Re: Why paint?

RH Nigl wrote:

Why exclude the symbolism of art making when
it is personal variation of mathematics, and does
this very human of activities from our earliest records
(Lascaux, France), really diifer from our perception
of reality as, say, explained by either classical,
quantum, or 'new' physics.
RH Nigl

Before you pluck roses out of your ass learn the difference between
art and craft,

<http://thisquantumworld.com/ht/images/stories/RFA/transport_ii_400.jpg>
<http://www.phschool.com/science/science_news/articles/electron_runs_through.html>
<http://www.hno.harvard.edu/gazette/2000/12.14/20-physicist.html>
<http://www.fnal.gov/pub/Art_Gallery/archive/Heller/index.html>

and why Picasso was important - but not his Blue Period. That was
courtesy of a French industrialist Jean Baptiste Guimet,

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/blue.htm

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Why paint?
    ... :>: Why exclude the symbolism of art making when ... :>: it is personal variation of mathematics, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Why paint?
    ... Why exclude the symbolism of art making when ... it is personal variation of mathematics, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Why paint?
    ... :>: Why exclude the symbolism of art making when ... :>: it is personal variation of mathematics, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Why paint?
    ... Why exclude the symbolism of art making when ... it is personal variation of mathematics, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • RE: Why paint?
    ... Why exclude the symbolism of art making from ... science when it is simply a personal variation of ...
    (sci.physics)
Loading