Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves

On Aug 19, 4:46 pm, "Androcles" <Engin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:1187563707.885822.56020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: On Aug 19, 2:32 pm, "Androcles" <Engin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:: > <m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

: >
: >news:1187554463.494181.323410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: >
: > : In the new theory, light still moves back and forth between an
: > : electric field and a magnetic one, as Maxwell's equations maintain,
: > : but the fields are properties of space itself.
: >
: > That's not a "new" theory, it's the old aether hauled out of the closet
: > and dusted off, then given a new coat of paint. It's still garbage.
:
: --No.

YES.

: In the aether theory, an invisible aether occupied space and
: light moved the aether. In Kinetic Space Theory, light moves space
: itself.

So now aether is called space, just as it it always has been, with
properties of permittivity and permeability.
That's not a "new" theory, it's the old aether hauled out of the closet
and dusted off, then given a new coat of paint. It's still garbage.
Pull the other leg, it's got Big Ben on it.

: According to Kinetic Space Theory, light moving through space
: is like sound moving in the air.

Yeah, that's exactly what the aether was.
Just another nutter that doesn't understand electromagnetics
and wanks off over space having some crazy properties, the same
idiotic properties that aether had. Whether you call it moving space
or aether, it's the same ***.


THAT'S NOT TRUE.

Kinetic Space Theory doesn't make any "crazy" claims about the
properties of space, like the aether had to have. It doesn't need
to. There's nothing that relies on unverifiable beliefs in the
unseen or invisible in Kinetic Space Theory. The properties that you
talk about, permittivity and permeabilty, are real measurable
properties of space. They are what capacitance and inductance are
based on. They are constants. And, the constant speed of light is
pretty closely equivalent to them. The reciprocal of the square root
of the product of the permittivity and permeability of free space
equals 299863380.5 m/s compared to the accepted value of the speed of
light value of 299792458 m/s (The two values are within .0003% of one
another). Do you think that's coincidence???

Kinetic Space Theory maintains that the speed that a space wave would
require to transit space can be calculated based on the idea that the
time period t required to build electric and magnetic fields (to cycle
through compressing space and displacing space) in an area A traversed
by a wave that moves through space in a period t is equal to the
permittivity e and permeability u of the area A that the wave will
cover in that time period t. In other words,

t/A = e * u * A/t

Now, if you solve for A/t, the amount of area traversed during each
wave period, you get theequation that says that the speed of light
should equal the reciprocal of the square root of the product of the
permittivity and permeability of free space or, in other words, the
equation that leads to a value that is .0003% of the speed of light in
a vacuum.

Kinetic Space Theory doesn't rely on stuff like the space-time
dilation of Relativity or the 11 or 23 unseen dimensions of string
theory. Everything it suggests relies on the observable rather than
the abstract.




.

Loading