Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: "Androcles" <Engineer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:04:17 GMT
"qbit" <qbit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:faeooi$an7$1@xxxxxxxxxxx
: "Androcles" <Engineer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
: > "qbit" <qbit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
: > : "Androcles" <Engineer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
: > : > "qbit" <qbit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
: > : > : "Androcles" <Engineer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
: > : > : > <mh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
: > : > : >
: > : > : > : c is a function of the permittivity and permeability of space.
: > : > : >
: > : > : > That's aether all right, and it doesn't work.
: > : > :
: > : > : You are wrong, Androcles.
: > : >
: > : > No I'm not, you are.
: > : >
: > : > : Just apply some logic:
: > : >
: > : > I'm very good at that.
: > : >
: > : > : if one, or both, of permittivity and
: > : > : permeability of space were differrent then obviously also
: > : > : c would have a differrent value. Don't you agree?
: > : >
: > : > No. Planets would interact with the medium, slow and fall into the
Sun.
: > :
: > : But this is always true, it's due to the gravitative attraction of
masses.
: >
: > The planets do not slow in their orbits. Just apply some logic.
:
: Sure do they. The orbital velocity of the Earth and other planetes
: varies during a full phase around the Sun. See Keppler's 3rd law...
:
: > : The only thing keeping them to fall into the Sun is that
: > : they are in motion and gain 'slingshot energy' from each other
: > : while circling in their usually elliptic orbits, ie. which gives them
: > : a perpetual motion, ie. much like a perpetuum mobile.
: >
: > That's the point. Any aether would slow them down, they'd lose
: > energy and fall into the Sun. Just apply some logic.
:
: Actually they indeed do lose some energy due to the
: resistance of the space. Just apply some logic... :-)
Ok, then they fall in the Sun. Earth has had 4 billions to do it
and it hasn't happened yet.
:
: > : the most interessting things of the universe.
: > : But we know so little of Space, although it is the key element
: > : to understand everything in our Universe, and beyond...
: >
: > Why is this pencil bent and broken, Mr Permittivity and Permeability?
: > http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/geoopt/optpic/brokpen.jpg
:
: But the pencil isn't broken, it's just an optical illusion.
Yes it is, I can SEE it is, so it MUST be broken.
Light has nothing to do with it.
I can see Algol getting brighter and dimmer, too, so must be.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
: But it is a good demonstration of how Relativistic charlatanism
: exactly works: it's all is just an illusion, a fata morgana, as seen
: from the distant or from a different angle, aka "frame of reference" :-).
:
.
- References:
- Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: mh
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: Androcles
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: mh
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: Androcles
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: mh
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: qbit
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: mh
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: Androcles
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: qbit
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: Androcles
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: qbit
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: Androcles
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: qbit
- Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- Prev by Date: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 836 August 21, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe
- Next by Date: Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
- Previous by thread: Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- Next by thread: Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|