Re: Why paint?
- From: "RH Nigl" <rhnigl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:50:50 -0500
"Androcles" <Engineer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:AlLVi.24209$vI1.17295@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"RH Nigl" <rhnigl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:efqdnRermJjF-rranZ2dnUVZ_ualnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
:
: "Androcles" <Engineer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
: news:swJVi.23728$vI1.1431@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: >
: > "RH Nigl" <rhnigl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
: > news:j7adnY9m09Frr7ranZ2dnUVZ_g2dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: > : Why exclude the symbolism of art making when
: > : it is personal variation of mathematics, and does
: > : this very human of activities from our earliest records
: > : (Lascaux, France), really diifer from our perception
: > : of reality as, say, explained by either classical,
: > : quantum, or 'new' physics.
: > : RH Nigl
: > :
: >
: > Is that idiotic drool supposed to be poetry?
: > Whatever it is or however it "diifers", "Why" needs a
: > question mark somewhere.
: >
: >
:
: I see you understood, (you know, newsgroup format typos
: are not mine alone). You know it is a question from your
: basic 'mastery' of English ... so what is your answer, fellow
: drooler? ;-)
:
:
:
: Here's the 'poem' again.
:
:
: Why exclude the symbolism of art making when
:
: it is personal variation of mathematics, and does
:
: this very human of activities from our earliest records
:
: (Lascaux, France), really differ from our perception
:
: of reality as, say, explained by either classical,
:
: quantum, or 'new' physics.
:
How High is a Chinaman.
Why do you still beat your mother.
Androcles, you are warm and fuzzy, like an atom.
Look, this query is only about the 'structure' (I really
do not have the correct word here), about 'perception',
I will say that another way, about 'observation and
consciousness, which seems to trigger our 'reality'.
Within string theory 'hypothica' this phenomena seems
to 'be'. This theory was articulated by HUP (Heisenberg
Uncertainty Principle), but since, not resolved.
I am simply stating that 'observational' reality is common.
The scientific resolution, the mathematic resolution at this
moment: unresolved.
Thanks for being a thorn.
RHN
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why paint?
- From: RH Nigl
- Re: Why paint?
- From: Androcles
- Re: Why paint?
- References:
- Why paint?
- From: RH Nigl
- Re: Why paint?
- From: Androcles
- Re: Why paint?
- From: RH Nigl
- Re: Why paint?
- From: Androcles
- Why paint?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why paint?
- Next by Date: Re: Why paint?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why paint?
- Next by thread: Re: Why paint?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|