Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: "Androcles" <Engineer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:16:42 GMT
<mh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1187702320.090845.277090@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Aug 21, 6:04 am, m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Aug 21, 5:42 am, "Androcles" <Engin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1187696833.172562.100370@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: On Aug 21, 1:23 am, "Androcles" <Engin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
: > "qbit" <q...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
: >
: >news:fae4jg$ce6$1@xxxxxxxxxxx
: > : "Androcles" <Engin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
><m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
: >
: > : >
: > : > : c is a function of the permittivity and permeability of space.
: > : >
: > : > That's aether all right, and it doesn't work.
: > :
: > : You are wrong, Androcles.
: >
: > No I'm not, you are.
: >
: > : Just apply some logic:
: >
: > I'm very good at that.
: >
: > : if one, or both, of permittivity and
: > : permeability of space were differrent then obviously also
: > : c would have a differrent value. Don't you agree?
: >
: > No. Planets would interact with the medium, slow and fall into the
Sun.
: > Just apply some logic. Space is nothing and has no properties.
: > Bullets fly through it unimpeded and so does light.
: >
: > : Therefore
: >
: > I don't agree so there is no "therefore".
: > Just apply some logic.
:
:
:
: Planets do not interact with the permittivity and permeability of free
: space for the same reason that waving an electromagnet in the air
: fails to cause electricity to flow in the electromagnet's circuit.
Light does not interact with space for the same reason that waving
a magnet in nothing causes a voltage to appear.
E = -dB/dt (Faraday)
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/AC/m.gif
: The relationship between the magnet and the windings that surround it
: does not change when you wave both in the air.
All motion is relative. Space is nothing so nothing can be relative to
it.
: The key to creating
: electromagnetic changes is to create a change in the relationship
: between a magnetic field and an electric field (according to Faraday's
: Law).
And nothing whatever to do with the empty space.
: This happens in an electromagnet when you move the magnet in
: space with respect to the loose electrons (the electric fields) in
: adjacent windings or you change the field intensity of the magnetic
: field in the magnet (which is what happens in transformers).
And nothing whatever to do with the empty space.
:
: The definition of permittivity is the measure of the ability of an
: entity to develop an electric field.
And nothing whatever to do with the empty space.
: The definition of permeability
: is the measure of the ability of an entity to develop an electric
: field.
And nothing whatever to do with the empty space.
: Since empty space contains non-zero permittivity and permeability
: values,
I do not accept that. Prove it.
???
I don't know what to say to the question of space not containing non-
zero permittivity and permeability values. So says the NIST and every
other scientific body. Why do you think that is not so?
The trouble with forums like this is you never know if somebody just
doesn't know science or they have some alternate interesting theory.
Do you have some reason for disputing why empty space possesses
permittivity and permeability?
The deal is that if empty space does have the ability to develop
electric and magnetic fields which is what permittivity and
permeability are all about, then what does that mean?
Doesn't that gives us a very strong clue as to what electricity and
magnetism really are.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The magnetic constant 0 (equal to the vacuum permeability, also known
as the permeability of free space) is a universal physical constant,
relating mechanical and electromagnetic units of measurement. In the
International System of Units (SI), the magnetic constant = 4 ×10 7
H/m, or approximately 1.2566×10 6 H/m
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permeability_of_free_space
The crackpot opinion of Wackypedia is not proof. Any idiot
can write wackypedia and they do. I asked for PROOF.
Proof:
1 a: the cogency of evidence that compels acceptance by the mind of a truth
or a fact
b: the process or an instance of establishing the validity of a statement
especially by derivation from other statements in accordance with principles
of reasoning
2 obsolete : experience
3: something that induces certainty or establishes validity
4 archaic : the quality or state of having been tested or tried; especially
: unyielding hardness
The electric constant 0 (also known as the permittivity of free
space, or by the term dielectric constant of vacuum), is a
fundamental physical constant. The constant 0 connects mechanical
quantities (time, length, mass) to the units for electrical charge,
for example in Coulomb's law. Its value in SI units is
8.855 x 10-12 F m-1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_constant
The crackpot opinion of Wackypedia is not proof. Any idiot
can write wackypedia and they do. I asked for PROOF.
.
- References:
- Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: mh
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: Androcles
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: mh
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: Androcles
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: mh
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: qbit
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: mh
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: Androcles
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: qbit
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: Androcles
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: mh
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: Androcles
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: mh
- Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- From: mh
- Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- Prev by Date: Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- Next by Date: Re: Comparison of Physics and Maths
- Previous by thread: Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- Next by thread: Re: Kinetic Space Theory Proposes Space Moves
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|