Re: Contious optical receiver
- From: jonas.thornvall@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 09:28:44 -0700
On 9 Aug, 17:51, jonas.thornv...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 9 Aug, 17:41, jonas.thornv...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 9 Aug, 17:32, jonas.thornv...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 9 Aug, 16:52, Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
jonas.thornv...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Is it possible to blend light frequencies from different sources
through a prism?
Certainly.
What differ a prism from a RGB mask?
I guess there must be somekind of relation between the size of the
pixel unit and the receiver/receptor device for the actual blending of
wavelength to take place. Given big enough pixels no blending take
place.
Give possibility to read values from one pixel using a 32 bit graphice
card, what kind of device would ýou use to determine the value. Given
the grapic card would be infinitly fast, what kind of physical device
could be used to determine the value of it?
There is no limit for how fast actual computations can be done, the
limits is in the feeding mechanism "setup" for computation and the
frequensy of the receiver, storing.the result.- Dölj citerad text -
- Visa citerad text -
Do an optical computer have use for quantization A/D D/A or could it
send and receive intervals of frequensies to be interpretated?- Dölj citerad text -
- Visa citerad text -
As i understand it the timed signals of an analog TV-transmissions PAL
do not really have quantisised values only frame resolution "timed
frames" from which scanlines are extrapolated? I read in wikipedia
that the there is no actual pixel resolution, but i am not even sure
there is a scan line resolution is there?
Is there a limit for how fast a static "nonemoving single point"
cathode electron beam can be processed in such a way as to display
natural colors.
What is the limits for color resolution and speed of frequense changes
on the beam of a cathode ray?
Is it only dependent on the transmitter and receiver?
or RGB-signal have an information rate 3
.
- References:
- Contious optical receiver
- From: jonas . thornvall
- Re: Contious optical receiver
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Contious optical receiver
- From: jonas . thornvall
- Re: Contious optical receiver
- From: jonas . thornvall
- Re: Contious optical receiver
- From: jonas . thornvall
- Contious optical receiver
- Prev by Date: Re: Contious optical receiver
- Next by Date: Re: Contious optical receiver
- Previous by thread: Re: Contious optical receiver
- Next by thread: Re: Contious optical receiver
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|