sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Re: The ice is melting
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Flying via GR override
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: OG
• Re: Redshift 10 Galaxies?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Help with 3 Physics problems
  • From: Androcles
• The Dirac Equation for a HA (Hydrogen Atom) ?
  • From: PhaseSpace R8
• Re: Interpretation of E = m*c^2 as kinetic energies of sub-particles
  • From: Louis_N
• Re: Help with 3 Physics problems
  • From: shreemayeede
• Re: wave equation
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: uri
• Re: The Pioneer 11 anomaly is merely cosmic entropy, not tired light.
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: wave equation
  • From: Igor
• Re: idea of a new theory...**************************************
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 180.4: PI Matrices From Optimal to "Worst" Relate to Band/Banded Matrices
  • From: OsherD
• wave equation
  • From: Fallingeagle
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Olp
• Re: Help with 3 Physics problems
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Need Thermal Expansion Coefficients for Specific Stable Isotopes
  • From: parlous2112
• Re: NOBEL PRIZE SUBMISSION
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The energy in mass is gyroscopic.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: new r********y (and other things) book
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: new r********y (and other things) book
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: idea of a new theory...**************************************
  • From: Androcles
• How Electric Cars Should be Built
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• idea of a new theory...**************************************
  • From: Divij Rao
• Re: Can graphene overtake silicon as the essential ingredient of computer chips?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: The Pioneer 11 anomaly is merely cosmic entropy, not tired light.
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: Help with 3 Physics problems
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 182.1: Chaos vs Tunneling/Wormholes via Riemann Zeta Function and Probable Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: new r********y (and other things) book
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Help with 3 Physics problems
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 180.3: Probable Causation/Influence Matrix As Modified Alternating-Sign Matrix
  • From: OsherD
• Help with 3 Physics problems
  • From: shreemayeede
• Re: Looking for a solutions manual to University Physics, 12th ed.
  • From: Dan L.
• The Pioneer 11 anomaly is merely cosmic entropy, not tired light.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Definition of stress tensor in continuum mech
  • From: GSS
• Re: Can graphene overtake silicon as the essential ingredient of computer chips?
  • From: Mrs. Sodium K. Chloride
• Re: new r********y (and other things) book
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: new r********y (and other things) book
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad goes to Bolivia
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad goes to Bolivia
  • From: rick_sobie
• The Universe has cooled 1,100 fold ( z = 1,100 ) to 2.725 Kelvin.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad goes to Bolivia
  • From: rick_sobie
• new r********y (and other things) book
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad goes to Bolivia
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Can graphene overtake silicon as the essential ingredient of computer chips?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Terabit Electron Streaming
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Terabit Electron Streaming
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Can graphene overtake silicon as the essential ingredient of computer chips?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Can graphene overtake silicon as the essential ingredient of computer chips?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Can graphene overtake silicon as the essential ingredient of computer chips?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: John C . Polasek
• "Causality"
  • From: Olp
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad goes to Bolivia
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad goes to Bolivia
  • From: rick_sobie
• Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad goes to Bolivia
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Can graphene overtake silicon as the essential ingredient of computer chips?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Looking for a solutions manual to University Physics, 12th ed.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Math Trek: Beating the Bush for Patterns
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Can graphene overtake silicon as the essential ingredient of computer chips?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Looking for a solutions manual to University Physics, 12th ed.
  • From: EngineerYou
• Re: Question about Feynman books
  • From: isw
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Ghost Hunting & Physics
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: Ghost Hunting & Physics
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Gordon
• OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 28 Sep 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Ghost Hunting & Physics
  • From: Benj
• Re: Ghost Hunting & Physics
  • From: Benj
• Re: Confutazione della legge del Faraday
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: uri
• Re: Ghost Hunting & Physics
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: QUANTUM MECHANIC HYPNOTISTS
  • From: Igor
• Re: Thor's Physicist
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Blame it on pop-science - questions around superconductivity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What happens to electrons at the corner/edge/face of a crystal?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• 102nd Birthday of E=mc2 ( 27 Sep 1905- 27 Sep.2007) Complete tribute in book Einstein's E=mc2 generalized , www.ajayonline.us
  • From: watchs
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Question about Feynman books
  • From: Sarah
• Re: Question about Feynman books
  • From: Sarah
• Re: Question about Feynman books
  • From: Sarah
• What happens to electrons at the corner/edge/face of a crystal?
  • From: Bhushit Joshipura
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Blame it on pop-science - questions around superconductivity
  • From: Bhushit Joshipura
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: QUANTUM MECHANIC HYPNOTISTS
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: Ghost Hunting & Physics
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: So is this elegant, ugly or both?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Relativity Question
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Relativity Question
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Relativity Question
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Warped dish.
  • From: Benj
• Re: Ghost Hunting & Physics
  • From: Benj
• Re: Arc length of sin x
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Online Physics Master's degree program?
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Warped dish.
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Ghost Hunting & Physics
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Quantum Gravity 182.0: A Relationship Between Probable Causation/Influence (PI) and Riemann Zeta Function
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Large Hadron Collider Operational?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: QUANTUM MECHANIC HYPNOTISTS
  • From: Eric Gisse
• johnreed-Math and Universe, Part 3, September 27, 2007
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Arc length of sin x
  • From: nobody
• Re: Pet Kind-Termination Kits
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Ghost Hunting & Physics
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: boson boss
• johnreed-Math and Universe, Part 5, September 27, 2007
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: So is this elegant, ugly or both?
  • From: nobody
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Quantum Gravity 182.0: A Relationship Between Probable Causation/Influence (PI) and Riemann Zeta Function
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 182.0: A Relationship Between Probable Causation/Influence (PI) and Riemann Zeta Function
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 182.0: A Relationship Between Probable Causation/Influence (PI) and Riemann Zeta Function
  • From: OsherD
• QUANTUM MECHANIC HYPNOTISTS
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: So is this elegant, ugly or both?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: So is this elegant, ugly or both?
  • From: nobody
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Carnegie Mellon offering free courses?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: So is this elegant, ugly or both?
  • From: nobody
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: So is this elegant, ugly or both?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Relativity Question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: So is this elegant, ugly or both?
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• So is this elegant, ugly or both?
  • From: nobody
• Re: Looking for a solutions manual to University Physics, 12th ed.
  • From: Dan L.
• Re: Need Feedback on Kinetic Space Theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Warped dish.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Large Hadron Collider Operational?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Warped dish.
  • From: Dr. Pastor
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Definition of stress tensor in continuum mech
  • From: LC
• Re: Earth satellites do not exactly follow 1/r^2 gravity law
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Need Feedback on Kinetic Space Theory
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Dave
• Re: Looking for a solutions manual to University Physics, 12th ed.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Looking for a solutions manual to University Physics, 12th ed.
  • From: adsezerregister
• Re: Redshift 10 Galaxies?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Is the phonon as phony as Uncle Al is?
  • From: Eddie
• Need Feedback on Kinetic Space Theory
  • From: mh
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Arc length of sin x
  • From: Proctologically Violated©®
• Re: Flying via GR override
  • From: Igor
• Re: riding beside a photon
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Large Hadron Collider Operational?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4
  • From: John Park
• Re: Simplest experiment to demo CO2 IR absorbtion
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Large Hadron Collider Operational?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Earth satellites do not exactly follow 1/r^2 gravity law
  • From: John Park
• Re: Relativity Question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Relativity Question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4
  • From: Androcles
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: riding beside a photon
  • From: malibu
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Large Hadron Collider Operational?
  • From: Igor
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: BRAIN FRY #3
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: uri
• Re: riding beside a photon
  • From: srp
• Re: Simplest experiment to demo CO2 IR absorbtion
  • From: Dwib
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: riding beside a photon
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: riding beside a photon
  • From: malibu
• Re: Large Hadron Collider Operational?
  • From: srp
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 840 September 26, 2007 by PhillipF. Schewe
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Simplest experiment to demo CO2 IR absorbtion
  • From: Androcles
• Online Physics Master's degree program?
  • From: cathy_cocksucker
• Re: Impedance/reflectivity/refractive index of glass
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: The ice is melting
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Large Hadron Collider Operational?
  • From: Androcles
• Simplest experiment to demo CO2 IR absorbtion
  • From: tadamsmar@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Definition of stress tensor in continuum mech
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Large Hadron Collider Operational?
  • From: GRavman
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: WTC Towers:300,000 Have Toxic dust in Their lungs
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Fuel Reformers for Home Power or Cars & Tractors
  • From: narivasant
• Re: Large Hadron Collider Operational?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Large Hadron Collider Operational?
  • From: GRavman
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Olp
• Re: Moment of Inertia of solid sphere vs. hollow sphere
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: New Materials from High Pressure and Heat
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4
  • From: Androcles
• Impedance/reflectivity/refractive index of glass
  • From: Lasse.Karagiannis@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Quantum Gravity 180.2: New Dimensional Analysis With Matrices
  • From: OsherD
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4
  • From: Androcles
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Thor's Physicist
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Quantum Gravity 181.0: Kurt Godel - Bringing Logic and Philosophy Back Into Physics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 26 September 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: info
• Re: Carnegie Mellon offering free courses?
  • From: info
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4
  • From: John Park
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Redshift 10 Galaxies?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Redshift 10 Galaxies?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Carnegie Mellon offering free courses?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 26 September 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The ice is melting
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: boson boss
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• The ice is melting
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Fuel Reformers for Home Power or Cars & Tractors
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Unifying Time's Arrows: Re: Moving Dimensions Theory--The New Paradigm that Unifies Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, and Statistical Mechanics; while underlying ST & LQG
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 840 September 26, 2007 by PhillipF. Schewe
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Fuel Reformers for Home Power or Cars & Tractors
  • From: narivasant
• Re: Flying via GR override
  • From: GRavman
• HandyMan DataBase Over 1,000,000 Specs
  • From: Scott
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Definition of stress tensor in continuum mech
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Definition of stress tensor in continuum mech
  • From: LC
• energy vs imbalance
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: DEEPLY CONCERNED ABOUT AUSTRALIA IN FAST RAISING SEAS
  • From: Eddie
• Re: Relativity Question
  • From: Igor
• Re: Flying via GR override
  • From: Igor
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 840 September 26, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Reducing total human consumption.
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Pet Kind-Termination Kits
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Definition of stress tensor in continuum mech
  • From: LC
• Re: Redshift 10 Galaxies?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: briggs
• Re: Universe with time feedback. Shape and law
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Quantum Gravity 180.1: Uniform Distribution Limit For Random Matrices
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Flying via GR override
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Reducing total human consumption.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Life Span of Virtual Particles???
  • From: srp
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: boson boss
• "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Olp
• Re: Flying via GR override
  • From: GRavman
• Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: Relativity Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity Question
  • From: Jeckyl
• Another form of aluminum glass
  • From: Darrell Lakin
• Life Span of Virtual Particles???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: New Materials from High Pressure and Heat
  • From: Darrell Lakin
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Relativity Question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Flying via GR override
  • From: GRavman
• Re: Do Up Quarks Create Charge???
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!
  • From: Benj
• Warning: MS Exel 2007 cannot do math
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Quantum Gravity 181.0: Kurt Godel - Bringing Logic and Philosophy Back Into Physics
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!
  • From: CWatters
• Level broadening, what is the physical reason
  • From: nure123
• Stricter birth control for the richest.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Universe with time feedback. Shape and law
  • From: validakis
• Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!
  • From: rick_sobie
• Reducing total human consumption.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Quantum Gravity 180.1: Uniform Distribution Limit For Random Matrices
  • From: OsherD
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Single-photon microwave source fits on a chip
  • From: Sam Wormley
• new layer in Earth's mantle
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The ONLY "Theory of Everything" That WORKS
  • From: Uncle Pal
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Quantum Gravity 181.0: Kurt Godel - Bringing Logic and Philosophy Back Into Physics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!
  • From: jimp
• Re: Relativity Question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Relativity Question
  • From: OG
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Kant's thought experiment : is chirality a dimension?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: underwater
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: New Materials from High Pressure and Heat
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Relativity Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Kant's thought experiment : is chirality a dimension?
  • From: Androcles
• Relativity Question
  • From: relativityquestion
• Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!
  • From: jimp
• Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Kant's thought experiment : is chirality a dimension?
  • From: jlette111
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Bond angle for H20: 104.5 degrees, or more
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Bond angle for H20: 104.5 degrees, or more
  • From: _dee
• Re: THE MECHANICS OF THE UNIIVERSE
  • From: Uncle Pal
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: boson boss
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: briggs
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: New Materials from High Pressure and Heat
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: BRAIN FRY #3
  • From: PD
• Re: NOBEL PRIZE SUBMISSION
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: BRAIN FRY #3
  • From: Androcles
• Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2 (corrections)
  • From: Androcles
• New Materials from High Pressure and Heat
  • From: Darrell Lakin
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2 (corrections)
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: hanson
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2 (corrections)
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: underwater
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: underwater
  • From: CWatters
• Re: underwater
  • From: CWatters
• Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: BRAIN FRY #3
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: BRAIN FRY #3
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bond angle for H20: 104.5 degrees, or more
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2
  • From: Randy Poe
• "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe"
  • From: Olp
• "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe"
  • From: Olp
• Re: underwater
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Bond angle for H20: 104.5 degrees, or more
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: M-theory
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: M-theory
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: super heated water
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Do Up Quarks Create Charge???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: BRAIN FRY #3
  • From: PD
• Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2 (corrections)
  • From: Androcles
• Bond angle for H20: 104.5 degrees, or more
  • From: _dee
• Re: BRAIN FRY #3
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: BRAIN FRY #3
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2 (corrections)
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2 (corrections)
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 180.0: Alternating Sign Matrices and Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 179.1: Riccati Subtypes in Determinant Form
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Fourier Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty is Nonsense
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Fourier Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty is Nonsense
  • From: OsherD
• Re: underwater
  • From: Sam Wormley
• underwater
  • From: bob
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: BRAIN FRY #3
  • From: Mas Plak
• AGE OF THE UNIVERSE CALCULATED
  • From: BURT
• Re: riding beside a photon
  • From: srp
• Re: BRAIN FRY #3
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: BRAIN FRY #3
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: riding beside a photon
  • From: malibu
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• BRAIN FRY #3
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: riding beside a photon
  • From: malibu
• Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Do Up Quarks Create Charge???
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• hacking through electric outlets!!!
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2 (corrections)
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Question about Feynman books
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: super heated water
  • From: STUARTe
• Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2 (corrections)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2
  • From: OG
• Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Do Up Quarks Create Charge???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Question about Feynman books
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about Feynman books
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: super heated water
  • From: PD
• Re: Balancing weights
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Re: Balancing weights
  • From: Andy Resnick
• A force between neutrinos and dark energy
  • From: B.Adams
• Re: Balancing weights
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Unifying Time's Arrows: Re: Moving Dimensions Theory--The New Paradigm that Unifies Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, and Statistical Mechanics; while underlying ST & LQG
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: riding beside a photon
  • From: PD
• Re: Balancing weights
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Do Up Quarks Create Charge???
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack
  • From: Igor
• Re: Balancing weights
  • From: PD
• Re: Fourier Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty is Nonsense
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: super heated water
  • From: Igor
• Re: Do Up Quarks Create Charge???
  • From: Igor
• Re: Fourier Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty is Nonsense
  • From: Edward Green
• Balancing weights
  • From: vikraman.choudhury@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fourier Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty is Nonsense
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Unifying Time's Arrows: Re: Moving Dimensions Theory--The New Paradigm that Unifies Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, and Statistical Mechanics; while underlying ST & LQG
  • From: Uncle Hal
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: "Is More Than One Quark Needed?"
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Quantum Gravity 178.2: Einstein's c Overruled By Causal Hessian on fxxfyy - fxy^2
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Question about Feynman books
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: super heated water
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Fourier Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty is Nonsense
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: riding beside a photon
  • From: srp
• Question about Feynman books
  • From: Sarah
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: PD
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Do Up Quarks Create Charge???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: PD
• super heated water
  • From: STUARTe
• Re: New thoughts on Planetary Cores of Jupiter-like worlds
  • From: Darrell Lakin
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Ions in solution
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Perovskite Properties on Jupiter-like planets
  • From: Darrell Lakin
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Y.Porat
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Sep 24, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: how to use finite difference time domain method?
  • From: Androcles
• how to use finite difference time domain method?
  • From: Surbhi
• John Fredriksen, buy another football team and call it day.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: riding beside a photon
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Equivalence Principle and how to prove it probabilistically.
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: riding beside a photon
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: riding beside a photon
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: riding beside a photon
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: riding beside a photon
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: GENESIS THEORY ASTRONOMY STELLAR CONSTELLATION UNIVERSE
  • From: rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: GENESIS THEORY ASTRONOMY STELLAR CONSTELLATION UNIVERSE
  • From: rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: GENESIS THEORY ASTRONOMY STELLAR CONSTELLATION UNIVERSE
  • From: rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: riding beside a photon
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Pmb
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: riding beside a photon
  • From: malibu
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Is this a trick?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The formal proof for the existence of the "other world" ("afterworld" - "counter-world") completed with the use of methods of mathematical logic
  • From: Factor
• Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack
  • From: greysky
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is this a trick?
  • From: shiitshite
• free gay, bi, straight sex cams
  • From: campromoter
• Re: Christians *PRAY* For Armageddon...
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Farnsworth field
  • From: boson boss
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: boson boss
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: M-theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is this a trick?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: boson boss
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SPHERICAL vs. POLARIZED EMWAVE (Variable charge)
  • From: eBayer
• Re: Fourier Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty is Nonsense
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Fourier Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty is Nonsense
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fourier Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty is Nonsense
  • From: Igor
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack
  • From: Igor
• Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack
  • From: Igor
• Re: Physicists, Ghosts and Quantum Gravity
  • From: Igor
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Fourier Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty is Nonsense Part 2
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Farnsworth field
  • From: Androcles
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: greenhouse effuct
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Farnsworth field
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Farnsworth field
  • From: rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• A Quantum Cosmology: No Dark Matter, Dark Energy nor Accelerating Universe
  • From: Surfer
• Re: How can a carbon arc generate a wide spectrum
  • From: Szczepan Bialek
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Suri
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: riding beside a photon
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Physicists, Ghosts and Quantum Gravity
  • From: Kowstue
• SPHERICAL vs. POLARIZED EMWAVE (Variable charge)
  • From: dedanoe
• Poverty is a crime, I'm tellin' ya.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Pois é,Такимобразомэто.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Physicists, Ghosts and Quantum Gravity
  • From: Benj
• Fourier Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty is Nonsense Part 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Fourier Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty is Nonsense
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Jeckyl's " load of crap ".
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: The Draper family
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Jeckyl's “ load of crap ”.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: riding beside a photon
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The term " Age of the Universe " is a misnomer.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• variable oscillating mass
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: riding beside a photon
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack
  • From: Androcles
• riding beside a photon
  • From: malibu
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Randy Poe
• BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Relativity Theory is beginning to crack
  • From: greysky
• The term “ Age of the Universe ” is a misnomer.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Physicists, Ghosts and Quantum Gravity
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: M-theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorenz transformation, speed of light and now EPR experiment
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spin water in tube
  • From: Harold Burns
• Ultrasound - its use in Technology and Science
  • From: Wieslaw Bicz (www.optel.pl)
• Ultrasound - its use in Technology and Science
  • From: Wieslaw Bicz (www.optel.pl)
• M-theory
  • From: uri
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Fourier Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty is Nonsense
  • From: Mas Plak
• Fourier Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty is Nonsense
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 178.2: Einstein's c Overruled By Causal Hessian on fxxfyy - fxy^2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: BrainStimPro Binaural Brainwave Generator
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ions in solution
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The quantitative view of reality
  • From: Androcles
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Ions in solution
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: BrainStimPro Binaural Brainwave Generator
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The quantitative view of reality
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: uri
• Ions in solution
  • From: matt271829-news
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Suri
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: PD
• Re: Lorenz transformation, speed of light and now EPR experiment
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Lorenz transformation, speed of light and now EPR experiment
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Moment of Inertia of solid sphere vs. hollow sphere
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spin water in tube
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Cavitation - high temperature
  • From: Androcles
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• riding beside a photon as it makes its waves animation
  • From: malibu
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 178.1: Hessians Relate Quantum (Macroscopic) Tunneling, Wormholes, Black Holes
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: lorenz transformation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• TAO photon
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: The quantitative view of reality
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: The quantitative view of reality
  • From: Plum Totter
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Plum Totter
• The quantitative view of reality
  • From: BURT
• Re: Spin water in tube
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Cavitation - high temperature
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Spin water in tube
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Ghosts in Hilbert Space
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: Ghosts in Hilbert Space
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Spin water in tube
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Cavitation - high temperature
  • From: Androcles
• How you Model nature depends on what you can predict and measure.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• OT:WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 21 Sep 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• A water screw made of clear steel ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Cavitation - high temperature
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Spin water in tube
  • From: Uncle Al
• Theory of Thermodynamics
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Ghosts in Hilbert Space
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: uri
• Re: Cavitation - high temperature
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spin water in tube
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Nikola Tesluman: His Lightning Staff & Far-Seeing Crystal Ball
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Szczepan Bialek
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Quantum Nanotechnology simulates the Mind?
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Cavitation - high temperature
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: microtubules test
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Stored ionized gas for ion drives.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Spin water in tube
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Spin water in tube
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: GENESIS THEORY ASTRONOMY STELLAR CONSTELLATION UNIVERSE
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Re: Perovskite Properties on Jupiter-like planets
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: New thoughts on Planetary Cores of Jupiter-like worlds
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: New Materials possible in extrasolar planets
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Moment of Inertia of solid sphere vs. hollow sphere
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: How can a carbon arc generate a wide spectrum
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Lorenz transformation, speed of light and now EPR experiment
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Gravitational Evolution
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Igor
• Re: Moment of Inertia of solid sphere vs. hollow sphere
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Cavitation - high temperature
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Igor
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Igor
• Re: How can a carbon arc generate a wide spectrum
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Cavitation - high temperature
  • From: sumesh . pt
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Quantum Gravity 178.2: Einstein's c Overruled By Causal Hessian on fxxfyy - fxy^2
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Lorenz transformation, speed of light and now EPR experiment
  • From: Androcles
• Re: goggle error, can't post in main body so i'll post it in subject... Immortalist, in your main exchange with Hammond, The function of Hameroff microtubules mediating quantum coherence in the brain with"orchestrated objective reduction" is to explain the
  • From: Cash Star
• Re: Lorenz transformation, speed of light and now EPR experiment
  • From: Chrisd5000rouge
• Re: Particle motion and wave motion
  • From: malibu
• goggle error, can't post in main body so i'll post it in subject... Immortalist, in your main exchange with Hammond, The function of Hameroff microtubules mediating quantum coherence in the brain with"orchestrated objective reduction" is to explain the global binding of the entire brain that produces a unity which is supposedly called consciousness. Now what you are saying is that we don't need a global binding effect to explain perception and this means given enough advances in computers and processing power. We can make computers conscious without any need for quantum coherence global binding mechanism? It would be cool to meet pure androids that can think and feel like you and I. Is this at all possible?
  • From: Kowstue
• microtubules test
  • From: Kowstue
• test
  • From: Kowstue
• microtubules test
  • From: Kowstue
• Hammond vs Immortalist Microtubules thread
  • From: Kowstue
• Hammond vs Immortalist Microtubules thread
  • From: Kowstue
• re: (are) NDE's "MICROTUBULE CONSCIOUSNESS"?
  • From: Kowstue
• re: (are) NDE's "MICROTUBULE CONSCIOUSNESS"?
  • From: Kowstue
• re: ARE NDE's "MICROTUBULE CONSCIOUSNESS" ?
  • From: Kowstue
• re: ARE NDE's "MICROTUBULE CONSCIOUSNESS" ?
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: Particle motion and wave motion
  • From: PD
• Re: ARE NDE's "MICROTUBULE CONSCIOUSNESS" ?
  • From: Kowstue
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Suri
• Re: Spin water in tube
  • From: Androcles
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Ghosts in Hilbert Space
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Szczepan Bialek
• Re: WTC Towers: The case for Dust in the Lungs
  • From: _dee
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: _dee
• Re: Ghosts in Hilbert Space
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Ghosts in Hilbert Space
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Ghosts in Hilbert Space
  • From: rick_sobie
• Quantum Gravity 178.2: Einstein's c Overruled By Causal Hessian on fxxfyy - fxy^2
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 179.0: Generalized Riccati Differential Equations and Tunneling
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Spin water in tube
  • From: tj Frazir
• Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe?
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Particle motion and wave motion
  • From: srp
• Re: Particle motion and wave motion
  • From: srp
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Particle motion and wave motion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Particle motion and wave motion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jim Black
• Perovskite Properties on Jupiter-like planets
  • From: Darrell Lakin
• New thoughts on Planetary Cores of Jupiter-like worlds
  • From: Darrell Lakin
• New Materials possible in extrasolar planets
  • From: Darrell Lakin
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Quantum Nanotechnology simulates the Mind?
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Spin water in tube
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Spin water in tube
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Quantum Nanotechnology simulates the Mind?
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Spin water in tube
  • From: Androcles
• Spin water in tube
  • From: Harold Burns
• Re: Lorenz transformation, speed of light and now EPR experiment
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Stored ionized gas for ion drives.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Magnets
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Magnets
  • From: CWatters
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Magnets
  • From: Kevin Hunt
• Magnets
  • From: sensible
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorenz transformation, speed of light and now EPR experiment
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Undergarduate physics problems for unergraduate physics students...
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Undergarduate physics problems for unergraduate physics students...
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: PD
• Re: How can a carbon arc generate a wide spectrum
  • From: Igor
• Re: Ghosts in Hilbert Space
  • From: Igor
• Re: Particle motion and wave motion
  • From: PD
• Re: Does efficiency have a definition in physics?
  • From: PD
• Re: Particle motion and wave motion
  • From: Benj
• Lorenz transformation, speed of light and now EPR experiment
  • From: Chrisd5000rouge
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: PD
• Re: Particle motion and wave motion
  • From: PD
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Define proportionality constant in radioactive decay
  • From: PD
• Re: Does efficiency have a definition in physics?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Define proportionality constant in radioactive decay
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Does efficiency have a definition in physics?
  • From: Front Office
• Re: Undergarduate physics problems for unergraduate physics students...
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Undergarduate physics problems for unergraduate physics students...
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Quantum Nanotechnology simulates the Mind?
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: WTC Towers: The case for Dust in the Lungs
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Particle motion and wave motion
  • From: srp
• Re: Define proportionality constant in radioactive decay
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: TIME QUANTIZATION GENESIS PERFECT VACUUM
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Pet Kind-Termination Kits
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Ghosts in Hilbert Space
  • From: Uncle Al
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Suri
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: How can a carbon arc generate a wide spectrum
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Wolfram, networked gravity
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Re: How can a carbon arc generate a wide spectrum
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Looking for a solutions manual to University Physics, 12th ed.
  • From: Maria
• Re: How can a carbon arc generate a wide spectrum
  • From: srp
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Ghosts in Hilbert Space
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: Quantum Gravity 176.5: /Dxy(exp(x +/- y)/ = exp(x +/- y) Conserves Inflation, Not "c"
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Re: Define proportionality constant in radioactive decay
  • From: Robert S
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 19 September 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Greg Neill
• Define proportionality constant in radioactive decay
  • From: Lasse.Karagiannis@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Androcles
• Predicting the outcome.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?
  • From: _dee
• Quantum Gravity 178.1: Hessians Relate Quantum (Macroscopic) Tunneling, Wormholes, Black Holes
  • From: OsherD
• How can a carbon arc generate a wide spectrum
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Time travelers up to their tricks again...
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: lorenz transformation
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: franklinhu
• PHYSICS TEACHING IN INDIAN POLYTECHNICS
  • From: MIM
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Fiesty Blogger
• Re: Determinism
  • From: Flipper, the talking porpoise.
• Re: The Older Clown
  • From: Pmb
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Time travelers up to their tricks again...
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: lorenz transformation
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Time travelers up to their tricks again...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time travelers up to their tricks again...
  • From: Spanker
• Re: Time travelers up to their tricks again...
  • From: rick_sobie
• lorenz transformation and spped of light
  • From: Chrisd5000rouge
• Re: Time travelers up to their tricks again...
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Time travelers up to their tricks again...
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: lorenz transformation
  • From: Chrisd5000rouge
• Re: lorenz transformation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: entropy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Particle motion and wave motion
  • From: Androcles
• Time travelers up to their tricks again...
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: lorenz transformation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: lorenz transformation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Moment of Inertia of solid sphere vs. hollow sphere
  • From: Dwib
• Re: lorenz transformation
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: lorenz transformation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: entropy
  • From: Dwib
• Particle motion and wave motion
  • From: topurabbi
• lorenz transformation
  • From: Chrisd5000rouge
• Re: Moment of Inertia of solid sphere vs. hollow sphere
  • From: guskz
• Re: Wolfram, networked gravity
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Moment of Inertia of solid sphere vs. hollow sphere
  • From: PD
• Wolfram, networked gravity
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Determinism
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Rotational kinetic energy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Nikola Tesla and Wireless Power Transmission
  • From: malibu
• Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village
  • From: Igor
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Igor
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Igor
• Re: Nikola Tesla and Wireless Power Transmission
  • From: Michael Moroney
• Re: Have a science question here is another good spot
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Moment of Inertia of solid sphere vs. hollow sphere
  • From: guskz
• Re: Nikola Tesla and Wireless Power Transmission
  • From: malibu
• Re: Living Math Entities possible?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Living Math Entities possible?
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: Living Math Entities possible?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: is it sun glory?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village
  • From: greysky
• Re: Quantum Computing not practical?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Suri
• Re: Rotational kinetic energy
  • From: quentin
• Re: is it sun glory?
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Rotational kinetic energy
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Moment of Inertia of solid sphere vs. hollow sphere
  • From: Greg Neill
• Moment of Inertia of solid sphere vs. hollow sphere
  • From: quentin
• Rotational kinetic energy
  • From: quentin
• Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: Does efficiency have a definition in physics?
  • From: Androcles
• Instructors' manuals for Engineering books
  • From: modernbooks
• Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Living Math Entities possible?
  • From: Kowstue
• Does efficiency have a definition in physics?
  • From: Ken Miner
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village
  • From: Bob Cain
• Quantum Gravity 178.0: More Re Hessian Determinants and Matrices
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: franklinhu
• Quantum Gravity 176.9: Hessian Matrix (Matrix of Dxy) Is Important
  • From: OsherD
• Re: is it sun glory?
  • From: sdl2112
• Quantum Gravity 176.8: Dxy Generalization of Riccati Differential Equation
  • From: OsherD
• The Long Overdue, Premature Death of SuperString Theory
  • From: JLee
• Quantum Gravity 176.7: Dxy Generates Waves
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Determinism
  • From: Flipper, the talking porpoise.
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Determinism
  • From: John.Leonard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Living Math Entities possible?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: is it sun glory?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: is it sun glory?
  • From: Jaga
• Re: is it sun glory?
  • From: OG
• Re: is it sun glory?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Where can I find torsion wire?
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: is it sun glory?
  • From: Androcles
• is it sun glory?
  • From: Jaga
• Re: Have a science question here is another good spot
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Where can I find torsion wire?
  • From: guskz
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Have a science question here is another good spot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Nikola Tesla and Wireless Power Transmission
  • From: Androcles
• Re: entropy
  • From: Florian
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Nikola Tesla and Wireless Power Transmission
  • From: eBiker
• Re: Have a science question here is another good spot
  • From: mrannals
• Re: entropy
  • From: Benj
• Re: Shrinking Kilogram Bewilders Physicists
  • From: Mas Plak
• Nikola Tesla and Wireless Power Transmission
  • From: danbos
• Re: entropy
  • From: malibu
• Re: entropy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Where can I find torsion wire?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Igor
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Igor
• Re: how to isolate UPS radiation
  • From: boson boss
• Re: how to isolate UPS radiation
  • From: boson boss
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Szczepan Bialek
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Szczepan Bialek
• Re: entropy
  • From: Dwib
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Determinism
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village
  • From: Igor
• Re: entropy
  • From: Igor
• entropy
  • From: malibu
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Igor
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Igor
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Igor
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: uri
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: srp
• Re: Have a science question here is another good spot
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Living Math Entities possible?
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village
  • From: Kowstue
• Have a science question here is another good spot
  • From: mrannals
• Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: solution manual for Fluid Mechanics (Frank M. White)
  • From: mrannals
• Re: Is Polkinghorne Correct?
  • From: mrannals
• Re: Living Math Entities possible?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: elliptic and hyperbolic forms
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Nonlinear Physics, Coupled Map Lattice, Circular Maps
  • From: Androcles
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Suri
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Living Math Entities possible?
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Where can I find torsion wire?
  • From: guskz
• Re: Where can I find torsion wire?
  • From: guskz
• Re: Where can I find torsion wire?
  • From: guskz
• Nonlinear Physics, Coupled Map Lattice, Circular Maps
  • From: B^3
• Re: Where can I find torsion wire?
  • From: guskz
• Re: elliptic and hyperbolic forms
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: elliptic and hyperbolic forms
  • From: pol
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: quentin
• Re: Pass
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Szczepan Bialek
• Re: Shrinking Kilogram Bewilders Physicists
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Living Math Entities possible?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Szczepan Bialek
• Re: Equivalence Principle and how to prove it probabilistically.
  • From: AutoCrank
• Re: Was Einstein totally and completely wrong?
  • From: AutoCrank
• Re: Nemsis and Nexus star core
  • From: AutoCrank
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Shrinking Kilogram Bewilders Physicists
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Where can I find torsion wire?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Where can I find torsion wire?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Particle Pairs,and One being Virtual ?
  • From: Flipper, the talking porpoise.
• Shrinking Kilogram Bewilders Physicists
  • From: dlham
• Re: Determinism
  • From: Flipper, the talking porpoise.
• Re: Where can I find torsion wire?
  • From: guskz
• Re: Where can I find torsion wire?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Mother Earth's Interior Is HOLLOW and POPULATED
  • From: Helium Nickle Knob
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Where can I find torsion wire?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: INFINITE HYDROGEN ENERGY!!!
  • From: Will Janoschka
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Living Math Entities possible?
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Pass
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Coefficient of restitution tables
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• T.J., Are you using a submersible ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Living Math Entities possible?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Living Math Entities possible?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: YBM
• Re: Living Math Entities possible?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Living Math Entities possible?
  • From: Pmb
• The cosmos “ Just is. ”... it doesn't “ happen ”.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Living Math Entities possible?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Living Math Entities possible?
  • From: Kowstue
• Re: What dose "paper in preparation" means?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Information of ship Sale & Purchase
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: energy produced by steam ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: energy produced by steam ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What dose "paper in preparation" means?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What dose "paper in preparation" means?
  • From: nure123
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: YBM
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: srp
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Age of the universe
  • From: BURT
• Re: Nemsis and Nexus star core
  • From: BURT
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: srp
• Re: earths polarity
  • From: CWatters
• Re: energy produced by steam ?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Androcles
• Re: OT: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 14 Sep 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: energy produced by steam ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: energy produced by steam ?
  • From: OG
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Szczepan Bialek
• Re: What dose "paper in preparation" means?
  • From: PD
• Alliance of Opposites: Electrons and positrons make new molecule
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Radiometer cause.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: elliptic and hyperbolic forms
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Determinism
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is Polkinghorne Correct?
  • From: Igor
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: srp
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 839 September 17, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Suri
• Is Polkinghorne Correct?
  • From: Paul Grieg
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: srp
• Re: What dose "paper in preparation" means?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• solution manual for Fluid Mechanics (Frank M. White)
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 14 Sep 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Planet People & Moon People
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Planet People & Moon People
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Particle Pairs,and One being Virtual ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: PD
• Quantum Gravity 176.6: Dxy Versus Dtt And Toward A Quantum Gravity Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Coefficient of restitution tables
  • From: Peter
• energy produced by steam ?
  • From: airconsol
• Re: elliptic and hyperbolic forms
  • From: pol
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: quentin
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Sep 17, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Richard Feynman and His Views on Wave Theory of EM?
  • From: Bob Cain
• What is so "micro" in microcanonical ensemble?
  • From: Mev
• Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: shrinking kilogram bewilders scientists
  • From: Remus
• Re: Planet People & Moon People
  • From: Remus
• Quantum Gravity 176.5: /Dxy(exp(x +/- y)/ = exp(x +/- y) Conserves Inflation, Not "c"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Pass
  • From: Jeckyl
• How an electrostatic gravity is possible
  • From: franklinhu
• Quantum Gravity 176.4: Time Influences Space By Wrapping Around It
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Pass
  • From: Pointer
• Re: earths polarity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• earths polarity
  • From: aaron479
• Re: How Math Creates a Universe
  • From: Rushtown
• Re: Particle Pairs,and One being Virtual ?
  • From: Flipper, the talking porpoise.
• Re: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Pass
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Particle Pairs,and One being Virtual ?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Determinism
  • From: Flipper, the talking porpoise.
• Re: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation
  • From: wlawleriv
• Re: Loschmidt Number and Avogadro Number - What relation?
  • From: Robert Martinu
• Re: Quantum Gravity 176.3: Gumbel's Bivariate Exponential Distribution in Second Mixed Partial Probable Correlation and Entanglement Equation
  • From: AutoCrank
• Re: The Core - The Central Force of the Universe
  • From: AutoCrank
• Re: Nemsis and Nexus star core
  • From: AutoCrank
• Re: Equivalence Principle and how to prove it probabilistically.
  • From: AutoCrank
• Re: #17 Replacing General Relativity by Dirac's Sea of Positrons; Does Cosmos have two Spaces?; new book: Growing-Solar-System theory via Dirac New-Radioactivity replaces Nebular-Dust-Cloud theory
  • From: AutoCrank
• Re: shrinking kilogram bewilders scientists
  • From: YBM
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: YBM
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: YBM
• Nemsis and Nexus star core
  • From: BURT
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Planet People & Moon People
  • From: Pointer
• Re: Planet People & Moon People
  • From: Rushtown
• Re: elliptic and hyperbolic forms
  • From: Androcles
• Planet People & Moon People
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Anti Neutron
  • From: BURT
• Re: elliptic and hyperbolic forms
  • From: pol
• Re: Determinism
  • From: Flipper, the talking porpoise.
• Pass
  • From: BURT
• Re: elliptic and hyperbolic forms
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What dose "paper in preparation" means?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Physics Today
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Re: Determinism
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Richard Feynman and His Views on Wave Theory of EM?
  • From: guskz
• Re: Determinism
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Particle Pairs,and One being Virtual ?
  • From: Flipper, the talking porpoise.
• What dose "paper in preparation" means?
  • From: nure123
• Re: Determinism
  • From: Flipper, the talking porpoise.
• Re: Double-slit experiment
  • From: Christian Dicken
• Re: The beginning of Time.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Y.Porat
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Eser
• Re: Determinism
  • From: Flipper, the talking porpoise.
• Particle Pairs,and One being Virtual ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Richard Feynman and His Views on Wave Theory of EM?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The beginning of Time.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: PD
• Re: Sagnac Idiocy
  • From: AutoCrank
• Re: Equivalence Principle and how to prove it probabilistically.
  • From: AutoCrank
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• elliptic and hyperbolic forms
  • From: pol
• ZPE also in space?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Kilogram prototype mysteriously loses weight
  • From: hanson
• Re: Richard Feynman and His Views on Wave Theory of EM?
  • From: Androcles
• Double-slit experiment
  • From: alien
• Determinism
  • From: John.Leonard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Equivalence Principle and how to prove it probabilistically.
  • From: AutoCrank
• Re: Richard Feynman and His Views on Wave Theory of EM?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• chicken
  • From: Flipper, the talking porpoise.
• Re: Richard Feynman and His Views on Wave Theory of EM?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Richard Feynman and His Views on Wave Theory of EM?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Richard Feynman and His Views on Wave Theory of EM?
  • From: Michael Asherman
• Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars
  • From: malibu
• Re: Richard Feynman and His Views on Wave Theory of EM?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Richard Feynman and His Views on Wave Theory of EM?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Richard Feynman and His Views on Wave Theory of EM?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Richard Feynman and His Views on Wave Theory of EM?
  • From: OG
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: BRAIN FRY -- Problem #1
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars
  • From: malibu
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: bodies on earth
  • From: malibu
• Richard Feynman and His Views on Wave Theory of EM?
  • From: Chris
• Re: bodies on earth
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• bodies on earth
  • From: malibu
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: Mather
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: sno
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: jimp
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: Mather
• Re: Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Perpetual motion is possible
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Did man really walk on the moon? (seriously)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Did man really walk on the moon? (seriously)
  • From: CWatters
• Re: So, what if we took a kilogram, calibrated it against the reference, and flew it once around the world?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: So, what if we took a kilogram, calibrated it against the reference, and flew it once around the world?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Could there be a connection between standard kilogram having less weight then its copies, and Pioneer's anomalous acceleration?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars
  • From: Flipper, the talking porpoise.
• Re: So, what if we took a kilogram, calibrated it against the reference, and flew it once around the world?
  • From: Androcles
• So, what if we took a kilogram, calibrated it against the reference, and flew it once around the world?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: God and Leonhard Euler
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: srp
• Re: Coefficient of restitution
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars
  • From: hanson
• Re: Coefficient of restitution
  • From: Peter
• Re: Could there be a connection between standard kilogram having less weight then its copies, and Pioneer's anomalous acceleration?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars
  • From: malibu
• Re: Coefficient of restitution
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Solidifying space mirrors in space?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Eser
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Eser
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Eser
• Coefficient of restitution
  • From: Peter
• all stars
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Benj
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Y.Porat
• Quantum Gravity 176.3: Gumbel's Bivariate Exponential Distribution in Second Mixed Partial Probable Correlation and Entanglement Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Y.Porat
• Quantum Gravity 177.0 (miss-sent to sci.physics.relativity): Polynomials Identified As x -y Differences By Chinese
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars
  • From: malibu
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Thundercloud "accelerator" fires gamma-ray beam?
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Thundercloud "accelerator" fires gamma-ray beam?
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: The beginning of Time.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: shrinking kilogram bewilders scientists
  • From: srp
• Re: The Reason why ALL mass is at "c"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: srp
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: BRAIN FRY -- Problem #1
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars
  • From: Flipper, the talking porpoise.
• professional fiber optic equipment manufacturer sources
  • From: henyi99@xxxxxxx
• Re: BRAIN FRY -- Problem #1
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: BRAIN FRY -- Problem #1
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars
  • From: malibu
• BRAIN FRY -- Problem #1
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: why dark energy density is small
  • From: Flipper, the talking porpoise.
• Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Experiment finds graphene's missing pi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• I Shall Rebuild Physics From The Ground Up, to Suit My Eclectic Tastes
  • From: Flipper, the talking porpoise.
• Christine's worst habits are: 1. Food, 2. Casual Sex.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime
  • From: Flipper, the talking porpoise.
• Re: Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime
  • From: Flipper, the talking porpoise.
• Re: Did man really walk on the moon? (seriously)
  • From: jimp
• Re: Did man really walk on the moon? (seriously)
  • From: Dac
• Re: Did man really walk on the moon? (seriously)
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Virtual Arrow of Time.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Einstein's energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG! moron
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Could there be a connection between standard kilogram having less weight then its copies, and Pioneer's anomalous acceleration?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Reason why ALL mass is at "c"
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Did man really walk on the moon? (seriously)
  • From: Dac
• Re: Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: PD
• OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 14 Sep 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Multiple problems push LHC start to next spring
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Randy Poe
• INFINITE HYDROGEN ENERGY!!!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Could there be a connection between standard kilogram having less weight then its copies, and Pioneer's anomalous acceleration?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Did man really walk on the moon? (seriously)
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Moving masses, time-deletion and the expanding Universe, and the standard kilogram (take 2)
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: cavitation temperature
  • From: Szczepan Bialek
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: cavitation temperature
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: shrinking kilogram bewilders scientists
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: shrinking kilogram bewilders scientists
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: jimp
• Re: shrinking kilogram bewilders scientists
  • From: srp
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Did man really walk on the moon? (seriously)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Undergarduate physics problems for unergraduate physics students...
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Did man really walk on the moon? (seriously)
  • From: jimp
• Re: Did man really walk on the moon? (seriously)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: cavitation temperature
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: star-man
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: cavitation temperature
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The beginning of Time.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: srp
• Re: Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Did man really walk on the moon? (seriously)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Did man really walk on the moon? (seriously)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Did man really walk on the moon? (seriously)
  • From: Dac
• Many Solutions Manuals and Ebooks in Electronic (PDF)Format!
  • From: solutionpaypay
• Re: Did man really walk on the moon? (seriously)
  • From: Randy Poe
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Eser
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Did man really walk on the moon? (seriously)
  • From: Dac
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The beginning of Time.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime
  • From: Flipper, the talking porpoise.
• Re: Another Error of Einstein: The Calculation of Starlight Bending
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• cavitation temperature
  • From: sumesh . pt
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: star-man
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?
  • From: Bob Cain
• star-man
  • From: malibu
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime
  • From: Flipper, the talking porpoise.
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Still More Proof: Erica Gisse knows crap about Spacetime
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: jimp
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• why dark energy density is small
  • From: Jack Sarfatti
• Re: Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime
  • From: Dac
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime
  • From: Dac
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?
  • From: Dac
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: einsteintheretard
• Re: Undergarduate physics problems for unergraduate physics students...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Kilo prototype mysteriously loses weight
  • From: George
• Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?
  • From: George
• professionalism in science
  • From: galathaea
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: einsteintheretard
• Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?
  • From: George
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: einsteintheretard
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Grouchy
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: srp
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Undergarduate physics problems for unergraduate physics students...
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: PD
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: srp
• Re: Kilogram prototype mysteriously loses weight
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Undergarduate physics problems for unergraduate physics students...
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: srp
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: srp
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• "Specialized Search Engines" along with Google Search Capability
  • From: prashant.thanki@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Androcles
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Thundercloud "accelerator" fires gamma-ray beam?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Thundercloud "accelerator" fires gamma-ray beam?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: srp
• solution manual
  • From: solutionpaypay
• Re: Thundercloud "accelerator" fires gamma-ray beam?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Undergarduate physics problems for unergraduate physics students...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• michael lalonde sudbury stalker
  • From: wdrpower
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Eser
• shrinking kilogram bewilders scientists
  • From: mohammadsidiquekhan
• Re: God and Leonhard Euler
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Can a box's weight change due to internal change?
  • From: Dac
• Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?
  • From: Dac
• Re: Can a box's weight change due to internal change?
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?
  • From: Dac
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: srp
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: srp
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: srp
• Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weigh
  • From: Anonymous Sender
• Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?
  • From: Aage Andersen
• Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: I need some suggestions
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?
  • From: Aage Andersen
• Re: Undergarduate physics problems for unergraduate physics students...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Kilo prototype mysteriously loses weight
  • From: Aage Andersen
• Kilo prototype mysteriously loses weight
  • From: Dac
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Thundercloud "accelerator" fires gamma-ray beam?
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Undergarduate physics problems for unergraduate physics students...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Undergarduate physics problems for unergraduate physics students...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Flipper, the talking porpoise.
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Flipper, the talking porpoise.
• Kilogram prototype mysteriously loses weight
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Thundercloud "accelerator" fires gamma-ray beam?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Can Quantum Gravity Bring Back JFK or Resurrect the Dead?
  • From: Dac
• Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Benj
• Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Can Quantum Gravity Bring Back JFK or Resurrect the Dead?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: galathaea
• Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: Androcles
• Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: Androcles
• Can Quantum Gravity Bring Back JFK or Resurrect the Dead?
  • From: Dac
• Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: PD
• Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: Androcles
• Re: I need some suggestions
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Heisenberg's boat ride through TWO SLITS.
  • From: Captain Monkeynuts
• Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: Androcles
• Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: PD
• Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: Androcles
• Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: hanson
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Jeez, that was close
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: PD
• Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Presumption of amateur status
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Jeez, that was close
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Presumption of amateur status
  • From: PD
• Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: I need some suggestions
  • From: PD
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Jeckyl
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Eser
• Re: Double-Slit with single photons and electrons etc.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: I need some suggestions
  • From: srp
• Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: srp
• Re: Qm has to be considered as an experimental limited Theory !!
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: yinbing-zhou
• Re: I need some suggestions
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Proof: Erica Gisse knows NOTHING about SPACETIME.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Germany builds röntgen laser
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: I need some suggestions
  • From: Androcles
• I need some suggestions
  • From: thinktank
• Quantum Gravity 176.2: Second Mixed Partial Probable Correlation and Entanglement Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 176.1: More Re Second Mixed Partial Derivative is Causation-Related
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Gauge Symmetry
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Can a home go free on electricity?
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Can a home go free on electricity?
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Can a home go free on electricity?
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Gravity and Temperature
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: malibu
• Gauge Symmetry
  • From: Blah
• Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Gravity and Temperature
  • From: galathaea
• Re: What is the photons direction??
  • From: Florian
• The Holy Book 2.0 (beta) Has Pictures!
  • From: Michael Hell
• Quantum Geometry
  • From: rafael
• Re: What is the photons direction??
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is the photons direction??
  • From: PD
• Re: Can a home go free on electricity?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: What is the photons direction??
  • From: martin
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron.
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Examples
  • From: newsgr . mail
• Re: time beginning
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is the photons direction??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• What is the photons direction??
  • From: martin
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Eser
• Re: Loschmidt Number and Avogadro Number - What relation?
  • From: meda
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Loschmidt Number and Avogadro Number - What relation?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: Jim Black
• History Detectives, Physics Segment
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Quantum Gravity 176.0: Second Mixed Partial Derivative is Causation-Related
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Loschmidt Number and Avogadro Number - What relation?
  • From: meda
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: hanson
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 175.51: Poles and Belgians Generalize Entanglement and Quantum Computation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: time beginning
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Gravity and Temperature
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: Can a home go free on electricity?
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Can a home go free on electricity?
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Can a home go free on electricity?
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Loschmidt Number and Avogadro Number - What relation?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: hanson
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Antigravity, our doom? (or best way)
  • From: hanson
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: hanson
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: malibu
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: malibu
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Antigravity, our doom? (or best way)
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: time beginning
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Antigravity, our doom? (or best way)
  • From: hanson
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Antigravity, our doom? (or best way)
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: Can a home go free on electricity?
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Tesla and free energy
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Antigravity, our doom? (or best way)
  • From: hanson
• Re: Tesla and free energy
  • From: gb6726
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Benj
• Re: DID AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS REFUTE EINSTEIN?
  • From: Pom Trotter
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Can a home go free on electricity?
  • From: Dave of Physics
• Re: Can a home go free on electricity?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tesla and free energy
  • From: malibu
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Tesla and free energy
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Tesla and free energy
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Tesla and free energy
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Free energy
  • From: Gieniu
• Re: Tesla and free energy
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Antigravity, our doom? (or best way)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Tesla and free energy
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Gravity and Temperature
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Can a home go free on electricity?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Tesla and free energy
  • From: gb6726
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Can a home go free on electricity?
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Can a home go free on electricity?
  • From: gb6726
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Jeez, that was close
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: malibu
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Eser
• Re: Can a home go free on electricity?
  • From: gb6726
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Can a home go free on electricity?
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Can a home go free on electricity?
  • From: gb6726
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: srp
• Re: Can a home go free on electricity?
  • From: gb6726
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: time beginning
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Aliens are Coming!
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Antigravity, our doom? (or best way)
  • From: hanson
• Re: time beginning
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Can a home go free on electricity?
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Qm has tobe considered as an experimentaly limited Theory !!
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Can a home go free on electricity?
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Global warming - Is it a bad thing?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Antigravity, our doom? (or best way)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: PD
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: PD
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: PD
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: einsteintheretard
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: Piss poor design led to Klondike III tower collapse?
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: photons
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: photons
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?
  • From: srp
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Negative Temperature Achieved in Microwave Egg Poacher
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Ian Parker
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Sep 10, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Loschmidt Number and Avogadro Number - What relation?
  • From: meda
• Re: Global warming - Is it a bad thing?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Y.Porat
• Tesla and free energy
  • From: Ragamafin
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: Jim Black
• Quantum Gravity 171.91: The String-Wave or Brane-Wave
  • From: OsherD
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 171.9: Waves As Alternating-Sign Objects
  • From: OsherD
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Benj
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: malibu
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time beginning
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: time beginning
  • From: malibu
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• More on the "Big Bang"...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: time beginning
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Global warming - Is it a bad thing?
  • From: Remus
• Re: time beginning
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: time beginning
  • From: malibu
• Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: time beginning
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: time beginning
  • From: malibu
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: hanson
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Global warming Theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Jeez, that was close
  • From: Sam Wormley
• time beginning
  • From: Blah
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Rex
• Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: Rex
• Re: Global warming Theory
  • From: jimbo
• Jeez, that was close
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Negative Temperature Achieved in Microwave Egg Poacher
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Negative Temperature Achieved in Microwave Egg Poacher
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Global warming Theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Negative Temperature Achieved in Microwave Egg Poacher
  • From: Ron Hardin
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: Global warming Theory
  • From: Igor
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: Igor
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: Szczepan Bialek
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: photons
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Quantum Computing not practical?
  • From: socal_dan2000
• Re: Quantum Computing not practical?
  • From: socal_dan2000
• Re: Global warming Theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Global warming Theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Piss poor design led to Klondike III tower collapse?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Global warming Theory
  • From: jimbo
• "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Olp
• Re: Quantum Spacetime
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: nonsense
• Re: Physicists have managed to entangle two individual atomic ions
  • From: srp
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Rex
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Rex
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: guskz
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Dinosaur extinction linked to colliding asteroids???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quantum Computing not practical?
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: merl blake
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mars polar pit gullies currently forming?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Double-Slit with single photons and electrons etc.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Relativity and Chaos
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Quantum Spacetime
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: Rex
• What's the appearance of stationary light?
  • From: Rex
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Hey Google! Here's another GREAT idea!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• thermoelectric cooled or non dry ice based cloud chamber?
  • From: Will Holden
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: the pseudoskeptic
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Microtubules noisefree enough for quantum coherence?
  • From: Rex
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Global warming Theory
  • From: Benj
• Re: Global warming Theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Copyright Protection
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 175.8: Intermission on Relationship Between Riccati Differential Equation and Inventiveness
  • From: OsherD
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: Szczepan Bialek
• Re: I've been "Jew'ed"
  • From: hanson
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Rex
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Jeckyl
• Copyright Protection
  • From: Jean
• Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness
  • From: Rex
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Sven Geier
• Global warming Theory
  • From: jimbo
• Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Rex
• Quantum Gravity 175.7: Symmetric Matrices, Symmetric Tensors of Rank 2, Hermitian Matrices
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Georges Lemaitre -- Unsung visionary in physics and astronomy
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Y.Porat
• Many Solutions Manuals and Ebooks in Electronic (PDF)Format!
  • From: solutionpaypay
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Physicists have managed to entangle two individual atomic ions
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Rex
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Rex
• Re: I've been "Jew'ed"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon
  • From: Robert S
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: PD
• Re: Greenhelm Engineering Opportunities
  • From: Robert S
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: PD
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: PD
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: hanson
• Quantum Computing not practical?
  • From: socal_dan2000
• Re: Greenhelm Engineering Opportunities
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: PD
• Re: Physicists have managed to entangle two individual atomic ions
  • From: Engineering Calculations
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: merl blake
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon
  • From: Igor
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: PD
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: Sue...
• Re: how to isolate UPS radiation
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Beyond the Big Bang" -- History Channel
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• "Beyond the Big Bang" -- History Channel
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: nonsense
• Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon
  • From: Androcles
• Colour of the eclipsed Moon
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: Tunguska objects changed directions??
  • From: Rex
• Re: Tunguska objects changed directions??
  • From: Benj
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Gravity"
  • From: Olp
• Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?
  • From: PD
• Re: Hey Google! Here's another GREAT idea!
  • From: PD
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Tunguska objects changed directions??
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Sven Geier
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Sven Geier
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: dhawal damle
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: dhawal damle
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Rex
• Tunguska objects changed directions??
  • From: Rex
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Many Solutions Manuals and Ebooks in Electronic (PDF)Format!
  • From: paysolution
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: srp
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: srp
• Re: photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: meda
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: srp
• Re: Physicists have managed to entangle two individual atomic ions
  • From: srp
• Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?
  • From: srp
• Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: srp
• Re: Quantum Spacetime
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Dwib
• Re: how to isolate UPS radiation
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: plenty of rain on new planet
  • From: boson boss
• Re: how to isolate UPS radiation
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: meda
• Re: photons
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: photons
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?
  • From: meda
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness
  • From: Rex
• Re: Gravity, space-time, and black holes?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: srp
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Physicists have managed to entangle two individual atomic ions
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: plenty of rain on new planet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: plenty of rain on new planet
  • From: hanson
• Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: photons
  • From: Androcles
• OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 7 Sep 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness
  • From: Rex
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Numerical/Physical Modeler and Analyst - Metron (Northern VA)
  • From: vincent64@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: photons
  • From: PD
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: PD
• Re: photons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: photons
  • From: PD
• Re: Scientists find easy way to send information to the past!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: plenty of rain on new planet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity, space-time, and black holes?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity, space-time, and black holes?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: plenty of rain on new planet
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Fine Structure constants?
  • From: hanson
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Dwib
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Dwib
• Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: Dwib
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Fine Structure constants?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: photons
  • From: Randy Poe
• The Reason why no mass can move at "c"
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness
  • From: Rex
• Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness
  • From: Rex
• Re: Physicists have managed to entangle two individual atomic ions
  • From: srp
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 838 September 7, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity, space-time, and black holes?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: photons
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: photons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: photons
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Gravity, space-time, and black holes?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Antigravity, our doom?
  • From: pipoxyz
• Re: photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• plenty of rain on new planet
  • From: boson boss
• Re: how to isolate UPS radiation
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Possible Proof that Heisenberg's princilple is INVALID
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.921: Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Defective
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: einsteintheretard
• Re: how to isolate UPS radiation
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: einsteintheretard
• how to isolate UPS radiation
  • From: boson boss
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: nonsense
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Olp
• Re: photons
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: photons
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: photons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: entangled particles as one particle
  • From: PD
• Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness
  • From: Rex
• Re: photons
  • From: PD
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: PD
• Re: Would a current deviate an electron beyond a 2 slit wall?
  • From: guskz
• Re: Possible Proof that Heisenberg's princilple is INVALID
  • From: guskz
• Re: This experiment would end Heisenberg's theory.
  • From: guskz
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hey Google! Here's another GREAT idea!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Hey Google! Here's another GREAT idea!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Hey Google! Here's another GREAT idea!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Gravity, space-time, and black holes?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: The Relative Theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: dhawal damle
• Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: nonsense
• electric field in a current carrying conductor
  • From: dhawal damle
• Re: photon energy
  • From: Quantum_Ranger
• Re: Quantum Spacetime
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Quantum Gravity 170.921: Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Defective
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 170.921: Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Defective
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Benj
• Physicists have managed to entangle two individual atomic ions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Many Solutions Manuals and Ebooks in Electronic (PDF)Format!
  • From: solutionpaypay
• Re: Is the Universe Expanding ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is the Universe Expanding ?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually.
  • From: Jeckyl
• The Relative Theory
  • From: mashuo2008@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gravity, space-time, and black holes?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is the Universe Expanding ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: photon energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Gravity, space-time, and black holes?
  • From: thomat65
• Re: Is the Universe Expanding ?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: photon energy
  • From: malibu
• Re: photon energy
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness
  • From: Androcles
• Re: dimension's
  • From: Anthony Davis
• Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness
  • From: Uncle Al
• photon energy
  • From: conrad
• can I PLEASE have physics giancoli 6th edition solution manual
  • From: charlie_86_99
• Re: dimension's
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: entangled particles as one particle
  • From: Rex
• Re: Why isn't pitch-black dark under a shadow?
  • From: OG
• Biophysics of Self-Awareness
  • From: Rex
• dimension's
  • From: jimbo
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Why isn't pitch-black dark under a shadow?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Why isn't pitch-black dark under a shadow?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Why isn't pitch-black dark under a shadow?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: einsteintheretard
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Hey Google! Here's another GREAT idea!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Why isn't pitch-black dark under a shadow?
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Why isn't pitch-black dark under a shadow?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Why isn't pitch-black dark under a shadow?
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Why isn't pitch-black dark under a shadow?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: einsteintheretard
• Why isn't pitch-black dark under a shadow?
  • From: Stem sells
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: PD
• Re: Would a current deviate an electron beyond a 2 slit wall?
  • From: Igor
• Re: This experiment would end Heisenberg's theory.
  • From: Igor
• entangled particles as one particle
  • From: menkaur@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This experiment would end Heisenberg's theory.
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: einsteintheretard
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: photons
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Saturn's Hexagonal Polar Feature Explained
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Saturn's Hexagonal Polar Feature Explained
  • From: NoEinstein
• This experiment would end Heisenberg's theory.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hey Google! Here's another GREAT idea!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: PD
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: PD
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Hey Google! Here's another GREAT idea!
  • From: PD
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: einsteintheretard
• Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: guskz
• Re: Let's Pretend
  • From: Androcles
• Let's Pretend
  • From: einsteintheretard
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Olp
• Re: Is the Universe Expanding ?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Is the Universe Expanding ?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: How can a Black Hole be hollow?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Hey Google! Here's another GREAT idea!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Physics of Consciousness & Momemtum Energy
  • From: Rex
• Re: Physics of Consciousness & Momemtum Energy
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Physics of Consciousness & Momemtum Energy
  • From: Rex
• Re: Physics of Consciousness & Momemtum Energy
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell
  • From: marc
• Re: Physics of Consciousness & Momemtum Energy
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Physics of Consciousness & Momemtum Energy
  • From: Rex
• Re: Physics of Consciousness & Momemtum Energy
  • From: Jeckyl
• Get Your Space on Pishnut Space For Free and Send Free Ecards
  • From: Nina Fawn
• Re: Physics of Consciousness & Momemtum Energy
  • From: Rex
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Missing Galaxy cluster Shadows and Huge CMB Voids seems to reason for a new raspberry shaped multiverse.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Physics of Consciousness & Momemtum Energy
  • From: Jeckyl
• I Will Rebuild Physics from the Ground Up in a Form which more Suits my Tastes.
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Physics of Consciousness & Momemtum Energy
  • From: Rex
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 5 September 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: photons
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually.
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Possible Proof that Heisenberg's princilple is INVALID
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Would a current deviate an electron beyond a 2 slit wall?
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: srp
• Re: Stacking repelling magnets
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Would a current deviate an electron beyond a 2 slit wall?
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: black holes are white!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is the Universe Expanding ?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: Igor
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: PD
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: meda
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: srp
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: meda
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: srp
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Olp
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: meda
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Feral cats die sooner, but they have more fun.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: srp
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: srp
• Is the Universe Expanding ?
  • From: gdjbryan
• ElectroMagnetic radiation through 2 slits causes interference patterns
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Possible Proof that Heisenberg's princilple is INVALID
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: meda
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: meda
• Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Specialized search engine for: Physics, maths and philosophy
  • From: prashant.thanki@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Missing Galaxy cluster Shadows and Huge CMB Voids seems to reason for a new raspberry shaped multiverse.
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: PD
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: PD
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: PD
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: PD
• Missing Galaxy cluster Shadows and Huge CMB Voids seems to reason for a new raspberry shaped multiverse.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Nikola Tesluman: His Lightning Staff & Far-Seeing Crystal Ball
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Missing Galaxy cluster Shadows and Huge CMB Voids seems to reason for a new raspberry shaped multiverse.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: black holes are white!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Feral cats die sooner, but they have more fun.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: mike3
• Re: China freer than USA? :-)
  • From: mike3
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Macro Micro Planck
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: Dwib
• Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2
  • From: meda
• Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: srp
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Physics High School Teacher
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physics High School Teacher
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio
  • From: hanson
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: srp
• Re: gravitational force
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Physics High School Teacher
  • From: hanson
• Re: Quantum Gravity 175.3: How Can a Probability Suddenly "Pop Up"?
  • From: Igor
• Jeff Relf is a lazy, deluded and deadbeat bastard.
  • From: hanson
• Re: G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Androcles
• Re: bowling ball
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physics High School Teacher
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Iranian classicl music
  • From: Androcles
• Re: gravitational force
  • From: Androcles
• Re: applications of light penetrative capacity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Saturn's Hexagonal Polar Feature Explained
  • From: Benj
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: srp
• Re: Physics High School Teacher
  • From: Benj
• Re: Saturn's Hexagonal Polar Feature Explained
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Like T.J., Hanson and Potter, Porat is a rich/deluded bastard.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Saturn's Hexagonal Polar Feature Explained
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Physics High School Teacher
  • From: hanson
• The Psychology of Physics.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: bowling ball
  • From: Dwib
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Dwib
• Re: gravitational force
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: gravitational force
  • From: Sue...
• Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Disproving Einstein's General Relativity (GR)
  • From: sekots via NatScience.com
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: srp
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Olp
• Many Solutions Manuals and Ebooks in Electronic (PDF)Format!
  • From: solutionpaypay
• Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Physics High School Teacher
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: bowling ball
  • From: thorstenkranz
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: salam, i want to lknow about the complete procedure of production of sound
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mathematicians versus Semanticists
  • From: John Christiansen
• Re: Mathematicians versus Semanticists
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Quantum Gravity 175.6: Frank Wilczek On Pessimistic vs Optimistic Theories
  • From: OsherD
• salam, i want to lknow about the complete procedure of production of sound
  • From: lyba_syed
• Quantum Gravity 175.6: Frank Wilczek On Pessimistic vs Optimistic Theories
  • From: OsherD
• Re: GAB NOMINATION: Re: The German Archives
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: bowling ball
  • From: Androcles
• Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: bowling ball
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: bowling ball
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is Energy Required to Produce 1 Gal of Ethanol less than Energy obtained by burning 1 gal of Ethanol??
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Physics High School Teacher
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Mathematicians versus Semanticists
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Conserved vs Constrained
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist
  • From: merl blake
• Carl Zeiss Microscopy - New Onlineshop!
  • From: CZ Micha
• Re: Conserved vs Constrained
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Iranian classicl music
  • From: Androcles
• Re: applications of light penetrative capacity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: gravitational force
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physics High School Teacher
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Conserved vs Constrained
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Mathematicians versus Semanticists
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Conserved vs Constrained
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Physics High School Teacher
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Stacking repelling magnets
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: bowling ball
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Earth Started inflating at 1 G ???
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: gravitational force
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Iranian classicl music
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physics High School Teacher
  • From: Androcles
• Re: applications of light penetrative capacity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physics High School Teacher
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Iranian classicl music
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: applications of light penetrative capacity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: gravitational force
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: PAMELA DEFENDS EINSTEIN
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Strange Optical Effect
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: Stacking repelling magnets
  • From: Tom
• 3 electrons with definite total spin (like spin triplet/singlet)?
  • From: Anton81
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Olp
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Macro Micro Planck
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: THE OBSERVABLE UNIVERSE
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Physics High School Teacher
  • From: Androcles
• Re: applications of light penetrative capacity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Energy requirements for a matter-antimatter converter?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Energy requirements for a matter-antimatter converter?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Strange Optical Effect
  • From: Androcles
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Sep 03, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Conserved vs Constrained
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: How many idiots does it take to confirm an idiocy like RT ?
  • From: John Park
• Quantum Gravity 175.5: Entropy of Entanglement and Holographic Principle and Dark Energy
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 175.4: Intermission Regarding Trolls and Internet Graffiti Artists
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Strange Optical Effect
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: Quantum Gravity 175.3: How Can a Probability Suddenly "Pop Up"?
  • From: OsherD
• Physics High School Teacher
  • From: S-Levy
• Re: Quantum Gravity 175.3: How Can a Probability Suddenly "Pop Up"?
  • From: OsherD
• Iranian classicl music
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: fust advice
  • From: q-bit
• Is Energy Required to Produce 1 Gal of Ethanol less than Energy obtained by burning 1 gal of Ethanol??
  • From: Bernard Isker
• Re: bowling ball
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Question from a Sci-Fi Writer
  • From: Mike Bass
• Re: G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: the entirely absolutely final complete collection of ideas
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: gravitational force
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: applications of light penetrative capacity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Energy requirements for a matter-antimatter converter?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: the entirely absolutely final complete collection of ideas
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: gravitational force
  • From: Rex
• Re: the entirely absolutely final complete collection of ideas
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: the entirely absolutely final complete collection of ideas
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Macro Micro Planck
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: the entirely absolutely final complete collection of ideas
  • From: Uncle Al
• Energy requirements for a matter-antimatter converter?
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: plasma
  • From: Uncle Al
• Physicists versus Logicians
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: gravitational force
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Conserved vs Constrained
  • From: Igor
• Re: G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: THE OBSERVABLE UNIVERSE
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Conserved vs Constrained
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: gravitational force
  • From: Igor
• Re: Forex Trading - Scam or Ligitimate Money Maker
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: THE OBSERVABLE UNIVERSE
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Spacetime the Matrix??
  • From: nonsense
• Re: Conserved vs Constrained
  • From: Igor
• fust advice
  • From: idursun08@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Strange Optical Effect
  • From: Androcles
• Re: bowling ball
  • From: Androcles
• Re: photons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravitation Force Resolution and the NIST Neutron Standard
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: OT: CNN Europe drops 'science' subject from website
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_information
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Announcement
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Strange Optical Effect
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: THE OBSERVABLE UNIVERSE
  • From: BioFreak
• THE OBSERVABLE UNIVERSE
  • From: gdjbryan
• Re: G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Olc
• Many Solutions Manuals and Ebooks in Electronic (PDF)Format!
  • From: solutionpaypay
• Re: G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: virtual particles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is Spacetime the Matrix??
  • From: Rex
• Re: Macro Micro Planck
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Macro Micro Planck
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Earth Started inflating at 1 G ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: bowling ball
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is Spacetime the Matrix??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Stacking repelling magnets
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Strong gravitational fields
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Biomedical Engineering info
  • From: biomeng
• Re: photons
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Stacking repelling magnets
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Forex Trading - Scam or Ligitimate Money Maker
  • From: aekaaet5
• Re: Stacking repelling magnets
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: bowling ball
  • From: nonsense
• Re: OT: CNN Europe drops 'science' subject from website
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: bowling ball
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Stacking repelling magnets
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Conserved vs Constrained
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: bowling ball
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: bowling ball
  • From: Sam Wormley
• bowling ball
  • From: bob
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: Historic but quntitative Physics Text
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: A most elementary question
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: plasma
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio
  • From: hanson
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Strange Optical Effect
  • From: poopdeville
• Re: gravitational force
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Macro Micro Planck
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• plasma
  • From: chenchugang
• Re: photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: photons
  • From: Androcles
• Announcement
  • From: valeri
• Re: Conserved vs Constrained
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: gravitational force
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: Conserved vs Constrained
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Question from a Sci-Fi Writer
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Question from a Sci-Fi Writer
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Question from a Sci-Fi Writer
  • From: Uncle Al
• The meter, second and kilogram are the same thing.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• OT: CNN Europe drops 'science' subject from website
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: photons
  • From: Igor
• Re: photons
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Quantum Gravity 175.3: How Can a Probability Suddenly "Pop Up"?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Still burning? :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Conserved vs Constrained
  • From: Igor
• Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio
  • From: hanson
• Re: Question from a Sci-Fi Writer
  • From: srp
• Re: virtual particles
  • From: srp
• Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question from a Sci-Fi Writer
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: You're working for ? ? ?
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: Macro Micro Planck
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: photons
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: gravitational force
  • From: Greg Neill
• "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Olc
• Re: Still burning? :-)
  • From: Dr. Planckenstein
• classical mechanics is a consequence of maxent. who said that?
  • From: jb
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 31 Aug 07 Washington, DC
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: photons
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: gravitational force
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Conserved vs Constrained
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Quantum Gravity 175.3: How Can a Probability Suddenly "Pop Up"?
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Macro Micro Planck
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Question from a Sci-Fi Writer
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Gravitation Force Resolution and the NIST Neutron Standard
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Many Solutions Manuals and Ebooks in Electronic (PDF)Format!
  • From: BioFreak
• Still burning? :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Conserved vs Constrained
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Many Solutions Manuals and Ebooks in Electronic (PDF)Format!
  • From: solutionpaypay
• Gravitation Force Resolution and the NIST Neutron Standard
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Question from a Sci-Fi Writer
  • From: Mike Bass
• Question from a Sci-Fi Writer
  • From: Mike Bass
• Quantum Gravity 175.3: How Can a Probability Suddenly "Pop Up"?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: gravitational force
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Quantum Gravity 175.2: Quantum "Fluctuations" As a Misinterpretation of Probability
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 175.1: Why Different Phases Are Highly Compatible With Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: gravitational force
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: photons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Conserved vs Constrained
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: gravitational force
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: gravitational force
  • From: malibu
• Quantum Gravity 175.0: Negative Mass and Naked Singularities
  • From: OsherD
• Conserved vs Constrained
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Millimetric-frequency-receivers for distant radio-astronomy?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: gravitational force
  • From: Sam Wormley
• gravitational force
  • From: Divij Rao
• Re: IBM targets single-atom data storage
  • From: hanson
• Re: Stacking repelling magnets
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Stacking repelling magnets
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Stacking repelling magnets
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Why not solar cell covered cars?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: photons
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: photons
  • From: Androcles
• photons
  • From: conrad
• Re: virtual particles
  • From: Androcles