole in the Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Cosmic collision may shed light on dark matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: socratus
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Modified gravity fails at long distances
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Debating Creationists
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Sarfatti's Fireside Chat Aug 26 2007 C2C Talk Radio
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Book Review - Storm World: Hurricanes, Politics, and the Battle over Global Warming
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sarfatti this Sunday - Talk Radio
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Nuclear Quadrupole Moment
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Poor design led to I-35W bridge collapse?
  • From: nonsense
• Sarfatti this Sunday - Talk Radio
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Re: Sony Develops "Bio Battery" Generating Electricity from Sugar
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Can a box's weight change due to internal change?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Cel-Phone GPS ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Can a box's weight change due to internal change?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 24 Aug 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Anabolic Steroids and Children of America
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Counterfactual assumptions yield nonsense. -- Tom Roberts
  • From: Androcles
• Nuclear Quadrupole Moment
  • From: whengooddogsdobad
• Re: Anabolic Steroids and Children of America
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Counterfactual assumptions yield nonsense. -- Tom Roberts
  • From: hanson
• Re: Gravity
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Cel-Phone GPS ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: new perpetual motion prize
  • From: Androcles
• Anabolic Steroids and Children of America
  • From: edward . wong25
• Cel-Phone GPS ?
  • From: Robert11
• Can a box's weight change due to internal change?
  • From: Francis
• Re: new perpetual motion prize
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Sony Develops "Bio Battery" Generating Electricity from Sugar
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: mjb
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: new perpetual motion prize
  • From: Androcles
• Re: new perpetual motion prize
  • From: Androcles
• Re: new perpetual motion prize
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: new perpetual motion prize
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: malibu
• Counterfactual assumptions yield nonsense. -- Tom Roberts
  • From: Androcles
• Re: new perpetual motion prize
  • From: Bernhard Kuemel
• Re: new perpetual motion prize
  • From: Androcles
• Re: new perpetual motion prize
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: new perpetual motion prize
  • From: Bernhard Kuemel
• Re: new perpetual motion prize
  • From: Bernhard Kuemel
• Re: new perpetual motion prize
  • From: Bernhard Kuemel
• Re: Book suggestions....
  • From: rAgAv
• "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Tereh
• Re: Deriving the Lorentz Transformation
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: fisrt exercice of Ashcroft
  • From: manouchk
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: blackhead
• Re: new perpetual motion prize
  • From: Androcles
• Re: new perpetual motion prize
  • From: Richard Tobin
• new perpetual motion prize
  • From: Bernhard Kuemel
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: mjb
• Re: Dire Straits
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Arithmetic breakthrough!
  • From: rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why not solar cell covered cars?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Arithmetic breakthrough!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: K40 positron emission branch ratio
  • From: Bernhard Kuemel
• Quantum Gravity 171.2: Breaking Alternating-Sign Matrix Code
  • From: OsherD
• Team claims first silicon spinFET
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why not solar cell covered cars?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Atmospheric Heating During Re-Entry
  • From: Kenneth Doyle
• Re: Why not solar cell covered cars?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: K40 positron emission branch ratio
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Atmospheric Heating During Re-Entry
  • From: PD
• Re: Atmospheric Heating During Re-Entry
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Atmospheric Heating During Re-Entry
  • From: Androcles
• Re: BUSH CARTEL STAGED 9/11
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Why not solar cell covered cars?
  • From: z
• Re: Atmospheric Heating During Re-Entry
  • From: jimp
• Atmospheric Heating During Re-Entry
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Why not solar cell covered cars?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Why not solar cell covered cars?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Arithmetic breakthrough!
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: A most elementary question
  • From: Dwib
• K40 positron emission branch ratio
  • From: Bernhard Kuemel
• Re: Why not solar cell covered cars?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Light resonance and cancellation?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: Igor
• Re:Gravity
  • From: Darrell Lakin
• Re: Why not solar cell covered cars?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why not solar cell covered cars?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: mjb
• Re: fisrt exercice of Ashcroft
  • From: manouchk
• Re: Why not solar cell covered cars?
  • From: PD
• Re: Light resonance and cancellation?
  • From: PD
• Re: Dire Straits
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Why not solar cell covered cars?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• fisrt exercice of Ashcroft
  • From: manouchk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: My recent posting purpose
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: Why not solar cell covered cars?
  • From: Stem sells
• Re: Light resonance and cancellation?
  • From: Stem sells
• Re: Light resonance and cancellation?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why not solar cell covered cars?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The great falsification of physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light resonance and cancellation?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: The great falsification of physics
  • From: PD
• Re: How can magnetic field align a mgnetic dipole along its direction?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: John C . Polasek
• "Gravity"
  • From: Tereh
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: How can magnetic field align a mgnetic dipole along its direction?
  • From: Tareq
• Re: A most elementary question
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Book suggestions....
  • From: PD
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: All Accounting jobs are available here...here...here...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: Eric Gisse
• SRT , GRT and " Minkowski space ".
  • From: socratus
• Re: Dire Straits
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Low energy neutrinos detected - confirming standard solar model
  • From: goddesshekate
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: mjb
• All Accounting jobs are available here...here...here...
  • From: Accounting Genious
• Quantum Gravity 172.0: Canadians, Americans, Russians Solve The Double Slit and EPR Paradoxes
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Light collapses step-by-step
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Light collapses step-by-step
  • From: Sam Wormley
• A new search engine for books -- Zercle.com
  • From: none
• Re: Light collapses step-by-step
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Light resonance and cancellation?
  • From: Stem sells
• How much for a small personal wind-turbine?
  • From: Stem sells
• Why not solar cell covered cars?
  • From: Stem sells
• Re: My recent posting purpose
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why Would Anyone Trust NASA's Climate Data Now?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Book suggestions....
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: Why Would Anyone Trust NASA's Climate Data Now?
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: My recent posting purpose
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: My recent posting purpose
  • From: JSH
• Re: My recent posting purpose
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Light collapses step-by-step
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Momentum conservation
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Jack Sarfatti on Coast to Coast Talk Radio Aug 26, 2007 10PM Pacific Time
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: Androcles
• JSH: My recent posting purpose
  • From: JSH
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: PD
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: PD
• Re: Book suggestions....
  • From: PD
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Book suggestions....
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: PD
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: PD
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: A most elementary question
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: A most elementary question
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Learning to get by on less is more fun than learning to earn more.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: A most elementary question
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: srp
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The great falsification of physics
  • From: Igor
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: But why? Questioning primes.
  • From: willo_thewisp
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: srp
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: srp
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why do sci.physics posters have such toilet mouths?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: A most elementary question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: srp
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Arithmetic breakthrough!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Arithmetic breakthrough!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Is the universe really flat?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: WATCHING AN OBJECT GO QUANTUM
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: srp
• Re: WTC Towers: Proves usa is ignorant
  • From: tj Frazir
• Deriving the Lorentz Transformation
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: The great falsification of physics
  • From: John Christiansen
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: Randy Poe
• The great falsification of physics
  • From: a_guest
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: srp
• Re: JSH: So math people fake it
  • From: karvaporo
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Tereh
• Re: JSH: So math people fake it
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: But why? Questioning primes.
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: Book suggestions....
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is the universe really flat?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Book suggestions....
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: mjb
• Re: Arithmetic breakthrough!
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: JSH: But why? Questioning primes.
  • From: Rupert
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Androcles
• New site, sort of youtube for scientists:
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: mjb
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Low energy neutrinos detected - confirming standard solar model
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Quantum Gravity 171.1: ArXiv On Noncommutative Gauge Matrix Models
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 171.0: Austria (Vienna) Achieves Quantum Gravity Via Trace
  • From: Traveler
• Quantum Gravity 171.0: Austria (Vienna) Achieves Quantum Gravity Via Trace
  • From: OsherD
• Help to make drawers by wire?
  • From: davidinvestworld
• Re: Low energy neutrinos detected - confirming standard solar model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Arithmetic breakthrough!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is the universe really flat?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• JSH: But why? Questioning primes.
  • From: JSH
• Is the universe really flat?
  • From: Hatem Abdelghani
• Electromagnetic Quantum
  • From: joilly17
• Re: JSH: So math people fake it
  • From: JSH
• WATCHING AN OBJECT GO QUANTUM
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quasar dispersal
  • From: BURT
• Re: Low energy neutrinos detected - confirming standard solar model
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th
• Re: JSH: So math people fake it
  • From: local host
• Re: JSH: Critical mass
  • From: local host
• I'm a member of the Pirate's Union, local 342845683B.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Low energy neutrinos detected - confirming standard solar model
  • From: goddesshekate
• Low energy neutrinos detected - confirming standard solar model
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th
• Re: Uncle All? Energy from water?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A most elementary question
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: JSH: So math people fake it
  • From: Rupert
• Re: So long as I don't have to leave Seattle, I'll be happy.
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Arithmetic breakthrough!
  • From: boson boss
• Re: JSH: So math people fake it
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Momentum conservation
  • From: Peter
• Re: A most elementary question
  • From: PD
• Re: Uncle All? Energy from water?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: hanson
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Uncle All? Energy from water?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: So math people fake it
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: Arithmetic breakthrough!
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Androcles
• Re: HOW EXACTLY SUPERLUMINAL SIGNALS INVALIDATE RELATIVITY
  • From: hanson
• Re: A most elementary question
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Would Anyone Trust NASA's Climate Data Now?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Arithmetic breakthrough!
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Uncle All? Energy from water?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Uncle All? Energy from water?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Randy Poe
• Arithmetic breakthrough!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A most elementary question
  • From: Igor
• Re: OT: Back from Foobar
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: John Christiansen
• Re: How can magnetic field align a mgnetic dipole along its direction?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A most elementary question
  • From: PD
• Re: HOW EXACTLY SUPERLUMINAL SIGNALS INVALIDATE RELATIVITY
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A most elementary question
  • From: Richard Tobin
• A most elementary question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: Androcles
• GPS being used for Shuttle's return to KFC this morning - landing 11:32am CDT
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: hanson
• OT: Back from Foobar
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: mjb
• Re: Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: Androcles
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 836 August 21, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: JSH: Critical mass
  • From: gjedwards
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: aatu . koskensilta
• Re: Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: qbit
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: mh
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: mh
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: qbit
• Re: JSH: So math people fake it
  • From: karvaporo
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: Androcles
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Tereh
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How can magnetic field align a mgnetic dipole along its direction?
  • From: Tareq
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: mh
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: malibu
• infinity.8.co
  • From: dedanoe
• Law, Legal , accidental claims, Insurance online, updates online marketing
  • From: elie
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: qbit
• Re: Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: Androcles
• Re: JSH: So math people fake it
  • From: gjedwards
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: qbit
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 170.991: Alternating Sign Matrices and Causal Alternating Signs
  • From: OsherD
• Re: JSH: So math people fake it
  • From: Eric Gisse
• JSH: So math people fake it
  • From: JSH
• Re: Why Would Anyone Trust NASA's Climate Data Now?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Critical mass
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: The Cult of Global Warming
  • From: hanson
• Re: The Cult of Global Warming
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: JSH: Critical mass
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• JSH: Critical mass
  • From: JSH
• Re: Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: hanson
• Re: Momentum conservation
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: hanson
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: Why Would Anyone Trust NASA's Climate Data Now?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: PD
• Re: Momentum conservation
  • From: Peter
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Rutherford Scattering of Two Moving Particles
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: mh
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: mh
• Re: Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Would Anyone Trust NASA's Climate Data Now?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Pressure gradient inside a drop
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Pressure gradient inside a drop
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Extradimensional creatures???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: hanson
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: Androcles
• Re: OT: Simple question about a robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Seismic theories
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ADIOS YOU SIMPLE-MINDED SONSOFBITCHES
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: mjb
• Re: Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Cult of Global Warming
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: OT: Simple question about a robot
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Why Would Anyone Trust NASA's Climate Data Now?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Pressure gradient inside a drop
  • From: sumesh . pt
• Re: Seismic theories
  • From: DDP3000
• Re: Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: hanson
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: mjb
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: qbit
• Re: OT: Simple question about a robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Simple question about a robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How can magnetic field align a mgnetic dipole along its direction?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• How can magnetic field align a mgnetic dipole along its direction?
  • From: Tareq
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Randy Poe
• Rutherford Scattering of Two Moving Particles
  • From: John Schutkeker
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Tereh
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: PD
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: ADIOS YOU SIMPLE-MINDED SONSOFBITCHES
  • From: malibu
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: malibu
• Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: mjb
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: PD
• Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: PD
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Aug 20, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org
• New Resource Site on Instrumentation
  • From: Techman
• symposium on time's arrow, quantum measurement and superluminal behavior
  • From: frontierscientist
• the University of Koblenz-Landau faster-than liight experiments
  • From: frontierscientist
• Re: New Faster-Than-Light Quantum Tunneling Allegations
  • From: frontierscientist
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Quantum Gravity 170.99: Cylindrical Wormhole Via Combinatoric Graph Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: mh
• Quantum Gravity 170.98: Eigenvalue Symmetry About 0 in Graph Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Could this device be built?
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: hanson
• Re: Successive trips through gravitational fields causes light to red-shift - not a Big Bang
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Successive trips through gravitational fields causes light to red-shift - not a Big Bang
  • From: mh
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: Successive trips through gravitational fields causes light to red-shift - not a Big Bang
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Successive trips through gravitational fields causes light to red-shift - not a Big Bang
  • From: mh
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: malibu
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: Uriah Heap
• Re: Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: hanson
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: mh
• Re: Seismic theories
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Seismic theories
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Exporting terrorism, I guess :-)
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Seismic theories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Global Expansion Tectonic was Re: Seismic theories
  • From: Florian
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: Uncle Al
• Seismic theories
  • From: DDP3000
• Re: Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: fmardini
• Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
  • From: mh
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: PD
• Re: Momentum conservation
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: Androcles
• Relativity for the non scientific
  • From: fmardini
• Re: Germans break speed of light
  • From: hanson
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Al.Rivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: hurricanes and galaxies
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Germans break speed of light
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Vacuum Temperature
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Germans break speed of light
  • From: hanson
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.94: Von Neumann's Entropy Defeated By 2 + 2 = 4
  • From: OsherD
• Re: hurracanes and galaxies
  • From: hanson
• Re: Germans break speed of light
  • From: hanson
• Quantum Gravity 170.97: Minimal Polynomial and Invariant Subspace Theorems
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Wagnerphile
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Germans break speed of light
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: China freer than USA? :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Quarks ???? + Calculations
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Now I'm _Really_ Getting Ambitious
  • From: Graham
• Re: hurricanes and galaxies
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Philosophers, Geometric Analogy, and Nuclear Weapons Security
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Citer
• Re: Particle is real, Field is not???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: TEST
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.94: Von Neumann's Entropy Defeated By 2 + 2 = 4
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Momentum conservation
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Momentum conservation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: how to calculate expantion of air by rising temperature ?
  • From: hihihi
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Forget biofuels - burn oil and plant forests instead
  • From: Benj
• Quantum Gravity 170.96: More Re Alternating-Sign Eigenvalues
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 170.95: Alternating-Sign Eigenvalues
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Perpetual Geomagnetic Motor
  • From: Giggling Japanese Underwear Girls
• Perpetual Geomagnetic Motor
  • From: ageofmagnetizm
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.94: Von Neumann's Entropy Defeated By 2 + 2 = 4
  • From: OsherD
• Re: hurracanes and galaxies
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: hurracanes and galaxies
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: You lose it to China, China loses it to us :-)
  • From: hanson
• Re: Germans break speed of light
  • From: hanson
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: malibu
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: PD
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: PD
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Momentum conservation
  • From: PD
• Re: Momentum conservation
  • From: PD
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Momentum conservation
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Philosophers, Geometric Analogy, and Nuclear Weapons Security
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Definition of "physical observer"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Philosophers, Geometric Analogy, and Nuclear Weapons Security
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Definition of "physical observer"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Momentum conservation
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: how to calculate expantion of air by rising temperature ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: malibu
• Re: Germans break speed of light
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: OT: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. ParkFriday, 17 Aug07 Washington,DC
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Correct meaning of "Quantum leap" Could act like AC
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Momentum conservation
  • From: Peter
• Definition of "physical observer"
  • From: newsgr . mail
• Re: OT: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. ParkFriday, 17 Aug07 Washington,DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: how to calculate expantion of air by rising temperature ?
  • From: hihihi
• how to calculate expantion of air by rising temperature ?
  • From: hihihi
• Re: Article: Photons flout the light speed limit
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: hurracanes and galaxies
  • From: Eric Gisse
• New Faster-Than-Light Quantum Tunneling Allegations
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• hurracanes and galaxies
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: OT: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. ParkFriday, 17 Aug 07 Washington,DC
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: You lose it to China, China loses it to us :-)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: OT: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. ParkFriday, 17 Aug 07 Washington,DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: I love this video!
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Al's type of honeymoon :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: You lose it to China, China loses it to us :-)
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Book to bring me up to date?
  • From: Stuart Bruff
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.92: Hilgevoor and Uffink's Criticisms of HUP
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Double Slit Paradoxon - An indicator for a "bug" in the architecture or machinery of our universe?
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Momentum conservation
  • From: Peter
• Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Momentum conservation
  • From: Peter
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Vacuum Temperature
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Vacuum Temperature
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Uncle Al, sperm donor.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Germans break speed of light
  • From: hanson
• Re: Phase Flow Problem
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.9: Germans Pioneer in Superluminality, Chinese Now Follow
  • From: hanson
• Re: Momentum conservation
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Germans break speed of light
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Momentum conservation
  • From: PD
• Al's goodness :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Big Bang Pioneer, Ralph Alpher, Passes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Particle Motion
  • From: PD
• You lose it to China, China loses it to us :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: The Accelerating Universe and Decreasing Cosmic Gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Big Bang Pioneer, Ralph Alpher, Passes
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Dark Matter Mystery Deepens in Cosmic 'Train Wreck'
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Light barrier broken - hot news..
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Birefringence
  • From: Abimanyu
• Re: Birefringence
  • From: Abimanyu
• Re: Uncle Al, sperm donor.
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: Pmb
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Aug 07 Washington, DC
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.94: Von Neumann's Entropy Defeated By 2 + 2 = 4
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Momentum conservation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: BioFreak
• Momentum conservation
  • From: Peter
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Big Bang Pioneer, Ralph Alpher, Passes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: China freer than USA? :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Exporting terrorism, I guess :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Big Bang Pioneer, Ralph Alpher, Passes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: We caught the rats in their ratholes :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: We caught the rats in their ratholes :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Citer
• Re: Big Bang Pioneer, Ralph Alpher, Passes
  • From: malibu
• Re: Particle Motion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Particle Motion
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Particle Motion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The smallest common denominator for photon energy .
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Big Bang Pioneer, Ralph Alpher, Passes
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Purblindness
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.94: Von Neumann's Entropy Defeated By 2 + 2 = 4
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 170.94: Von Neumann's Entropy Defeated By 2 + 2 = 4
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Quantum Gravity 170.93: Cambridge and Oxford Demolish the "Light Cone Causality"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.9: Germans Pioneer in Superluminality, Chinese Now Follow
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Road Bumps: Why dirt roads develop a washboard surface
  • From: jimp
• Road Bumps: Why dirt roads develop a washboard surface
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Particle Motion
  • From: hanson
• Re: NASA's New 'Lesson' from Space
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: plagiarizing Uncle rect-Al, sperm donor.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Simple question about a robot
  • From: winka
• Re: Light barrier broken - hot news..
  • From: winka
• Re: Uncle Al, sperm donor.
  • From: winka
• Re: Uncle Al, sperm donor.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: OT: Simple question about a robot
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: NASA's New 'Lesson' from Space
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Particle Motion
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: YBM
• Scattering water drops off of water drops, nearly elastic collisions?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: Uncle Al, sperm donor.
  • From: Tom M
• Re: Particle Motion
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Particle Motion
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Phase Flow Problem
  • From: andy everett
• Particle Motion
  • From: joilly17
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Al.Rivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: srp
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: PD
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: NASA's New 'Lesson' from Space
  • From: tj Frazir
• Peek-A-Boo !
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Aug 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Al.Rivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.0: Wormholes, Quasi Black Holes, Difference Sets
  • From: Hannu Poropudas
• Re: Little clouds
  • From: PD
• Re: Light barrier broken - hot news..
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Uncle Al, sperm donor.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Uncle Al, sperm donor.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Little clouds
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: OT: Simple question about a robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Simple question about a robot
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: NASA's New 'Lesson' from Space
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Little clouds
  • From: Jan van S.
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Uncle Al, sperm donor.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The smallest common denominator for photon energy .
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: malibu
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: mike3
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: kunzmilan
• Re: Article: Photons flout the light speed limit
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The smallest common denominator for photon energy .
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: srp
• Re: Uncle Al, sperm donor.
  • From: Shadowland
• Re: Uncle Al, sperm donor.
  • From: Shadowland
• Re: Purblindness
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: OT: Simple question about a robot
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Uncle Al, sperm donor.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Uncle Al, sperm donor.
  • From: Shadowland
• Re: Coulomb law
  • From: Prof_Tarantoga
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: Dac
• Re: Light quanta.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Simple question about a robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Light barrier broken - hot news..
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: TEST John Pictures very clear
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Germans break speed of light
  • From: Shadowland
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The smallest common denominator for photon energy .
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Simple question about a robot
  • From: someone2
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Citer
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light barrier broken - hot news..
  • From: PD
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: PD
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: PD
• Re: China freer than USA? :-)
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: srp
• Re: OT: Simple question about a robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: PD
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: PD
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Double Slit Paradoxon - An indicator for a "bug" in the architecture or machinery of our universe?
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Light barrier broken - hot news..
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Light quanta.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Big Bang Pioneer, Ralph Alpher, Passes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Dark Matter Mystery Deepens in Cosmic 'Train Wreck'
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Big Bang Pioneer, Ralph Alpher, Passes
  • From: malibu
• Re: Light barrier broken - hot news..
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: srp
• Re: Now I'm _Really_ Getting Ambitious
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Light barrier broken - hot news..
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Light barrier broken - hot news..
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Light barrier broken - hot news..
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: TEST John Pictures very clear
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: malibu
• Re: Forget biofuels - burn oil and plant forests instead
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Germans break speed of light
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Now I'm _Really_ Getting Ambitious
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Big Bang Pioneer, Ralph Alpher, Passes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: PD
• Re: Germans break speed of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: srp
• Germans break speed of light
  • From: Shadowland
• Re: Little clouds
  • From: PD
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: qjohnny2000
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: island
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: greysky
• Re: Simple question about a robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Simple question about a robot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: Sid Lanier
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: PD
• Re: OT: Simple question about a robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: srp
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: Sid Lanier
• Re: OT: Simple question about a robot
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Al.Rivero@xxxxxxxxx
• OT: Simple question about a robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: Al.Rivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: PD
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: Sid Lanier
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light speed broken?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Light speed broken?
  • From: Sid Lanier
• Phase Flow Problem
  • From: shalmanesar
• Re: TEST
  • From: hanson
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: malibu
• Re: China freer than USA? :-)Bush thrown out in UK
  • From: hanson
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.91: Heisenberg Imitated Einstein's c on Uncertainty
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: Light has no mass
  • From: PD
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: PD
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: PD
• Little clouds
  • From: Jan van S.
• Re: China freer than USA? :-)Bush thrown out in UK
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• TEST
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.92: Hilgevoor and Uffink's Criticisms of HUP
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: China freer than USA? :-)
  • From: hanson
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: hanson
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Vacuum Temperature
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Vacuum Temperature
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: PD
• Re: Quarks ????
  • From: srp
• Re: Vacuum Temperature
  • From: Greg Neill
• (video) Professor Steven Jones explains how the Twin Towers & WTC bldg 7 were brought down with explosives on 9/11
  • From: plenty560
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: island
• Re: Vacuum Temperature
  • From: _ . - . _
• Re: to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: My perpetual mobile page (can you disprove it)
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: China freer than USA? :-)
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Vacuum Temperature
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Vacuum Temperature
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Double Slit Paradoxon - An indicator for a "bug" in the architecture or machinery of our universe?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Vacuum Temperature
  • From: _ . - . _
• Re: particle movement on a water wave
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quarks ????
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Killer laser:
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Citer
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.9: Germans Pioneer in Superluminality, Chinese Now Follow
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Al.Rivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light has no mass
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Light has no mass
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Light has no mass
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Light has no mass
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Double Slit Paradoxon - An indicator for a "bug" in the architecture or machinery of our universe?
  • From: qbit
• Double Slit Paradoxon - An indicator for a "bug" in the architecture or machinery of our universe?
  • From: qbit
• Re: Light has no mass
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Light has no mass
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Light has no mass
  • From: rick_sobie
• Quantum Gravity 170.92: Hilgevoor and Uffink's Criticisms of HUP
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 170.91: Heisenberg Imitated Einstein's c on Uncertainty
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Light has no mass
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Hannu Poropudas
• Re: Light has no mass
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Light has no mass
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.9: Germans Pioneer in Superluminality, Chinese Now Follow
  • From: hanson
• Re: Light has no mass
  • From: rick_sobie
• Quantum Gravity 170.9: Germans Pioneer in Superluminality, Chinese Now Follow
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Light has no mass
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: O Lucky Man!
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Light has no mass
  • From: rick_sobie
• Light has no mass
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: China freer than USA? :-)
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: RESOLUT Duplicates Supernova Conditions
  • From: rick_sobie
• RESOLUT Duplicates Supernova Conditions
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Al.Rivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Al.Rivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Physics Today: Letters Language of science I: Theories and laws
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.8: Adding Tachyons to the Picture (But Not Mainsteam Physicists and Below)
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: PD
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Androcles
• particle movement on a water wave
  • From: mathieu_gdal
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Al.Rivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Al.Rivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Androcles
• Physics Today: Letters Language of science I: Theories and laws
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Al.Rivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Al.Rivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Holy shinola
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is tin foil a good heat insulator?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Holy shinola
  • From: panton_chrimaton
• Holy shinola
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: O Lucky Man!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New Theory of the Universe Suggests Space Moves (PRWeb)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Explaining origin of Universe - researchers at Florida State University suggest answers
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: PD
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Tidal forces: mechanics, anthropic principle, coincidence?
  • From: Al.Rivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: O Lucky Man!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: New Theory of the Universe Suggests Space Moves (PRWeb)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Explaining origin of Universe - researchers at Florida State University suggest answers
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: O Lucky Man!
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: to sam
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: to sam
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: #5 the heavy water ratio found in the Outer Planets, Earth is a...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Citer
• Re: Is tin foil a good heat insulator?
  • From: lister
• Re: Correct meaning of "Quantum leap"?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: suggested books
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Nanotubes guide phonons with ease
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: suggested books
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Madame Curie et al
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: suggested books
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 170.8: Adding Tachyons to the Picture (But Not Mainsteam Physicists and Below)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is tin foil a good heat insulator?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Differences RT vs Newton
  • From: John Park
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: Will Janoschka
• Re: Chthonian Planet in the process of forming
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Chthonian Planet in the process of forming
  • From: Darrell Lakin
• Re: suggested books
  • From: qbit
• Re: Binaural Brainwave Generator
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: suggested books
  • From: qbit
• Re: China freer than USA? :-)
  • From: hanson
• Nanotubes guide phonons with ease
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: qbit
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: Dac
• Re: Teleportation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: qbit
• Re: suggested books
  • From: dimitris
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: Traveler
• suggested books
  • From: dimitris
• Re: Is tin foil a good heat insulator?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is tin foil a good heat insulator?
  • From: lister
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Now I'm _Really_ Getting Ambitious
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: pmb
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: pmb
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: Will Janoschka
• Re: Can Argon remain ionized after plasma state?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why is the Perseid Shower an annual event?
  • From: kent
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Chthonian Planet in the process of forming
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: kent
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is tin foil a good heat insulator?
  • From: Dear Leader
• Chthonian Planet in the process of forming
  • From: Darrell Lakin
• Re: Is tin foil a good heat insulator?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Constantly moving objects Collide
  • From: PD
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Is tin foil a good heat insulator?
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: PD
• Re: Now I'm _Really_ Getting Ambitious
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: China freer than USA? :-)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: Igor
• Re: China freer than USA? :-)
  • From: blackhead
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Is tin foil a good heat insulator?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Birefringence
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Can Argon remain ionized after plasma state?
  • From: JAH
• Re: ***Nothing.....***
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: to sam
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Birefringence
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: to sam
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Birefringence
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: to sam
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: to sam
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is tin foil a good heat insulator?
  • From: PD
• Re: to sam
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Birefringence
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: PD
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Birefringence
  • From: Abimanyu
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: Androcles
• Is tin foil a good heat insulator?
  • From: lister
• Re: Why is the Perseid Shower an annual event?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Potter Reflections on a Snowy Evening
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: kent
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: Androcles
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: qbit
• Re: Our expanding earth - video
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Basics, Pi and arc-lengths
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: When Almighty Allah Does Not Know
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: ***Nothing.....***
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: kent
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Our expanding earth - video
  • From: Florian
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Beyond batteries: Storing power in a sheet of paper
  • From: Uncle Al
• "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Citer
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: qbit
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: qbit
• Helium balloons in cornering cars
  • From: kent
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: Dac
• Re: Mint Green: the art and science of covering a roof
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: qbit
• Re: any proof gravity travels at c?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Now I'm _Really_ Getting Ambitious
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Constantly moving objects Collide
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: panton_chrimaton
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Lorentz, Poincare, Aether and Einstein
  • From: d_hainz
• Lorentz, Poincare, Aether and Einstein
  • From: d_hainz
• Re: Why is the Perseid Shower an annual event?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Why is the Perseid Shower an annual event?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why is the Perseid Shower an annual event?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Why is the Perseid Shower an annual event?
  • From: kent
• drag-coefficient shallow water
  • From: arman
• Re: Potter Reflections on a Snowy Evening
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Basics, Pi and arc-lengths
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: My perpetual mobile page (can you disprove it)
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Internet censorship for this post does not appear in Google: # 51Perelman's Ricci Flow is just a more elaborate Iterative Roots and Archimedes Plutonium
  • From: King Buttlover of Gaylord Island
• Re: My perpetual mobile page (can you disprove it)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: My perpetual mobile page (can you disprove it)
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: My perpetual mobile page (can you disprove it)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: China freer than USA? :-)
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: My perpetual mobile page (can you disprove it)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Constantly moving objects Collide
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: My perpetual mobile page (can you disprove it)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How did life begin?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: NASA corrects "bug" in climate data
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Constantly moving objects Collide
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Constantly moving objects Collide
  • From: vijay . singh . mail
• Re: Constantly moving objects Collide
  • From: vijay . singh . mail
• Re: Constantly moving objects Collide
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Constantly moving objects Collide
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Constantly moving objects Collide
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.7: Nations That Encourage Nonconformity with Regard To Superluminality, Wormholes, Solitons, etc.
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: China freer than USA? :-)
  • From: gb6726
• Constantly moving objects Collide
  • From: vijay . singh . mail
• Re: My perpetual mobile page (can you disprove it)
  • From: gb6726
• Re: My perpetual mobile page (can you disprove it)
  • From: panton_chrimaton
• Re: My perpetual mobile page (can you disprove it)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• My perpetual mobile page (can you disprove it)
  • From: gb6726
• Quantum Gravity 170.7: Nations That Encourage Nonconformity with Regard To Superluminality, Wormholes, Solitons, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Classical Arrogant Idiocy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How did life begin?
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Physicists minimize 'sticky friction' in tiny machines
  • From: Uncle Al
• "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Citer
• Re: Classical Arrogant Idiocy
  • From: hanson
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: How did life begin?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Universe Curves
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: China freer than USA? :-)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: ***Nothing.....***
  • From: dedanoe
• Classical Arrogant Idiocy
  • From: Androcles
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Aug 13, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Now I'm _Really_ Getting Ambitious
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Now I'm _Really_ Getting Ambitious
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Now I'm _Really_ Getting Ambitious
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Now I'm _Really_ Getting Ambitious
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: The speed of time
  • From: coryschulz
• Re: The speed of time
  • From: qbit
• Poem: Potter Reflections on a Snowy Evening
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of time
  • From: qbit
• Re: The speed of time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The speed of time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Differences RT vs Newton
  • From: John Park
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.6: Curious Role of Patent Offices etc in Superluminality
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: The speed of time
  • From: coryschulz
• Re: NASA corrects "bug" in climate data
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Our expanding earth - video
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Our expanding earth - video
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Our expanding earth - video
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Our expanding earth - video
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Our expanding earth - video
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Our expanding earth - video
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Our expanding earth - video
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Our expanding earth - video
  • From: Androcles
• Dark-Flap- Why the Search For Dark Matter is Funny
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Park
• Re: China freer than USA? :-)
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Our expanding earth - video
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Our expanding earth - video
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Our expanding earth - video
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Our expanding earth - video
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Our expanding earth - video
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 170.6: Curious Role of Patent Offices etc in Superluminality
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Stephen Hawking and Einstein's Idea
  • From: Nick
• Re: Where does the information come from?
  • From: Wang Polisher
• Re: Our expanding earth - video
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Our expanding earth - video
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Our expanding earth - video
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: NASA corrects "bug" in climate data
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Our expanding earth - video
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Our expanding earth - video
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: NASA corrects "bug" in climate data
  • From: Traveler
• Re: NASA corrects "bug" in climate data
  • From: Androcles
• Our expanding earth - video
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Exporting terrorism, I guess :-)
  • From: hanson
• Re: Pokerization of Lottery
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: ***Nothing.....***
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: ***Nothing.....***
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Exporting terrorism, I guess :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: NASA corrects "bug" in climate data
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Exporting terrorism, I guess :-)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: We caught the rats in their ratholes :-)
  • From: panton_chrimaton
• Re: The speed of time
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 170.5: Brazilians and Italians Add Superluminal Nondiffracting Waves To The Picture
  • From: OsherD
• Re: NASA corrects "bug" in climate data
  • From: Androcles
• Re: We always remember you, in August :-)
  • From: Pork Dotter
• Re: to sam
  • From: panton_chrimaton
• Re: We caught the rats in their ratholes :-)
  • From: Shadowland
• We caught the rats in their ratholes :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Because truth hurts :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Iraq's business boom will be with ... :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• One wonders what the real figure is :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• We always remember you, in August :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Exporting terrorism, I guess :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• China freer than USA? :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• We have a thing in there :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Citer
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: NASA corrects "bug" in climate data
  • From: Traveler
• Re: The speed of time
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Radioactive Boyscout Is at It Again
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: Pmb
• Eric Gisse doesn't know proper time thus nothing about spacetime
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Radioactive Boyscout Is at It Again
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: ***Nothing.....***
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: Radioactive Boyscout Is at It Again
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: planetary heat radiation
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Radioactive Boyscout Is at It Again
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: to sam
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: to sam
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How did life begin?
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: They Finally Made Her Go to Rehab
  • From: Agent Smith
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Where does the information come from?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: panton_chrimaton
• Re: explanation needed
  • From: dimitris
• Re: The speed of time
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: ***Nothing.....***
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: The speed of time
  • From: coryschulz
• Re: The speed of time
  • From: Androcles
• ***Nothing.....***
  • From: rAgAv
• The speed of time
  • From: coryschulz
• Re: PHASING - Is it possible ??
  • From: Happy Dog
• Re: NASA corrects "bug" in climate data
  • From: Androcles
• Pokerization of Lottery
  • From: pokerislotto
• Re: Electrical circuits and charge - caution, lengthy
  • From: Brian VanPelt
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Radioactive Boyscout Is at It Again
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: NASA corrects "bug" in climate data
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: Pmb
• Re: NASA corrects "bug" in climate data
  • From: Traveler
• Stephen Hawking and Einstein's Idea
  • From: BURT
• Re: NASA corrects "bug" in climate data
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: NASA corrects "bug" in climate data
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Plagiarism of Paul Karl Hoiland
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: NASA corrects "bug" in climate data
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: They Finally Made Her Go to Rehab
  • From: Quantum_Ranger
• Re: Radioactive Boyscout Is at It Again
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Physicists minimize 'sticky friction' in tiny machines
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Radioactive Boyscout Is at It Again
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Elvis, the enterprise, looms bigger 30 years on
  • From: Agent Smith
• Many Tidbits from Andrew Morton
  • From: Agent Smith
• Brad Arrives in Chicago, Much to Angie's Delight
  • From: Agent Smith
• When Plinko Attacks!!
  • From: Agent Smith
• Vicki B. & Crew Take on Barneys
  • From: Agent Smith
• MK & A Hit the Road
  • From: Agent Smith
• Iron Man Promo Pic
  • From: Agent Smith
• They Finally Made Her Go to Rehab
  • From: Agent Smith
• Mel B Takes Her Case to Larry King Live
  • From: Agent Smith
• Claire Danes Does TRL
  • From: Agent Smith
• Becks Back In Action
  • From: Agent Smith
• Re: How did life begin?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: explanation needed
  • From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Re: to sam
  • From: panton_chrimaton
• Re: explanation needed
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Electrical circuits and charge - caution, lengthy
  • From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: panton_chrimaton
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: 1 of deep ocean's most turbulent areas has big impact on climate
  • From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: to sam
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: to sam
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: New Member at ae911truth confirms obvious about controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC7 - stupid Goy just can't think for themselves - they rely on the television to tell them what is and what isn't. lol. Stupid goy. I agree with the Zionists. They are stupid and need to be farmed like sheep. Go for it ZioNazis! The time is yours. The Stupid Goy are So stupid they will never get it. If you spit in their face and tell them it was rain-drops from the clouds they will believe you.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• explanation needed
  • From: dimitris
• Re: The Basics, Pi and arc-lengths
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: New Member at ae911truth confirms obvious about controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC7 - stupid Goy just can't think for themselves - they rely on the television to tell them what is and what isn't. lol. Stupid goy. I agree with the Zionists. They are stupid and need to be farmed like sheep. Go for it ZioNazis! The time is yours. The Stupid Goy are So stupid they will never get it. If you spit in their face and tell them it was rain-drops from the clouds they will believe you.
  • From: malibu
• Re: The further the planet from the star, the older it is. Has this been considered?
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: If You Can Not Answer- Do NOt Apply
  • From: boson boss
• Re: 1-{Universe}
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: PHASING - Is it possible ??
  • From: hanson
• Re: New Member at ae911truth confirms obvious about controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC7 - stupid Goy just can't think for themselves - they rely on the television to tell them what is and what isn't. lol. Stupid goy. I agree with the Zionists. They are stupid and need to be farmed like sheep. Go for it ZioNazis! The time is yours. The Stupid Goy are So stupid they will never get it. If you spit in their face and tell them it was rain-drops from the clouds they will believe you.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: When Almighty Allah Does Not Know
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: to sam
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: panton_chrimaton
• Re: New Member at ae911truth confirms obvious about controlled demolition of the Twin Towers
  • From: John
• Re: When Almighty Allah Does Not Know
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• 1 of deep ocean's most turbulent areas has big impact on climate
  • From: nicholaschapman . fr
• New Member at ae911truth confirms obvious about controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC7 - stupid Goy just can't think for themselves - they rely on the television to tell them what is and what isn't. lol. Stupid goy. I agree with the Zionists. They are stupid and need to be farmed like sheep. Go for it ZioNazis! The time is yours. The Stupid Goy are So stupid they will never get it. If you spit in their face and tell them it was rain-drops from the clouds they will believe you.
  • From: War Office
• Re: How did life begin?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: How did life begin?
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: PD
• Re: Radioactive Boyscout Is at It Again
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Radioactive Boyscout Is at It Again
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: 1-{Universe}
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: Pmb
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 10 Aug 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: When Almighty Allah Does Not Know
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Radioactive Boyscout Is at It Again
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Poincaré, Perelman and proof
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Citer
• Re: Radioactive Boyscout Is at It Again
  • From: John
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John
• Re: How did life begin?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Radioactive Boyscout Is at It Again
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: How did life begin?
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Oh, Silly Me
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Radioactive Boyscout Is at It Again
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 10 Aug 07 Washington, DC
  • From: BioFreak
• Oh, Silly Me
  • From: John Schutkeker
• If You Can Not Answer- Do NOt Apply
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: An American motherfucker :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Experts
  • From: BioFreak
• Quantum Gravity 170.4: Solitons and Wormholes by Sergiu I. Vacaru of Spain, Who is Mostly Outside of Spain
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 170.3: Solitons Follow Generalized Riccati Differential Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 10 Aug 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Quantum Gravity 170.2: Rosetta Stone 2 The Probable Causation Origin of Dimensional Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: When Almighty Allah Does Not Know
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: to sam
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: to sam
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Electrical circuits and charge - caution, lengthy
  • From: Brian VanPelt
• Re: The Physics of Treason
  • From: hetware
• Re: The Physics of Treason
  • From: hetware
• Re: What will the future be like 200 years from now?
  • From: greysky
• Re: How can attraction be explained in terms of Virtual Photons ??
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How can attraction be explained in terms of Virtual Photons ??
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: How can attraction be explained in terms of Virtual Photons ??
  • From: Y.Porat
• A photon is made of two fields at right-angles.
  • From: malibu
• Re: What will the future be like 200 years from now?
  • From: OwlHoot
• The further the planet from the star, the older it is. Has this been considered?
  • From: malibu
• Trader Joe Frazir
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: What will the future be like 200 years from now?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What will the future be like 200 years from now?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How did life begin?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How did life begin?
  • From: Agent Smith
• Re: Single pixel CRT
  • From: jimp
• Re: How did life begin?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: PHASING - Is it possible ??
  • From: malibu
• Re: Single pixel CRT
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 10 Aug 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Advice required re: superheated liquid in domestic environment
  • From: Jethro
• Re: What will the future be like 200 years from now?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.1: Soliton-Wormhole Relationships
  • From: Dear Leader
• Radioactive Boyscout Is at It Again
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Knocking Wood Helps a Lot
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: What will the future be like 200 years from now?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: What will the future be like 200 years from now?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: SPACE
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: PHASING - Is it possible ??
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Oh, What a Bummer
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Oh, What a Bummer
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: How did life begin?
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Knocking Wood Helps a Lot
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.0: Wormholes, Quasi Black Holes, Difference Sets
  • From: Hannu Poropudas
• Re: Single pixel CRT
  • From: jimp
• oops, shit, try this
  • From: malibu
• Re: PHASING - Is it possible ??
  • From: malibu
• "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Citer
• Re: Single pixel CRT
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: 1-{Universe}
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• electromagnetic radiation animation/model
  • From: malibu
• Re: Advice required re: superheated liquid in domestic environment
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: to sam
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: When Almighty Allah Does Not Know
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: PHASING - Is it possible ??
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Poincaré, Perelman and proof
  • From: Uncle Al
• Knocking Wood Helps a Lot
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: PD
• Re: to sam
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Advice required re: superheated liquid in domestic environment
  • From: Jethro
• Re: to sam
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Single pixel CRT
  • From: jimp
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: Tom Potter
• Single pixel CRT
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: planetary heat radiation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: planetary heat radiation
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: PHASING - Is it possible ??
  • From: PD
• Re: 1-{Universe}
  • From: PD
• Re: How can attraction be explained in terms of Virtual Photons ??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How do we know that....c question.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Poincaré, Perelman and proof
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How did life begin?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Poor design led to I-35W bridge collapse?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Flat Spacetime Theories that are Empirically Indistinguishable ...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: None discrete convolution computation/arithmetic based on pixel blending and pixel registers.
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Oh, What a Bummer
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PHASING - Is it possible ??
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: Randy Poe
• Oh, What a Bummer
  • From: John Schutkeker
• None discrete convolution computation/arithmetic based on pixel blending and pixel registers.
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: What happens when a meteor is on a collision course with Earth
  • From: Iceman
• Re: PHASING - Is it possible ??
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Quantum Gravity 170.1: Soliton-Wormhole Relationships
  • From: OsherD
• Re: PHASING - Is it possible ??
  • From: Varun
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: PHASING - Is it possible ??
  • From: Androcles
• PHASING - Is it possible ??
  • From: Varun
• Re: 1-{Universe}
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: Brisance
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: 1-{Universe}
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: 1-{Universe}
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: planetary heat radiation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jimp
• planetary heat radiation
  • From: Darrell Lakin
• X-ray holography breaks the femtosecond barrier
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jimp
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jimp
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jimp
• Re: How do we know that....c question.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How do we know that....c question.
  • From: gyansorova
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: 1-{Universe}
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: 1-{Universe}
  • From: PD
• Re: 1-{Universe}
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: PD
• Re: How can attraction be explained in terms of Virtual Photons ??
  • From: PD
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Dark energy
  • From: Sid Lanier
• Re: Dark energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: Dark energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Dark energy
  • From: Sid Lanier
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jimp
• Re: How do we know that....c question.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: 1-{Universe}
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Free Fall Formula
  • From: Dwib
• Re: 1-{Universe}
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: How do we know that....c question.
  • From: Randy Poe
• How to feed a matrix of analog cathode ray tubes blend their wavelenghts and use as a computer using a simple RGB protocol
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: How do we know that....c question.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What will the future be like 200 years from now?
  • From: JimboCat
• Re: Free Fall Formula
  • From: PD
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Free Fall Formula
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: Dwib
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: Dwib
• Re: 1-{Universe}
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What will the future be like 200 years from now?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jimp
• Re: 1-{Universe}
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Black holes and their environments
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: 1-{Universe}
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: 1-{Universe}
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.0: Wormholes, Quasi Black Holes, Difference Sets
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jimp
• Re: 1-{Universe}
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Contious optical receiver
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How can attraction be explained in terms of Virtual Photons ??
  • From: srp
• Re: How do we know that....c question.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: 1-{Universe}
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Contious optical receiver
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Free Fall Formula
  • From: qbit
• Re: What will the future be like 200 years from now?
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: What will the future be like 200 years from now?
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: What will the future be like 200 years from now?
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: How do we know that....c question.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Free Fall Formula
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: What will the future be like 200 years from now?
  • From: Ian Parker
• "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Citer
• 1-{Universe}
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: How do we know that....c question.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Free Fall Formula
  • From: srp
• Re: How do we know that....c question.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How do we know that....c question.
  • From: Androcles
• How can attraction be explained in terms of Virtual Photons ??
  • From: Varun
• Re: What will the future be like 200 years from now?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: What will the future be like 200 years from now?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: How do we know that....c question.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What will the future be like 200 years from now?
  • From: Tom Potter
• How do we know that....c question.
  • From: gyansorova
• physics
  • From: nrsm . das
• Re: LASER in liquid Bitrogen
  • From: Dork Spotter
• Quantum Gravity 170.0: Wormholes, Quasi Black Holes, Difference Sets
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Free Fall Formula
  • From: qbit
• Re: Free Fall Formula
  • From: srp
• Re: Free Fall Formula
  • From: BradGuth
• two new websites you have to investigate on electronics
  • From: traveltightwad
• Re: Free Fall Formula
  • From: BURT
• Re: Free Fall Formula
  • From: PD
• Re: please help.. (angular momenum)
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: Free Fall Formula
  • From: Uncle Al
• sci.physics scheduled for sporge flood
  • From: supernews
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: Quantum Gravity 169.9: Surprisingly "Fundamental" Alternations in Riemann and Exponential Functions
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Free Fall Formula
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Free Fall Formula
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: Islamic science
  • From: hanson
• Re: Thermal conductivity
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: Thermal conductivity
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Free Fall Formula
  • From: Mario
• Re: Free Fall Formula
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Thermal conductivity
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: Free Fall Formula
  • From: Mario
• Re: QUASAR distance
  • From: malibu
• Re: Free Fall Formula
  • From: Mario
• Re: The Physics of Treason
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Free Fall Formula
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Physics of Treason
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Free Fall Formula
  • From: Mario
• Re: The Physics of Treason
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Laser in Liquid Nitrogen
  • From: jimp
• Re: Perfect lens could reverse Casimir force
  • From: Uncle Al
• Free Fall Formula
  • From: Mario
• Re: QUASAR distance
  • From: malibu
• Laser in Liquid Nitrogen
  • From: Varun
• LASER in liquid Bitrogen
  • From: Varun
• Re: Old story, New names
  • From: Garry Denke
• Laser in Liquid Nitrogen
  • From: Varun
• Laser in Liquid Nitrogen
  • From: Varun
• Re: What will the future be like 200 years from now?
  • From: Shadowland
• Re: Pound-Rebka
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: What will the future be like 200 years from now?
  • From: greysky
• Re: Thermal conductivity
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Thermal conductivity
  • From: pogromca_kozłów
• Thermophotovoltaic polymers
  • From: Dulcamara
• Re: Motion of the UNIVERSE
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Experts
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: What will the future be like 200 years from now?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Why do sci.physics posters have such toilet mouths?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Perfect lens could reverse Casimir force
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Physics of Treason
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Dual Split experiment
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Why do sci.physics posters have such toilet mouths?
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: The Physics of Treason
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Islamic science
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: The Dual Split experiment
  • From: Y.Porat
• Quantum Gravity 169.9: Surprisingly "Fundamental" Alternations in Riemann and Exponential Functions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Conservation of energy and impulse
  • From: Sergey Karavashkin
• Re: Conservation of energy and impulse
  • From: Sergey Karavashkin
• Quantum Gravity 169.8: Probable Causation Relates To Brane Theory Via Riemann Zeta Function (Combinatorics)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Dual Split experiment
  • From: Jim Black
• The Dual Split experiment
  • From: Gert Baars
• What will the future be like 200 years from now?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: srp
• Re: The Physics of Treason
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mass of light PrOoF
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Brisance
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: Global Warming at Odds With Science
  • From: Gordon
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Physics of Treason
  • From: hetware
• Re: SPACE
  • From: John
• Re: QUASAR distance
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: TO CUT GRAVITY IN HALF
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: SPACE
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Dual Split experiment
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Perfect lens could reverse Casimir force
  • From: Uncle Al
• QUASAR distance
  • From: BURT
• Re: Math Trek: Cloudy Crystal Balls
  • From: jimp
• Re: Global Warming at Odds With Science
  • From: jimp
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: srp
• TO CUT GRAVITY IN HALF
  • From: BURT
• SPACE
  • From: BURT
• Re: Global Warming at Odds With Science
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Motion of the UNIVERSE
  • From: BURT
• Re: Mass of light PrOoF
  • From: BURT
• Re: Math Trek: Cloudy Crystal Balls
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: BURT
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Perfect lens could reverse Casimir force
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: dlham
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: srp
• Re: Perfect lens could reverse Casimir force
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of energy and impulse
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How does this work?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: How does this work?
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: srp
• Re: Perfect lens could reverse Casimir force
  • From: Uncle Al
• Global Warming at Odds With Science
  • From: jimp
• Re: The Basics, Pi and arc-lengths
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Perfect lens could reverse Casimir force
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Conservation of energy and impulse
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Perfect lens could reverse Casimir force
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Wi-Fi: A Health Hazard
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Conservation of energy and impulse
  • From: Sergey Karavashkin
• Re: Conservation of energy and impulse
  • From: Sergey Karavashkin
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: srp
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: PD
• Re: to sam
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why do sci.physics posters have such toilet mouths?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Why do sci.physics posters have such toilet mouths?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Basics, Pi and arc-lengths
  • From: PD
• Why do sci.physics posters have such toilet mouths?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Perfect lens could reverse Casimir force
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Perfect lens could reverse Casimir force
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Wi-Fi: A Health Hazard
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Perfect lens could reverse Casimir force
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Basics, Pi and arc-lengths
  • From: Tom Potter
• frazir picks Robert Nardelli to head Chrysler
  • From: Tom Potter
• How to spot sociopaths in the newsgroups
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Experts
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Mass of light PrOoF
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Mass of light PrOoF
  • From: Pmb
• Perfect lens could reverse Casimir force
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Online Photo Contest
  • From: fs_John
• Re: Motion of the UNIVERSE
  • From: BernardZ
• Undivided Structure of the Matter
  • From: Joro
• Re: Quantum Gravity 169.4: Geometric vs Topological Wormholes
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 169.7: Accelerative Energy, Mass Creation, and Origin of the Big Bang
  • From: OsherD
• Motion of the UNIVERSE
  • From: BURT
• GPS in motion
  • From: BURT
• Re: Conservation of energy and impulse
  • From: BURT
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: BURT
• Re: Mass of light PrOoF
  • From: BURT
• Re: RELATIVITY
  • From: BURT
• Re: RELATIVITY
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Mass of light PrOoF
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: RELATIVITY
  • From: mike3
• RELATIVITY
  • From: BURT
• Re: Mass of light PrOoF
  • From: BURT
• Re: Conservation of energy and impulse
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Conservation of energy and impulse
  • From: Sergey Karavashkin
• Re: I'm comin' for ya - and I've almost got it.
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: The Basics, Pi and arc-lengths
  • From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Re: Mass of light PrOoF
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Basics, Pi and arc-lengths
  • From: Josh
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Eric Gisse
• TV Interview about Science on the Simpsons
  • From: Paul
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How does this work?
  • From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Re: How does this work?
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: The Basics, Pi and arc-lengths
  • From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Re: The Basics, Pi and arc-lengths
  • From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• The Basics, Pi and arc-lengths
  • From: Josh
• Re: I'm comin' for ya - and I've almost got it.
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: How does this work?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How does this work?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Des
• Re: SRT GPS formula for Einstein Dingleberries, Fecyls & Wabniggers
  • From: hanson
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: I'm comin' for ya - and I've almost got it.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: malibu
• Re: How does this work?
  • From: qbit
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Kamil.Szot@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: srp
• Re: How does this work?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How does this work?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• How does this work?
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: srp
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Teranews test
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 169.6: Cross-Phase "Rosetta Stone"
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: Help me understand refraction
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: srp
• Re: Physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Old story, New names
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The GOD CIPHER
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Losing spin
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: srp
• Re: Potter has found a practical use for General Relativity!!!!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Quantum Gravity 169.4: Geometric vs Topological Wormholes
  • From: Hannu Poropudas
• Re: Losing spin
  • From: PD
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: PD
• Re: Potter has found a practical use for General Relativity!!!!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Potter has found a practical use for General Relativity!!!!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Potter has found a practical use for General Relativity!!!!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Laser flips magnetic bit without any help
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 169.6: Cross-Phase "Rosetta Stone"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Acoustics/Wave theory
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Acoustics/Wave theory
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Brisance
  • From: hetware
• Re: The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: PD
• Re: MY New Muscial Instrument Invention- Graphene Symphony
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Experts
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Acoustics/Wave theory
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: srp
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Aug 06, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Today's OPUS by Berkeley Breathed
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Brisance
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Brisance
  • From: hetware
• Re: Old story, New names
  • From: Denoco Inc.
• Re: Teranews test
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Quantum Gravity 169.5: Clarification of Born's Quantum Probability via Probable Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Tesla Technology relating to HAARP?
  • From: Mr. Titan
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Des
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: srp
• Old story, New names
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: Old story, New names
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Potter's Prediction -- that an oscillator will oscillate at a slightly higher frequency in orbit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Potter has found a practical use for General Relativity!!!!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The GOD CIPHER
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Potter has found a practical use for General Relativity!!!!
  • From: The_Man
• I'm comin' for ya - and I've almost got it.
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: Potter has found a practical use for General Relativity!!!!
  • From: Pmb
• The GOD CIPHER
  • From: JLee
• Re: Potter has found a practical use for General Relativity!!!!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: to sam
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Amazing geometric sculpture fetches $18,000 at Christies.
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: Pound-Rebka
  • From: BURT
• Re: Axioms of Time, Space, Gravity, Velocity, Accelleration - According to the CATS Theory Of The Universe v1.00a
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Experts
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Axioms of Time, Space, Gravity, Velocity, Accelleration - According to the CATS Theory Of The Universe v1.00a
  • From: qbit
• Re: Experts
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: hanson
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Louis_N
• Re: Springs "slinkys" and kinetic energy "velocity"
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Springs "slinkys" and kinetic energy "velocity"
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Springs "slinkys" and kinetic energy "velocity"
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Springs "slinkys" and kinetic energy "velocity"
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: That Bridge in Minneapolis
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Teranews test
  • From: Androcles
• September in VietNam is perfect for me... I hope there's sushi.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Axioms of Time, Space, Gravity, Velocity, Accelleration - According to the CATS Theory Of The Universe v1.00a
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: who is the moon belonging to?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Teranews test
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Springs "slinkys" and kinetic energy "velocity"
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Experts
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: math
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Springs "slinkys" and kinetic energy "velocity"
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Axioms of Time, Space, Gravity, Velocity, Accelleration - According to the CATS Theory Of The Universe v1.00a
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Physics of Treason
  • From: hetware
• Re: Pound-Rebka
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Springs "slinkys" and kinetic energy "velocity"
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Springs "slinkys" and kinetic energy "velocity"
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Teranews test
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Axioms of Time, Space, Gravity, Velocity, Accelleration - According to the CATS Theory Of The Universe v1.00a
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 169.4: Geometric vs Topological Wormholes
  • From: OsherD
• Brisance
  • From: hetware
• Re: Springs "slinkys" and kinetic energy "velocity"
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Axioms of Time, Space, Gravity, Velocity, Accelleration - According to the CATS Theory Of The Universe v1.00a
  • From: qbit
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Axioms of Time, Space, Gravity, Velocity, Accelleration - According to the CATS Theory Of The Universe v1.00a
  • From: qbit
• Re: Teranews test
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Axioms of Time, Space, Gravity, Velocity, Accelleration - According to the CATS Theory Of The Universe v1.00a
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Axioms of Time, Space, Gravity, Velocity, Accelleration - According to the CATS Theory Of The Universe v1.00a
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Axioms of Time, Space, Gravity, Velocity, Accelleration - According to the CATS Theory Of The Universe v1.00a
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The Physics of Treason
  • From: hetware
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Axioms of Time, Space, Gravity, Velocity, Accelleration - According to the CATS Theory Of The Universe v1.00a
  • From: qbit
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: Dan in Philly
• Re: Check this Homebrew Tesla stuff downunder
  • From: jimp
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Kamil.Szot@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Losing spin
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Losing spin
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Axioms of Time, Space, Gravity, Velocity, Accelleration - According to the CATS Theory Of The Universe v1.00a
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Axioms of Time, Space, Gravity, Velocity, Accelleration - According to the CATS Theory Of The Universe v1.00a
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Springs "slinkys" and kinetic energy "velocity"
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Losing spin
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Losing spin
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Experts
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Axioms of Time, Space, Gravity, Velocity, Accelleration - According to the CATS Theory Of The Universe v1.00a
  • From: qbit
• Re: Uncle Al's soulmate :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Pound-Rebka
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Springs "slinkys" and kinetic energy "velocity"
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Potter has found a practical use for General Relativity!!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Teranews test
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Springs "slinkys" and kinetic energy "velocity"
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The Physics of Treason
  • From: hetware
• Re: Axioms of Time, Space, Gravity, Velocity, Accelleration - According to the CATS Theory Of The Universe v1.00a
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Axioms of Time, Space, Gravity, Velocity, Accelleration - According to the CATS Theory Of The Universe v1.00a
  • From: qbit
• Re: Springs "slinkys" and kinetic energy "velocity"
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Axioms of Time, Space, Gravity, Velocity, Accelleration - According to the CATS Theory Of The Universe v1.00a
  • From: qbit
• Short news of Iran :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Islamic science
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: The_Man
• Quantum ballistics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Kamil.Szot@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Springs "slinkys" and kinetic energy "velocity"
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Eric Gisse doesn't know the basics of Relativity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Tnec
• "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Tnec
• Re: Potter has found a practical use for General Relativity!!!!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: to sam
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Kamil.Szot@xxxxxxxxx
• Springs "slinkys" and kinetic energy "velocity"
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• to sam
  • From: Tom Potter
• Potter has found a practical use for General Relativity!!!!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Physics of Treason
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Major K00kfroth from Art Deco
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Teranews test
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Islamic science
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Axioms of Time, Space, Gravity, Velocity, Accelleration - According to the CATS Theory Of The Universe v1.00a
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Entertainment for the Physics Minded Individual
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: P AND Q 2 PARTICLES
  • From: Divij Rao
• Re: The Physics of Treason
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Islamic science
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Physics of Treason
  • From: Benj
• Quantum Gravity 169.3: Similar Methods Yield Pressure As Cause of Energy Density and Radius
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Check this Homebrew Tesla stuff downunder
  • From: Benj
• Quantum Gravity 169.2: Fermat's Last Theorem Equation x^n + y^n = z^n In PI Phase
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Check this Homebrew Tesla stuff downunder
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Quantum Mechanics Question
  • From: faceman28208@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Mechanics Question
  • From: faceman28208@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 169.1: The Intersection in Wormholes From Spheres and Balls Via Probable Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 169.0: Wormholes From Spheres and Balls Via Probable Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Physics of Treason
  • From: hetware
• Islamic science
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Axioms of Time, Space, Gravity, Velocity, Accelleration - According to the CATS Theory Of The Universe v1.00a
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Pound-Rebka
  • From: BURT
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Des
• Axioms of Time, Space, Gravity, Velocity, Accelleration - According to the CATS Theory Of The Universe v1.00a
  • From: qbit
• Re: Eric Gisse. Mitch Raemsch
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mass of light PrOoF
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Pound-Rebka
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Eric Gisse. Mitch Raemsch
  • From: BURT
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Eric Gisse. Mitch Raemsch
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Pound-Rebka
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Eric Gisse. Mitch Raemsch
  • From: BURT
• Plato's Form in Abstract-Yet
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Pound-Rebka
  • From: BURT
• Re: Mass of light PrOoF
  • From: BURT
• Re: LIGHT
  • From: BURT
• Re: Motion undetected
  • From: BURT
• Re: The Physics of the Platonic Realm
  • From: Des
• Re: The Physics of the Platonic Realm
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Explanation for existence of inverse square law forces
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Des
• Re: The Physics of the Platonic Realm
  • From: Des
• Re: Humans are evil
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: That Bridge in Minneapolis
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: An American motherfucker :-)
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Humans are evil
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Major K00kfroth from Art Deco
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: hanson
• Re: MY New Muscial Instrument Invention- Graphene Symphony
  • From: MHS
• Re: Explanation for existence of inverse square law forces
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Explanation for existence of inverse square law forces
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: MY New Muscial Instrument Invention- Graphene Symphony
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: An American motherfucker :-)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Uncle Al's soulmate :-)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Experts
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Physics of the Platonic Realm
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Motion undetected
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: An American motherfucker :-)
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: Explanation for existence of inverse square law forces
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: BURT
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Des
• Re: Major K00kfroth from Art Deco
  • From: hanson
• Re: SRT GPS formula
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Teranews test
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Mass of light PrOoF
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Experts
  • From: Benj
• Re: Why black holes in particle accelerators are a myth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question on direction of electron flow and current flow
  • From: Will Janoschka
• Re: Why black holes in particle accelerators are a myth
  • From: greysky
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Jaga
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Jaga
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: Dan in Philly
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Entertainment for the Physics Minded Individual
  • From: Sam Wormley
• MY New Muscial Instrument Invention- Graphene Symphony
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: The Physics of the Platonic Realm
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Experts
  • From: Uncle Al
• Entertainment for the Physics Minded Individual
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: Why black holes in particle accelerators are a myth
  • From: malibu
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: the age of the universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: LIGHT
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The electric field of a continuous charge distribution
  • From: RB
• Re: The electric field of a continuous charge distribution
  • From: RB
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Des
• Re: The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: dlham
• An American motherfucker :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Androcles
• "Gravity"
  • From: Tnec
• Uncle Al's soulmate :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: The Physics of the Platonic Realm
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Des
• Re: US condensed-matter community grapples with availability of crystalline samples
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: J. Paul Getty
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: The Physics of the Platonic Realm
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Why black holes in particle accelerators are a myth
  • From: srp
• Re: Some un erased black boards
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: The electric field of a continuous charge distribution
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Quantum Gravity 168.8: Replacement of Topological Holes By Geometric Holes in Wormholes
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: The electric field of a continuous charge distribution
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Why black holes in particle accelerators are a myth
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Math Trek: Cloudy Crystal Balls
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Testing the elements of the Big Bang
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Experts
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Aug 07 Washington, DC
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Mass of light PrOoF
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Motion undetected
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Kamil.Szot@xxxxxxxxx
• Are we sure that black holes contain singularities?
  • From: Kamil.Szot@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Y.Porat
• Quantum Gravity 168.9: Distance-Proximity Relationship Yields Wormholes
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Major K00kfroth from Art Deco
  • From: Tom Potter
• Why black holes in particle accelerators are a myth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Math Trek: Cloudy Crystal Balls
  • From: jimp
• Re: VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, July 2007
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The electric field of a continuous charge distribution
  • From: RB
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Des
• Math Trek: Cloudy Crystal Balls
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: hanson
• Mass of light PrOoF
  • From: BURT
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Jaga
• Motion undetected
  • From: BURT
• Re: I see fat people
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Des
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: hanson
• Re: The electric field of a continuous charge distribution
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Des
• Re: Explanation for existence of inverse square law forces
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Testing the elements of the Big Bang
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Explanation for existence of inverse square law forces
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Explanation for existence of inverse square law forces
  • From: Greg Heath
• I see fat people
  • From: rick_sobie
• Experts
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The electric field of a continuous charge distribution
  • From: RB
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Des
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How Long will a 1 Horse power Electric motor Run Continuously?
  • From: gyansorova
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: PD
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: Androcles
• OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Aug 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Des
• Re: Question on direction of electron flow and current flow
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: PD
• Re: Question on direction of electron flow and current flow
  • From: lyttlec
• Re: Question on direction of electron flow and current flow
  • From: lyttlec
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Acoustics/Wave theory
  • From: Jon Slaughter
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: santopietro
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 835 August 3, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: How Long will a 1 Horse power Electric motor Run Continuously?
  • From: Shadowland
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 835 August 3, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• How Long will a 1 Horse power Electric motor Run Continuously?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: Benj
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: pogromca_kozłów
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: martin
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: pogromca_kozłów
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: hanson
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: santopietro
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: santopietro
• Would the Earth had magnetic pole if it would stop rotating
  • From: Jaga
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: santopietro
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: santopietro
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: PD
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: PD
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: srp
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: PD
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?
  • From: Des
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Tnec
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: dlham
• Re: Quantum Gravity 168.8: Replacement of Topological Holes By Geometric Holes in Wormholes
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Repost from SCI.p.Research-Matrix Determinant as Path Integral?
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: Acoustics/Wave theory
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Repost from SCI.p.Research-Matrix Determinant as Path Integral?
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: PD
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: The_Man
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: PD
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: Superconductivity - Is it still being pursued?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: Ian Parker
• Tachyons
  • From: pogromca_kozłów
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: supercritical CO2 pressure calculation
  • From: Bernhard Kuemel
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• my infrared methane sensor is decreasing ,can you help me? 选项
  • From: 秦少平
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: supercritical CO2 pressure calculation
  • From: Bernhard Kuemel
• Re: Gisse, How are those “ head pills ” working out for ya ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Gisse, How are those “ head pills ” working out for ya ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Quantum Gravity 168.8: Replacement of Topological Holes By Geometric Holes in Wormholes
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: supercritical CO2 pressure calculation
  • From: Brian Elmegaard
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Benj
• Re: Superconductivity - Is it still being pursued?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Rotation of a body in free space.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: Benj
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Superconductivity - Is it still being pursued?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: patmpowers
• Re: Superconductivity - Is it still being pursued?
  • From: Igor
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: Benj
• Re: Rotation of a body in free space.
  • From: rsprawls
• Re: Teranews test
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Quantum Gravity 168.7: Canadians and New Zealanders Advance Wormhole Phase
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 168.7: Canadians and New Zealanders Advance Wormhole Phase
  • From: OsherD
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: The_Man
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: hanson
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: hanson
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: That Bridge in Minneapolis
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: The_Man
• Re: The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across idiots
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: The_Man
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: jimp
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Acoustics/Wave theory
  • From: gyansorova
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: jimp
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: The_Man
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: santopietro
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: santopietro
• Re: Rotation of a body in free space.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Rotation of a body in free space.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Rotation of a body in free space.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: santopietro
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: jimp
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: santopietro
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: martin
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: math
  • From: Androcles
• math
  • From: muhammad
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: martin
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: martin
• Re: The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: dlham
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: santopietro
• Re: The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: dlham
• Re: Rotation of a body in free space.
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: Traveler
• supercritical CO2 pressure calculation
  • From: Bernhard Kuemel
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: santopietro
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: jimp
• Re: The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: PD
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: santopietro
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: jimp
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: santopietro
• Re: The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• The Earth, relative to space itself, is stationary!
  • From: dlham
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Benj
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: PD
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: jimp
• Re: please help.. (angular momenum)
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: please help.. (angular momenum)
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: Igor
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: Benj
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: Traveler
• Acoustics/Wave theory
  • From: Jon Slaughter
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Major K00kfroth from Art Deco
  • From: hanson
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: jimp
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: santopietro
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: jimp
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: jimp
• Re: Atom as energy diode
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: Jeff Wisnia
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: santopietro
• Lumen output from incandescent light bulbs?
  • From: Jeff Wisnia
• Re: 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: jimp
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: santopietro
• 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: fleesow
• 6th August 1945 when Japan suffered first Atomic explosion
  • From: fleesow
• Paul Andersen's article showed Eric Gisse is IGNORANT on Temperature and Lorentz scalars.
  • From: guskz
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Question on direction of electron flow and current flow
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Teranews test
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: jimp
• Re: Atom as energy diode
  • From: srp
• Re: Question on direction of electron flow and current flow
  • From: Shadowland
• Re: US condensed-matter community grapples with availability of crystalline samples
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: Des
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: PD
• Re: Question on direction of electron flow and current flow
  • From: PD
• Atom as energy diode
  • From: Smolenkov
• "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Tnec
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: Greg
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: PD
• Re: US condensed-matter community grapples with availability of crystalline samples
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Free travel!!!!!
  • From: Lepi Duja
• Re: Question on direction of electron flow and current flow
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Some un erased black boards
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Rotation of a body in free space.
  • From: rsprawls
• Re: Rotation of a body in free space.
  • From: rsprawls
• Re: Rotation of a body in free space.
  • From: rsprawls
• No chance?
  • From: Eckard Blumschein
• Re: Major K00kfroth from Art Deco
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: Ed Diaz
• Re: Teranews test
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The role of Quantum Mechanics in semiconductors
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Teranews test
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: santopietro
• Re: The role of Quantum Mechanics in semiconductors
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: jimp
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: santopietro
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: jimp
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Non-Locality and so-called Determinism or Freedom
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: Some un erased black boards
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Some un erased black boards
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: santopietro
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: santopietro
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: jimp
• Re: Quantum Mechanics Question
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: jimp
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: Big science needs vacuum innovation
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Simple, Inexpensive Refractometer to Test Large Glass Blank
  • From: W. Watson
• Physical mechanism for voltage drop across resistor
  • From: santopietro
• Check this Homebrew Tesla stuff downunder
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: The Physics of the Platonic Realm
  • From: Des
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Physics of the Platonic Realm
  • From: Des
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: Dan in Philly
• Re: Rotation of a body in free space.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum Mechanics Question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Physics of the Platonic Realm
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Rotation of a body in free space.
  • From: rsprawls
• 3D Vision Comes Into View
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Physics of the Platonic Realm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• The Physics of the Platonic Realm
  • From: Des
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: Des
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: US condensed-matter community grapples with availability of crystallinesamples
  • From: Uncle Al
• Quantum Mechanics Question
  • From: faceman28208@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Secret Science Anti Gravity Revealed Homemade
  • From: CWatters
• Labyrinths appear in bead mixtures
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: the age of the universe
  • From: BURT
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Teranews test
  • From: Eric Gisse
• US condensed-matter community grapples with availability of crystalline samples
  • From: Sam Wormley
• This is different: Electric fields have potential as a cancer treatment
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: the age of the universe
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: the age of the universe
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Non-Locality and so-called Determinism or Freedom
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Teranews test
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Question on direction of electron flow and current flow
  • From: jimp
• Re: The role of Quantum Mechanics in semiconductors
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question on direction of electron flow and current flow
  • From: Varun
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: srp
• Re: Question on direction of electron flow and current flow
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question on direction of electron flow and current flow
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Question on direction of electron flow and current flow
  • From: smallpond
• Re: Question on direction of electron flow and current flow
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Question on direction of electron flow and current flow
  • From: Sith Lord
• Re: Space without space: World Hologram & Warp Drive
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The role of Quantum Mechanics in semiconductors
  • From: Uncle Al
• Secret Science Anti Gravity Revealed Homemade
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: smallpond
• Re: the age of the universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• What is quantum entanglement?
  • From: martin
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Phantom scojocupcake
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Phantom scojocupcake
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Phantom scojocupcake
• "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Tnec
• Re: the age of the universe
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: The role of Quantum Mechanics in semiconductors
  • From: Szczepan Bialek
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: The role of Quantum Mechanics in semiconductors
  • From: Benj
• Re: the age of the universe
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The role of Quantum Mechanics in semiconductors
  • From: Eric Gisse
• The role of Quantum Mechanics in semiconductors
  • From: Tom Potter
• the age of the universe
  • From: BURT
• Re: Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Jong Kim
• Quantum Gravity 168.6: Portuguese Relate Quantum Phase Transitions to Probability
  • From: OsherD
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS -- HIDDEN WAVE BEHAVIOR REVEALED
  • From: jimp
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS -- HIDDEN WAVE BEHAVIOR REVEALED
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: jimp
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS -- HIDDEN WAVE BEHAVIOR REVEALED
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: rtjensen@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Rotation of a body in free space.
  • From: rsprawls
• Re: Quantum Gravity 168.5: Probable Causation Phase of Mini- and Maxi- Black Holes Without General Relativity
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: Quantum Gravity 168.4: Mini- and Maxi- Black Holes Without General Relativity
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: Dan in Philly
• Re: Simple, Inexpensive Refractometer to Test Large Glass Blank
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Simple, Inexpensive Refractometer to Test Large Glass Blank
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: please help.. (angular momenum)
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Simple, Inexpensive Refractometer to Test Large Glass Blank
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Rotation of a body in free space.
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Fun physics puzzle
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Rotation of a body in free space.
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Rotation of a body in free space.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Quantum Gravity 168.5: Probable Causation Phase of Mini- and Maxi- Black Holes Without General Relativity
  • From: OsherD
• Rotation of a body in free space.
  • From: rsprawls
• Quantum Gravity 168.5: Probable Causation Phase of Mini- and Maxi- Black Holes Without General Relativity
  • From: OsherD
• Teranews test
  • From: Tom Potter