Re: Light speed broken?
- From: "greysky" <greysky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 22:17:13 GMT
There simply isn't enough information in the article you cite to come to an
honest conclusion. So, despite most of the yahoos in this group who have
decided on a conclusion based on nothing, I'll wait for the technical
write-up. You should too.
Greysky
"Sid Lanier" <slanier01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:F81xi.3582$U24.57@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
How does this one differ from other recent such reports?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/08/16/scispeed116.xml
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Light speed broken?
- From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Re: Light speed broken?
- From: Steve Pope
- Re: Light speed broken?
- References:
- Light speed broken?
- From: Sid Lanier
- Light speed broken?
- Prev by Date: Re: Simple question about a robot
- Next by Date: Re: Light speed broken?
- Previous by thread: Re: Light speed broken?
- Next by thread: Re: Light speed broken?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|