Re: Gravity without mattter
- From: "RH Nigl" <rhnigl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 13:45:30 -0400
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:47237062.ADEB9DFC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Don Stockbauer wrote:Matter?
On Oct 26, 6:59 pm, "RH Nigl" <rhn...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Uncle Al" <Uncle...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4722772C.D0A124C4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
RH Nigl wrote:
Is it possible to have (G)ravity independent of the existence of
A bit more, if Matter never existed, would there be Gravity?
Weyl tensor. No mass is required for gravitation.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
The property that is invariant is self referential. Same chicken and
egg tautology I think
RHNwww.exoptica.typepad.com/blogoptica
Gravity sure seems to be dependent on mass if one looks around a bit,
at least out to the causal horizon, that is..
Know something tehnically valid before you speak,
Yes, I agree. Gravity, as explained, is not technically valid.
RHN
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weyl_tensor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrov_classification
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricci_decomposition
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
.
- References:
- Gravity without mattter
- From: RH Nigl
- Re: Gravity without mattter
- From: Uncle Al
- Re: Gravity without mattter
- From: RH Nigl
- Re: Gravity without mattter
- From: Don Stockbauer
- Re: Gravity without mattter
- From: Uncle Al
- Gravity without mattter
- Prev by Date: Re: Detecting IEDs...
- Next by Date: Re: Detecting IEDs...
- Previous by thread: Re: Gravity without mattter
- Next by thread: Re: Gravity without mattter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
