Re: Denying Realism or Denying Locality - what's your pick?

On Aug 5, 7:19 am, Des <descartesne...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 5, 5:26 am, "hanson" <han...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Des" <descartesne...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:1186204896.539914.4590@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> "hanson" <han...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
... Dizzy didn't get to hear what he wanted to hear.
So he advocated ... some more....
Dizzy Desy "Des" <descartesne...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:1186199466.142059.149080@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[hanson]
Hey Dizzy, listen and listen good. I went again thru your
very lengthy tirade of posts, and behold, I say onto you, Des,
you made one single very profound and seminal statement.

What's particular statement? Maybe I said something anti
relativistic? I don't remember following Pentcho so I don't
get what you mean dude. I still think SR, GR is correct.
Sorry to disappoint you. But then SR, GR is some kind of
illusion. SR is anti-telepathy. GR is anti-teleportation.
But I just want to focus on SR and telepathy and
QM because quantum gravity is not easy so will leave
it to Roberts. But the problem is I have to make QFT
diffeomorphism invariant so it has to be related to GR
as well. Gee. I wished there was no telepathy so I'd not
be into physics all this years and just spend the free time
on the beach.

des



Kudos to you. --- So, could you repeat that great insight of
yours again and elaborate on it without swaying and drifting
over into other trivial fields and sidebar subjects. Please.
hanson

PS:
I posted this same message into 2 branches of this thread.
It is that important. But you need to answer only to one.


Ah. Physics of the Mind? Well. You must be interested in
the 2 million dollars challenge or maybe to defeat Randi himself.
Sure.

I'm categorical mind and matter are interactive because of massive
hands-on experiences in it lasting decades. My experiences are not
the philosophical kind but actual. In the following site:

http://www.accessv.com/~yuan/yansci/time/2002_YanXin_Qigong_JSE.pdf

...are effects of mind on matter that are measured in scientific
equipments.. We can duplicate it too at will. In fact, if
there is sensitive equiptments. You can demonstrate that
our mind can affect matter by either affecting
the wave function or something more fundamental.
Not only this. It works non-locally too as if we can directly
affect either the particles themselves (if Bohmian mechanics is
true) or by changing the quantum information that coorelates
the connections (if Bohr is right that quantum is contextual).
I'm gonna tell you something strange. I treat voodoo victims
that no doctor in the planet can treat. What happens in
voodoo victims is that their bioplasmic body is damaged
(by non-local assault). What we do is treat the bioplasmic
body and the person is treated. I'm affiliated with the
following centers with branches in all countries:

http://www.pranicmds.org/

http://www.pranichealing.org/directory/headquarters.htm

I'll give anyone $2 million dollars who can refute the above.

In the following atomic structure of water can change by
the background conscious force of any human.

http://www.amazon.com/Hidden-Messages-Water-Masaru-Emoto/dp/0743289803/ref=sr_1_1/104-5326270-0835920?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1186288044&sr=1-1

What we do is just concentrate the consicious force and
make it work at greater magnitude. Dr. William Tiller has massive
experimental results in it.

http://www.tillerfoundation.com/

Unfortunately, his theories is based similar to Bohmian
Mechanics and may not be right if there is no Absolute frame.

We are now on the verge of a new paradigm shift in physics.
What matters are just the details. Like how non-local conscious
force works amidst the constrain put by SR where if instantaneous
signalling occurs, there will be frame of reference where things
will be seen to go backward in time when seen in an inertial
frame. GR and quantum gravity is also involved because space
seems to be an illusion as if spacetime is just a projection
from the Hilbert Space itself.

Of course I won't mind if you won't believe any of it as it takes
personal experiences in them for decades to know the result.

Anyway. there is something puzzling about you Anti-Relativists.
SR is built in the fabric of the Standard Model like Quantum
Field Theory, QED, etc. and it can make very accurate predictions.
Why are you anti-SR when it's results is written all over physics??

Well. If SR is irrefutable and there is no absolute frame. Then
the only way to explain the conscious force effect on matter
and the spacetime dynamics is that either time can move
backward (or is symmetric) or Bohm Implicate Order is real
that can coordinates all those connections. Only time will
tell.

des



(Andro hold your comments until I do respond to Dizzy's answer.)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


.

Relevant Pages