Re: Contious optical receiver

jonas.thornvall@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 9 Aug, 19:54, j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
jonas.thornv...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 9 Aug, 18:14, j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
jonas.thornv...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 9 Aug, 16:52, Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
jonas.thornv...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Is it possible to blend light frequencies from different sources
through a prism?

Certainly.
What differ a prism from a RGB mask?
I guess there must be somekind of relation between the size of the
pixel unit and the receiver/receptor device for the actual blending of
wavelength to take place. Given big enough pixels no blending take
place.

There is no physical "blending" of light from an RGB mask, rather
it is in how the eye and brain work leading to the perception that
the individual colored dots blend into one of another color.
So you say the blending a CCD record is not physical?
So our brain create the RECORDED CCD result so when you print out the
picture from a recorded monitor or TV you still have the RGB
information "IDIOT"?

No, I said the human perception of a CRT's three discrete colored
dots as a single dot of another color is an optical illusion caused
by the way the brain and eye work.

You do know movies are a rapid series of still pictures the brain and
eye "blend" into what appears to be motion, don't you?

Same thing, sorta.

As far as CCD's go, they work like CRT's in reverse.

The sensor array has a color filter mask over it so each "pixel" is
actually three pixels of three different colors.

There is no mixing of light frequencies to produce light of a different
frequency in any of this.

That would require something that reacts none-linearly to light, which
don't exist either in the human body, CRT's or CCD's.

If you cared to read what i wrote...

It would be easier if you learned English.

Well if receptors and brain can do there sure have to be an algorithm
behind doing the blending of the three sources with different
luminance, and i see no problem with an electronic DEVICE LIKE A CCD
doing the same thing.

That's because you have no understanding of what is going on.

The whole point of CCD cameras, or any color camera for that matter, is
to "unblend" the light frequencies into three discrete values.

It doesn't matter if there are three filters picking up 3 different
wavelenghts they are mixed down using an algorithm. The question is
there a way to bypass the computational effort "algorithm" mixing
using an optical device like a small lens or prism.

There is NO, repeat, NO mixing going on in a CCD.

The output is 3 numbers for each "pixel" which represent the intensity
of 3 different colors.

One more time, there is NO, repeat, NO mixing going on in a CCD.

There is quite the opposite happening.

Ignorant twit.

IDIOT......

Uneducatable moron.

Using three cathodes directed to respective filter of a single "PIXEL"
cell and downmixing the RGB through a prism would lead to blasing fast
computation given a logic and aritmetic based on RGB and would not be
limited to binary computations. It is fully possible to develop an
aritmetic with base 4,8,16 or 24. Now you line up a grid of those
babies and build an architecture around it, using devices as optical
routers as feedback systems to the cathodes. You would preferably have
to create a new kind of storage, so you get rid of the freaking AD/DA
quantisisers.

Babbling nonsense.

You haven't a clue how any of this works.

I am quite serious when i say that we will see such systems within 10
years, nonebinary computers without AD/DA binary quantisisers.
Computational systems not based in binary aritmetic and logic gates.
Instead analog computational systems using multivalued aritmetic based
on downmixing wavelenghts from ordinary cathodes and pixel shaders
through a prism using optical routers as feedback systems.

Utter, rabid, nonsense.

Spend some time on Wiki and read up how how eyes, cameras, and CRT's
work before you make an even bigger fool of yourself.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Contious optical receiver
    ... What differ a prism from a RGB mask? ... So you say the blending a CCD record is not physical? ... BLUE...THE MONITOR SENDS OUT WAVELENGTH OF 400 TO 700 NM ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Contious optical receiver
    ... What differ a prism from a RGB mask? ... So our brain create the RECORDED CCD result so when you print out the ... The sensor array has a color filter mask over it so each "pixel" is ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Contious optical receiver
    ... What differ a prism from a RGB mask? ... So you say the blending a CCD record is not physical? ... The output is 3 numbers for each "pixel" which represent the intensity ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Where have all the anamorphic movies gone?
    ... The Panavision Genesis camera is HDTV resolution. ... x 1080 pixel progressive-scan HD signal -- the extra pixels on the CCD ... The Dalsa Origin has a 8MP sensor with an RGB Bayer ...
    (rec.arts.movies.tech)
  • Re: CCD misunderstanding/ confusion
    ... which has an ICX098 CCD ... >>>pixel area than the 098 and also has a larger pixel size, ... If the pixel scale is much smaller than the scale of the ... but after using my Lumenera with the 424 CCD for two months I have no ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)