Re: Relativity for the non scientific

"hanson" <hanson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Kejyi.6013$A57.3474@xxxxxxxxxxx
: Grave-site wab*** "H. Wabnig" <.... .-- .- -... -. .. --. @ .- --- -.
dot
: .- -> was digging in his message
: news:osfic35jdfm8f3qgsgmetuo0v9gcabb5mu@xxxxxxxxxx
: >
: > On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 21:24:52 GMT, "Androcles"
: > <Engineer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
: >>
: >>"fmardini" <f.mardini@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
: >>news:1187554983.773657.8860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: >
: [Andro]
: >>:> "Start at the very beginning, a very good place to start."
: >>: > Anyway, here's what you are looking for.
: >>: > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Smart/Smart.htm
: >>:
: [Fmardini]
: >>: looks interesting but with i see a lot of equations and i am sure they
: >>: ain't gonna like that
: >>: i was thinking along the lines of discussing some of the consequences
: >>: of the theory of relativity that could be appreciated by the layman --
: >>: the space time continuum, gravity, etc.
: >>: I was planning on leading with the question "Do clocks measure time,
: >>: or is time that what clocks measure??!"
: >>
: [Andro]
: >>It's got pictures. <shrug>
: >>It's also got:
: >>'we establish by definition that the "time" required by light to travel
: >>from
: >>A to B equals the "time" it requires to travel from B to A' because I
SAY
: >>SO
: >>and I'm
: >>the great genius Einstein, YOU STUPID LITTLE PEOPLE. -- Albert Einstein.
: >>Then the equations begin and out pops all the crank stuff you want to
: >>talk about but don't understand because you are layman.
: >>
: >>That's relativity for the non-scientific.
: >>Why not talk about horoscopes and palmistry and black magic,
: >>it's just as stupid to listen to Madame Gaga with her crystal ball
: >>as any relativist?
: >>
: [Wab***]
: > Androcles says so:
: > A train moves from London to Birmingham (A to B) and returns to London
: > (B to A) in NO time, because when you come later and look, the train
: > is "still" here in London. The time and distance the train travelled
: > are exactly ZERO ZERO in Androcles' math.
: > Then Androcles concludes: (average velocity) v = 0 / 0.
: > Which is the famous Androcles "division by zero", check his webpages.
: > w.
: >
: [Wab***]
: Wabie, YOUR insertion of London and Birmingham must have
: come from your necrophilic penchant to search for grave sites:
: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/1585613f01cedac5?hl=en&;
: >
: Wabie, you being an incurable Dingelberry that dangles from
: Einstein's sphincter, you still have not comprehended how
: Andro did derive at the 0/0 condition which shows that everything
: can be explained conveniently with relativity but without any
: adherence to reality. -- You were told numerous times to
: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/96c1fde68777bc9f
::: "Start off with the Einstein t & l equations [(t' = t*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
::: etc] and then work'em backwards until can finally see that 0/0
: phenomena to occur. "
: But apparently you do not have that capacity because your
: wabniggering and Grabschändung is a priority for you:
: >
: You will not be invited by Prof. Mardini to the Grotta Azzura
: on Capri. Andor will be, while you are driven by your Sucht to
: continue to distrub grave sites and continue to wab*** yourself.
: Have fun, Wabie... ahaha... Thanks for the laughs... ahahanson
:

"A train moves from London to Birmingham" -- Wab***.
Nope. A train moves from Inwood-207 St. to Far Rockaway on
the New York subway.
http://subway.umka.org/maps/new-york.gif

You are absolutely right, Wab*** put in Birmingham, but we'll
never know why.

As far as Einstein goes, the distance AB is UNDEFINED and
so is the time of arrival/departure at B, but the A train will
certainly have to stop at B so it cannot possibly have constant
velocity.

The difference between mathematics and physics is the
word "assume" doesn't exist in mathematics. Wabbie will
never be a mathematician, he's just another opinionated bigot
who has never been shown elementary calculus, derivatives.

The Jew that said 'we establish by definition that pi is exactly 3.0' was
stoned, either by having rocks thrown at him or too much wacky baccy,
or both.
2Chronicles 4:2 reads thus, ?Also he made a molten sea of ten cubits from
brim to brim, round in compass, and five cubits the height thereof; and a
line of thirty cubits did compass it round about.?






.