Re: Particle motion and wave motion

On Sep 21, 6:17 am, s...@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 21 sep, 06:14, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Sep 20, 9:10 pm, s...@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On 20 sep, 21:52, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

You and all other Copehnagen physicists swallowed the decree
lock stock and barrel without question, simply because it is
the easy way out.

Actually, he was proven wrong first by Aspect et al., and then later
by others, who performed the experiment that Einstein proposed to test
his position. The results proved him wrong. Do catch up.

I have analyzed these tests. Convincing only to those who believe
that QM is the end of the line, in other words, Copenhagen physicists.

Not convincing to me nor to any other causalist.

Well, actually, it did convince a good number of causalists. That's
what experiments are for, to convince those who were sure that the
answer was probably otherwise. Science is not politics. A scientist
doesn't take a position and hold to it firmly despite empirical
evidence to the contrary. To do so would be ... well, unscientific.

It did not convince de Broglie nor Einstein nor Planck and for good
reasons.

Oh, and by the way, the experiments performed first by Aspect et al
(and then confirmed by others performed later) were done in the early
1980's and published in 1982.
deBroglie died in 1987 at the age of 94. In 1982, he was 89 years old
and published no comment on the Aspect experiments.
Einstein died in 1955, 27 years before the publication of the Aspect
results.
Planck died in in 1947, 35 years before the publication of the Aspect
results.

You say these three were not convinced by the Aspect experiment and
for good reason, and I certainly do understand the good reason.
You say you also analyzed those results and were not convinced for the
same good reason. From this I infer that you are either dead, or that
you failed to notice in your careful analysis when the results were
published.

And there is ample empirical evidence that elementary
particles remain localized at all times even as they move, even if
Copenhagen physicists have built their careers for the past 80 years
on denying it.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A few serious Questions for the Evolutionist.
    ... The evidence compels me to accept evolution.The evidence was ... but there is no other reason. ... 3a) If God worked a genuine miracle in your life (and there could be ... convince them? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Out-dated theory
    ... reason why they were able to propose it as an explanation of ... Dark energy goes back to Einstein? ... other creationists) persist in doing without any ...
    (uk.religion.christian)
  • Re: Cleaning Away Einsteins Mishmash (is Copyrighted.)
    ... That is the reason that I have derided physicists so much for being ... Einstein as most who venture there. ... When an object's velocity ... such natural occurrence as his very own 'principle of relativity'! ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Need Help With c-Invariance
    ... to any other inertial observer. ... then the empty space isn't truly empty. ... there is no reason that Maxwell's equations would indicate that once ... Einstein did not show this, ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: most reliable and durable rifle?
    ... # In 1938 Albert Einstein had a challenge to his survival, ... country in mind that would let you in with ten bucks in your pocket and no ... government to back the ten bucks. ...
    (rec.guns)
Quantcast