Re: A model inside a neural network inside a model
- From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:10:07 -0800
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:59:24 -0000, Michael Hell <mobydikc@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
It is possible, we could use apply mathematics to science in radically
different ways.
This thought would carry more weight if you at least understood
algebra.
Instead of modeling reality directly with mathematics;
We use mathematics to model a neural network;
Then the neural network, directly models reality.
I'd love to see you implement this. How do you program what you do not
understand?
In other words, the idea is to use a neural network to build a model
inside a model.
A model inside a neural network inside a model.
How delightfully recursive.
Now show us why this is anything other than a word salad from someone
with no education in physics or mathematics.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A model inside a neural network inside a model
- From: Michael Hell
- Re: A model inside a neural network inside a model
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A model inside a neural network inside a model
- References:
- A model inside a neural network inside a model
- From: Michael Hell
- A model inside a neural network inside a model
- Prev by Date: A model inside a neural network inside a model
- Next by Date: Re: A model inside a neural network inside a model
- Previous by thread: A model inside a neural network inside a model
- Next by thread: Re: A model inside a neural network inside a model
- Index(es):