Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
- From: "Pmb" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 02:18:23 -0400
<franklinhu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1192340864.849836.301840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have been reading the original "Does the Inertia of a Body Depend
Upon Its Energy-Content?" 1905 paper by Albert Einstein and I really
don't see how Einstein concluded e=mc^2.
See the original paper at:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
The last part says:
"Neglecting magnitudes of fourth and higher orders we may place
K0-K1 = 1/2(L/c^2)v^2
From this equation it directly follows that:--
If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass
diminishes by L/c²."
Now just how does this in any way directly follow???? He might as well
have said " ... and then a miracle happens and ...".
Einstein proved *that* it happens. He wasn't claiming that he understood the
mechanism to it.
The equation above doesn't appear to contain any mass parameter. Einstein
speaks of it but does not assign a symbol to it. In this case Einstein
referres to the mass as that which gives a body kinetic energy. A change in
kinetic energy is therefore proportional to the value of the bodies mass.
Pete
..
The
K0, K1 terms appear to represent a kinetic energy terms. It appears to
me to be saying that the difference in kinetic energy depends on the
energy L emitted by the system in question.
How do you get E=mc^2 from any of this?
-fhuemc
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
- From: franklinhu
- Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
- References:
- Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
- From: franklinhu
- Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
- Prev by Date: Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
- Next by Date: Re: A simple lightspeed experiment and Lorentz polarization
- Previous by thread: Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
- Next by thread: Re: Please explain where you get e=mc^2 from 1905 paper
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|