Re: Light speed broken?
- From: Traveler <traveler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:18:42 -0500
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:59:28 -0400, "Sid Lanier"
<slanier01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
How does this one differ from other recent such reports?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/08/16/scispeed116.xml
It does not prove that light speed is broken. Quantum tunneling only
proves that space (distance) does not exist. It's explained at the
link below. QT is old news, though. What's interesting with this
experiment is the distance involved; 3 ft apart is very impressive.
However, I am not that surprised. I have been saying it for a long
time now; distance is an illusion. In the future, we will have quantum
jump technologies that will allow us to move from anywhere to anywhere
instantly.
Nasty Little Truth About Space:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Crackpots/nasty.htm#Space
Louis Savain
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Light speed broken?
- From: qjohnny2000
- Re: Light speed broken?
- From: Sid Lanier
- Re: Light speed broken?
- References:
- Light speed broken?
- From: Sid Lanier
- Light speed broken?
- Prev by Date: Re: Quarks ????
- Next by Date: Re: Quarks ????
- Previous by thread: Re: Light speed broken?
- Next by thread: Re: Light speed broken?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|