Re: Light speed broken?
- From: "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:24:27 -0700
On Aug 16, 3:59 pm, "Sid Lanier" <slanie...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
How does this one differ from other recent such reports?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/08/16/sci...
Nearfield or evanescent paths don't count because
they don't move measureable energy or information.
"Quantum Tunneling on Your Kitchen Table"
http://www.altair.org/Qtunnel.html
<< Figure 3: The wave impedance measures
the relative strength of electric and magnetic
fields. It is a function of source [absorber] structure. >>
Formerly: http://www.conformity.com/0102reflections.html
http://www.sm.luth.se/~urban/master/Theory/3.html
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?url=/iel5/5/31165/01450944.pdf?arnumber=1450944
Sue...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Light speed broken?
- From: BioFreak
- Re: Light speed broken?
- From: rick_sobie
- Re: Light speed broken?
- References:
- Light speed broken?
- From: Sid Lanier
- Light speed broken?
- Prev by Date: Re: Light barrier broken - hot news..
- Next by Date: Re: Double Slit Paradoxon - An indicator for a "bug" in the architecture or machinery of our universe?
- Previous by thread: Re: Light speed broken?
- Next by thread: Re: Light speed broken?
- Index(es):