Re: Dark matter?
- From: "Mrs. Sodium K. Chloride" <guesswork@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 08:14:16 -0500
"Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li" <chris.marx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4705b676$1_2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Mrs. Sodium K. Chloride" <guesswork@xxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitragwith
news:0dWdnbyQwdxHMJjanZ2dnUVZ_rWtnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li" <chris.marx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:47051bae$3_2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li" <chris.marx@xxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:fdth3s$l1b$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"G. L. Bradford" <glbrad01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag"Mrs. Sodium K. Chloride" <guesswork@xxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:-budnZuZ2KO2t5_anZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
news:ufednYFmvbWnvJ7anZ2dnUVZ_jOdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dark matter exhibits gravitation, but no detectable interaction
photons.
I told you before:
DM is potential energy, _ie_ eletricity in its 1st aggregate
state at ~-5'000'000 C. This means that DM has not yet
been transormed (in the dynamical equilibrium zone) to
other aggregate forms, such as EM & substances, & that
therefore it is invinvisible but nontransparent. Fopr the
same reason it has nothing to do with gravitation, which
is (as the GFMI shows) substance-relevant, bipolar &
vortex-driven, space _per se_: thus DM may be regarded
as a kind of cavity in space. _Cf_ Part 2 of the EVU
"The Primeval Phenomenon of Substance Formation" in
www.paf.li/perceptions.htm#_Toc2338370.
Bahhhh....
Dark matter is nothing more than large scale probabilistic
enrichments or rarifications of length in a given region.
So why is it not transparent? We observe it as a "hole"
in space, that's all.
That's why you cant see it.
It is invisible because it is not a substance, just pure
potential electricity.
And I'd bet that it does affect light, but the only way
to observe it's effects would be to travel 1,000,000
parsecs through space to make comparisons.
It des not affect light, EM is generated in the dynamical
equilibrium zone, where it meets a warmer environment.
I dont believe that it has no effect on light. I think that
the probabilistic approach explains redshifting in such
a way that a big bang is completely unneccesary.
Of course there isn't any "big bang", a childish idea of
7 steps taken from the Bible.
That's the spirit !!
Science is nothing more than a 5,000 year old argument.
Maybe more.
Much less: 5 to 600 years, beginning after the LGJ.
Plato and Pliny takes you back about 2,500 years. Before that there was
voodoo and medicineman. Judaism goes back further, arguably the act of
developing laws and rules by which to live is a precursor to finding laws
which govern the cosmos.
The IceMan had a cast copper axehead, I think that he was around 5,000 y.o.,
maybe older.
Neanderthal Man had hunting, agriculture and art. Technologies for living. I
would trace physics back to that, maybe further.
Dont ever take anyone at their word. Make them prove
what they say and dont ever let anyone off the hook -
especially dunces like me.
Keep that up and you'll go far.
Not exactly, Mrs. That's not what I'm testing here in the
PRS-Conglomerate.
++++
LGJ = Last Great Jolt (the last one ending a
series of cataclysms in the middle of the
Trecento (= 14th XK century), caused by a
repositioning of earth, as warranted by the GCR);
cf (in German) www.paf.li/lgr.htm; defining
the End of:
ST = SchizoTime = the period between Old &
Modern Time, in the series of the "apocalyptic"
catastrophes in which the Antique Civilizations
(recovered from an earlier series of global
catastrophes) perished
GCR = Gregorian Calendar Reform 1577/1582 AD
_cf_ www.paf.li/05%20Evidence.pdf
XC = Christian Calendar
PRS(-Conglomerate) = entirety of the collective
thinking systems, ie the Philosophies, Religions
& [exo- & esoteric] sciences, ruled by the
CREDO = "What is OBSERVED is NOT to be PERCEIVED,
& what is to be BELIEVED is NOT to be OBSERVED"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dark matter?
- From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
- Re: Dark matter?
- References:
- Dark matter?
- From: jonas . thornvall
- Re: Dark matter?
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Dark matter?
- From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
- Re: Dark matter?
- From: Mrs. Sodium K. Chloride
- Re: Dark matter?
- From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
- Re: Dark matter?
- From: Mrs. Sodium K. Chloride
- Re: Dark matter?
- From: Chris Marx c/o www.paf.li
- Dark matter?
- Prev by Date: Re: New Technique to Apply Math to QM
- Next by Date: Re: Hare-brained idea?
- Previous by thread: Re: Dark matter?
- Next by thread: Re: Dark matter?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|