Hubble Spacetime observation is affected more by GR then SR
- From: "guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx" <guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:44:01 -0700
Spacetime's metric tensor uses more GR than SR to determine proper
distance and proper time.
The Universe needed supernovas and only redshift observation, has an
expansion velocity well below c and therefore Hubble observation
should be affected more by GR than SR.
More precisely the metric tensor and GR rely mostly on Schwarzchild's
metric. This same Schwartzchild metric determines both gravitational
time dilation and gravitational redshift (a direct redshift due to
gravity and BEFORE any time dilation factor has been implemented to
this existing formula).
PART AA:
ro = Schwarzchild radius = 2GM / c2
Gravitational Redshift: z + 1 = 1 / Sqrt(1-ro/r)
Gravitational Time Dilation: to = tf * Sqrt (1 - ro/r)
Instead of Schwarzchild's M / r (derived from ro/r), the spacetime
metric tensor uses the thermodynamic equation of state which is
pressure over density.
Regardless, "proper time" and "proper distance" for GR is measured by
Minkowski/Einstein light beam traveling through the *least* dense
location in the Universe, thus the largest possible "r" distance from
each local density.
********************************************************************
Conclusion #1:
The above describes how light's travel through spacetime which is the
"mean" distance "r" between densities (galaxies) where GR will affect
it's proper travel time and proper travel distance the LEAST.
Conclusion #2:
There is no real proper time, as explained in #1, the least dense
location in space determines the proper time (and proper distance).
Conclusion #3:
This least dense location for a light beam's travel is exactly in
between galaxies (least dense) .........
...........THEREFORE it is ABSURD to believe that gravitational time
dilation in between galaxies will affect observation and clocks more
then gravitational time dilition INSIDE A GALAXY...which means in our
solar galaxy here on Earth.
It does affect observation by 1 part per million, but this observation
from 1 milllion to 10 billion years into the past is SUFFICIENT to
explain Hubble's false redshift accelerated expansion. And as
explained at the very beginning, GR affect's the expansion observation
much more then SR.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hubble Spacetime observation is affected more by GR then SR
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Hubble Spacetime observation is affected more by GR then SR
- Prev by Date: Re: GETTING RID OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
- Next by Date: Quantum Gravity 192.3: P(A-->B) - P(B-->A) Equation Supports Macroscopic Causing Microscopic Viewpoint
- Previous by thread: Re: GETTING RID OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
- Next by thread: Re: Hubble Spacetime observation is affected more by GR then SR
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|