Re: Our expanding earth - video

On Aug 13, 12:49 am, "Androcles" <Engin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<rick_so...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:1186962053.885794.14690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: On Aug 13, 12:02 am, rick_so...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
: > On Aug 12, 11:47 pm, "Androcles" <Engin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
: >
: >
: >
: > > <rick_so...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
: >
: > >news:1186956528.898045.169910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: > > : On Aug 12, 10:10 pm, "Androcles" <Engin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:: > <rick_so...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

: >
: > > : >
: > > : >news:1186949998.123666.170500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: > > : > :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjgidAICoQI
: > > : > : Yes that explains a lot. Including why the dinosaurs managed to
live
: > > : > : when today they would not be able to get up off the ground.
: > > : >
: > > : > Hahaha!
: > > : > Where did the water come from?
: > > : > Hahaha!
: > > :
: > > : Well thats a good question.
: > > :
: > > : But its possible that hydrogen
: >
: > > Hahahaha!
: > > It's possible and even probable that you are a fuckin' insane,
: > > you know nothing about density or the inverse square law of gravity.
: > > IF the dinosaurs would not be able to get off the ground today they'd
: > > have even less chance on a smaller Earth.
: >
: > Thats the million dollar question but if the planet is now twice the
: > size, then that must mean that either it is somewhat hollow now, and
: > the inevitable catastrophic collapse of the earth's crust, in a
: > several mile free fall, to the (making quotation marks above
: > shoulders) magma below, will ensue at any moment, or,
: > or, the earth is now twice the size, has twice the mass, and hence
: > twice the gravity.
: > But, where did that matter come from?
: > Well thats also a good question, and some of it comes from space, and
: > well, as we are expanding, there must be a little secret about what
: > happens when the earth expands, such that it retains its mass, the
: > molecules still have mass, even though the density is less, and that
: > is because of what gravity actually is, and it is accelerated mass.
: > So smaller planets may be more dense, but their gravity may not be
: > more.
: > So that does fly in the face of the standard theory somewhat, such
: > that a neutron star will have a great deal of mass, but be small, so
: > basically, we have not quite managed to fit all the pieces together
: > yet.
: > Which is good because it gives us things to do.
:
: You see the thing is that a neutron star is almost in a different
: state of matter. It is a solid ball of neutrons.
: The nuclei are touching.
: So it is resisting expansion very well. Almost at the point of going
: back in time, like a black hole.
: A black hole happens when it resists expansion so well, that the rest
: of the universe expands around it, and it is getting left behind.
:
: But with a planet, it is still just molecules with all the forces
: operating normally, electrons and covalent bonds etc and depending on
: the individual elements, how much each element resists expansion, that
: is how much gravity it has.
:
: Hydrogen just chugs along, while uranium resists expansion and is
: heavy.
: The more the nuclei resists expansion, the more dark energy it gives
: off, and the more electrons it has.
: As you move through the periodic table of elements etc.
: Each occupying a slot.
:
: So its not just the radius of a planet that determines its gravity, it
: has to do with the elements it contains and their proportions.
:
: But just the additional water arriving from space, that does not seem
: sufficient to me, to increase the gravitational mass of the planet,
: such that dinosaurs can't live.
:
: So we were apparently hit, 65 million years ago, but dinosaurs were
: already on their way out before that dreadful day.
: According to the fossil record.
:
: That was just the final blow, which finished them off.
:
: But then there were other factors, like more atmospheric pressure.
: So I think if you combine all the various little things, like expanded
: earth, additional mass, greater atmospheric pressure, you arrive at
: conditions not suitable for dinosaurs.
: You see this huge beast lived during the cretaceous, only 144 million
: years ago, and supposedly the earth took a long time to double the
: first time, which means no noticeable gradual reduction in size over
: the eons, as you would expect, in a linear gravitational increase
: curve.
:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1362194.stm
:
: You would expect to see dinos getting proportionally smaller from 250
: million years ago to 65 million years ago, and their necks shorter
: etc.
:
: So there was some catastrophism, of some sort, which played a role in
: their demise. It wasn't just gravity.
: Its just that now, gravity is different, and hence they could not live
: today.
:
: But could we possibly have gained half our present mass in 65 million
: years? From impacts dust water?
: Not likely. But then we could still grow twice the size, and just have
: less density. And have a smaller increase in gravity, than if you
: doubled the size and retained the density.
:
: So what has been suggested was that earths gravity was less, but the
: atmosphere thicker, which provided some buoyancy and so it is the
: combination of these factors which led to their demise.
:
: There must be more to this mysterious story, but the fact is, the
: earth has expanded, and the evidence is clearly there.
:

The fact is you are crazy.
The fact is you are so fucking stooopid you should be plonked.
*plonk*

Newtonian physics is like 100 years old and outdated.
Why don't you make your arguments in the dirt with a stick using
grunts.

.

Quantcast