Re: Evaluating 100 years old theories in theoretical physics.
- From: Igor <thoovler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:19:34 -0000
On Oct 17, 1:23 am, atom.mo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Evaluating 100 years old theories in theoretical physics.
1) Light is the modulation of waves on magnetic lines. I.e. light is
oscillating magnetic lines.
Light is an oscillating electomagnetic field
2) Magnetic field lines are created when charged particles are aligned
in a single mode in a material. For this alignment, motions
of them are not necessary.
Currents are the sources of magnetic fields. No motion, no current,
and certainly no magnetic field. Subatomic spin generates magnetic
fields by essentially the same principle.
3) Electric field is created only where there are unbalanced and
opposite charges.
Then why is the field only dependent on one source charge?
4) No particles have any wave nature in an absolutely 'energy free'
background.
I have absolutely no idea what you are saying and I don't think you do
either.
5) In a lowest energy level, orbital electrons of an atom have no any
motions (the term 'orbital electron' itself is wrong, as
electrons never orbit about the nucleus of an atom).
Electrons are smeared out in probability density clouds no matter what
state they are in.
6) Space inside of atom is not empty, but filled with space matter.
Space by definition is empty, but you might be referring to the
quantum notion of vacuum, which is not empty.
7) Releasing of energy in a chemical or nuclear reaction is due to the
releasing, expansion or explosion of space matter.
It's actually due to the liberation of binding energy between the
consituent atoms for chemistry or nucleons for nuclear processes.
8) Only bond making reactions release energy (exothermic) and all bond
braking reactions absorb energy (endothermic). This
principle is applicable for both chemical and nuclear reactions.
Close enough.
Visit:http://physics-edu.org/index.htmlhttp://physics-edu.org/new_developments_in_theoretical_physics.pdf
Since you got most of these wrong, don't you think it's a bit
premature to create a webpage about physics?
.
- References:
- Evaluating 100 years old theories in theoretical physics.
- From: atom . model
- Evaluating 100 years old theories in theoretical physics.
- Prev by Date: How do physicists deal journals in other languages?
- Next by Date: Re: Detecting IEDs...
- Previous by thread: Re: Evaluating 100 years old theories in theoretical physics.
- Next by thread: Re: Is Google Evil?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
