Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- From: Sam Wormley <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 03:59:37 GMT
Tom Potter wrote:
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:b2efh3d5papsl0jenmlf1mjto0jo4f2v5j@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:54:37 +0800, "Tom Potter" <tdp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageGPS
news:famch3hkpvglmoagkkv3lblf31frbsgbb8@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:36:20 +0800, "Tom Potter" <tdp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>"What part of GR <that> CORRECTLY PREDICTS ALL OBSERVED GRAVITATIONAL
wrote:
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageWhat part of GR CORRECTLY PREDICTS ALL OBSERVED GRAVITATIONAL
news:bcibh3dc1t3epdra68mh7k9t423r6o482u@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:52:57 +0800, "Tom Potter" <tdp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>I am disappointed to see that Gisse
wrote:
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageNo argument - just a repeat of the idiocies.
news:8q9bh3l2mh73mvqsu3t64djuccc56rtedm@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:33:08 +0800, "Tom Potter" <tdp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>As I posted:
wrote:
[snip spewing]
GR correctly predicts all observed gravitational phenomena. It is a
tool.
was incapable of generating an argument to rationalize GTR,
PHENOMENA confuses you, crackpotter?
[snip idiocy, unread]
PHENOMENA" are you using to make life better for humanity, Gisse?
[snip remaining, unread]
It is interesting to see that General Relativity Cultists
use ONE Urban Legend
to justify the waste of time, money and minds on GTR.
The GTR Cult cherish the GPS/GTR Urban Legend,
more than Catholics cherish the Lourdes Legend.
Poor pathetic Potter is sooooo uneducated... which accounts
for these postings of his! Poor pathetic Potter!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- References:
- Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- From: Tom Potter
- Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- Next by Date: Tom Potter says: “ Relativity is not germane to clock synchronization. ”
- Previous by thread: Re: Einstein, Hawking and General Relativity disallow black holes.
- Next by thread: Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|