Re: Relativity for the non scientific

"Androcles" <Engineer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Kzkyi.66628$lx3.59708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
WHOLE POST HERE:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/26d936c11b7fe92b?hl=en&;

"hanson" <hanson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Kejyi.6013$A57.3474@xxxxxxxxxxx
Grave-site wab*** "H. Wabnig" was digging in his message
news:osfic35jdfm8f3qgsgmetuo0v9gcabb5mu@xxxxxxxxxx
"Androcles" <Engineer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
fmardini" <f.mardini@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1187554983.773657.8860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Andro to Mardini]
'we establish by definition that the "time" required by light to travel
from A to B equals the "time" it requires to travel from B to A' because
I, Albert Einstein, SAY SO and I'm the great genius Einstein,
YOU STUPID LITTLE PEOPLE". -- Albert Einstein.
Then the equations begin and out pops all the crank stuff you want to
talk about but don't understand because you are layman.

[Wab***]
Androcles says also:
A train moves from London to Birmingham (A to B) and returns to London
(B to A) in NO time, because when you come later and look, the train
is "still" here in London. The time and distance the train travelled
are exactly ZERO ZERO in Androcles' math.
Then Androcles concludes: (average velocity) v = 0 / 0.
Which is the famous Androcles "division by zero", check his webpages.
w.
: >
[hanson]
Wabie, YOUR insertion of London and Birmingham must have
come from your necrophilic penchant to search for grave sites:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/1585613f01cedac5?hl=en&;
: >
Wabie, you being an incurable Dingelberry that dangles from
Einstein's sphincter, you still have not comprehended how
Andro did derive at the 0/0 condition which shows that everything
can be explained conveniently with relativity but without any
adherence to reality. -- You were told numerous times to
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/96c1fde68777bc9f
::: "Start off with the Einstein t & l equations [(t' = t*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
::: etc] and then work'em backwards until can finally see that 0/0
::: phenomena to occur. "
But apparently you do not have that capacity because your
wabniggering and Grabschändung is a priority for you:

[Andro]
"A train moves from London to Birmingham" -- Wab***.
Nope. A train moves from Inwood-207 St. to Far Rockaway on
the New York subway. http://subway.umka.org/maps/new-york.gif
Hanson, you are absolutely right, Wab*** put in Birmingham,
but we'll never know why.
As far as Einstein goes, the distance AB is UNDEFINED and
so is the time of arrival/departure at B, but the A train will
certainly have to stop at B so it cannot possibly have constant
velocity.

[hanson]
..... ahahahaha... I don't think you'll get thru' to Wabie, with
any illustration about the speed of (A to B) and (B to A)
being not the same in nature, no matter how many terrestrial
left/right or to/fro locations A and B, straight or wiggly in
between, photographic or drawn, you show him. Wabbie will
not get it, just as he did not get it when I suggested for him
to do the retro-engineering with [(t' = t*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) etc].

But, **maybe** it will sink in, if you tell Wabbie that the train,
when going from the Innsbruck valley (A) UP the slope to the
Brenner Pass (B) will NOT have the same speed as when it
is rolling DOWNHILL from the pass (B) BACK down into the
Innsbruck valley (A) from where it started.

Stress to Wabbie that Einstein, ad hoc, willfully & emotionally
decided and insisted to DEFINE in his, Einstein's mind, that
the train will always have the same speed (his case the light)
no matter whether it goes up/down -- to/fro -- left or right.

Impress that this is **the ASSUMPTION that Einstein made**
which ultimately results in the phenomenon of 0/0, which gives
theoretical results that **always** do fit the bill of any "experiment"
for any its "observer(s)", even if they have to drag their own
"frame" along to fit the "observations"... ahahahaha...

I doubt though, that Wabbie will get it. He is, like all Einstein
Dingleberries, damaged goods who were robbed of their
individual thinking by the religious force of indoctrination, just
like Jews, the Evangelicals and the ass-venting Muslim are.
No difference!, since physics too, in they final analysis, happens
to be an anthropo-social enterprise.... ahahaha... ahahanson




.

Loading