Tom Potter says: “ Relativity is not germane to clock synchronization. ”
- From: Jeff☠Relf <Jeff_Relf@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Oct 2007 04:05:00 GMT
Like most people ( including Gisse ), Tom Potter,
your understanding of Relativity is extremely superficial.
I don't know what you're smoking, Tom,
but no one in their right mind would assert, as you do,
that Relativity is not germane to clock synchronization.
.
- References:
- Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- Next by Date: Re: atomic orbitals program
- Previous by thread: Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- Next by thread: Re: Tom Potter says: â?o Relativity is not germane to clock synchronization. â??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|