Re: Our expanding earth - video

On Aug 13, 12:02 am, rick_so...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Aug 12, 11:47 pm, "Androcles" <Engin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



<rick_so...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:1186956528.898045.169910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: On Aug 12, 10:10 pm, "Androcles" <Engin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:: > <rick_so...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

: >
: >news:1186949998.123666.170500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: > :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjgidAICoQI
: > : Yes that explains a lot. Including why the dinosaurs managed to live
: > : when today they would not be able to get up off the ground.
: >
: > Hahaha!
: > Where did the water come from?
: > Hahaha!
:
: Well thats a good question.
:
: But its possible that hydrogen

Hahahaha!
It's possible and even probable that you are a fuckin' insane,
you know nothing about density or the inverse square law of gravity.
IF the dinosaurs would not be able to get off the ground today they'd
have even less chance on a smaller Earth.

Thats the million dollar question but if the planet is now twice the
size, then that must mean that either it is somewhat hollow now, and
the inevitable catastrophic collapse of the earth's crust, in a
several mile free fall, to the (making quotation marks above
shoulders) magma below, will ensue at any moment, or,
or, the earth is now twice the size, has twice the mass, and hence
twice the gravity.
But, where did that matter come from?
Well thats also a good question, and some of it comes from space, and
well, as we are expanding, there must be a little secret about what
happens when the earth expands, such that it retains its mass, the
molecules still have mass, even though the density is less, and that
is because of what gravity actually is, and it is accelerated mass.
So smaller planets may be more dense, but their gravity may not be
more.
So that does fly in the face of the standard theory somewhat, such
that a neutron star will have a great deal of mass, but be small, so
basically, we have not quite managed to fit all the pieces together
yet.
Which is good because it gives us things to do.

You see the thing is that a neutron star is almost in a different
state of matter. It is a solid ball of neutrons.
The nuclei are touching.
So it is resisting expansion very well. Almost at the point of going
back in time, like a black hole.
A black hole happens when it resists expansion so well, that the rest
of the universe expands around it, and it is getting left behind.

But with a planet, it is still just molecules with all the forces
operating normally, electrons and covalent bonds etc and depending on
the individual elements, how much each element resists expansion, that
is how much gravity it has.

Hydrogen just chugs along, while uranium resists expansion and is
heavy.
The more the nuclei resists expansion, the more dark energy it gives
off, and the more electrons it has.
As you move through the periodic table of elements etc.
Each occupying a slot.

So its not just the radius of a planet that determines its gravity, it
has to do with the elements it contains and their proportions.

But just the additional water arriving from space, that does not seem
sufficient to me, to increase the gravitational mass of the planet,
such that dinosaurs can't live.

So we were apparently hit, 65 million years ago, but dinosaurs were
already on their way out before that dreadful day.
According to the fossil record.

That was just the final blow, which finished them off.

But then there were other factors, like more atmospheric pressure.
So I think if you combine all the various little things, like expanded
earth, additional mass, greater atmospheric pressure, you arrive at
conditions not suitable for dinosaurs.
You see this huge beast lived during the cretaceous, only 144 million
years ago, and supposedly the earth took a long time to double the
first time, which means no noticeable gradual reduction in size over
the eons, as you would expect, in a linear gravitational increase
curve.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1362194.stm

You would expect to see dinos getting proportionally smaller from 250
million years ago to 65 million years ago, and their necks shorter
etc.

So there was some catastrophism, of some sort, which played a role in
their demise. It wasn't just gravity.
Its just that now, gravity is different, and hence they could not live
today.

But could we possibly have gained half our present mass in 65 million
years? From impacts dust water?
Not likely. But then we could still grow twice the size, and just have
less density. And have a smaller increase in gravity, than if you
doubled the size and retained the density.

So what has been suggested was that earths gravity was less, but the
atmosphere thicker, which provided some buoyancy and so it is the
combination of these factors which led to their demise.

There must be more to this mysterious story, but the fact is, the
earth has expanded, and the evidence is clearly there.







.

Quantcast