Re: A model inside a neural network inside a model

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:51:52 -0000, Michael Hell <mobydikc@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

[snip junk]

The tools required to understand reality have progressed beyond idle
speculation, which is what you seem to be suggesting. All those
highbrow-sounding words like "neural network" don't seem to carry any
weight when you equate them to folks making a guess about how the
world works based on knowledge from 400 years ago.
.

Relevant Pages