Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: "qbit" <qbit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:18:57 +0200
"Androcles" <Engineer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
"qbit" <qbit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
: "Androcles" <Engineer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
: > "qbit" <qbit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
: > : "Androcles" <Engineer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
: > : > <mh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
: > : >
: > : > : c is a function of the permittivity and permeability of space.
: > : >
: > : > That's aether all right, and it doesn't work.
: > :
: > : You are wrong, Androcles.
: >
: > No I'm not, you are.
: >
: > : Just apply some logic:
: >
: > I'm very good at that.
: >
: > : if one, or both, of permittivity and
: > : permeability of space were differrent then obviously also
: > : c would have a differrent value. Don't you agree?
: >
: > No. Planets would interact with the medium, slow and fall into the Sun.
:
: But this is always true, it's due to the gravitative attraction of masses.
The planets do not slow in their orbits. Just apply some logic.
Sure do they. The orbital velocity of the Earth and other planetes
varies during a full phase around the Sun. See Keppler's 3rd law...
: The only thing keeping them to fall into the Sun is that
: they are in motion and gain 'slingshot energy' from each other
: while circling in their usually elliptic orbits, ie. which gives them
: a perpetual motion, ie. much like a perpetuum mobile.
That's the point. Any aether would slow them down, they'd lose
energy and fall into the Sun. Just apply some logic.
Actually they indeed do lose some energy due to the
resistance of the space. Just apply some logic... :-)
: the most interessting things of the universe.
: But we know so little of Space, although it is the key element
: to understand everything in our Universe, and beyond...
Why is this pencil bent and broken, Mr Permittivity and Permeability?
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/geoopt/optpic/brokpen.jpg
But the pencil isn't broken, it's just an optical illusion.
But it is a good demonstration of how Relativistic charlatanism
exactly works: it's all is just an illusion, a fata morgana, as seen
from the distant or from a different angle, aka "frame of reference" :-).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: Androcles
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- References:
- Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: mh
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: Androcles
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: mh
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: Androcles
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: mh
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: qbit
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: mh
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: Androcles
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: qbit
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: Androcles
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: qbit
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: Androcles
- Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- Prev by Date: Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- Next by Date: Re: Relativity for the non scientific
- Previous by thread: Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- Next by thread: Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|