Re: Detecting IEDs...
- From: "Tom Potter" <tdp1001@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:52:27 +0800
"Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1193507282.959862.49910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Oct 27, 10:45 am, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Sam Wormley" <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:JptUi.172822$Fc.143347@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Tom Potter wrote:
And it would be a piece of cake
to build a device that:
1. Monitored the cell phone band.
Potter, since the signal is so weak at the GPS receiver antenna, a
single
small transmitter can "render unusable" all receivers over a large
area
(many hundreds of square km).
Sammy, reread my post, Randy Poe's post,
and the patent I referenced,
and get educated why "Jamming"
as you previously referred to it,
is not an effective way to
neutralize GPS weaponry.
Do your homework and get educated on why "Jamming"
is such an easy way to neutralize GPS receivers.
http://computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/story/0,10801,77702,00.html
"January 17, 2003 (Computerworld) -- Government officials and
communications experts are assessing the public safety and
security implications of a newly posted online article that provides
directions for making cheap devices that can jam Global Positioning
System (GPS) signals."
http://www.avweb.com/news/avionics/182754-1.html
"You think the only time you have to worry about getting your GPS
jammed is during wartime? Think again -- these devices are so
sensitive that many things could jam them."
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/06/06/mod_gps_jamming_trial_cornwall/
[an experiment in GPS jamming by the UK Ministry of Defense]
"According to a BBC report, effects on GPS receivers can be expected
up to 11km from Portreath"
- Randy
Randy, do you ever read your references?
I challenge you to post actual quotes and data
from these sites that supports your position.
Here is an excerpt from the patent I mentioned.
================
"Description of the Related Art
In recent years, multi-element antenna systems have proven themselves to be
extremely effective at protecting GPS receivers from high power jamming.
High dynamic range systems with digital back-end processing, such as those
developed at Rockwell Collins, Inc., are capable of spatially nulling
jamming signals by as much as 60 dB while simultaneously maintaining good
antenna gain to desired signal sources.
Recently, however, there has been renewed interest in C/A code spoofers and
repeaters (meaconers). A spoofer is a broadcast signal intended to look like
a GPS satellite signal."
Randy, note that proper techniques are
"extremely effective at protecting GPS receivers from high power jamming",
but that there is a
"renewed interest in C/A code spoofers and repeaters (meaconers)."
An ad for a commercial "jammer" is listed below.
Note that it takes 1000 Milliwatts ( One watt)
of RF power to jam receivers about 50 feet away.
And note that the power spreads out as a function of
the square of the distance, so it would take
4 watts to jam a receiver 100 feet away,
16 watts to jam a receiver 200 feet away,
64 watts to jam a receiver 400 feet away, etc.
Ad for a GPS Jammer.
==============================
Big Power GPS Jammer
Description:
Total Output Power: 1000 Milliwatts
Effective distance: 0 to 15 metres (in optimum conditions)
===================
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://notsocrazyideas.blogspot.com/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Detecting IEDs...
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Detecting IEDs...
- References:
- Detecting IEDs...
- From: Occidental
- Re: Detecting IEDs...
- From: John C . Polasek
- Re: Detecting IEDs...
- From: Dwib
- Re: Detecting IEDs...
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: Detecting IEDs...
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Detecting IEDs...
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: Detecting IEDs...
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Detecting IEDs...
- From: John C . Polasek
- Re: Detecting IEDs...
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: Detecting IEDs...
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Detecting IEDs...
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: Detecting IEDs...
- From: Randy Poe
- Detecting IEDs...
- Prev by Date: Re: Detecting IEDs...
- Next by Date: Re: Detecting IEDs...
- Previous by thread: Re: Detecting IEDs...
- Next by thread: Re: Detecting IEDs...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|