sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Quantum Gravity 195.1: The Markov/Bayesian Establishment
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 196.0: Graph Energy Additivity and Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 196.0: Graph Energy Additivity and Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Eriw
• Re: Space Foreshortning (an original theory)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quantum Gravity 195.0: Hungarians Prove Importance of Non-Markovian Continuous Quantum Measurements
  • From: bob
• Re: Space Foreshortning (an original theory)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Space Foreshortning (an original theory)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Bert and T.J.'s outlandish, unverifiable claims.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Proposal about the neutron
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: electricity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Proposal about the neutron
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: electricity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A simple question about satellites
  • From: Igor
• Re: A simple question about satellites
  • From: Sam Wormley
• My patience for “ Usenet newbies ” is limited.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Isn't this the history of fields, including gravitomagnetism ?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Why paint?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: Igor
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Why paint?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Why paint?
  • From: N
• Isn't this the history of fields, including gravitomagnetism ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: A simple question about satellites
  • From: Thomas
• Re: Why paint?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: electricity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Help with Lagrangian mechanics
  • From: mL
• Changes in the gross charge can be lethal.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Bert and T.J.'s outlandish, unverifiable claims.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: black holes made of light?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: black holes made of light?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Quantum Gravity 195.0: Hungarians Prove Importance of Non-Markovian Continuous Quantum Measurements
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why paint?
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: tadchem
• Re: This can run your car
  • From: Androcles
• Re: electricity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Proposal about the neutron
  • From: PD
• Re: This can run your car
  • From: Larry Snyder
• A simple question about satellites
  • From: Maja
• Re: Proposal about the neutron
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Space Foreshortning (an original theory)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Proposal about the neutron
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: lorenz transformation
  • From: Androcles
• Proposal about the neutron
  • From: Carlos L
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Gordon
• Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: lorenz transformation
  • From: nessunoic
• Re: This can run your car
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ?Does God exist
  • From: Pmb
• Re: DamnInteresting.COM is... well... more interestingthanSci.Phy...
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Why paint?
  • From: N
• Re: Why paint?
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: This can run your car
  • From: Larry Snyder
• Re: Space Foreshortning (an original theory)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Lepton is composite?
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Space Foreshortning (an original theory)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: This can run your car
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Open the pod bay doors Hel.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Why paint?
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Why paint?
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Why paint?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Covariance
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Unravelling the mysteries of coiling ropes
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: This can run your car
  • From: Larry Snyder
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment and Lorentz polarization
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Match Making Machinery
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: This can run your car
  • From: Androcles
• Re: electricity
  • From: Androcles
• This can run your car
  • From: Larry Snyder
• Re: electricity
  • From: Blind Poe
• Re: Why paint?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: DamnInteresting.COM is... well... more interesting thanSci.Phy...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why paint?
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 194.0: Additive Monochromatic Decomposition of Polynomials
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Covariance
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Why paint?
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Velocity of Aluminum vapor in a vacuum?
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: DamnInteresting.COM is... well... more interesting thanSci.Phy...
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Space Foreshortning (an original theory)
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: electricity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Why paint?
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Why paint?
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Why paint?
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Why paint?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Lepton is composite?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: Igor
• Re: Why paint?
  • From: Igor
• Re: electricity
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Why paint?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: electricity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: electricity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Space Foreshortning (an original theory)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: electricity
  • From: PD
• Re: Space Foreshortning (an original theory)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why paint?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: DamnInteresting.COM is... well... more interesting than Sci.Phy...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• My sole “ investments ” are people.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• RE: Why paint?
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: electricity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Why paint?
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition or Dust
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: electricity
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Quantum Gravity 193.6: Clifford Operations With Regard To 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 193.7: Does Clifford (Spacetime Algebra) Geometric Product ab = P(A-->B)?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Open the pod bay doors Hel.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Open the pod bay doors Hel.
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Gravity 193.5: Converting Clifford Algebra and Physics To Probability Equations Via 2 --> 1 + P(A<-->B)
  • From: jimp
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Help with Lagrangian mechanics
  • From: bit188
• Re: Quantum Gravity 193.5: Converting Clifford Algebra and Physics To Probability Equations Via 2 --> 1 + P(A<-->B)
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Open the pod bay doors Hel.
  • From: rick_sobie
• DamnInteresting.COM is... well... more interesting than Sci.Physics.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: SOLUTION MANUALS OF VARIOUS EBOOKS
  • From: solution
• Re: SOLUTION MANUALS OF VARIOUS EBOOKS
  • From: solution
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Open the pod bay doors Hel.
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• I'm the most f_cked-up guy here.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Youse Guys
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: black holes made of light?
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: black holes made of light?
  • From: BradGuth
• Glazier v Wormley
  • From: RH Nigl
• Open the pod bay doors Hel.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Quantum Gravity 193.5: Converting Clifford Algebra and Physics To Probability Equations Via 2 --> 1 + P(A<-->B)
  • From: Huang
• China motorcycles
  • From: Elizazhan
• Re: Space Foreshortning (an original theory)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ?Does God exist
  • From: Pmb
• Re: ?Does God exist
  • From: Pmb
• Re: electricity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: electricity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• proTECT&RAI.KI.DO oki.doki i.e. vastOK
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: electricity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Space Foreshortning (an original theory)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 193.5: Converting Clifford Algebra and Physics To Probability Equations Via 2 --> 1 + P(A<-->B)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Einstein, Hawking and General Relativity disallow black holes.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Pop Quiz for Science Buffs!
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Covariance
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Pop Quiz for Science Buffs!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Sagnac Experiment "OR" Higgs Field theory is ***FALSE***
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: electricity
  • From: jimp
• Re: electricity
  • From: jimp
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: jimp
• I use “ Search PlugIns ”, not RSS feeds.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Covariance
  • From: Laurent
• Re: electricity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity without matter
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Space Foreshortning (an original theory)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Mental Anguish --> Stress-Weakened Immune System --> Cancer -->...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The best way to get information and news.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Does God exist? <= NO
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Fresnel's equations - problem with transmitted ray
  • From: Hans
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Oct 29, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Pair production of neutrinos
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Shadows of the Fourth Dimension, (and not Time)
  • From: kunzmilan
• Einstein, Hawking and General Relativity disallow black holes.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Quantum Gravity 194.0: France: Light Gravitinos As Dark Matter, and Probable Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Passive componets in optical communication field
  • From: honkylee@xxxxxxxxx
• Lepton is composite?
  • From: square17320508
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Ylno
• FA Soap Bubbles vintage Science manual book 1912
  • From: Alys
• Re: for solution manuals visit
  • From: PD
• Re: for solution manuals visit
  • From: PD
• Re: Fresnel's equations - problem with transmitted ray
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Mental Anguish --> Stress-Weakened Immune System --> Cancer --> Death.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• The roots of the Old and New Testament Cosmologies are Aramaic.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• I've no hope of changing myself, much less anyone else.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Time dilation is centrifugal.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Unravelling the mysteries of coiling ropes
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Unravelling the mysteries of coiling ropes
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Blackhole questions
  • From: cannoningeneral@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A model inside a neural network inside a model
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 193.4: 2 is Basic To Real Clifford Algebras
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: jimp
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: jimp
• Re: Space Foreshortning (an original theory)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A model inside a neural network inside a model
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A model inside a neural network inside a model
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Bert, How did you find out about it ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity without matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Time dilation Real???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A model inside a neural network inside a model
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Test post.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Space Foreshortning (an original theory)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity without matter
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Oct 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Oct 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• for solution manuals visit
  • From: techie
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Fresnel's equations - problem with transmitted ray
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Fresnel's equations - problem with transmitted ray
  • From: Androcles
• Re: electricity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• MAGNUM IMAGINARYUM of Excellency Dedanoe Unlishnidaos
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Gravitational mass/Inertial mass defn?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity without matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Old and New Testimate are Aramaic Cosmologies.
  • From: panton_chrimaton
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Space Foreshortning (an original theory)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Fresnel's equations - problem with transmitted ray
  • From: Hans
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Does Universal Time (Absolute Time) Exists??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The rich are like gods, enslaving the poor.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Space Foreshortning (an original theory)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• The rich are like gods, enslaving the poor.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Does Universal Time (Absolute Time) Exists??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravitational mass/Inertial mass defn?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravitational mass/Inertial mass defn?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• !i!Father Free -- VASE SAVE!i!
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: $200 Dollar a Barrel Oil Is Bilderberg Plan To Destroy Middle ...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Shadows of the Fourth Dimension, (and not Time)
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Shadows of the Fourth Dimension, (and not Time)
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Gravity without matter
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• The Old and New Testimate are Aramaic Cosmologies.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Shadows of the Fourth Dimension, (and not Time)
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: No one likes reality, where would Tina Turner be without her wigs ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: No one likes reality, where would Tina Turner be without her wigs ?
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Shadows of the Fourth Dimension, (and not Time)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Shadows of the Fourth Dimension, (and not Time)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Interview question
  • From: aarklon
• Re: Blackhole questions
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Both the past and the future exist at the same " time ".
  • From: RH Nigl
• No one likes reality, where would Tina Turner be without her wigs ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Shadows of the Fourth Dimension, (and not Time)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Both the past and the future exist at the same " time ".
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe?
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: All dimensions are spatial dimensions.
  • From: RH Nigl
• Both the past and the future exist at the same “ time ”.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• All dimensions are spatial dimensions.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Blackhole questions
  • From: Jonathan Rothenberg
• Re: atomic orbitals program
  • From: panton_chrimaton
• Re: atomic orbitals program
  • From: PD
• Re: atomic orbitals program
  • From: Androcles
• Bert, How did you find out about it ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Quantum Gravity 193.3: Spin in Clifford Algebra via Hestenes (Arizona)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A model inside a neural network inside a model
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Gravitational mass/Inertial mass defn?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravitational mass/Inertial mass defn?
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: atomic orbitals program
  • From: malibu
• Re: Shadows of the Fourth Dimension, (and not Time)
  • From: RH Nigl
• Shadows of the Fourth Dimension, (and not Time)
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Oct 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: black holes made of light?
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Oct 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: Why in hell would they keep it â?? Top Secret â?? ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Test post.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: jimp
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A model inside a neural network inside a model
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Oct 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Oct 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Hypergeometrical Formula for the Permittivity of Vaccum
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Oct 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Randy Poe
• see it and say it TAO 5
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: Igor
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: jimp
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Hypergeometrical Formula for the Permittivity of Vaccum
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Oct 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Hypergeometrical Formula for the Permittivity of Vaccum
  • From: srp
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: About Gravity, Inertia and Mass
  • From: Pmb
• Why in hell would they keep it “ Top Secret ” ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: A racist's mind is a terrible thing.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Oct 07 Washington, DC
  • From: malibu
• TAO essencial EDU harvest SMS Collection
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: 11E80.jpg by dedanoe unlishnidaos
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: About Gravity, Inertia and Mass
  • From: malibu
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Oct 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: About Gravity, Inertia and Mass
  • From: malibu
• Re: black holes made of light?
  • From: Eric Baird
• Quantum Gravity 193.2: S = h sqrt(s(s+1)) Explained via Probable Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Oct 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mr. Messager - stop your slander
  • From: YBM
• About Gravity, Inertia and Mass
  • From: Laurent
• About Gravity, Inertia and Mass
  • From: Laurent
• Mr. Messager - stop your slander
  • From: Ylmo
• Morphogenetic Fields and Carl Jung's Collective Unconscious
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: RH Nigl
• "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Ylmo
• Re: Are we close to the next scientific revolution?
  • From: Laurent
• Hypergeometrical Formula for the Permittivity of Vaccum
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Bert, How do you know your sweet potatoes come from Mexico ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: RH Nigl
• Bert, How do you know your sweet potatoes come from Mexico ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Bert, who imports the sweet potatoes for you ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Oct 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 193.1: Why Have Spins Nonzero Multiples of 1/2 Via Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 193.0: Why Bosons Including Gravitons Have Spins 0, 1, 2 Via Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Quantum Gravity 192.91: 1/2 in Spin and Supersymmetry
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 192.91: 1/2 in Spin and Supersymmetry
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 192.9: Catenary, Hyperbolic Functions, Rejected Functions
  • From: OsherD
• Let There Be Aluminum-42: Experiment creates surprise isotope
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: electricity
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• A racist's mind is a terrible thing.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Bert, who imports the sweet potatoes for you ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: RH Nigl
• I have diabetes, not leprosy.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: meet them UNLISHNIDAOS
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: OT: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. ParkFriday, 26 Oct 07 Washington,DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Are we close to the next scientific revolution?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Oct 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Oct 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• dedanoe on fair of innovations
  • From: dedanoe
• leverian unified dynamics (lud like light union darkness)
  • From: dedanoe
• meet them UNLISHNIDAOS
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Oct 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: A model inside a neural network inside a model
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A model inside a neural network inside a model
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Gravity without mattter
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A model inside a neural network inside a model
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Gravity without mattter
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: List of Nuclear reactions that can take place in Universe.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Are we close to the next scientific revolution?
  • From: srp
• Re: Are all sweet potatoes â?? Mexican Sweet Potatoes â?? ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: electricity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Kiss Your Monkey Ass Goodbye
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: electricity
  • From: Szczepan Bialek
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: electricity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: electricity
  • From: Szczepan Bialek
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Sue...
• Re: electricity
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: electricity
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Kiss Your Monkey Ass Goodbye
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravitational mass/Inertial mass defn?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Are we close to the next scientific revolution?
  • From: Murphy
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: electricity
  • From: Szczepan Białek
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: electricity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Gravitational mass/Inertial mass defn?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Gravitational mass/Inertial mass defn?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: I'd rather be poor and savvy than rich and deluded.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Gravitational mass/Inertial mass defn?
  • From: srp
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Ylmo
• Re: electricity
  • From: jimp
• Re: electricity
  • From: srp
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: electricity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Gravitational mass/Inertial mass defn?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: electricity
  • From: PD
• Re: electricity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Gravitational mass/Inertial mass defn?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: SOLUTION MANUALS OF VARIOUS EBOOKS
  • From: PD
• Re: 11E80.jpg by dedanoe unlishnidaos
  • From: PD
• !i! IS-U-SE <=> E-VO-SE !i!
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: 11E80.jpg by dedanoe unlishnidaos
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: steel cable as an alternative for the space elevator?
  • From: Greg Neill
• electricity
  • From: aarklon
• Re: Does Universal Time (Absolute Time) Exists??
  • From: Y.Porat
• Are all sweet potatoes “ Mexican Sweet Potatoes ” ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Gravitational mass/Inertial mass defn?
  • From: mmm901
• Re: steel cable as an alternative for the space elevator?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Uranium Veronica
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does Universal Time (Absolute Time) Exists??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 25 October 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Unravelling the mysteries of coiling ropes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Einstein's Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Beware: the Next Giant Asteroid Belt is Overdue
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: g Forces
  • From: Adam
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: steel cable as an alternative for the space elevator?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Beware: the Next Giant Asteroid Belt is Overdue
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Beware: the Next Giant Asteroid Belt is Overdue
  • From: Uncle Al
• Beware: the Next Giant Asteroid Belt is Overdue
  • From: wbraithw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: John C . Polasek
• temporal dimensions
  • From: nkomli
• Re: g Forces
  • From: CWatters
• Re: A model inside a neural network inside a model
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: What causes the Ka doublet of characteristic X-ray?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A model inside a neural network inside a model
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Igor
• Re: A model inside a neural network inside a model
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Two Springs in Series
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A model inside a neural network inside a model
  • From: galathaea
• Re: A model inside a neural network inside a model
  • From: Eric Gisse
• A model inside a neural network inside a model
  • From: Michael Hell
• Job Opportunities
  • From: Wigz
• Re: How bumblebees fly - solved
  • From: z
• What causes the Ka doublet of characteristic X-ray?
  • From: Luyang Han
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: black holes made of light?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How bumblebees fly - solved
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: silicon lifeforms
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quantum Gravity 192.6: The Uniform and Finite-Interval Distributions Are Again "Partial Optima", This Time In Expectations
  • From: local host
• Re: Quantum Gravity 192.7: The Factor (1/2) in Physical Equations
  • From: local host
• Re: Quantum Gravity 192.9: Catenary, Hyperbolic Functions, Rejected Functions
  • From: local host
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 844 October 25, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• free articles
  • From: sorincosofret
• "The Creation of a Universe and the Gravity Transformations"
  • From: Ylmo
• Re: The 69 virgins come with 69 fathers-in-law.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: g Forces
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The 69 virgins come with 69 fathers-in-law.
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Two Springs in Series
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Androcles
• Re: g Forces
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: â?¡ Re: I happy with whatever life deals me, no matter how little.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Does Universal Time (Absolute Time) Exists??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Tom Potter
• The best way to get information and news.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: g Forces
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 192.9: Catenary, Hyperbolic Functions, Rejected Functions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Gravity 192.4: P ' (A-->B) increases as Probable Correlation Increases and as P(B-->A) gets closer to P(A-->B)
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: g Forces
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 192.8: Chi-Square Distribution and 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Two Springs in Series
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 192.7: The Factor (1/2) in Physical Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Two Springs in Series
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: " Mr. Hanson " won't tell you what languages he speaks.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: " Mr. Hanson " won't tell you what languages he speaks.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Two Springs in Series
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New study concludes: AGWBunnie farts are top pollution in the environment. Environmental activist, Algore, suggests worldwide elevation of consciousness to this very real threat.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: List of Nuclear reactions that can take place in Universe.
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Two Springs in Series
  • From: Alexander
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: g Forces
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 192.6: The Uniform and Finite-Interval Distributions Are Again "Partial Optima", This Time In Expectations
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 192.5: Quantum Gravity vs Supply-Demand Limitations and No Limitations - A "Rosetta Stone"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: " Mr. Hanson " won't tell you what languages he speaks.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: " Mr. Hanson " won't tell you what languages he speaks.
  • From: Traveler
• Re: " Mr. Hanson " won't tell you what languages he speaks.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: briggs
• g Forces
  • From: Mike E
• Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 257)
  • From: Traveler
• Re: list of solution manuals
  • From: PD
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: " Mr. Hanson " won't tell you what languages he speaks.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: jimp
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: DiamondSkeptic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Take your adverage parent Tom....
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: List of Nuclear reactions that can take place in Universe.
  • From: PD
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Tom Potter, are you this person ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tom Potter, are you this person ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Take your adverage parent Tom....
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Ylmo
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How bumblebees fly - solved
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Pmb
• Re: black holes made of light?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• I have solutions to Kreizig and White
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Low-precision clocks on the moon and the earth.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Low-precision clocks on the moon and the earth.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• “ Mr. Hanson ” won't tell you what languages he speaks.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Upon retiring from Nasa, Joe stressed out --> Big Time <-- .
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!
  • From: NovaJoe
• Quantum Gravity 192.4: P ' (A-->B) increases as Probable Correlation Increases and as P(B-->A) gets closer to P(A-->B)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Prime numbers relevant in physics?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Huang
• Re: black holes made of light?
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Take your adverage parent Tom....
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Tom Potter, are you this person ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: Does Universal Time (Absolute Time) Exists??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Pmb
• Re: black holes made of light?
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: 11E80.jpg by dedanoe unlishnidaos
  • From: local host
• Re: Hubble Spacetime observation is affected more by GR then SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 192.3: P(A-->B) - P(B-->A) Equation Supports Macroscopic Causing Microscopic Viewpoint
  • From: OsherD
• Hubble Spacetime observation is affected more by GR then SR
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: GETTING RID OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does Universal Time (Absolute Time) Exists??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Igor
• Re: Networking opportunity for Physicists
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Earth's Gravitational Time Dilation MUST affect Hubble's Expanding Universe
  • From: guskz
• Re: Earth's Gravitational Time Dilation MUST affect Hubble's Expanding Universe
  • From: guskz
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: 11E80.jpg by dedanoe unlishnidaos
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Igor
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Igor
• 11E80.jpg by dedanoe unlishnidaos
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Philosophy of Global Warming
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Harvey Pecker
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
  • From: Ken Dixon
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Industrial production of magnets
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Industrial production of magnets
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Andy Resnick
• The 69 virgins come with 69 fathers-in-law.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Ylmo
• Re: Industrial production of magnets
  • From: Androcles
• This is the way we like it.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• When you feed the pigeons, you just get more pigeons.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• ‡ Re: I happy with whatever life deals me, no matter how little.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• No matter how little I have... that's the way I like it.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Networking opportunity for Physicists
  • From: vincent64@xxxxxxxxx
• Earth's Gravitational Time Dilation MUST affect Hubble's Expanding Universe
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tom Potter, are you this person ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tesla Coil
  • From: Benj
• Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 257)
  • From: Paul Le Bourdais
• Take your adverage parent Tom....
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Model Mechanics: A Theory of Everything
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tesla Coil
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Physical FORCE , & What It REALLY IS
  • From: Harvey Pecker
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Exposing sociopaths, phonies, liars, charlatans, and cultists.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Quantum Gravity 191.8: India: Mass Not Fundamental Dimension
  • From: OsherD
• Re: black holes made of light?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: jimp
• Quantum Gravity 192.3: Normalization By Probable Correlation Destroys Heisenberg Uncertainty
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Physical FORCE , & What It REALLY IS
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Quantum Gravity 192.2: Causal Maximal Analog of Born's Probability With P '
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 192.2: Causal Maximal Analog of Born's Probability With P '
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: black holes made of light?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Model Mechanics: A Theory of Everything
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: black holes made of light?
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 192.1: P(A-->B)^2 - P(B-->A)^2 Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Tesla Coil
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 192.0: P ' (A-->B) and P(A <--> B) in Terms of P(A-->B) and P(B-->A) Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Model Mechanics: A Theory of Everything
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: W. D. Allen
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: jimp
• Re: Are supernovae really lasers, or is this pure sci-fi ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are supernovae really lasers, or is this pure sci-fi ?
  • From: PD
• Re: black holes made of light?
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Gordon
• CUBAN CIGARS......
  • From: Willy
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Igor
• Model Mechanics: A Theory of Everything
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Exposing sociopaths, phonies, liars, charlatans, and cultists.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Igor
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Igor
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: black holes made of light?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Happiness seems wholly unrelated to how much one has.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Industrial production of magnets
  • From: Camilo
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Eventually, all material wealth will be provided by John Fredri...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Any limits on relativistic impact blast velocity?
  • From: IsaacKuo
• Re: Tom Potter says: â?o Relativity is not germane to clock synchronization. â??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Gravity 191.7: Israelis: Time Creates Space Creates Mass/Matter
  • From: ahtremblay
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Occidental
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: hanson
• Re: Does Universal Time (Absolute Time) Exists??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Tesla Coil
  • From: Uncle Al
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Ylmo
• Re: Happiness seems wholly unrelated to how much one has.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: I happy with whatever life deals me, no matter how little.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Spin up/down refers to how particles align, e.g. cooper condensates.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Does Universal Time (Absolute Time) Exists??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• “ delta( momentum ) == delta( frequency ) ”.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Happiness seems wholly unrelated to how much one has.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does Universal Time (Absolute Time) Exists??
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: momentum vs. velocity in uncertainty principle
  • From: Ray
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Oct 22, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: momentum vs. velocity in uncertainty principle
  • From: Ray
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Design the future contest by NASA...check the link
  • From: Designer
• Quantum Gravity 191.7: Israelis: Time Creates Space Creates Mass/Matter
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Tesla Coil
  • From: Bert Hickman
• Re: momentum vs. velocity in uncertainty principle
  • From: Sam Wormley
• I happy with whatever life deals me, no matter how little.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Tesla Coil
  • From: Frank
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Industrial production of magnets
  • From: srp
• Re: Is Bert biting the hand that feeds him ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Science and Faith
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Tesla Coil
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: atomic orbitals program
  • From: malibu
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Gordon
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Dwib
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Gravity is weaker than magnets where ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Industrial production of magnets
  • From: Camilo
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: PD
• Re: Double Slit and MMX in one?
  • From: PD
• Re: atomic orbitals program
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Double Slit and MMX in one?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Lee Smolin, what's he got against strings?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Velocity of Aluminum vapor in a vacuum?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: fluid mechanics lectures
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: Double Slit and MMX in one?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Double Slit and MMX in one?
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Help with Lagrangian mechanics
  • From: mL
• Re: Does Universal Time (Absolute Time) Exists??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Velocity of Aluminum vapor in a vacuum?
  • From: James Lerch
• Re: Double Slit and MMX in one?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Double Slit and MMX in one?
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Any limits on relativistic impact blast velocity?
  • From: Igor
• Re: New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: momentum vs. velocity in uncertainty principle
  • From: Igor
• Re: Lee Smolin, what's he got against strings?
  • From: Igor
• Re: New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!
  • From: Igor
• Re: Help with Lagrangian mechanics
  • From: PD
• Re: Help with Lagrangian mechanics
  • From: Thomas
• Lagrangian mechanics
  • From: Kate R
• Re: New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!
  • From: Frank
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Tom Potter is not showing the way.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Tom Potter, are you this person ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Tom Potter, aren't sports fans wasting their minds, just like you ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!
  • From: NovaJoe
• New relativistic hypothesis will blow your mind!!!!
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: Quantum Gravity 191.4: Could Macroscopic vs Microscopic Phases Be Analogous to Change of Coordinates and Intersections as Well as Inclusions Change Thereby?
  • From: OsherD
• Biggest 'small' black hole discovered
  • From: william . hillton
• Quantum Gravity 191.3: Proof of Theorem
  • From: OsherD
• "Gravity"
  • From: Eefcm
• Re: Velocity of Aluminum vapor in a vacuum?
  • From: IsaacKuo
• Re: Pronunciation of "Radau"
  • From: Lorents
• Art_Deco's 'bot.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• RHU Theory: The relativity of the inertial phenomena
  • From: NovaJoe
• Re: Does Universal Time (Absolute Time) Exists??
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Britney Spears randomly tested twice a week for drug and alcohol usage.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Britney Spears randomly tested twice a week for drug and alcohol usage.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Quantum Gravity 191.2: More Re Sciarretta on Macroscopic Causes Microscopic More Than Vice Versa
  • From: OsherD
• Velocity of Aluminum vapor in a vacuum?
  • From: James Lerch
• Quantum Gravity 191.1: Sciarretta on Macroscopic Causes Microscopic More Than Vice Versa
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Benj
• Quantum Gravity 191.0: Macroscopic Causes Microscopic More Than Vice Versa
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• My head is a box full of nothing... and that's the way I like it.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• “ DNA tech ” vs. “ Relativity tech ”.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Tom Potter, what “ DNA tech ” are you talking about ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tom Potter, are you this person ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Tom Potter is not showing the way.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: atomic orbitals program
  • From: Uncle Al
• Tom Potter says: “ Relativity is not germane to clock synchronization. ”
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Tom Potter, aren't sports fans wasting their minds, just like you ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: atomic orbitals program
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Tom Potter, are you this person ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Lee Smolin, what's he got against strings?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Tom Potter, are you this person ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: ORBITAL MOTION --MECHANICS
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: atomic orbitals program
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: black holes made of light?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: black holes made of light?
  • From: OG
• Re: Help with Lagrangian mechanics
  • From: mL
• Re: Any limits on relativistic impact blast velocity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Help with Lagrangian mechanics
  • From: mL
• OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Oct 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: black holes made of light?
  • From: jjsavage
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Dwib
• Re: black holes made of light?
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: black holes made of light?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Jim Black
• atomic orbitals program
  • From: Martin
• Re: Any limits on relativistic impact blast velocity?
  • From: IsaacKuo
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Any limits on relativistic impact blast velocity?
  • From: IsaacKuo
• Re: momentum vs. velocity in uncertainty principle
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: jimp
• electron figure eight animation
  • From: malibu
• Re: Any limits on relativistic impact blast velocity?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Help with Lagrangian mechanics
  • From: Thomas
• black holes made of light?
  • From: jjsavage
• Re: Any limits on relativistic impact blast velocity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: John C . Polasek
• momentum vs. velocity in uncertainty principle
  • From: jjsavage
• Re: Any limits on relativistic impact blast velocity?
  • From: IsaacKuo
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Any limits on relativistic impact blast velocity?
  • From: IsaacKuo
• Re: Any limits on relativistic impact blast velocity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Elegant Rebuttal to Gore Nobel Peace Prize
  • From: Benj
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Any limits on relativistic impact blast velocity?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Benj
• Gravity from another dimension?
  • From: Jarry
• Re: Elegant Rebuttal to Gore Nobel Peace Prize
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Any limits on relativistic impact blast velocity?
  • From: IsaacKuo
• Re: Two definitions of Philosophy, and Global Warming defined
  • From: Jong Kim
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Ylper
• fish diagram calculation with i-epsilon prescription
  • From: Barrow
• Re: Elegant Rebuttal to Gore Nobel Peace Prize
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Coanda Effect vs. Bernoulli Principle wrt aerodynamic lift
  • From: Thomas
• Is Bert biting the hand that feeds him ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Quantum Gravity 190.0: Optimizing Communication Networks By Probable Causation/Influence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Coanda Effect vs. Bernoulli Principle wrt aerodynamic lift
  • From: RP
• Quantum Gravity 189.0: Croatians Show Interaction Force Proportional to Probable Causation at Boundary Between Two Media
  • From: OsherD
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 18 October 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Test
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Interesting binary
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Coanda Effect vs. Bernoulli Principle wrt aerodynamic lift
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is Google evil? Are they "cooking the books"???
  • From: Tom Potter
• Coanda Effect vs. Bernoulli Principle wrt aerodynamic lift
  • From: tadchem
• Re: How bumblebees fly - solved
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Pronunciation of "Radau"
  • From: tadchem
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 843 October 18, 2007 by Phillip F.Schewe
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Help with Lagrangian mechanics
  • From: mL
• Re: EXERCISE: Optimum emissivity for hot-weather house
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Does Universal Time (Absolute Time) Exists??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 188.0: Non-Gaussian Quantum Teleportation Triumphs Over Gaussian One
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Interesting binary
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Pronunciation of "Radau"
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Re: How bumblebees fly - solved
  • From: Benj
• Re: Electromagnetic Induction problem in kitchen?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Interesting binary
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Interesting binary
  • From: PD
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 843 October 18, 2007 by Phillip F.Schewe
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Interesting binary
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Interesting binary
  • From: PD
• Re: Electromagnetic Induction problem in kitchen?
  • From: srp
• Re: Interesting binary
  • From: Androcles
• Interesting binary
  • From: PD
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How bumblebees fly - solved
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Electromagnetic Induction problem in kitchen?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How bumblebees fly - solved
  • From: Edward Green
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 843 October 18, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Pronunciation of "Radau"
  • From: srp
• Re: How do physicists deal journals in other languages?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: How do physicists deal journals in other languages?
  • From: srp
• Re: the next time i will be baging your dead ass in a black bag
  • From: dedanoe
• the next time i will be baging your dead ass in a black bag
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Electromagnetic Induction problem in kitchen?
  • From: srp
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Androcles
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Tsoc
• Re: Pronunciation of "Radau"
  • From: Lorents
• test
  • From: dxyaep
• Re: Money talks, shit walks.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Black hole Riddle
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How do physicists deal journals in other languages?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: How do physicists deal journals in other languages?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: EXERCISE: Optimum emissivity for hot-weather house
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Money talks, shit walks.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Does Universal Time (Absolute Time) Exists??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Bert, you shouldn't date the astronaut's daughters.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Help with Lagrangian mechanics
  • From: tadchem
• Re: EXERCISE: Optimum emissivity for hot-weather house
  • From: timo
• Re: Elegant Rebuttal to Gore Nobel Peace Prize
  • From: Benj
• Re: How do physicists deal journals in other languages?
  • From: Benj
• Quantum Gravity 187.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) and Cardinality
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A partical moving though a magnetic field
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A partical moving though a magnetic field
  • From: Androcles
• A partical moving though a magnetic field
  • From: nateomason
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Bert, you shouldn't date the astronaut's daughters.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: PD
• Re: How do physicists deal journals in other languages?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How do physicists deal journals in other languages?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Electromagnetic Induction problem in kitchen?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How do physicists deal journals in other languages?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How do physicists deal journals in other languages?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How do physicists deal journals in other languages?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Help with Lagrangian mechanics
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Elegant Rebuttal to Gore Nobel Peace Prize
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is Google Evil?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Electromagnetic Induction problem in kitchen?
  • From: cp3
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: jimp
• Re: Evaluating 100 years old theories in theoretical physics.
  • From: Igor
• How do physicists deal journals in other languages?
  • From: blackhead
• Re: mount mckinley
  • From: Eddie
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Androcles
• Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Hurricane Expert Calls Al Gore's Theory "Ridiculous"
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Hurricane Expert Calls Al Gore's Theory "Ridiculous"
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Google Evil?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: PD
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Help with Lagrangian mechanics
  • From: Thomas
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does Universal Time (Absolute Time) Exists??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 181.2 (see 183.3 also): Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP) vs Causation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Uncle Al
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Nret
• Re: Global Warming is caused by the Sun, the moon and the stars.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Hurricane Expert Calls Al Gore's Theory "Ridiculous"
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Pronunciation of "Radau"
  • From: srp
• Pronunciation of "Radau"
  • From: Lorents
• Re: NASA exposes Apollo Hoax
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The lunar astronaut's clocks tick faster, that's just a fact.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Across the Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: THE FUTURE OF SCIENCE AND MANKIND
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does Universal Time (Absolute Time) Exists??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Tom's X, Y, Z, T postion in G.R.'s hypersphere.
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Tom's X, Y, Z, T postion in G.R.'s hypersphere.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: How to divide by zero, from mathematics of non-life to the formula of big bang
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Help with Lagrangian mechanics
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• if NOTHING cannot over ALL then NOTHING actually WILL
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Evaluating 100 years old theories in theoretical physics.
  • From: Androcles
• Governments are obsessed with numbers and letters.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: idea of a new theory...**************************************
  • From: Divij Rao
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Ground state wavefunction of hydrogen in momentum space
  • From: Barrow
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic
• Re: Is Google Evil?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Evaluating 100 years old theories in theoretical physics.
  • From: atom . model
• Re: Quantum Gravity 181.2 (see 183.3 also): Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP) vs Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 181.2 (see 183.3 also): Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP) vs Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Quantum Gravity 181.1: Is "Chaplygin gas" Actually Logic, and is the Universe's "Geometry/Proto-Matter" Actually Logic?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Global Warming is caused by the Sun, the moon and the stars.
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Newtonian Physics: Sliding box on sphere
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Newtonian Physics: Sliding box on sphere
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Quantum Gravity 184.2: John D. Barrow of Cambridge U. on Varying Constants
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Newtonian Physics: Sliding box on sphere
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Please Donate to the Friend For Dimmy Fund
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Al Gore wins Nobel peace Prize.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Al Gore wins Nobel peace Prize.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Al Gore wins Nobel peace Prize.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How to eliminate evil from society
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Newtonian Physics: Sliding box on sphere
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Re: Hurricane Expert Calls Al Gore's Theory "Ridiculous"
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Newtonian Physics: Sliding box on sphere
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Gravity Waves and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: THE FUTURE OF SCIENCE AND MANKIND
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Newtonian Physics: Sliding box on sphere
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: THE FUTURE OF SCIENCE AND MANKIND
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Piezoelectricity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Newtonian Physics: Sliding box on sphere
  • From: Uncle Al
• Newtonian Physics: Sliding box on sphere
  • From: bpdace
• Re: Piezoelectricity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Light clock fast or slow?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Hurricane Expert Calls Al Gore's Theory "Ridiculous"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Piezoelectricity
  • From: Camilo
• Piezoelectricity
  • From: Camilo
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Interpreting Recoil Motion for Undergraduate Students
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Interpreting Recoil Motion for Undergraduate Students
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment and Lorentz polarization
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Interpreting Recoil Motion for Undergraduate Students
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Magnetic vector sum repelling a piece off the game board?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Fusion reactors
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Michael Asherman
• Re: How to divide by zero, from mathematics of non-life to the formula of big bang
  • From: ExtrêmeAchillès
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: PD
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: briggs
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Igor
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: Igor
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: PD
• Re: How to divide by zero, from mathematics of non-life to the formula of big bang
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Interpreting Recoil Motion for Undergraduate Students
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: EXERCISE: Optimum emissivity for hot-weather house
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: quantization of electron spin?
  • From: jjsavage
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Evird
• Re: fluid mechanics lectures
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Road to Physics Knowledge
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: quantization of electron spin?
  • From: Herman Trivilino
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Re: The Road to Physics Knowledge
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Newtonian Physics Question
  • From: DiamondSkeptic
• Magnetic vector sum repelling a piece off the game board?
  • From: Bhushit Joshipura
• Interpreting Recoil Motion for Undergraduate Students
  • From: Tareq
• Re: excessive turbo reactor
  • From: dedanoe
• Solution Manual for Knight Physics
  • From: heavken
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Quantum Gravity 186.1: Tipler, Valenkin, Penrose/Hameroff, Fedorov, Astakhov on "Migrating Consciousness"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A classification of life and universe
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Quantum Gravity 186.0: Pioneer Anomaly and Black Hole Matter Generating By Tidal Forces
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Ionization optimization
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• OT ... immigration disaster
  • From: wg
• What's the last?
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: How to divide by zero, from mathematics of non-life to the formula of big bang
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Road to Physics Knowledge
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ionization optimization
  • From: bob
• Re: idea of a new theory...**************************************
  • From: tadchem
• Re: idea of a new theory...**************************************
  • From: tadchem
• Do you see lots of ads for cigars on Norwegian TV ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: The Nobel Peace Prize 2007
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Multivariate polynomial regression (help)
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The Nobel Peace Prize 2007
  • From: tj Frazir
• Fusion reactors
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: EXERCISE: Optimum emissivity for hot-weather house
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Help with Lagrangian mechanics
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: Pmb
• EXERCISE: Optimum emissivity for hot-weather house
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Measuring sub picoamp DC by electrical or chemical means
  • From: Paul
• Re: Across the Universe
  • From: hanson
• Re: Measuring sub picoamp DC by electrical or chemical means
  • From: Stanislaw Flatto
• Ionization optimization
  • From: Camilo
• Re: The Road to Physics Knowledge
  • From: srp
• Re: The Road to Physics Knowledge
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Multivariate polynomial regression (help)
  • From: t99hurt
• fluid mechanics lectures
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: quantization of electron spin?
  • From: Uncle Al
• How to divide by zero, from mathematics of non-life to the formula of big bang
  • From: ExtrêmeAchillès
• Re: The lunar astronaut's clocks tick faster, that's just a fact.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Invasive, Indeed:
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: excessive turbo reactor
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: Igor
• quantization of electron spin?
  • From: jjsavage
• Maxwell's Daemon origin
  • From: Cur
• Re: excessive turbo reactor
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Invasive, Indeed:
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Road to Physics Knowledge
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Quantum Gravity 184.2: John D. Barrow of Cambridge U. on Varying Constants
  • From: bob
• "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Tahw
• Re: The Kingdom of Norway likes taxes and Albert Gore... what a sho...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Road to Physics Knowledge
  • From: srp
• Re: The Kingdom of Norway likes taxes and Albert Gore... what a sho...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Nobel Peace Prize 2007
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: THE FUTURE OF SCIENCE AND MANKIND
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: steel cable as an alternative for the space elevator?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Road to Physics Knowledge
  • From: greysky
• Re: Across the Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Kingdom of Norway likes taxes and Albert Gore... what a sho...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: PD
• Re: Help with Lagrangian mechanics
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Why Are Republicans Anti-Science?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: THE FUTURE OF SCIENCE AND MANKIND
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• The Road to Physics Knowledge
  • From: Nelson
• Re: Expanding universe vs galaxies collide
  • From: p4o2
• Expanding universe vs galaxies collide
  • From: p4o2
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Let's hear it for Swiss patent clerks !
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: John Park
• Re: Gravity Waves and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Oct 15, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Wind power question
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Forget " mass " and " energy ", all you need to know is this...
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: Eric Gisse
• In Norway, feminine ideals are the --> Law <-- .
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: CWatters
• Quantum Gravity 184.2: John D. Barrow of Cambridge U. on Varying Constants
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 184.1: The Curious Case of Constant Time in F = Gm1m2/r^2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: idea of a new theory...**************************************
  • From: Divij Rao
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Forget " mass " and " energy ", all you need to know is this...
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Strange Creature
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: franklinhu
• It's less contentious to speak of momentum.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Mark Trimble
• Re: Hurricane Expert Calls Al Gore's Theory "Ridiculous"
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The Lord's Natural Philosopher
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Light Falling, Light Accelerate
  • From: Pmb
• Hurricane Expert Calls Al Gore's Theory "Ridiculous"
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Dark Energy = Light Energy ??
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Help with Lagrangian mechanics
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Re: Dark Energy = Light Energy ??
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: Winning Ticket
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Light Falling, Light Accelerate
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Light Falling, Light Accelerate
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity Waves and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Help with Lagrangian mechanics
  • From: bit188
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Re: Forum on GMU prof Robert Hazen's Teaching Company course "Origins of Life."
  • From: maplehouse
• Re: Gravity Waves and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Re: Dark Energy = Light Energy ??
  • From: malibu
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: Igor
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Kingdom of Norway likes taxes and Albert Gore... what a shock !
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Dark Energy = Light Energy ??
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Light Falling, Light Accelerate
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Light Falling, Light Accelerate
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• The Kingdom of Norway likes taxes and Albert Gore... what a shock !
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Redshift object
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• excessive turbo reactor
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Gravity Waves and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Do physicists totally and completely misunderstand General Relativity?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Gravity Waves and the Speed of Gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: Benj
• Re: Dark Energy = Light Energy ??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Forget " mass " and " energy ", all you need to know is this...
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Forget “ mass ” and “ energy ”, all you need to know is this...
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Tom Potter judges without knowing the facts.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Wind power question
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Would Mr. Potter abolish public parks, hospitals and the Internet ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Lord's Natural Philosopher
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: CWatters
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: Engineering Calculations
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment and Lorentz polarization
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: Henry
• Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Invasive, Indeed:
  • From: mike3
• Re: Winning Ticket
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Invasive, Indeed:
  • From: jimp
• Re: Magnetic Fields at general points in space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: RP
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: mikeranch87
• Magnetic Fields at general points in space
  • From: rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light in a box
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Invasive, Indeed:
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Forum on GMU prof Robert Hazen's Teaching Company course "Origins of Life."
  • From: maplehouse
• Light in a box
  • From: mikeranch87
• Invasive, Indeed:
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Double Slit and MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Double Slit and MMX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New Technique to Apply Math to QM
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Double Slit and MMX
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Indirect predictions
  • From: Michael Hell
• Indirect predictions
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: New Technique to Apply Math to QM
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New Technique to Apply Math to QM
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Dark Energy = Light Energy ??
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Dark Energy = Light Energy ??
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dark Energy = Light Energy ??
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Life and information (and rocks)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Re: Winning Ticket
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Further than light travel
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: Collecting positronium
  • From: mikeranch87
• Dark Energy = Light Energy ??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Collecting positronium
  • From: malibu
• Re: 1100% ideal efficiency
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Forum on GMU prof Robert Hazen's Teaching Company course "Origins of Life."
  • From: maplehouse
• Re: Wind power question
  • From: CWatters
• Re: I WANT YOU TO PUT EQUAL SING BETWEEN YOUR ECONOMIC AND PHYSICAL EFFICIENCY RIGHT NOW
  • From: Uncle Fester
• Re: New Technique to Apply Math to QM
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: are you ready to die?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Collecting positronium
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Redshift object
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Quantum Gravity 178.3: There is No Lower Bound To Free Field Energy
  • From: OsherD
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Morf
• Winning Ticket
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is 9 the limit to dimensions ????
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Do gravitons move like photons?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: p orbital paradox and cloud model of electrons
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Quantum Gravity 185.1: Logical/Knowledge Coordinates and Phase
  • From: OsherD
• Re: are you ready to die?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Do physicists totally and completely misunderstand General Relativity?
  • From: Bhanwara
• I WANT YOU TO PUT EQUAL SING BETWEEN YOUR ECONOMIC AND PHYSICAL EFFICIENCY RIGHT NOW
  • From: dedanoe
• are you ready to die?
  • From: dedanoe
• the YinYang LeverLaw vs. the quasi-laws from newton's mechanics
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: 1100% ideal efficiency
  • From: dedanoe
• fluid mechanics videos
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Redshift object
  • From: OG
• Re: Dark Matter
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Boy oh boy do I love taxes and tax payers ? !
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Collecting positronium
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: Do physicists totally and completely misunderstand General Relativity?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Do physicists totally and completely misunderstand General Relativity?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Wind power question
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Wind power question
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Gisse's posts should come with this disclaimer...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Mr. DIALUPUSA keeps confusing ignorance with reality.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: The Nobel Peace Prize 2007
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Galaxy evolve
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: Do gravitons move like photons?
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: Hypersphere form
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: Ugly Atheists!
  • From: Pmb
• Redshift object
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: Further than light travel
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: Further than light travel
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: Wind power question
  • From: OG
• Re: Wind power question
  • From: Supertech
• Re: Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 Oct 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Do gravitons move like photons?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Wind power question
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Hypersphere form
  • From: malibu
• Re: Wind power question
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Is 9 the limit to dimensions ????
  • From: malibu
• Re: Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is 9 the limit to dimensions ????
  • From: Gordon
• Re: Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Airplane Pilot's As Horse Flies
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Nobel Peace Prize 2007
  • From: Uncle Al
• The Nobel Peace Prize 2007
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is 9 the limit to dimensions ????
  • From: Igor
• Re: Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Pete, I was just projecting Gisse's sentiment back on himself.
  • From: Pmb
• Pete, I was just projecting Gisse's sentiment back on himself.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Gisse's posts should come with this disclaimer...
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: uri
• Gisse's posts should come with this disclaimer...
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Further than light travel
  • From: Front Office
• Re: Gisse won't be missed.
  • From: Pmb
• The lunar astronaut's clocks tick faster, that's just a fact.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Gisse won't be missed.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Do physicists totally and completely misunderstand General Rela...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Ton
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Gisse won't be missed.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Gravity is best understood in terms of momentum, not mass or energy.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Further than light travel
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Launching of Publications Online
  • From: publisher
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Do physicists totally and completely misunderstand General Relativity?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• everything as energy from metaphysical perspective
  • From: dcvibe@xxxxxxxxx
• Would Mr. Potter abolish public parks, hospitals and the Internet ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Quantum Gravity 170.994: Wormholes Don't Require Exotic Matter
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Hypersphere form
  • From: Uncle Fester
• Re: Do physicists totally and completely misunderstand General Relativity?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Quantum Gravity 185.0: The Strange Case P(X --> Y = k) Yielding Calculus, Nonsmooth Analysis, q-Calculus, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Our ability to exploit the “ gizmo ” is what really counts.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: 1100% ideal efficiency
  • From: mikeranch87
• Wind power question
  • From: Tom Potter
• Hypersphere form
  • From: mikeranch87
• Further than light travel
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: If and when perfect knowledge is possible...
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: 1100% ideal efficiency
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Free energy
  • From: Gieniu
• Re: sending something into orbit
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: Uncle Al
• If and when perfect knowledge is possible...
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Do physicists totally and completely misunderstand General Relativity?
  • From: Androcles
• Some NNTP ( Usenet ) servers.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Herman Trivilino
• Re: Do physicists totally and completely misunderstand General Relativity?
  • From: Bhanwara
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: Herman Trivilino
• Re: Do physicists totally and completely misunderstand General Relativity?
  • From: Bhanwara
• Re: Do physicists totally and completely misunderstand General Relativity?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Do physicists totally and completely misunderstand General Relativity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Pound Rebka
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Pound Rebka
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: Igor
• Re: A classification of life and universe
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: Pound Rebka
  • From: mikeranch87
• ---> BiZzAr <--- /'/////////
  • From: lovekgc
• Re: sending something into orbit
  • From: Benj
• Re: 1100% ideal efficiency
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• A simple lightspeed experiment by single GPS horizon skimming.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: sending something into orbit
  • From: Igor
• Re: What is the worst thing ever on this planet?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Is 9 the limit to dimensions ????
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Creating an Up Draft
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: If Ether moving in direction of Big Bang, it cannot be seen.
  • From: Igor
• Re: 1100% ideal efficiency
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: 1100% ideal efficiency
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: me
• Re: Stern-Gerlach effect goes chiral
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Would a suit made of neutrons be bulletproof?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: sending something into orbit
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: photoelectric effect threshold frequencies
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: steel cable as an alternative for the space elevator?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: steel cable as an alternative for the space elevator?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A classification of life and universe
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Re: Is it at all possible -- at least in theory -- to violate the second law?
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Would a suit made of neutrons be bulletproof?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: sending something into orbit
  • From: Androcles
• Re: If Ether moving in direction of Big Bang, it cannot be seen.
  • From: PD
• "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Wole
• Re: wave equation, please help
  • From: Fallingeagle
• If Ether moving in direction of Big Bang, it cannot be seen.
  • From: guskz
• 1100% ideal efficiency
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: sending something into orbit
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Re: Simple electrostatics ?
  • From: eisler07
• Mr. Kirovs, What platforms do you target ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 10 October 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Pound Rebka
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Would a suit made of neutrons be bulletproof?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Pound Rebka
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: Would a suit made of neutrons be bulletproof?
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: hubius helix
  • From: Mrs. Sodium K. Chloride
• Stern-Gerlach effect goes chiral
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: sending something into orbit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simple electrostatics ?
  • From: Herman Trivilino
• Would a suit made of neutrons be bulletproof?
  • From: Lemonhead
• Re: sending something into orbit
  • From: Androcles
• sending something into orbit
  • From: danlior2
• photoelectric effect threshold frequencies
  • From: mike7411@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: wave equation, please help
  • From: PD
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Re: Photoelectricity and superconductivity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: wave equation, please help
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: How bumblebees fly - solved
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A classification of life and universe
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: A classification of life and universe
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: wave equation, please help
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple electrostatics ?
  • From: PD
• hubius helix
  • From: malibu
• Re: A classification of life and universe
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The failure of Modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: Igor
• Re: A classification of life and universe
  • From: rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Potentials, real and unreal
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: A classification of life and universe
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: wave equation, please help
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Simple electrostatics ?
  • From: eisler07
• Re: wave equation, please help
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• wave equation, please help
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: A classification of life and universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A classification of life and universe
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The failure of Modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: hanson
• "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Ploc
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Re: AC Electricity at 60Hz...
  • From: srp
• Re: AC Electricity at 60Hz...
  • From: CWatters
• A classification of life and universe
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: mikeranch87
• AC Electricity at 60Hz...
  • From: Stem sells
• Re: JSH: EEP reality
  • From: bob
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: Herman Trivilino
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Massenergy of light
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: JSH: EEP reality
  • From: JSH
• Re: Airplane Pilot's As Physicists
  • From: Jim Logajan
• Re: AEONS
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Quantum Gravity 183.8: PI and Shannon MaxEnt v.s. HUP
  • From: OsherD
• The indeterminacy principle of number
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Airplane Pilot's As Physicists
  • From: Le Chaud Lapin
• Re: New Technique to Apply Math to QM
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
  • From: John Jones
• Nobel Physics prize recognizes GMR pioneers
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Power Loss Equation
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: There's only momentum ( e.g. angular momentum ).
  • From: PD
• Re: Power Loss Equation
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Would you agree that the austronauts' clocks would tick twice as fast ?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: srp
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: srp
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Power Loss Equation
  • From: nahuatlrevenge
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Doof
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE --- Number 842 October 9, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: Randy Poe
• There's only momentum ( e.g. angular momentum ).
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: New Technique to Apply Math to QM
  • From: Michael Hell
• Math is trivial... Ultra Trivial.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: me
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: me
• Re: Even protons might be cooling, if we could measure it.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• ZPM which came first
  • From: Engineering Calculations
• Re: Photoelectricity and superconductivity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Photoelectricity and superconductivity
  • From: Bhushit Joshipura
• Even protons might be cooling, if we could measure it.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: New Technique to Apply Math to QM
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The astronauts' clocks would be running twice as fast.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: frequency and time in a gravity well
  • From: Alan Browne
• Re: AEONS
  • From: Wim Vegt
• Re: How bumblebees fly - solved
  • From: andy everett
• Re: New Technique to Apply Math to QM
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: Front Office
• Re: Being a SRian...
  • From: hanson
• Re: frequency and time in a gravity well
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: me
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: me
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: me
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: me
• Re: JSH: EEP reality
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Le Sage gravity (Was: La Salle gravity)
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: JSH: EEP reality
  • From: litsohate
• Re: EEP reality
  • From: litsohate
• Re: frequency and time in a gravity well
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Re: Massenergy of light
  • From: Igor
• Re: The failure of Modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: PD
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: Front Office
• frequency and time in a gravity well
  • From: Alan Browne
• Re: The failure of Modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How bumblebees fly - solved
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How bumblebees fly - solved
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Massenergy of light
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Massenergy of light
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Massenergy of light
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Massenergy of light
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New published issue of Journal of Physics Students (JPS)
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: 'one small step'- said twice
  • From: Calvin
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: LLec
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: me
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: me
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: PD
• Re: Massenergy of light
  • From: PD
• Bell's inequality too specific?
  • From: Anton81
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: me
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Electric Car + Spring
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Kinetic energy question
  • From: Pmb
• Kinetic energy question
  • From: me
• Re: Massenergy of light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Potentials, real and unreal
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Massenergy of light
  • From: BernardZ
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Oct 08, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org
• New published issue of Journal of Physics Students (JPS)
  • From: jphysstu
• Re: 'one small step'- said twice
  • From: Benj
• Re: 'one small step'- said twice
  • From: Calvin
• Re: 'one small step'- said twice
  • From: malibu
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 170.993: Wormholes and Time Machines
  • From: OsherD
• Re: 'one small step'- said twice
  • From: Calvin
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Massenergy of light
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: 'one small step'- said twice
  • From: malibu
• Re: The beginning of the Universe before the Planck-time
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: Massenergy of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Massenergy of light
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: THE MECHANICS OF THEUNIVERSE
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: THE MECHANICS OF THEUNIVERSE
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: New Technique to Apply Math to QM
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: 'one small step'- said twice
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: 'one small step'- said twice
  • From: malibu
• Re: New Technique to Apply Math to QM
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New Technique to Apply Math to QM
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: New Technique to Apply Math to QM
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why the lack of usenet interest in anything JAXA SELENE?
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: New Technique to Apply Math to QM
  • From: Michael Hell
• An "Origin of the Universe"? A criticism.
  • From: John Jones
• Re: All Knowledge: The Bible is Scientific
  • From: Igor
• Re: Quantum Gravity 183.4: More Re HUP Misinterpreted
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 183.4: More Re HUP Misinterpreted
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How bumblebees fly - solved
  • From: Edward Green
• 'one small step'- said twice
  • From: malibu
• Re: Dielectrics for pre-school
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Quantum Gravity 183.4: More Re HUP Misinterpreted
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: uri
• Re: Dielectrics for pre-school
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The failure of Modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: greysky
• Re: Quantum Gravity 183.6: HUP Fails Scale-Reversibility, Zero-Blow-up
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 183.6: HUP Fails Scale-Reversibility, Zero-Blow-up
  • From: OsherD
• Potentials, real and unreal
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Double-Slit with single photons and electrons etc.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Size of the universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Electric Car + Spring
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Etad
• Mr. Messager - Stop Your Slander
  • From: Etad
• Re: The failure of Modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The failure of Modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: Greg Neill
• The failure of Modern Spatio-temporal theories
  • From: John Jones
• 65 physics articles "withdrawn" from LANL/arXiv
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Re: wave equation, boundary condition
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: JSH: EEP reality
  • From: gjedwards
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: Quantum Gravity 183.5: HUP's Mis-Diagonalization
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 183.5: HUP's Mis-Diagonalization
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How bumblebees fly - solved
  • From: Bumblebee Man
• Re: How bumblebees fly - solved
  • From: mikeranch87
• Re: How bumblebees fly - solved
  • From: jimp
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How bumblebees fly - solved
  • From: Dwib
• Re: How bumblebees fly - solved
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx
• How bumblebees fly - solved
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Quantum Gravity 183.4: More Re HUP Misinterpreted
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: srp
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: srp
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: srp
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: srp
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: srp
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: srp
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Re: electric permittivity and capacitors
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Computer Modeling Failure. Predictions for hurricane season a dismal dud.
  • From: Plonk
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: NoEinstein
• Focusing with quadrupoles?
  • From: nataliasanchez77
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: srp
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: JSH: EEP reality
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: srp
• Re: EEP reality
  • From: Insider
• Re: The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The mechanism of gravitation.
  • From: kirovs
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: JSH: EEP reality
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: The beginning of the Universe before the Planck-time
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Buoyant and Gravity =Clean Energy
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: La Salle gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Abort the Abortionists!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Receiving 2 GHz AM signals in space. What do they sound like?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: JSH: EEP reality
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: srp
• wave equation, boundary condition
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: JSH: EEP reality
  • From: JSH
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: JSH: EEP reality
  • From: Uncle Al
• "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Weiv
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Weiv
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Newtonian Dynamics Problem
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: srp
• Re: H-Bomb used in the name of Allah
  • From: Pmb
• Re: H-Bomb used in the name of Allah
  • From: Potte
• Re: H-Bomb used in the name of Allah
  • From: Pmb
• Re: H-Bomb used in the name of Allah
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Photoelectricity and superconductivity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Maxwell demon
  • From: kunzmilan
• Re: La Salle gravity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Newtonian Dynamics Problem
  • From: i_have_narcoleptic_insomnia
• Quantum Gravity 183.4: More Re HUP Misinterpreted
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: srp
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: srp
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Sputnik + 50: Remembering the dawn of the space age
  • From: Sam Wormley
• JSH: Re: EEP reality
  • From: local host
• Re: EEP reality
  • From: local host
• Re: Photoelectricity and superconductivity
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: EEP reality
  • From: local host
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: EEP reality
  • From: JSH
• JSH: Re: EEP reality
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: srp
• Re: Dielectrics for pre-school
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: La Salle gravity
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: EEP reality
  • From: Insider
• Re: Hare-brained idea?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• JSH: EEP reality
  • From: JSH
• Re: Gamma Ray Delay May Be Sign of 'New Physics'
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: srp
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Impedance/reflectivity/refractive index of glass
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: srp
• Re: Definition of stress tensor in continuum mech
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Photoelectricity and superconductivity
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Why the lack of usenet interest in anything JAXA SELENE?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Ship of Fools of AGW and the Titanic
  • From: Neutrino
• Re: Radiowave motion detector to 'measure' particle in quantum double slit experiment
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: wave equation
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: srp
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Rølf" ( pronounced as " Relf " ) might be a Norse surname.
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: srp
• OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 5 Oct 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: electric permittivity and capacitors
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Dielectrics for pre-school
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: The Ship of Fools of AGW and the Titanic
  • From: Neutrino
• Re: Quantum Gravity 183.3: Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP) Misinterprets Opposites
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Hare-brained idea?
  • From: PD
• Re: Photoelectricity and superconductivity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is Astronomy bullshit?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: light between the mirrors
  • From: Benj
• electric permittivity and capacitors
  • From: boson boss
• Re: light between the mirrors
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Definition of stress tensor in continuum mech
  • From: GSS
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 4 October 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Christof Koch
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Hare-brained idea?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: Mrs. Sodium K. Chloride
• Re: New Technique to Apply Math to QM
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Photoelectricity and superconductivity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Energy of a foot step
  • From: CWatters
• Photoelectricity and superconductivity
  • From: Bhushit Joshipura
• Quantum Gravity 183.3: Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP) Misinterprets Opposites
  • From: OsherD
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 4 October 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• physicsworld.com newswire (Week 40)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: Mrs. Sodium K. Chloride
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: Mrs. Sodium K. Chloride
• New Technique to Apply Math to QM
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Gamma Ray Delay May Be Sign of 'New Physics'
  • From: Potte
• Re: Definition of stress tensor in continuum mech
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Gamma Ray Delay May Be Sign of 'New Physics'
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Dielectrics for pre-school
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Gamma Ray Delay May Be Sign of 'New Physics'
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Models pure math vs objective
  • From: Potte
• Re: Dielectrics for pre-school
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Energy of a foot step
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Energy of a foot step
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Energy of a foot step
  • From: gb6726
• Re: physics question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Energy of a foot step
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Energy of a foot step
  • From: gb6726
• Re: light between the mirrors
  • From: OG
• Re: Dielectrics for pre-school
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• physics question
  • From: Julz
• Re: 150mph underground train connects London to channel
  • From: Gordon
• Re: Invitation to hobby researchers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: La Salle gravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Invitation to hobby researchers
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: light between the mirrors
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: light between the mirrors
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: La Salle gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Can Spacetime "points" be real?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Please help me
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: light between the mirrors
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Energy of a foot step
  • From: CWatters
• Re: 150mph underground train connects London to channel
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Energy of a foot step
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Quantum Gravity 184.0: Conversion of Multiplication/Division to Addition/Subtraction: Detection of Life on Other Planets
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: La Salle gravity
  • From: Peter
• From relativity to distributed, 5th dimension added easily
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Energy of a foot step
  • From: Igor
• Re: La Salle gravity
  • From: Igor
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• La Salle gravity
  • From: Peter
• Re: light between the mirrors
  • From: Androcles
• Re: light between the mirrors
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Electric car self Charging
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• light between the mirrors
  • From: Hayk
• Re: Can Spacetime "points" be real?
  • From: Potte
• Re: The Electric Car
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Electric Car & Potato
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gamma Ray Delay May Be Sign of 'New Physics'
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Can Spacetime "points" be real?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What is the Aether?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: boson boss
• Re: A QUICK LECTURE ON THE TRUE GEOLOGY
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• “Rølf” ( pronounced as “ Relf ” ) might be a Norse surname.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Hare-brained idea?
  • From: FoggyTown
• Re: THE MECHANICS OF THE UNIVERSE
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: COSMOLOGY: A Singular Conundrum: How Odd Is Our Universe?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Gamma Ray Delay May Be Sign of 'New Physics'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 184.0: Conversion of Multiplication/Division to Addition/Subtraction: Detection of Life on Other Planets
  • From: OsherD
• Problem of Determinism versus Free Will
  • From: Morpheal
• A faster way to better quantum computers
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Anton Zeilinger scoops first Issac Newton medal
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Anton Zeilinger scoops first Issac Newton medal
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 180.8: Random Variable Diagonal Matrix Theorem
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 183.1: More Re Effects of Inequality Opposites on Probable Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Anton Zeilinger scoops first Issac Newton medal
  • From: Sam Wormley
• COSMOLOGY: A Singular Conundrum: How Odd Is Our Universe?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 183.2: Infinitely Many Set and Set Measure Inverses
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Gamma Ray Delay May Be Sign of 'New Physics'
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 180.8: Random Variable Diagonal Matrix Theorem
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Physics and information
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gamma Ray Delay May Be Sign of 'New Physics'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Dielectrics for pre-school
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Gamma Ray Delay May Be Sign of 'New Physics'
  • From: malibu
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Hare-brained idea?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: hanson
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Please help me
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gamma Ray Delay May Be Sign of 'New Physics'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Hare-brained idea?
  • From: PD
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: Igor
• Hare-brained idea?
  • From: FoggyTown
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6726
• Re: #46 Listing of the major mistakes of the old math and their Reals extensions; new textbook; "Mathematical-Physics (p-adic primer) for students of age 6 onwards"
  • From: Other Me
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Electric Car & Lemon
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: THE WEIGHT OF LIGHT
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: THE WEIGHT OF LIGHT
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quantum Tunneling, some questions
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quantum Tunneling, some questions
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: THE WEIGHT OF LIGHT
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Quantum Tunneling, some questions
  • From: PD
• Re: Gamma Ray Delay May Be Sign of 'New Physics'
  • From: Mike Playle
• Re: Energy returned on energy invested (EROEI) problem with pumping oil
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Buoyant and Gravity =Clean Energy
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Energy returned on energy invested (EROEI) problem with pumping oil
  • From: Ray D.
• Re: Quantum Tunneling, some questions
  • From: srp
• Re: Physics and information
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Other Me
• Re: Maxwell demon
  • From: Uncle Al
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Weiv
• Re: Dielectrics for pre-school
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Quantum Tunneling, some questions
  • From: doolittle
• Re: THE WEIGHT OF LIGHT
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: Mrs. Sodium K. Chloride
• Buoyant and Gravity =Clean Energy
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: women manufactured to order...
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: malibu
• Re: Prime numbers relevant in physics?
  • From: PD
• Re: Definition of stress tensor in continuum mech
  • From: GSS
• Re: Energy of a foot step
  • From: CWatters
• Movies about physics
  • From: stark.effect@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Gravity 183.1: More Re Effects of Inequality Opposites on Probable Causation
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: gb6726
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: Mrs. Sodium K. Chloride
• Quantum Gravity 183.1: More Re Effects of Inequality Opposites on Probable Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Energy of a foot step
  • From: gb6726
• Re: still my fave
  • From: Mrs. Sodium K. Chloride
• Re: Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: Mrs. Sodium K. Chloride
• Re: Prime numbers relevant in physics?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 180.8: Random Variable Diagonal Matrix Theorem
  • From: Other Me
• Re: Gamma Ray Delay May Be Sign of 'New Physics'
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dielectrics for pre-school
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Prime numbers relevant in physics?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Physics and information
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Dark Matter and Early Stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dielectrics for pre-school
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: Ireckon
• Dielectrics for pre-school
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Help with 3 Physics problems
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Quantum Gravity 180.8: Random Variable Diagonal Matrix Theorem
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 180.8: Random Variable Diagonal Matrix Theorem
  • From: OsherD
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Prime numbers relevant in physics?
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Small Atomic Battery?
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Gamma Ray Delay May Be Sign of 'New Physics'
  • From: OG
• Re: Maxwell demon
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gamma Ray Delay May Be Sign of 'New Physics'
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Gamma Ray Delay May Be Sign of 'New Physics'
  • From: OG
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #4
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Gamma Ray Delay May Be Sign of 'New Physics'
  • From: malibu
• Re: Gamma Ray Delay May Be Sign of 'New Physics'
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gamma Ray Delay May Be Sign of 'New Physics'
  • From: malibu
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: Edward Green
• Maxwell demon
  • From: mike3
• Re: Gamma Ray Delay May Be Sign of 'New Physics'
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Gamma Ray Delay May Be Sign of 'New Physics'
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #1
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Definition of stress tensor in continuum mech
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: Igor
• Pauli Lectures: Optics, error(s)?
  • From: hetware
• Re: Spanning Two Eras of Relativity
  • From: Igor
• Small Atomic Battery?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 841 October 2, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe www.aip.org/pnu
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question about Feynman books
  • From: PD
• Re: AEONS
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: AEONS
  • From: Hoofington P. McSnort
• Re: Prime numbers relevant in physics?
  • From: PD
• Re: Plutonium: A History of the World's Most Dangerous Element
  • From: guskz
• SPAM Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Jeckyl
• AEONS
  • From: Wim Vegt
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Weiv
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Re: H-Bomb used in the name of Allah
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Prime numbers relevant in physics?
  • From: Anton81
• Re: Definition of stress tensor in continuum mech
  • From: GSS
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Why the 'Big Rip' is most likely not going to happen
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Spanning Two Eras of Relativity
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Would this make you 10 years old ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Would this make you 10 years old ?
  • From: Jeckyl
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
• Would this make you 10 years old ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: The number of electrons in a heavy Atom !...
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Question about Feynman books
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Maxwell's Equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Senhor Albuquerque, eu sou idiota, pois é.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The number of electrons in a heavy Atom !...
  • From: John Park
• Plutonium: A History of the World's Most Dangerous Element
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question about Feynman books
  • From: Sarah
• Re: still my fave
  • From: Eric Gisse
• still my fave
  • From: malibu
• Quantum Gravity 183.0: Effects of Inequality Opposites on Probable Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: J.M., are you from Albuquerque ?
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Please help me
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Maxwell's Equations
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: Androcles
• J.M., are you from Albuquerque ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: The whiny little bitch at NASA. Dancin Hansen and his role as Robespierre.
  • From: Hoofington P. McSnort
• Re: Definition of stress tensor in continuum mech
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Definition of stress tensor in continuum mech
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Prime numbers relevant in physics?
  • From: galathaea
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: Edward Green
• Quantum Gravity 180.7: Matrices Whose Elements are Sets
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th
• Re: Please help me
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Quantum Gravity 180.5: Mistake on F(x, x) and Possible Correction
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Prime numbers relevant in physics?
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Quantum Gravity 180.6: The Modified Unit Diagonal Theorem for PI Matrix
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Maxwell's Equations
  • From: Will O'the Wisp
• Re: Maxwell's Equations
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Maxwell's Equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Maxwell's Equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 180.6: The Modified Unit Diagonal Theorem for PI Matrix
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Help with 3 Physics problems
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Dark matter?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Being a SRian...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Brain FRY Problem # 3.1
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Maxwell's Equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Maxwell's Equations
  • From: Steven E. Landsburg
• Re: Please help me
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Definition of stress tensor in continuum mech
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Dark matter?
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Being a SRian...
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: The Pioneer Anomaly might be about " energized ( blueshifted ) light ".
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Nalp
• Re: Uncertainty Principle Create Universes ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quantum Gravity 180.5: Mistake on F(x, x) and Possible Correction
  • From: Mas Plak
• Re: Interpretation of E = m*c^2 as kinetic energies of sub-particles
  • From: Igor
• Re: Being a SRian...
  • From: Hoofington P. McSnort
• Re: The Dirac Equation for a HA (Hydrogen Atom) ?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Help with 3 Physics problems
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Question about Feynman books
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Being a SRian...
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: H-Bomb used in the name of Allah
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Uncertainty Principle Create Universes ???
  • From: Louis_N
• Re: Interpretation of E = m*c^2 as kinetic energies of sub-particles
  • From: Louis_N
• H-Bomb used in the name of Allah
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Uncertainty Principle Create Universes ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Can graphene overtake silicon as the essential ingredient of computer chips?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Quantum Gravity 180.5: Mistake on F(x, x) and Possible Correction
  • From: OsherD
• Prime numbers relevant in physics?
  • From: Anton81
• the energy//mass of YIN YANG is ZERO (big potatoe)
  • From: dedanoe
• Taxing the multi-tasking capabilities of the matrix computers
  • From: rick_sobie
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Oct 01, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Blame it on pop-science - questions around superconductivity
  • From: Androcles
• Please help me
  • From: George Orwell
• Re: Blame it on pop-science - questions around superconductivity
  • From: Bhushit Joshipura
• The Pioneer Anomaly might be about “ energized ( blueshifted ) light ”.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• An attractive or repulsive gravitomagnetic component.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Interpretation of E = m*c^2 as kinetic energies of sub-particles
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Are protons also cooling, or is it just the C.M.B. ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Why the 'Big Rip' is most likely not going to happen
  • From: greysky
• Re: Why the 'Big Rip' is most likely not going to happen
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question about Feynman books
  • From: Sarah
• Re: The whiny little bitch at NASA. Dancin Hansen and his role as Robespierre.
  • From: Hoofington P. McSnort
• Re: The stress-energy-momentum tensor of the solar system is not well mapped.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Help with 3 Physics problems
  • From: John C . Polasek
• The stress-energy-momentum tensor of the solar system is not well mapped.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf