sci.physics
- The Dirac Equation for a HA (Hydrogen Atom) ?, PhaseSpace R8
- Re: Interpretation of E = m*c^2 as kinetic energies of sub-particles, Louis_N
- Quantum Gravity 180.4: PI Matrices From Optimal to "Worst" Relate to Band/Banded Matrices, OsherD
- wave equation,
Fallingeagle
- Re: wave equation, Igor
- Re: wave equation, Timo A. Nieminen
- Need Thermal Expansion Coefficients for Specific Stable Isotopes, parlous2112
- Re: The energy in mass is gyroscopic., G=EMC^2 Glazier
- How Electric Cars Should be Built, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- idea of a new theory...**************************************, Divij Rao
- Quantum Gravity 182.1: Chaos vs Tunneling/Wormholes via Riemann Zeta Function and Probable Causation, OsherD
- Quantum Gravity 180.3: Probable Causation/Influence Matrix As Modified Alternating-Sign Matrix, OsherD
- Help with 3 Physics problems,
shreemayeede
- Re: Help with 3 Physics problems, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Help with 3 Physics problems, Androcles
- Re: Help with 3 Physics problems,
John C . Polasek
- Re: Help with 3 Physics problems,
shreemayeede
- Re: Help with 3 Physics problems, Androcles
- Re: Help with 3 Physics problems,
shreemayeede
- new r********y (and other things) book,
Eric Baird
- Re: new r********y (and other things) book,
Sam Wormley
- Re: new r********y (and other things) book, Eric Baird
- Re: new r********y (and other things) book,
Sam Wormley
- Re: new r********y (and other things) book, Eric Baird
- Re: new r********y (and other things) book, Androcles
- Re: new r********y (and other things) book,
Sam Wormley
- "Causality", Olp
- Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad goes to Bolivia, rick_sobie
- Math Trek: Beating the Bush for Patterns, Sam Wormley
- Can graphene overtake silicon as the essential ingredient of computer chips?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Can graphene overtake silicon as the essential ingredient of computer chips?,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: Can graphene overtake silicon as the essential ingredient of computer chips?,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Can graphene overtake silicon as the essential ingredient of computer chips?, Jan Panteltje
- Re: Can graphene overtake silicon as the essential ingredient of computer chips?, Mrs. Sodium K. Chloride
- Re: Can graphene overtake silicon as the essential ingredient of computer chips?, Jan Panteltje
- Re: Can graphene overtake silicon as the essential ingredient of computer chips?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Can graphene overtake silicon as the essential ingredient of computer chips?, Jan Panteltje
- Terabit Electron Streaming, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Terabit Electron Streaming, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Can graphene overtake silicon as the essential ingredient of computer chips?,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Can graphene overtake silicon as the essential ingredient of computer chips?,
Jan Panteltje
- OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 28 Sep 07 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
- Re: Confutazione della legge del Faraday, Randy Poe
- 102nd Birthday of E=mc2 ( 27 Sep 1905- 27 Sep.2007) Complete tribute in book Einstein's E=mc2 generalized , www.ajayonline.us, watchs
- What happens to electrons at the corner/edge/face of a crystal?, Bhushit Joshipura
- Blame it on pop-science - questions around superconductivity, Bhushit Joshipura
- johnreed-Math and Universe, Part 3, September 27, 2007, johnlawrencereedjr
- Ghost Hunting & Physics,
Kowstue
- Re: Ghost Hunting & Physics, Mas Plak
- Re: Ghost Hunting & Physics,
Benj
- Re: Ghost Hunting & Physics,
Kowstue
- Re: Ghost Hunting & Physics, Benj
- Re: Ghost Hunting & Physics, Kowstue
- Re: Ghost Hunting & Physics,
Mas Plak
- Re: Ghost Hunting & Physics, Benj
- Re: Ghost Hunting & Physics, Kowstue
- Re: Ghost Hunting & Physics,
Kowstue
- johnreed-Math and Universe, Part 5, September 27, 2007, johnlawrencereedjr
- Quantum Gravity 182.0: A Relationship Between Probable Causation/Influence (PI) and Riemann Zeta Function,
OsherD
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Quantum Gravity 182.0: A Relationship Between Probable Causation/Influence (PI) and Riemann Zeta Function, OsherD
- QUANTUM MECHANIC HYPNOTISTS,
Kowstue
- Re: QUANTUM MECHANIC HYPNOTISTS,
Eric Gisse
- Re: QUANTUM MECHANIC HYPNOTISTS, Kowstue
- Re: QUANTUM MECHANIC HYPNOTISTS, Igor
- Re: QUANTUM MECHANIC HYPNOTISTS,
Eric Gisse
- So is this elegant, ugly or both?,
nobody
- Re: So is this elegant, ugly or both?, Mas Plak
- Re: So is this elegant, ugly or both?, Randy Poe
- Re: So is this elegant, ugly or both?,
Androcles
- Re: So is this elegant, ugly or both?,
nobody
- Re: So is this elegant, ugly or both?, Androcles
- Re: So is this elegant, ugly or both?,
nobody
- Warped dish.,
Dr. Pastor
- Re: Warped dish., Androcles
- Re: Warped dish., Mas Plak
- Re: Warped dish., Benj
- Need Feedback on Kinetic Space Theory,
mh
- Re: Need Feedback on Kinetic Space Theory, Eric Gisse
- Re: Need Feedback on Kinetic Space Theory, Uncle Al
- Arc length of sin x,
Proctologically Violated©®
- Re: Arc length of sin x, nobody
- Re: Arc length of sin x, Jim Black
- Re: Earth satellites do not exactly follow 1/r^2 gravity law, John Park
- Online Physics Master's degree program?, cathy_cocksucker
- Simplest experiment to demo CO2 IR absorbtion, tadamsmar@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: WTC Towers:300,000 Have Toxic dust in Their lungs, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Large Hadron Collider Operational?,
GRavman
- Re: Large Hadron Collider Operational?, Sam Wormley
- Re: Large Hadron Collider Operational?, Androcles
- Re: Large Hadron Collider Operational?, Uncle Al
- Re: Large Hadron Collider Operational?, Y.Porat
- Re: Large Hadron Collider Operational?, Eric Gisse
- "A Basic Look at the Aether",
Olp
- Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether", Uncle Al
- Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether", Dave
- Impedance/reflectivity/refractive index of glass,
Lasse.Karagiannis@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Impedance/reflectivity/refractive index of glass, Andy Resnick
- Quantum Gravity 180.2: New Dimensional Analysis With Matrices, OsherD
- Re: Thor's Physicist,
Jong Kim
- Re: Thor's Physicist, Jong Kim
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4,
John Park
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4,
John Park
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4,
John Park
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4,
Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4, Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4, Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4, JM Albuquerque
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4, Eric Gisse
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Carnegie Mellon offering free courses?,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Carnegie Mellon offering free courses?,
info
- Re: Carnegie Mellon offering free courses?, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Carnegie Mellon offering free courses?,
info
- PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 26 September 2007 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley
- The ice is melting,
rick_sobie
- Re: The ice is melting, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The ice is melting,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The ice is melting, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Fuel Reformers for Home Power or Cars & Tractors, narivasant
- HandyMan DataBase Over 1,000,000 Specs, Scott
- energy vs imbalance, dedanoe
- Re: DEEPLY CONCERNED ABOUT AUSTRALIA IN FAST RAISING SEAS, Eddie
- PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 840 September 26, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Sam Wormley
- Definition of stress tensor in continuum mech, LC
- Re: Redshift 10 Galaxies?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: Redshift 10 Galaxies?, Sam Wormley
- Re: Redshift 10 Galaxies?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Redshift 10 Galaxies?, John C . Polasek
- Re: Redshift 10 Galaxies?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- "Is String Theory Justified?",
Olp
- Re: "Is String Theory Justified?",
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: "Is String Theory Justified?",
uri
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: "Is String Theory Justified?", uri
- Re: "Is String Theory Justified?", Gordon
- Re: "Is String Theory Justified?", rick_sobie
- Re: "Is String Theory Justified?", rick_sobie
- Re: "Is String Theory Justified?", rick_sobie
- Re: "Is String Theory Justified?", rick_sobie
- Re: "Is String Theory Justified?", uri
- Re: "Is String Theory Justified?",
uri
- Re: "Is String Theory Justified?",
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Flying via GR override,
GRavman
- Re: Flying via GR override,
Igor
- Re: Flying via GR override, GRavman
- Re: Flying via GR override, Igor
- Re: Flying via GR override,
Igor
- Re: Flying via GR override,
Uncle Al
- Re: Flying via GR override, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Relativity Question,
Androcles
- Re: Relativity Question, OG
- Re: Relativity Question,
Jeckyl
- Re: Relativity Question, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Relativity Question, Androcles
- Re: Relativity Question, Jeckyl
- Re: Relativity Question, Jeckyl
- Re: Relativity Question, Jeckyl
- Re: Relativity Question, Uncle Al
- Re: Relativity Question,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Relativity Question,
Androcles
- Re: Relativity Question, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Relativity Question, Androcles
- Re: Relativity Question, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Relativity Question,
Androcles
- Re: Relativity Question, Igor
- Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1,
boson boss
- Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1, Androcles
- Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1, boson boss
- Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1, Eric Gisse
- Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1, John C . Polasek
- Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1, Edward Green
- Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1,
Edward Green
- Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1, Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1, boson boss
- Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1, Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1, boson boss
- Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1, Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1, John C . Polasek
- Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1, boson boss
- Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: NOBEL PRIZE SUBMISSION, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: New Materials from High Pressure and Heat, Uncle Al
- Re: New Materials from High Pressure and Heat,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: New Materials from High Pressure and Heat,
Darrell Lakin
- Re: New Materials from High Pressure and Heat, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: New Materials from High Pressure and Heat,
Darrell Lakin
- Re: underwater,
Sam Wormley
- Re: underwater,
CWatters
- Re: underwater, Sam Wormley
- Re: underwater, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: underwater,
CWatters
- Re: underwater, Andy Resnick
- Re: underwater, CWatters
- Re: BRAIN FRY #3,
Mas Plak
- Re: BRAIN FRY #3,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY #3, Mas Plak
- Re: BRAIN FRY #3, Bruce Scott TOK
- Re: BRAIN FRY #3,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY #3,
Bruce Scott TOK
- Re: BRAIN FRY #3, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY #3,
PD
- Re: BRAIN FRY #3,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY #3, Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY #3, PD
- Re: BRAIN FRY #3, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY #3,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!,
Mas Plak
- Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!,
Raymond Yohros
- Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!, Mas Plak
- Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!, Raymond Yohros
- Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!, jimp
- Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!, Raymond Yohros
- Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!, jimp
- Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!, Benj
- Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!, Raymond Yohros
- Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!,
Raymond Yohros
- Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!, rick_sobie
- Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!, CWatters
- Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!, Eric Gisse
- Re: hacking through electric outlets!!!, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2,
Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2, OG
- Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2 (corrections),
Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2 (corrections), hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2 (corrections), Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2 (corrections), Jim Black
- Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2 (corrections), Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2 (corrections), Jim Black
- Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2 (corrections), Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2 (corrections), hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2,
Randy Poe
- Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2,
Randy Poe
- Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2,
Randy Poe
- Re: BRAIN FRY QUESTION # 2, Randy Poe
- Re: Balancing weights, PD
- Re: Balancing weights,
jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Balancing weights, Uncle Al
- Re: Balancing weights, Andy Resnick
- Re: Balancing weights, Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Unifying Time's Arrows: Re: Moving Dimensions Theory--The New Paradigm that Unifies Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, and Statistical Mechanics; while underlying ST & LQG, Uncle Al
- Re: Unifying Time's Arrows: Re: Moving Dimensions Theory--The New Paradigm that Unifies Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, and Statistical Mechanics; while underlying ST & LQG, Uncle Al
- Re: Question about Feynman books,
Uncle Al
- Re: Question about Feynman books,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Question about Feynman books, Androcles
- Re: Question about Feynman books, Sarah
- Re: Question about Feynman books, Sarah
- Re: Question about Feynman books,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Question about Feynman books, Jim Black
- Re: Do Up Quarks Create Charge???,
Igor
- Re: Do Up Quarks Create Charge???,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Do Up Quarks Create Charge???, Paul Cardinale
- Re: Do Up Quarks Create Charge???, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Do Up Quarks Create Charge???,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Do Up Quarks Create Charge???, PD
- Re: Do Up Quarks Create Charge???, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: super heated water, Uncle Al
- Re: super heated water, Igor
- Re: super heated water,
PD
- Re: super heated water,
STUARTe
- Re: super heated water, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: super heated water,
STUARTe
- Re: Is this a trick?,
shiitshite
- Re: Is this a trick?, Androcles
- Re: Farnsworth field, Sam Wormley
- Re: Farnsworth field, Androcles
- Re: Farnsworth field, boson boss
- Re: "The Properties of the Aether", Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
- Re: riding beside a photon, dedanoe
- Re: riding beside a photon,
Jeckyl
- Re: riding beside a photon, malibu
- Re: riding beside a photon,
Y.Porat
- Re: riding beside a photon, Jeckyl
- Re: riding beside a photon, Jeckyl
- Re: riding beside a photon, Y.Porat
- Re: riding beside a photon, Jeckyl
- Re: riding beside a photon, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: riding beside a photon, Eric Gisse
- Re: riding beside a photon,
srp
- Re: riding beside a photon,
malibu
- Re: riding beside a photon, srp
- Re: riding beside a photon, malibu
- Re: riding beside a photon, srp
- Re: riding beside a photon, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: riding beside a photon, malibu
- Re: riding beside a photon, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: riding beside a photon,
malibu
- Re: riding beside a photon,
PD
- Re: riding beside a photon, malibu
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1,
Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Edward Green
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Timo Nieminen
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Edward Green
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, briggs
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Edward Green
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, briggs
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Edward Green
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Edward Green
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, OG
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1,
Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, JM Albuquerque
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, JM Albuquerque
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Greg Neill
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, JM Albuquerque
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, JM Albuquerque
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, JM Albuquerque
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, JM Albuquerque
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, JM Albuquerque
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Edward Green
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1,
boson boss
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1,
Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, JM Albuquerque
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, JM Albuquerque
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1,
boson boss
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1, Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1,
Androcles
- Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack, Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack, Don Stockbauer
- Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack, Jeckyl
- Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack, Kowstue
- Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack, Pmb
- Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack, Kowstue
- Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack, Pmb
- Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack, Igor
- Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack, Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack, Igor
- Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack, Pmb
- Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack, Androcles
- Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack, Igor
- Re: Relativity Theory is beginning to crack, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Ultrasound - its use in Technology and Science, Wieslaw Bicz (www.optel.pl)
- Re: M-theory,
Sam Wormley
- Re: M-theory, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: M-theory, Uncle Al
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: M-theory, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Ions in solution,
Uncle Al
- Re: Ions in solution, Androcles
- Re: Ions in solution, Richard Tobin
- Re: The quantitative view of reality,
Plum Totter
- Re: The quantitative view of reality, Don Stockbauer
- Re: The quantitative view of reality,
Uncle Al
- Re: The quantitative view of reality, Androcles
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics,
Uncle Al
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics, Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics, Plum Totter
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics, Sam Wormley
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics, gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics, Eric Gisse
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics, Eric Gisse
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics, Eric Gisse
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics, Eric Gisse
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics, Sam Wormley
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics, Eric Gisse
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics, Uncle Al
- Message not available
- Re: Theory of Thermodynamics, Eric Gisse
- Re: GENESIS THEORY ASTRONOMY STELLAR CONSTELLATION UNIVERSE,
rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: GENESIS THEORY ASTRONOMY STELLAR CONSTELLATION UNIVERSE, rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: GENESIS THEORY ASTRONOMY STELLAR CONSTELLATION UNIVERSE, rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Cavitation - high temperature, Sam Wormley
- Re: Cavitation - high temperature,
Uncle Al
- Re: Cavitation - high temperature,
Androcles
- Re: Cavitation - high temperature, Uncle Al
- Re: Cavitation - high temperature, Androcles
- Re: Cavitation - high temperature, Uncle Al
- Re: Cavitation - high temperature, Androcles
- Re: Cavitation - high temperature,
Androcles
- Re: microtubules test, Uncle Al
- <Possible follow-ups>
- microtubules test, Kowstue
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Hammond vs Immortalist Microtubules thread, Kowstue
- <Possible follow-ups>
- re: (are) NDE's "MICROTUBULE CONSCIOUSNESS"?, Kowstue
- <Possible follow-ups>
- re: ARE NDE's "MICROTUBULE CONSCIOUSNESS" ?, Kowstue
- Re: "The Arrow of Time", Uncle Al
- Re: Perovskite Properties on Jupiter-like planets,
Uncle Al
- Re: Perovskite Properties on Jupiter-like planets, Darrell Lakin
- Re: Spin water in tube,
Androcles
- Re: Spin water in tube,
Uncle Al
- Re: Spin water in tube, tj Frazir
- Re: Spin water in tube, Uncle Al
- Re: Spin water in tube, Eric Gisse
- Re: Spin water in tube, Harold Burns
- A water screw made of clear steel ?, Jeff☠Relf
- Pois é,Такимобразомэто., Jeff☠Relf
- Poverty is a crime, I'm tellin' ya., Jeff☠Relf
- John Fredriksen, buy another football team and call it day., Jeff☠Relf
- Re: Spin water in tube, Androcles
- Re: Spin water in tube, Uncle Al
- Re: Spin water in tube, Androcles
- Re: Spin water in tube, Uncle Al
- Re: Spin water in tube, Androcles
- Re: Spin water in tube, Uncle Al
- Re: Spin water in tube, Androcles
- Re: Spin water in tube,
Uncle Al
- Re: Spin water in tube, Uncle Al
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Stored ionized gas for ion drives., Uncle Al
- Re: Magnets, Kevin Hunt
- Re: Magnets, CWatters
- Re: Magnets, Androcles
- Re: Lorenz transformation, speed of light and now EPR experiment,
Uncle Al
- Re: Lorenz transformation, speed of light and now EPR experiment,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Lorenz transformation, speed of light and now EPR experiment, Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
- Re: Lorenz transformation, speed of light and now EPR experiment,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Lorenz transformation, speed of light and now EPR experiment, Jim Black
- Re: Lorenz transformation, speed of light and now EPR experiment, Eric Gisse
- Re: Quantum Nanotechnology simulates the Mind?, boson boss
- Message not available
- Reducing total human consumption.,
Jeff☠Relf
- Stricter birth control for the richest., Jeff☠Relf
- Re: Reducing total human consumption.,
Uncle Al
- Re: Reducing total human consumption., Don Stockbauer
- Re: Pet Kind-Termination Kits,
Don Stockbauer
- Re: Pet Kind-Termination Kits, Puppet_Sock
- Re: Ghosts in Hilbert Space, Uncle Al
- Re: Ghosts in Hilbert Space, Igor
- Re: Ghosts in Hilbert Space,
rick_sobie
- Re: Ghosts in Hilbert Space,
rick_sobie
- Re: Ghosts in Hilbert Space, rick_sobie
- Re: Ghosts in Hilbert Space, Kowstue
- Re: Ghosts in Hilbert Space, rick_sobie
- Re: Ghosts in Hilbert Space, Kowstue
- Re: Ghosts in Hilbert Space, Kowstue
- Re: Ghosts in Hilbert Space,
rick_sobie
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Randy Poe
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Y.Porat
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Y.Porat
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Randy Poe
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Y.Porat
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Jeckyl
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Y.Porat
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Jeckyl
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Y.Porat
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Jeckyl
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Y.Porat
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Jeckyl
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Y.Porat
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Uncle Al
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Y.Porat
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Randy Poe
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?,
PD
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, PD
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Y.Porat
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Jeckyl
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Y.Porat
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Jeckyl
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, PD
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Jeckyl
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, PD
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Y.Porat
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?, Y.Porat
- Re: Formula for figuring electron shells/orbitals?,
Y.Porat
- Re: How can a carbon arc generate a wide spectrum, srp
- Re: How can a carbon arc generate a wide spectrum, Andy Resnick
- Re: How can a carbon arc generate a wide spectrum, Uncle Al
- Re: How can a carbon arc generate a wide spectrum,
Igor
- Re: How can a carbon arc generate a wide spectrum, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: How can a carbon arc generate a wide spectrum,
Randy Poe
- Re: How can a carbon arc generate a wide spectrum, Szczepan Bialek
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light,
Randy Poe
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light,
Androcles
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Androcles
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Androcles
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Jeckyl
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light,
Androcles
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light,
JM Albuquerque
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light,
Jeckyl
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Randy Poe
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Randy Poe
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Randy Poe
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Jeckyl
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, PD
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Jim Black
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Jeckyl
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Message not available
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Randy Poe
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Randy Poe
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Randy Poe
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Message not available
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Message not available
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Eric Gisse
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Eric Gisse
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Eric Gisse
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Jeckyl
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Greg Neill
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Greg Neill
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Greg Neill
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Eric Gisse
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Eric Gisse
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Eric Gisse
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Jeckyl
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Pmb
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Jeckyl
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Eric Gisse
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Y.Porat
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Jeckyl
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Y.Porat
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Jeckyl
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Jeckyl
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Y.Porat
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light, JM Albuquerque
- Re: lorenz transformation and spped of light,
Jeckyl
- Message not available
- The term “ Age of the Universe ” is a misnomer., Jeff☠Relf
- Re: The term " Age of the Universe " is a misnomer., Jeckyl
- Jeckyl's “ load of crap ”., Jeff☠Relf
- Re: Jeckyl's " load of crap "., Jeckyl
- Re: Time travelers up to their tricks again...,
rick_sobie
- Re: Time travelers up to their tricks again...,
rick_sobie
- Re: Time travelers up to their tricks again..., rick_sobie
- Re: Time travelers up to their tricks again..., rick_sobie
- Re: Time travelers up to their tricks again..., rick_sobie
- Re: Time travelers up to their tricks again...,
rick_sobie
- Re: Time travelers up to their tricks again..., Spanker
- Re: Particle motion and wave motion, Androcles
- Re: Particle motion and wave motion,
srp
- Re: Particle motion and wave motion, Benj
- Re: Particle motion and wave motion,
PD
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Particle motion and wave motion, Eric Gisse
- Re: Particle motion and wave motion, srp
- Re: lorenz transformation,
Uncle Al
- Re: lorenz transformation, Androcles
- Re: lorenz transformation,
Randy Poe
- Re: lorenz transformation, Androcles
- Re: lorenz transformation,
Chrisd5000rouge
- Re: lorenz transformation, Randy Poe
- Re: lorenz transformation,
Androcles
- Re: lorenz transformation, Jeckyl
- Re: lorenz transformation, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Wolfram, networked gravity, Jan Panteltje
- Re: Wolfram, networked gravity, Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
- Re: Moment of Inertia of solid sphere vs. hollow sphere, Greg Neill
- Re: Moment of Inertia of solid sphere vs. hollow sphere, guskz
- Re: Moment of Inertia of solid sphere vs. hollow sphere, PD
- Re: Moment of Inertia of solid sphere vs. hollow sphere,
Dwib
- Re: Moment of Inertia of solid sphere vs. hollow sphere,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Moment of Inertia of solid sphere vs. hollow sphere, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Moment of Inertia of solid sphere vs. hollow sphere, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Moment of Inertia of solid sphere vs. hollow sphere, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Moment of Inertia of solid sphere vs. hollow sphere,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Rotational kinetic energy,
Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Re: Rotational kinetic energy, quentin
- Re: Rotational kinetic energy, Uncle Al
- Re: is it sun glory?,
Androcles
- Re: is it sun glory?,
Jaga
- Re: is it sun glory?, Sam Wormley
- Re: is it sun glory?, sdl2112
- Re: is it sun glory?, Andy Resnick
- Re: is it sun glory?,
Jaga
- Re: is it sun glory?, Sam Wormley
- Re: is it sun glory?, OG
- Re: is it sun glory?, John Bailey
- Re: entropy, Igor
- Re: entropy,
Dwib
- Re: entropy,
Benj
- Re: entropy, Florian
- Re: entropy, Dwib
- Re: entropy, Androcles
- Re: entropy,
Benj
- Re: entropy,
Uncle Al
- Re: entropy, malibu
- Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village,
Kowstue
- Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village, Jan Panteltje
- Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village, Kowstue
- Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village, Bob Cain
- Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village, Jan Panteltje
- Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village, Kowstue
- Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village, Jan Panteltje
- Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village, Igor
- Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village, greysky
- Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village, Kowstue
- Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village, Igor
- Re: Mystery illness strikes after meteorite hits Peruvian village,
Kowstue
- Re: Where can I find torsion wire?,
Uncle Al
- Re: Where can I find torsion wire?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Where can I find torsion wire?, guskz
- Re: Where can I find torsion wire?,
guskz
- Re: Where can I find torsion wire?, Uncle Al
- Re: Where can I find torsion wire?, guskz
- Re: Where can I find torsion wire?, Mas Plak
- Re: Where can I find torsion wire?,
guskz
- Re: Where can I find torsion wire?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Living Math Entities possible?,
Jeckyl
- Re: Living Math Entities possible?,
Pmb
- Re: Living Math Entities possible?, Jeckyl
- Re: Living Math Entities possible?, Jeckyl
- Re: Living Math Entities possible?, Kowstue
- Re: Living Math Entities possible?, Jeckyl
- Re: Living Math Entities possible?, Kowstue
- Re: Living Math Entities possible?, Jeckyl
- Re: Living Math Entities possible?, Kowstue
- Re: Living Math Entities possible?, Jeckyl
- Re: Living Math Entities possible?, Kowstue
- Re: Living Math Entities possible?, Jeckyl
- Re: Living Math Entities possible?,
Pmb
- Re: Living Math Entities possible?, Pmb
- Re: Living Math Entities possible?,
Greg Neill
- Re: Living Math Entities possible?, Kowstue
- T.J., Are you using a submersible ?, Jeff☠Relf
- Re: Is Polkinghorne Correct?,
Igor
- Re: Is Polkinghorne Correct?, mrannals
- Re: Coefficient of restitution tables, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: energy produced by steam ?, OG
- Re: energy produced by steam ?, Uncle Al
- Re: energy produced by steam ?,
CWatters
- Re: energy produced by steam ?, tj Frazir
- Re: energy produced by steam ?, tj Frazir
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Eric Gisse
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible,
quentin
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, franklinhu
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, srp
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Sam Wormley
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible,
Igor
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible,
Szczepan Bialek
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, franklinhu
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Timo Nieminen
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Szczepan Bialek
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Szczepan Bialek
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Timo A. Nieminen
- Message not available
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Sam Wormley
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, uri
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Greg Neill
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, franklinhu
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Greg Neill
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, franklinhu
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Greg Neill
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, franklinhu
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Greg Neill
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Message not available
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Sam Wormley
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, uri
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Sam Wormley
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Message not available
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Sam Wormley
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, uri
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Sam Wormley
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible,
Szczepan Bialek
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Igor
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Igor
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, franklinhu
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Igor
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Sam Wormley
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Androcles
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Eric Gisse
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, franklinhu
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible,
Szczepan Bialek
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Igor
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Szczepan Bialek
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Igor
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Szczepan Bialek
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Igor
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Igor
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible,
Uncle Al
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
- Re: How an electrostatic gravity is possible, Androcles
- Re: earths polarity, Sam Wormley
- Re: earths polarity, CWatters
- Re: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, Sam Wormley
- Re: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, Eric Gisse
- Re: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Nemsis and Nexus star core,
AutoCrank
- Re: Nemsis and Nexus star core,
BURT
- Re: Nemsis and Nexus star core, AutoCrank
- Re: Nemsis and Nexus star core,
BURT
- Re: Planet People & Moon People,
Rushtown
- Re: Planet People & Moon People,
Remus
- Re: Planet People & Moon People, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Planet People & Moon People, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Planet People & Moon People,
Remus
- Re: Planet People & Moon People, Pointer
- Re: What dose "paper in preparation" means?, Sam Wormley
- Re: What dose "paper in preparation" means?, Andy Resnick
- Re: What dose "paper in preparation" means?,
PD
- Re: What dose "paper in preparation" means?,
nure123
- Re: What dose "paper in preparation" means?, Timo Nieminen
- Re: What dose "paper in preparation" means?,
nure123
- Re: What dose "paper in preparation" means?, tj Frazir
- <Possible follow-ups>
- "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Olp
- Re: Particle Pairs,and One being Virtual ?, Flipper, the talking porpoise.
- Re: Particle Pairs,and One being Virtual ?,
Paul Cardinale
- Re: Particle Pairs,and One being Virtual ?, Flipper, the talking porpoise.
- Re: Particle Pairs,and One being Virtual ?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Particle Pairs,and One being Virtual ?, Flipper, the talking porpoise.
- Re: elliptic and hyperbolic forms,
Sam Wormley
- Re: elliptic and hyperbolic forms,
pol
- Re: elliptic and hyperbolic forms, Androcles
- Re: elliptic and hyperbolic forms, pol
- Re: elliptic and hyperbolic forms, Androcles
- Re: elliptic and hyperbolic forms, pol
- Re: elliptic and hyperbolic forms, Androcles
- Re: elliptic and hyperbolic forms, schoenfeld . one
- Re: elliptic and hyperbolic forms,
pol
- Re: Double-slit experiment, Christian Dicken
- Re: Determinism,
Flipper, the talking porpoise.
- Re: Determinism, Flipper, the talking porpoise.
- Re: Determinism,
Edward Green
- Re: Determinism, Flipper, the talking porpoise.
- Re: Determinism, Flipper, the talking porpoise.
- Re: Determinism, Edward Green
- Re: Determinism, Flipper, the talking porpoise.
- Re: Determinism, Edward Green
- Re: Determinism, Flipper, the talking porpoise.
- Re: Determinism, Edward Green
- Re: Determinism, John.Leonard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Determinism, Flipper, the talking porpoise.
- Re: Determinism, Edward Green
- Message not available
- Re: Equivalence Principle and how to prove it probabilistically.,
AutoCrank
- Message not available
- Re: Equivalence Principle and how to prove it probabilistically., AutoCrank
- Message not available
- Re: Equivalence Principle and how to prove it probabilistically., AutoCrank
- Re: Equivalence Principle and how to prove it probabilistically., Bob Cain
- Re: Equivalence Principle and how to prove it probabilistically.,
AutoCrank
- Re: Richard Feynman and His Views on Wave Theory of EM?,
OG
- Re: Richard Feynman and His Views on Wave Theory of EM?,
Chris
- Re: Richard Feynman and His Views on Wave Theory of EM?, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Richard Feynman and His Views on Wave Theory of EM?,
Chris
- Re: Richard Feynman and His Views on Wave Theory of EM?, Michael Asherman
- Re: Richard Feynman and His Views on Wave Theory of EM?, Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Richard Feynman and His Views on Wave Theory of EM?, Androcles
- Re: Richard Feynman and His Views on Wave Theory of EM?, Bob Cain
- Re: bodies on earth,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: bodies on earth, malibu
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible, gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible,
Mather
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible,
gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible, gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible, gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible,
gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible,
gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible, gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible, gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible, sno
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible, Mather
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible,
gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible,
Richard Tobin
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible,
gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible, Richard Tobin
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible, gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible,
gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible,
Uncle Al
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible,
gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible, gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible, gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible, gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible,
gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible,
CWatters
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Perpetual motion is possible,
CWatters
- <Possible follow-ups>
- "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Eser
- "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Eser
- Re: Coefficient of restitution,
Greg Neill
- Re: Coefficient of restitution,
Peter
- Re: Coefficient of restitution, Greg Neill
- Re: Coefficient of restitution,
Peter
- Re: BRAIN FRY -- Problem #1,
Sam Wormley
- Re: BRAIN FRY -- Problem #1, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY -- Problem #1, Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: BRAIN FRY -- Problem #1, Eric Gisse
- Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars,
malibu
- Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars, Flipper, the talking porpoise.
- Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars, malibu
- Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars, Sam Wormley
- Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars, malibu
- Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars, Flipper, the talking porpoise.
- Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars, Sam Wormley
- Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars, malibu
- Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars, Sam Wormley
- Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars, malibu
- Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars, Sam Wormley
- Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars, Sam Wormley
- Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Stringy 'filaments' could have produced first stars, hanson
- Re: INFINITE HYDROGEN ENERGY!!!, Will Janoschka
- Re: Did man really walk on the moon? (seriously), Randy Poe
- Re: Did man really walk on the moon? (seriously), Sam Wormley
- Re: Did man really walk on the moon? (seriously), Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Did man really walk on the moon? (seriously), Uncle Al
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The beginning of Time., Sam Wormley
- Re: The beginning of Time., Greg Neill
- Re: The beginning of Time.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The beginning of Time., hanson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: cavitation temperature,
Sam Wormley
- Re: cavitation temperature, Szczepan Bialek
- Re: cavitation temperature,
Uncle Al
- Re: cavitation temperature, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: star-man, Jan Panteltje
- Re: star-man, Uncle Al
- Re: why dark energy density is small, Flipper, the talking porpoise.
- Re: Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime,
Uncle Al
- Re: Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime,
Dac
- Re: Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime, Flipper, the talking porpoise.
- Re: Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime, Flipper, the talking porpoise.
- Re: Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime, Uncle Al
- Re: Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime, Flipper, the talking porpoise.
- Re: Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime, Uncle Al
- Re: Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime, Flipper, the talking porpoise.
- I Shall Rebuild Physics From The Ground Up, to Suit My Eclectic Tastes, Flipper, the talking porpoise.
- chicken, Flipper, the talking porpoise.
- Re: Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime, Uncle Al
- Re: Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime, tj Frazir
- Re: Uncle Al on Quantum Gravity & Spacetime,
Dac
- Re: shrinking kilogram bewilders scientists,
srp
- Re: shrinking kilogram bewilders scientists, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: shrinking kilogram bewilders scientists, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: shrinking kilogram bewilders scientists, Remus
- Re: God and Leonhard Euler, Jong Kim
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Can a box's weight change due to internal change?, Dac
- Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?,
Aage Andersen
- Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?, Aage Andersen
- Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?, Dac
- Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?, Dac
- Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?, George
- Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?, Jan Panteltje
- Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?, Dac
- Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?, George
- Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?, Jan Panteltje
- Re: Official prototype of kilogram mysteriously losing weight?,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: Kilo prototype mysteriously loses weight, Aage Andersen
- Re: Undergarduate physics problems for unergraduate physics students..., Sam Wormley
- Re: Undergarduate physics problems for unergraduate physics students...,
Puppet_Sock
- Re: Undergarduate physics problems for unergraduate physics students..., hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Undergarduate physics problems for unergraduate physics students..., Puppet_Sock
- Re: Thundercloud "accelerator" fires gamma-ray beam?, Bob Cain
- Re: Thundercloud "accelerator" fires gamma-ray beam?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Androcles
- Re: Presumption of amateur status,
G. L. Bradford
- Re: Presumption of amateur status,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Sam Wormley
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Ian Parker
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Presumption of amateur status,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Presumption of amateur status,
galathaea
- Re: Presumption of amateur status,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, PD
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- professionalism in science, galathaea
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Androcles
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Benj
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, PD
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, srp
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, srp
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, srp
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, PD
- Re: Presumption of amateur status,
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Presumption of amateur status,
Benj
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Flipper, the talking porpoise.
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Ian Parker
- Re: Presumption of amateur status,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Flipper, the talking porpoise.
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Jim Black
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Eric Gisse
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, srp
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, srp
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, YBM
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Sam Wormley
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Y.Porat
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, srp
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Sam Wormley
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, srp
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Sam Wormley
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, srp
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Bob Cain
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, srp
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Randy Poe
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Androcles
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Randy Poe
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Randy Poe
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Randy Poe
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Randy Poe
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Randy Poe
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Randy Poe
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Randy Poe
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Eric Gisse
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Randy Poe
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Eric Gisse
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Eric Gisse
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Androcles
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, srp
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, srp
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, YBM
- Re: Presumption of amateur status,
Y.Porat
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Jeckyl
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Y.Porat
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Jeckyl
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Y.Porat
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Jeckyl
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Y.Porat
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Jeckyl
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Y.Porat
- Re: Presumption of amateur status, Jeckyl
- Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, srp
- Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces,
Uncle Al
- Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces,
Androcles
- Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, PD
- Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, Androcles
- Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, hanson
- Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, Androcles
- Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, Randy Poe
- Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, Androcles
- Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, Randy Poe
- Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, Androcles
- Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, PD
- Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, Androcles
- Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, PD
- Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, Androcles
- Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces,
Androcles
- Re: I need some suggestions, Androcles
- Re: I need some suggestions,
Richard Tobin
- Re: I need some suggestions, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: I need some suggestions, srp
- Re: I need some suggestions, PD
- Re: I need some suggestions, Puppet_Sock
- Re: Gauge Symmetry, Sam Wormley
- Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007, gb6726
- Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007,
gb6726
- Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007,
gb6726
- Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007, gb6726
- Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007, gb6726
- Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007, gb6726
- Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007, gb6726
- Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007, gb6726
- Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007, gb6726
- Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007, gb6726
- Re: Free energy was found, or a free energy in 2007,
gb6726
- Re: Heisenberg's 2 Slit due to electric field not electron., zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: What is the photons direction??,
Sam Wormley
- Re: What is the photons direction??,
martin
- Re: What is the photons direction??, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: What is the photons direction??,
martin
- Re: What is the photons direction??, PD
- Re: What is the photons direction??, Florian
- Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?,
Uncle Al
- Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?, Uncle Al
- Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?, Androcles
- Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?, Uncle Al
- Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?, Androcles
- Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?, Jan Panteltje
- Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?, Uncle Al
- Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?, Jan Panteltje
- Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?, Uncle Al
- Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?, Jan Panteltje
- Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?, Jim Black
- Re: New type of memory with 100x speed and capacity?,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: Gravity and Temperature,
Dr. Planckenstein
- Re: Gravity and Temperature,
galathaea
- Re: Gravity and Temperature, Dr. Planckenstein
- Re: Gravity and Temperature,
galathaea
- Re: Qm has to be considered as an experimental limited Theory !!, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Can a home go free on electricity?,
Mas Plak
- Re: Can a home go free on electricity?,
gb6726
- Re: Can a home go free on electricity?, gb6726
- Re: Can a home go free on electricity?, gb6726
- Re: Can a home go free on electricity?, gb6726
- Re: Can a home go free on electricity?, gb6726
- Re: Can a home go free on electricity?, gb6726
- Re: Can a home go free on electricity?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Can a home go free on electricity?, Dave of Physics
- Re: Can a home go free on electricity?, gb6726
- Re: Can a home go free on electricity?, Mas Plak
- Re: Can a home go free on electricity?, Mas Plak
- Re: Can a home go free on electricity?, gb6726
- Re: Can a home go free on electricity?, Mas Plak
- Re: Can a home go free on electricity?, Puppet_Sock
- Re: Can a home go free on electricity?,
gb6726
- Re: Can a home go free on electricity?,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can a home go free on electricity?,
gb6726
- Re: Can a home go free on electricity?, Mas Plak
- Re: Can a home go free on electricity?,
gb6726
- Re: Tesla and free energy,
gb6726
- Re: Tesla and free energy,
gb6726
- Re: Tesla and free energy, gb6726
- Re: Tesla and free energy, gb6726
- Re: Tesla and free energy, gb6726
- Re: Tesla and free energy, gb6726
- Re: Tesla and free energy, malibu
- Re: Tesla and free energy, gb6726
- Re: Tesla and free energy, gb6726
- Re: Tesla and free energy,
gb6726
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"...,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., Don Stockbauer
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"...,
Sam Wormley
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"...,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., Sam Wormley
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., Sam Wormley
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"...,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"...,
Eric Gisse
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"...,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., malibu
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., G. L. Bradford
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., Sam Wormley
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., G. L. Bradford
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., Sam Wormley
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., G. L. Bradford
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., Eric Gisse
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., Jim Black
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., Sam Wormley
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., Sam Wormley
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"...,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"...,
Jim Black
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"...,
Eric Gisse
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., Jim Black
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., Jim Black
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., G. L. Bradford
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: More on the "Big Bang"...,
Eric Gisse
- Re: time beginning,
malibu
- Re: time beginning,
Sam Wormley
- Re: time beginning, malibu
- Re: time beginning, Dr. Planckenstein
- Re: time beginning, Sam Wormley
- Re: time beginning, malibu
- Re: time beginning, Sam Wormley
- Re: time beginning, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: time beginning,
Sam Wormley
- Re: time beginning, BernardZ
- Re: time beginning,
boson boss
- Re: time beginning,
Sam Wormley
- Re: time beginning, boson boss
- Re: time beginning,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Jeez, that was close,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Jeez, that was close, John Schutkeker
- Re: Jeez, that was close,
John Schutkeker
- Re: Jeez, that was close, Sam Wormley
- Re: Double-Slit with single photons and electrons etc., G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, Rex
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, Androcles
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, Dwib
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, Igor
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, hanson
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?,
Uncle Al
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, Androcles
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?,
hanson
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, Androcles
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, hanson
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, Androcles
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, Randy Poe
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, Androcles
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, hanson
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, Androcles
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, hanson
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, Androcles
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, Randy Poe
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, Androcles
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, Randy Poe
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, hanson
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, Androcles
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: What's the appearance of stationary light?, hanson
- Re: Copyright Protection, Eric Gisse
- Re: Global warming Theory, Androcles
- Re: Global warming Theory,
Benj
- Re: Global warming Theory,
jimbo
- Re: Global warming Theory, Sam Wormley
- Re: Global warming - Is it a bad thing?,
Remus
- Re: Global warming - Is it a bad thing?, Androcles
- Re: Global warming - Is it a bad thing?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Global warming Theory,
jimbo
- Re: Global warming Theory,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Global warming Theory,
jimbo
- Re: Global warming Theory, Sam Wormley
- Re: Global warming Theory,
jimbo
- Re: Global warming Theory, Igor
- Re: Global warming Theory, Uncle Al
- Re: I've been "Jew'ed", hanson
- Re: Quantum Computing not practical?,
John Bailey
- Re: Quantum Computing not practical?,
socal_dan2000
- Re: Quantum Computing not practical?, socal_dan2000
- Re: Quantum Computing not practical?,
socal_dan2000
- Re: Quantum Computing not practical?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Re: Greenhelm Engineering Opportunities, Robert S
- Re: "Beyond the Big Bang" -- History Channel, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon, Androcles
- Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon, Androcles
- Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon, Sam Wormley
- Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon, Jim Black
- Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon, Sam Wormley
- Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon,
Igor
- Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon, Robert S
- Re: Colour of the eclipsed Moon, BradGuth
- Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?,
Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?, Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?, Androcles
- Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?, JM Albuquerque
- Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?, srp
- Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?, Tom Potter
- Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?, PD
- Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?, Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?, Uncle Al
- Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?, Igor
- Re: Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?, John C . Polasek
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Fine Structure constants?, hanson
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c",
Dwib
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Androcles
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c",
Don Stockbauer
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Jeckyl
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c",
Uncle Al
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Androcles
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c",
Jeckyl
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c",
guskz
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Y.Porat
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Jeckyl
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Y.Porat
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Jeckyl
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Y.Porat
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Jeckyl
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Y.Porat
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Jeckyl
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c",
guskz
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", BradGuth
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c",
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c",
Y.Porat
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Jeckyl
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Jeckyl
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Jeckyl
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Y.Porat
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Jeckyl
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Jeckyl
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Jeckyl
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Y.Porat
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Jeckyl
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Jeckyl
- Re: The Reason why ALL mass is at "c", tj Frazir
- Re: The Reason why ALL mass is at "c", Jeckyl
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c", Y.Porat
- Re: The Reason why no mass can move at "c",
Y.Porat
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Ian Parker
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Dwib
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?,
Uncle Al
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?,
pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Greg Neill
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Uncle Al
- Re: Antigravity, our doom? (or best way), G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Antigravity, our doom? (or best way), hanson
- Re: Antigravity, our doom? (or best way), G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Antigravity, our doom? (or best way), hanson
- Re: Antigravity, our doom? (or best way), pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom? (or best way), hanson
- Re: Antigravity, our doom? (or best way), pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom? (or best way), hanson
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Sam Wormley
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Sam Wormley
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Dwib
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Sam Wormley
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Sam Wormley
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Uncle Al
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Sven Geier
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Ian Parker
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Uncle Al
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Uncle Al
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, hanson
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, malibu
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Sven Geier
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Sam Wormley
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Greg Neill
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Sam Wormley
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Sam Wormley
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Sam Wormley
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Benj
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Sam Wormley
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Ian Parker
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, malibu
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Ian Parker
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, malibu
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Ian Parker
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, malibu
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Ian Parker
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, malibu
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, malibu
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Benj
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, malibu
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Benj
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, malibu
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Sam Wormley
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Sam Wormley
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Sven Geier
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Uncle Al
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Androcles
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?,
pipoxyz
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?,
Rex
- Re: Antigravity, our doom?, Sam Wormley
- Re: plenty of rain on new planet,
Uncle Al
- Re: plenty of rain on new planet, Androcles
- Re: plenty of rain on new planet,
hanson
- Re: plenty of rain on new planet, Androcles
- Re: plenty of rain on new planet, boson boss
- Re: how to isolate UPS radiation,
Mas Plak
- Re: how to isolate UPS radiation,
boson boss
- Re: how to isolate UPS radiation, Mas Plak
- Re: how to isolate UPS radiation, boson boss
- Re: how to isolate UPS radiation,
boson boss
- Re: how to isolate UPS radiation,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: how to isolate UPS radiation,
boson boss
- Re: how to isolate UPS radiation, boson boss
- Re: how to isolate UPS radiation,
boson boss
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor, nonsense
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor, Sue...
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor,
Sam Wormley
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor,
dhawal damle
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor, Sam Wormley
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor, nonsense
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor, gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor, nonsense
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor,
dhawal damle
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor,
Dwib
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor,
Sue...
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor, dhawal damle
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor, Sue...
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor, Szczepan Bialek
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor,
Edward Green
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor, Szczepan Bialek
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: electric field in a current carrying conductor,
Sue...
- Re: Quantum Spacetime,
Dr. Planckenstein
- Re: Quantum Spacetime,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Quantum Spacetime, Dr. Planckenstein
- Re: Quantum Spacetime,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Relative Theory, Androcles
- Re: Gravity, space-time, and black holes?, Sam Wormley
- Re: Gravity, space-time, and black holes?,
Jim Black
- Re: Gravity, space-time, and black holes?, NoEinstein
- Re: Gravity, space-time, and black holes?,
Uncle Al
- Re: Gravity, space-time, and black holes?,
Androcles
- Re: Gravity, space-time, and black holes?, Uncle Al
- Re: Gravity, space-time, and black holes?, Androcles
- Re: Gravity, space-time, and black holes?,
Androcles
- Re: photon energy,
Jim Black
- Re: photon energy, malibu
- Re: photon energy, Sam Wormley
- Re: photon energy, Quantum_Ranger
- Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness,
Uncle Al
- Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness, Androcles
- Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness,
Rex
- Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness, Don Stockbauer
- Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness, Rex
- Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness, Uncle Al
- Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness, Rex
- Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness, Uncle Al
- Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness, Androcles
- Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness, Rex
- Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness, jonas . thornvall
- Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness, jonas . thornvall
- Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness, Rex
- Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness, Uncle Al
- Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness, Androcles
- Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness, mitchsperkins
- Re: Biophysics of Self-Awareness, Rex
- Re: dimension's, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: dimension's, Anthony Davis
- Re: Why isn't pitch-black dark under a shadow?, Puppet_Sock
- Re: Why isn't pitch-black dark under a shadow?,
shalayka
- Re: Why isn't pitch-black dark under a shadow?, Don Stockbauer
- Re: Why isn't pitch-black dark under a shadow?, Sam Wormley
- Re: Why isn't pitch-black dark under a shadow?, Richard Tobin
- Re: Why isn't pitch-black dark under a shadow?, CWatters
- Re: Why isn't pitch-black dark under a shadow?, OG
- Re: Let's Pretend,
Androcles
- Re: Let's Pretend,
einsteintheretard
- Re: Let's Pretend, Androcles
- Re: Let's Pretend, PD
- Re: Let's Pretend, Androcles
- Re: Let's Pretend, Jeckyl
- Re: Let's Pretend,
Richard Tobin
- Re: Let's Pretend, Androcles
- Re: Let's Pretend, Androcles
- Re: Let's Pretend,
einsteintheretard
- Re: Let's Pretend, PD
- Re: Let's Pretend,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Let's Pretend,
einsteintheretard
- Re: Let's Pretend, PD
- Re: Let's Pretend, einsteintheretard
- Re: Let's Pretend, Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Let's Pretend, einsteintheretard
- Re: Let's Pretend, Timo Nieminen
- Re: Let's Pretend, einsteintheretard
- Re: Let's Pretend,
einsteintheretard
- Re: Let's Pretend, Eric Gisse
- Re: Let's Pretend,
Benj
- Re: Let's Pretend,
PD
- Re: Let's Pretend, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Let's Pretend, PD
- Re: Let's Pretend, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Let's Pretend, PD
- Re: Let's Pretend, Androcles
- Re: Let's Pretend, PD
- Re: Let's Pretend, Androcles
- Re: Let's Pretend, PD
- Re: Let's Pretend, Androcles
- Re: Let's Pretend, PD
- Re: Let's Pretend, Androcles
- Re: Let's Pretend, einsteintheretard
- Re: Let's Pretend,
PD
- Re: Let's Pretend,
Dwib
- Re: Let's Pretend, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Let's Pretend, einsteintheretard
- Re: Let's Pretend,
einsteintheretard
- Re: Let's Pretend,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Let's Pretend, einsteintheretard
- Re: Let's Pretend, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Let's Pretend, einsteintheretard
- Re: Let's Pretend, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Let's Pretend,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Let's Pretend, schoenfeld . one
- Re: Hey Google! Here's another GREAT idea!, PD
- Re: Hey Google! Here's another GREAT idea!,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Hey Google! Here's another GREAT idea!, Tom Potter
- Re: Hey Google! Here's another GREAT idea!,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Hey Google! Here's another GREAT idea!, Tom Potter
- Re: Physics of Consciousness & Momemtum Energy,
Jeckyl
- Re: Physics of Consciousness & Momemtum Energy,
Rex
- Re: Physics of Consciousness & Momemtum Energy, Jeckyl
- Re: Physics of Consciousness & Momemtum Energy, Rex
- Re: Physics of Consciousness & Momemtum Energy, Jeckyl
- Re: Physics of Consciousness & Momemtum Energy, Jeckyl
- Re: Physics of Consciousness & Momemtum Energy, Rex
- Re: Physics of Consciousness & Momemtum Energy, Jeckyl
- Re: Physics of Consciousness & Momemtum Energy, Rex
- Re: Physics of Consciousness & Momemtum Energy,
Rex
- Re: Is the Universe Expanding ?, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Is the Universe Expanding ?,
G. L. Bradford
- Re: Is the Universe Expanding ?,
G. L. Bradford
- Re: Is the Universe Expanding ?, G. L. Bradford
- Re: Is the Universe Expanding ?,
G. L. Bradford
- Re: Is the Universe Expanding ?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Is the Universe Expanding ?,
Benj
- Re: Is the Universe Expanding ?, Sam Wormley
- Re: Is the Universe Expanding ?,
Benj
- Re: Missing Galaxy cluster Shadows and Huge CMB Voids seems to reason for a new raspberry shaped multiverse., Sam Wormley
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Missing Galaxy cluster Shadows and Huge CMB Voids seems to reason for a new raspberry shaped multiverse., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: black holes are white!, Sam Wormley
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2, Dwib
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2,
mike3
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2, PD
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2, Androcles
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2, Eric Gisse
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2,
mike3
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2, Sam Wormley
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2,
PD
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2,
meda
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2, srp
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2, meda
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2, meda
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2, srp
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2, meda
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2, srp
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2,
meda
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2,
meda
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2, Randy Poe
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2, meda
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2, Pmb
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2, Randy Poe
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2, Pmb
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2, Randy Poe
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2, srp
- Re: Energy formula, alternatives to E=mc^2, Pmb
- Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell, jonas . thornvall
- Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell,
jonas . thornvall
- Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell, Eric Gisse
- Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell, jonas . thornvall
- Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell, Eric Gisse
- Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell, jonas . thornvall
- Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell, jonas . thornvall
- Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell,
jonas . thornvall
- Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell,
Uncle Al
- Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell, Androcles
- Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell,
jonas . thornvall
- Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell, jonas . thornvall
- Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell, jonas . thornvall
- Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell, marc
- Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell,
Androcles
- Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell, Androcles
- Re: A monkey guide to relativity, or a banana in a "NUT" shell,
Androcles
- Re: Saturn's Hexagonal Polar Feature Explained,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Saturn's Hexagonal Polar Feature Explained, NoEinstein
- Re: Saturn's Hexagonal Polar Feature Explained,
Benj
- Re: Saturn's Hexagonal Polar Feature Explained, NoEinstein
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Sam Wormley
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist,
Y.Porat
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist,
merl blake
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Y.Porat
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Jeckyl
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Rex
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Jeckyl
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Rex
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Jeckyl
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Rex
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Jeckyl
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Rex
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Jeckyl
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Y.Porat
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Rex
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Jeckyl
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Jeckyl
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist,
merl blake
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Sam Wormley
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist,
srp
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist,
Eric Gisse
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, srp
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, PD
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Eric Gisse
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, srp
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, merl blake
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, PD
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, srp
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Eric Gisse
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, jonas . thornvall
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Y.Porat
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Jeckyl
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Y.Porat
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Jeckyl
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, srp
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Y.Porat
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, John C . Polasek
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, srp
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, YBM
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Rex
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist,
Eric Gisse
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, Uncle Al
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, PD
- Re: The only true theory of everything would not be discovered by a physicist, gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Mathematicians versus Semanticists,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Mathematicians versus Semanticists,
G. L. Bradford
- Re: Mathematicians versus Semanticists, John Christiansen
- Re: Mathematicians versus Semanticists,
G. L. Bradford
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The Electric Car,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Electric Car,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Electric Car, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Electric Car, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Electric Car, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Electric Car, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Electric Car, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Electric Car, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Electric Car, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Electric Car, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Electric Car, jimp
- Re: The Electric Car, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Electric Car, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Electric Car, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Electric Car, jimp
- Re: The Electric Car, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Electric Car, jimp
- Re: The Electric Car, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Electric Car, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Electric Car, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Electric Car, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Electric Car, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Electric Car, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Electric Car, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Electric Car, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Electric Car, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Electric Car, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Electric Car, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Electric Car, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Electric Car, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Electric Car, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Electric Car, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Electric Car, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Electric Car, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Electric Car, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Electric Car,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Electric Car,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Electric Car,
rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Electric Car, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Electric Car,
rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Physics High School Teacher, Androcles
- Re: Physics High School Teacher,
Uncle Al
- Re: Physics High School Teacher,
Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: Physics High School Teacher, Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: Physics High School Teacher, hanson
- Message not available
- Re: Physics High School Teacher, hanson
- Re: Physics High School Teacher,
Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: Physics High School Teacher, Androcles
- Re: Iranian classicl music,
Uncle Al
- Re: Iranian classicl music,
Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: Iranian classicl music, Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: Iranian classicl music, Androcles
- Re: Iranian classicl music,
Androcles
- Re: applications of light penetrative capacity, Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: applications of light penetrative capacity,
Uncle Al
- Re: applications of light penetrative capacity, Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: applications of light penetrative capacity, Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: applications of light penetrative capacity, Androcles
- Re: applications of light penetrative capacity,
Uncle Al
- Re: fust advice, q-bit
- Re: THE OBSERVABLE UNIVERSE, BioFreak
- Re: THE OBSERVABLE UNIVERSE, Sam Wormley
- Re: THE OBSERVABLE UNIVERSE, Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Re: THE OBSERVABLE UNIVERSE, G. L. Bradford
- Re: G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?,
Randy Poe
- Re: G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?, jonas . thornvall
- Re: G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?, jonas . thornvall
- Re: G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?,
Uncle Al
- Re: G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?, jonas . thornvall
- Re: G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?,
Paul Cardinale
- Re: G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?,
jonas . thornvall
- Re: G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?, Paul Cardinale
- Re: G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?, jonas . thornvall
- Re: G for a body not constant, when other forces at work?,
jonas . thornvall
- Re: Earth Started inflating at 1 G ???, Paul Cardinale
- Re: Is Spacetime the Matrix??,
Rex
- Re: Is Spacetime the Matrix??, nonsense
- Re: bowling ball,
Sam Wormley
- Re: bowling ball,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: bowling ball, Paul Cardinale
- Re: bowling ball,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: bowling ball,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: bowling ball,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: bowling ball, nonsense
- Re: bowling ball, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: bowling ball,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: bowling ball, Androcles
- Re: bowling ball,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: bowling ball,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: bowling ball, Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: bowling ball, Androcles
- Re: bowling ball, thorstenkranz
- Re: bowling ball,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Strange Optical Effect, BioFreak
- Re: Strange Optical Effect,
Androcles
- Re: Strange Optical Effect,
Dr. Planckenstein
- Re: Strange Optical Effect, Androcles
- Re: Strange Optical Effect, Dr. Planckenstein
- Re: Strange Optical Effect,
Dr. Planckenstein
- Re: plasma, Greg Neill
- Re: plasma, Uncle Al
- Re: Announcement, BioFreak
- Re: OT: CNN Europe drops 'science' subject from website, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: OT: CNN Europe drops 'science' subject from website, BioFreak
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio,
Tom Potter
- Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio, hanson
- Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio, G. L. Bradford
- Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio, hanson
- Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio, Tom Potter
- Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio, hanson
- Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio, Tom Potter
- Re: Jack Sarfatti on national talk radio,
Sam Wormley
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Ian Macmillan
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Dwib
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Macro Micro Planck,
Dr. Planckenstein
- Re: Macro Micro Planck, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Macro Micro Planck,
G. L. Bradford
- Re: Macro Micro Planck,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Macro Micro Planck, Dr. Planckenstein
- Re: Macro Micro Planck, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Macro Micro Planck, Dr. Planckenstein
- Re: Macro Micro Planck,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Still burning? :-),
Dr. Planckenstein
- Re: Still burning? :-), BioFreak
- Re: Many Solutions Manuals and Ebooks in Electronic (PDF)Format!, BioFreak
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Many Solutions Manuals and Ebooks in Electronic (PDF)Format!, solutionpaypay
- Many Solutions Manuals and Ebooks in Electronic (PDF)Format!, solutionpaypay
- Many Solutions Manuals and Ebooks in Electronic (PDF)Format!, solutionpaypay
- Many Solutions Manuals and Ebooks in Electronic (PDF)Format!, paysolution
- Many Solutions Manuals and Ebooks in Electronic (PDF)Format!, solutionpaypay
- Many Solutions Manuals and Ebooks in Electronic (PDF)Format!, solutionpaypay
- Re: Question from a Sci-Fi Writer, srp
- Re: Question from a Sci-Fi Writer, Paul Cardinale
- Re: Question from a Sci-Fi Writer, Mike Bass
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Question from a Sci-Fi Writer,
Mike Bass
- Re: Question from a Sci-Fi Writer, BioFreak
- Re: Question from a Sci-Fi Writer, Mas Plak
- Re: Question from a Sci-Fi Writer, Uncle Al
- Re: Question from a Sci-Fi Writer, Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Conserved vs Constrained,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Conserved vs Constrained, G. L. Bradford
- Re: Conserved vs Constrained,
BioFreak
- Re: Conserved vs Constrained, G. L. Bradford
- Re: Conserved vs Constrained,
Igor
- Re: Conserved vs Constrained,
G. L. Bradford
- Re: Conserved vs Constrained, Igor
- Re: Conserved vs Constrained, G. L. Bradford
- Re: Conserved vs Constrained, Igor
- Re: Conserved vs Constrained, G. L. Bradford
- Re: Conserved vs Constrained, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Conserved vs Constrained, G. L. Bradford
- Re: Conserved vs Constrained, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Conserved vs Constrained, G. L. Bradford
- Re: Conserved vs Constrained, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Conserved vs Constrained,
G. L. Bradford
- Re: gravitational force,
Sam Wormley
- Re: gravitational force,
malibu
- Re: gravitational force, Sam Wormley
- Re: gravitational force,
Y.Porat
- We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually., Jeff☠Relf
- Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually., Y.Porat
- Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually., Randy Poe
- Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually., Y.Porat
- The Psychology of Physics., Jeff☠Relf
- Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually., Jeckyl
- Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually., Y.Porat
- Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually., Jeckyl
- Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually., Y.Porat
- Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually., Jeckyl
- Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually., Y.Porat
- Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually., Jeckyl
- Like T.J., Hanson and Potter, Porat is a rich/deluded bastard., Jeff☠Relf
- Jeff Relf is a lazy, deluded and deadbeat bastard., hanson
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Feral cats die sooner, but they have more fun., Jeff☠Relf
- Re: Feral cats die sooner, but they have more fun., hanson
- Re: gravitational force,
malibu
- Re: We're imprisoned in a virtual casino, losing it all, eventually., Jeckyl
- Re: gravitational force, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: gravitational force, Uncle Al
- Re: gravitational force, JM Albuquerque
- Re: gravitational force,
Uncle Al
- Re: gravitational force, Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: gravitational force, Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: gravitational force, Androcles
- Re: gravitational force,
Eric Gisse
- Re: gravitational force, Sue...
- Re: Stacking repelling magnets,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Stacking repelling magnets,
jonas . thornvall
- Re: Stacking repelling magnets, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Stacking repelling magnets, jonas . thornvall
- Re: Stacking repelling magnets, Eric Gisse
- Re: Stacking repelling magnets, G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Stacking repelling magnets, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Stacking repelling magnets, Sue...
- Re: Stacking repelling magnets,
jonas . thornvall
- Re: Stacking repelling magnets, Tom
- Re: photons,
Androcles
- Re: photons,
Y.Porat
- Re: photons, Jeckyl
- Re: photons,
Y.Porat
- Re: photons,
Sam Wormley
- Re: photons,
Y.Porat
- Re: photons, Jeckyl
- Re: photons, Y.Porat
- Re: photons, Jeckyl
- Re: photons, Pmb
- Re: photons, Jeckyl
- Re: photons, Y.Porat
- Re: photons, Jeckyl
- Re: photons, Y.Porat
- Re: photons, Jeckyl
- Re: photons, Eric Gisse
- Re: photons, Y.Porat
- Re: photons, Jeckyl
- Re: photons, Randy Poe
- Re: photons, Y.Porat
- Re: photons, Randy Poe
- Re: photons, Y.Porat
- Re: photons, Randy Poe
- Re: photons, Eric Gisse
- Re: photons, Jeckyl
- Re: photons, Jeckyl
- Re: photons, Y.Porat
- Re: photons, Jeckyl
- Re: photons, Y.Porat
- Re: photons, Jeckyl
- Re: photons, Randy Poe
- Re: photons, Y.Porat
- Re: photons, Jeckyl
- Re: photons, Y.Porat
- Re: photons, Jeckyl
- Re: photons, Y.Porat
- Re: photons, Jeckyl
- Re: photons, Randy Poe
- Re: photons, Y.Porat
- Re: photons, Jeckyl
- Re: photons, Y.Porat
- Re: photons, Jeckyl
- Re: photons,
Y.Porat
- Re: photons,
BioFreak
- Re: photons,
Dr. Planckenstein
- Re: photons, BioFreak
- Re: photons, Dr. Planckenstein
- Re: photons, Androcles
- Re: photons, Dr. Planckenstein
- Re: photons, Androcles
- Re: photons, BioFreak
- Re: photons,
Dr. Planckenstein
- Re: photons,
Igor
- Re: photons,
Y.Porat
- Re: photons, Jeckyl
- Re: photons, Y.Porat
- Re: photons, Jeckyl
- Re: photons, Pmb
- Re: photons, Pmb
- Re: photons,
Y.Porat
- Re: photons,
PD
- Re: photons,
Androcles
- Re: photons, Randy Poe
- Re: photons, Y.Porat
- Re: photons, Jeckyl
- Re: photons, Androcles
- Re: photons, PD
- Re: photons, Androcles
- Re: photons, PD
- Re: photons, Androcles
- Re: photons,
Y.Porat
- Re: photons, Randy Poe
- Re: photons, Jeckyl
- Re: photons, Y.Porat
- Re: photons, Jeckyl
- Re: photons,
Androcles
- Re: photons, BradGuth
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: virtual particles, srp
- Re: virtual particles, G=EMC^2 Glazier
Loading
