sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Re: The world needs better batteries.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Basic, but subtle, calculus question. Please help a girl.
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• At a true event horizon, not a single law of physics goes unbroken.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Bert, What's your laser like ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Equations
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Equations
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: "Causality"
  • From: Benj
• Re: "Causality"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Ghost, what are you talking about ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Nobel Winning UN Scientist's In Agreement With Profound Science...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• essay:: renewing einstein's philosophical legacy in the dawning age of quantum information: why a mathematically continuous model of spacetime is irreconcilable with principles of measurement
  • From: amichael
• Re: Langrangian for quantum simple harmonic oscillator
  • From: Igor
• Re: Equations
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• pion decay constant calculation to one loop
  • From: Barrow
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: ctrpapa
• "Causality"
  • From: Evig
• Forced Vibration on Non-linear System
  • From: tontoko
• Re: Nazi flying saucers
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Gravity: Force or Static Property
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Brillouin on entropy
  • From: kunzmilan
• Re: Why do crystals always have straight edges?
  • From: Benj
• Re: O no! perpetual motion
  • From: Benj
• Re: Equations
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Equations
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Equations
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Autymn conversative
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Equations
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Bert, how does your “ Photon Pump Laser ” work ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Bert, What's your laser like ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Equations
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Nazi flying saucers
  • From: tadchem
• Re: O no! perpetual motion
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: How does the gravitational force escape from a Black Hole?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: perpetualmotion
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Langrangian for quantum simple harmonic oscillator
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• The world needs better batteries.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: O no! perpetual motion
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Equations
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Equations
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Why Math?
  • From: Androcles
• Brillouin on entropy
  • From: michael . morten . nielsen
• O no! perpetual motion
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why Math?
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Re: Why Math?
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Re: Langrangian for quantum simple harmonic oscillator
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Equations
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Langrangian for quantum simple harmonic oscillator
  • From: John Rennie
• Re: Doppler Shift is evidence for the varying speed of light.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: perpetual motion
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Proto-galaxies tip cold dark matter
  • From: hanson
• Re: God's IQ -0
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: My favorite laser
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Driving generators.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: 400 nm laser pumped by electronic fusion -- possible?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why Math?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mpemba effect revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mpemba effect revisited
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Re: Why Math?
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Re: Mpemba effect revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Titanomachy
  • From: Androcles
• Driving generators.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Tiny, semi-random effects make poor power-supplies.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Titanomachy
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Equations
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Imagine the horror environmentalists would feel...
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Scattering/Diffusing laser light: Any applications?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Bible is the right brand of opium, not the Koran.
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Proto-galaxies tip cold dark matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Proto-galaxies tip cold dark matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 206.6: Golden Mean and the Truncated Real Laurent Series
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why Math?
  • From: John Park
• Scattering/Diffusing laser light: Any applications?
  • From: Stem sells
• The Bible is the right brand of opium, not the Koran.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Quantum Gravity 206.5: Contact With the Golden Ratio/Mean
  • From: OsherD
• Mpemba effect revisited
  • From: Eric Baird
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 28 November 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The atmosphere scatters blue light.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Imagine the horror environmentalists would feel...
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Tiny, semi-random effects make poor power-supplies.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Langrangian for quantum simple harmonic oscillator
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Defining “ the energy of mass ”.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Quantum Gravity 206.4: Kansas' Program of Deriving QG From Electrostatics etc.
  • From: bob
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Doppler Shift is evidence for the varying speed of light.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Florian
• Re: Reality? Quantum Perception.
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Doppler Shift is evidence for the varying speed of light.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Magnetic fields are not like a rope or a string.
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The size of a submarine is limited only by your imagination
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Magnetic fields are not like a rope or a string.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why Math?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Math?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: sattelite
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Magnetic fields are not like a rope or a string.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Doble boilers, heating 525 ft. of steel coil.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: God's IQ -0
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Re: perpetual motion
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: sattelite
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why Math?
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Re: Why Math?
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Re: Titanomachy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: perpetual motion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: perpetual motion
  • From: Uncle Al
• Langrangian for quantum simple harmonic oscillator
  • From: John Rennie
• Re: God's IQ -0
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quantised Special Relativity
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: perpetual motion
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Manics never make sense.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• For evidence the universe not only expands, but also contracts, visit http://www.ejdoscher.com.
  • From: ejdtr@xxxxxxx
• Re: sattelite
  • From: Igor
• Re: Why do crystals always have straight edges?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why do crystals always have straight edges?
  • From: hanson
• Re: perpetual motion
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Evig
• Re: Gas Simulation Question
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Quantised Special Relativity
  • From: tontoko
• Re: Are worm holes pieces of the fifth dimension?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Mass is gyroscopic momentum.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: colleesh
• Re: chemical potential energy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gas Simulation Question
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: chemical potential energy
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Gas Simulation Question
  • From: John Park
• Re: Why Math?
  • From: John Park
• Re: Gas Simulation Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Quantum Gravity 207.0: Microscopic and Macroscopic Order vs Disorder
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 206.4: Kansas' Program of Deriving QG From Electrostatics etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Gas Simulation Question
  • From: wrschlanger
• Re: chemical potential energy
  • From: Taras_96
• Re: Why do crystals always have straight edges?
  • From: michalchik@xxxxxxx
• From Mt. Fairweather's peek to 15 kilo feet under the deep sea floor.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: perpetual motion
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Manics never make sense.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Nuclear subs Never need to Surface
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: China discvovers moon!
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What are you seeing on your dives ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How does the gravitational force escape from a Black Hole?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: perpetual motion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: China discvovers moon!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: perpetual motion
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: hey
  • From: bob
• Re: China discvovers moon!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Guandumb Quackery 1041.109: kOsher bippyized and ZORBNIK FUNCTION with tripple spaces spew
  • From: bob
• Re: perpetual motion
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: China discvovers moon!
  • From: Androcles
• perpetual motion
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why do crystals always have straight edges?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is the earth an artificial construct?
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Re: Why do crystals always have straight edges?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A method to reduce the size of nuclear reactor
  • From: tadchem
• hey
  • From: sk2xpcjx0
• Re: Is the earth an artificial construct?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Mechanics question
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Why do crystals always have straight edges?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Is the earth an artificial construct?
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why do crystals always have straight edges?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: China discvovers moon!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: China discvovers moon!
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How does the gravitational force escape from a Black Hole?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: How does the gravitational force escape from a Black Hole?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why do crystals always have straight edges?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: goldstein's classical mechanics book
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• China discvovers moon!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Mechanics question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mechanics question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: sattelite
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is the earth an artificial construct?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quick Physics Question
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Re: goldstein's classical mechanics book
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is the earth an artificial construct?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• goldstein's classical mechanics book
  • From: fuzzy
• Re: Is the earth an artificial construct?
  • From: PD
• Re: sattelite
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: A method to reduce the size of nuclear reactor
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Why Math?
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Re: Is the earth an artificial construct?
  • From: Uncle Al
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 848 November 27, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe and Jason Bardi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: sattelite
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quick Physics Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Nuclear subs Never need to Surface
  • From: Androcles
• Re: sattelite
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Re: Trans-Dimensional Theory?
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Re: Nuclear subs Never need to Surface
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: sattelite
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Quick Physics Question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why do crystals always have straight edges?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why do crystals always have straight edges?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is the earth an artificial construct?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Trans-Dimensional Theory?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why do crystals always have straight edges?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is the earth an artificial construct?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Why do crystals always have straight edges?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Trans-Dimensional Theory?
  • From: Uncle Al
• What are you seeing on your dives ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Trans-Dimensional Theory?
  • From: Igor
• Tiny submarines cost billions of dollars.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: The size of a submarine is limited by your budget, no doubt.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Is the earth an artificial construct?
  • From: Larry Snyder
• Re: sattelite
  • From: Igor
• Gravitation is primordial momentum.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Nuclear subs Never need to Surface
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Nuclear subs Never need to Surface
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• The size of a submarine is limited by your budget, no doubt.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Nuclear subs Never need to Surface
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Nuclear subs Never need to Surface
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 207.0: Microscopic and Macroscopic Order vs Disorder
  • From: bob
• Re: Nuclear subs Never need to Surface
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: sattelite
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: " Terrorists " ( e.g. the Saudis of 9/11 ) use petroleum.
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Mechanics question
  • From: vikraman.choudhury@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why do crystals always have straight edges?
  • From: High Fiver
• Re: sattelite
  • From: High Fiver
• Re: Nuclear subs Never need to Surface
  • From: High Fiver
• "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Evig
• Nuclear subs Never need to Surface
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quick Physics Question
  • From: PD
• Re: The Ethics of Time Travel
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How does the gravitational force escape from a Black Hole?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Mechanics question
  • From: another . commi
• Re: Mechanics question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quick Physics Question
  • From: another . commi
• Re: Why do crystals always have straight edges?
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: colleesh
• Re: Mechanics question
  • From: vikraman.choudhury@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Mechanics question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity: Force or Static Property
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Trans-Dimensional Theory?
  • From: Androcles
• sattelite
  • From: karthikeya27@xxxxxxxxx
• Mechanics question
  • From: vikraman.choudhury@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why do crystals always have straight edges?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why do crystals always have straight edges?
  • From: Herbert Blenner
• Re: Quick Physics Question
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Re: Why do crystals always have straight edges?
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Quantum Gravity 206.3: On Piecewise Linear Phase Transitions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Trans-Dimensional Theory?
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Quantum Gravity 206.2: A Quantum Gravity Function Generalizing Hyperbolic Functions
  • From: OsherD
• Quick Physics Question
  • From: wrschlanger
• Re: Why Math?
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Why do crystals always have straight edges?
  • From: Albert
• Re: Trans-Dimensional Theory?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Gravity: Force or Static Property
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The origins of gravity are far too primordial/causal to alter.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Trans-Dimensional Theory?
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Einstein's E=mc2 Generalized , book published from New York , USA
  • From: colleesh
• Re: Gravity: Force or Static Property
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why Math?
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• What would you like to see, if not Nasa ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• “ Terrorists ” ( e.g. the Saudis of 9/11 ) use petroleum.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Tom in New York.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Gravity: Force or Static Property
  • From: Sanders Kaufman
• Re: Do you think we REALLY landed on the moon in 1969 ? Bullshit
  • From: tj Frazir
• Gravity: Force or Static Property
  • From: dfnj2006
• Re: pellets of Plutonium fired at plutonium block
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Question on insulation
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Energy consumed by a thermometer?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Binary Shuffling
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Why Math?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why Math?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Question on insulation
  • From: skg
• Re: Why Math?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Live Free !
  • From: Androcles
• Re: length contraction, specal relativiy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: length contraction, specal relativiy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Live Free !
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Why Math?
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Explaining A Solid To A Youngster ?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Energy consumed by a thermometer?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Web-Schrodinger
  • From: mark
• "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Evig
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Nov 26, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org
• Relativistic Complex Analysis
  • From: tontoko
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: ctrpapa
• Quantum Gravity 207.0: Microscopic and Macroscopic Order vs Disorder
  • From: OsherD
• Re: length contraction, specal relativiy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gaby's manic... not good.
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Binary Shuffling
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Spew from the sun, dissipating into space.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: length contraction, specal relativiy
  • From: hanson
• Guandumb Quackity 501.78's : Super uncompression using Retro- Raccati Cheese Equations (RRCE)
  • From: bob
• Quantum Gravity 206.1: More Re Expansive Force as Multiplicative Inverse of Newtonian F_g = Gm1m2/r^2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: length contraction, specal relativiy
  • From: Jim Black
• Accelerator Class- An External Magnetron Tube as an Accelerator
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Gaby's manic... not good.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Live Free !
  • From: FluillBoxia
• Re: length contraction, specal relativiy
  • From: Neil Bates
• Re: length contraction, specal relativiy
  • From: Androcles
• length contraction, specal relativiy
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Live Free !
  • From: FluillBoxia
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Recent Sam Wormley (?) post on real numbers?
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Binary Shuffling
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Binary Shuffling
  • From: Uncle Al
• Binary Shuffling
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Quantum Gravity 206.0: Expansive Force as Multiplicative Inverse of Newtonian F_g = Gm1m2/r^2
  • From: OsherD
• Electron Decay?- BY Symmetric Force
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Physicists spot unusual charged meson
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: one kind of photon, 2 kinds of neutrino from linked one-to-one rotations
  • From: Androcles
• Re: one kind of photon, 2 kinds of neutrino from linked one-to-one rotations
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: m-branequarkquantumquirkyatomicmolecular cellularhumanplanetsolarsystemgalaxiesnebulauniverseinfinitygod--that pretty much sums it up, in a word.
  • From: Uncle Al
• one kind of photon, 2 kinds of neutrino from linked one-to-one rotations
  • From: malibu
• FA Geometric & Military Compass Galileo Galilei
  • From: Alys
• Re: Rapidly spinning, counter-rotating disks of Plutonium in close ...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: To DIG, "Dear Mr. Moderator..."
  • From: hanson
• Re: big bang stuff
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: gans1973
• big bang stuff
  • From: menkaur@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: gans1973
• Re: observing universe affecting it?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Energy consumed by a thermometer?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: computer screen
  • From: Androcles
• Re: computer screen
  • From: Androcles
• An Easier Method for Solving Schroedinger Equation
  • From: tontoko
• Re: observing universe affecting it?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Quantum Gravity 205.9: What's Wrong With P(sqrt(PA)) --> P(A) =
  • From: OsherD
• Re: observing universe affecting it?
  • From: Benj
• Quantum Gravity 205.8: Summary Continued
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Energy consumed by a thermometer?
  • From: Benj
• Re: exp and log examples
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: exp and log examples
  • From: Tom Potter
• Energy consumed by a thermometer?
  • From: timeOday
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: EM current matrix element of Dirac field
  • From: Barrow
• Re: To DIG, "Dear Mr. Moderator..."
  • From: hanson
• Re: computer screen
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: computer screen
  • From: bob
• m-branequarkquantumquirkyatomicmolecular cellularhumanplanetsolarsystemgalaxiesnebulauniverseinfinitygod--that pretty much sums it up, in a word.
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Free energy
  • From: Gieniu
• Re: computer screen
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time reversal transmission ideas
  • From: Androcles
• Re: computer screen
  • From: Androcles
• Re: computer screen
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Time reversal transmission ideas
  • From: Uncle Al
• computer screen
  • From: bob
• Quantum Gravity 205.7: Summary of Quantum Gravity Theories
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 205.6: P(P(A)-->P(A)^2) = 1 Solutions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: CWatters
• Re: EM current matrix element of Dirac field
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: To DIG, "Dear Mr. Moderator..."
  • From: hanson
• Re: observing universe affecting it?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: observing universe affecting it?
  • From: Calvin
• Re: observing universe affecting it?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: observing universe affecting it?
  • From: Calvin
• Re: observing universe affecting it?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: observing universe affecting it?
  • From: Calvin
• Re: Explaining Physics-Stephen Hawking
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Explaining Physics-Stephen Hawking
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Igor
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Florian
• Re: To DIG, "Dear Mr. Moderator..."
  • From: hanson
• Re: observing universe affecting it?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Explaining Physics-Stephen Hawking
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Explaining Physics-Stephen Hawking
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: observing universe affecting it?
  • From: Androcles
• Schrodinger's Fridge
  • From: Shubee
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Rapidly spinning, counter-rotating disks of Plutonium in close contact.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: observing universe affecting it?
  • From: Calvin
• Re: observing universe affecting it?
  • From: Androcles
• Robert Frost's Poetry and the Theory of General Relativity
  • From: Bill A
• Time reversal transmission ideas
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Time reversal transmission ideas
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: observing universe affecting it?
  • From: Calvin
• "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Krow
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: George
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: George
• Re: EM current matrix element of Dirac field
  • From: mathlover
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: EM current matrix element of Dirac field
  • From: Jim Black
• Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: observing universe affecting it?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Explaining Physics-Stephen Hawking
  • From: RP
• Re: observing universe affecting it?
  • From: RP
• EM current matrix element of Dirac field
  • From: Barrow
• Quantum Gravity 205.5: Bibliographies of Hehl, Obukhov, Rubilar, Blagojevic
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 205.3: Not Only Does God Play Dice (Probability), But Plays Probability of Probabilities
  • From: OsherD
• Re: observing universe affecting it?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Quantum Gravity 205.4: Electrostatic Coulomb Equation Permittivity Appears in Skewon Field Theory of Electrodynamics-Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A method to reduce the size of nuclear reactor
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A method to reduce the size of nuclear reactor
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A method to reduce the size of nuclear reactor
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A method to reduce the size of nuclear reactor
  • From: tj Frazir
• observing universe affecting it?
  • From: Calvin
• Re: sheet of ice
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: My Point-a*- My Kind of Research
  • From: tadchem
• My Point-a*- My Kind of Research
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Nov 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• So, it's possible to change light into matter ...
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• group
  • From: gig
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: George
• Re: Questions on salt water vs fresh water....
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum Gravity 205.3: Not Only Does God Play Dice (Probability), But Plays Probability of Probabilities
  • From: hanson
• Re: Questions on salt water vs fresh water....
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Questions on salt water vs fresh water....
  • From: jim
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Questions on salt water vs fresh water....
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Physicists spot unusual charged meson
  • From: Igor
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Farce of Quantum Gravity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Explaining Physics-Stephen Hawking
  • From: NoEinstein
• Farce of Quantum Gravity
  • From: Murphy
• Re: Explaining Physics-Stephen Hawking
  • From: NoEinstein
• Quantum Gravity 205.3: Not Only Does God Play Dice (Probability), But Plays Probability of Probabilities
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Krow
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Krow
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Krow
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Stuff in the News: physicsworld.com newswire (Week 47)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Quantum Gravity 205.2: How Quadratics Arise From Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Light Changed to Matter, Then Stopped and Moved
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Possible Maxwell deamon implementation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Possible Maxwell deamon implementation?
  • From: ivanb
• Quantum Gravity 205.1: How 1/R and 1/R^2 Become Quadratics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Physicists spot unusual charged meson
  • From: Y.Porat
• Quantum Gravity 205.0: Quadratic/Riccati Quantum Gravity/Unification
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How does the gravitational force escape from a Black Hole?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Physicists spot unusual charged meson
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Making billions off ships from Zambia
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: gans1973
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Bzzt, Uncle Al and academia: Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Explaining Physics-Stephen Hawking
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: sheet of ice
  • From: Androcles
• Re: (Molecular Magnetism and Levitation)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Two Mirrors Face to Face
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Two Mirrors Face to Face
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Possible Maxwell deamon implementation?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Two Mirrors Face to Face
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: sheet of ice
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Possible Maxwell deamon implementation?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Two Mirrors Face to Face
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Two Mirrors Face to Face
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: (Molecular Magnetism and Levitation)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Two Mirrors Face to Face
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Two Mirrors Face to Face
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: CWatters
• Re: sheet of ice
  • From: CWatters
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Stellar Black Hole Oddities
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Two Mirrors Face to Face
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: sheet of ice
  • From: Gordon
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: sheet of ice
  • From: jimp
• sheet of ice
  • From: bob
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: George
• Re: Two Mirrors Face to Face
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Possible Maxwell deamon implementation?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Two Mirrors Face to Face
  • From: Androcles
• Re: (Molecular Magnetism and Levitation)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: (Molecular Magnetism and Levitation)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Possible Maxwell deamon implementation?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Two Mirrors Face to Face
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Explaining Physics-Stephen Hawking
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Our water-world is transient, a point on the endless EntropyScape.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Krow
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: gans1973
• Re: Explaining Physics-Stephen Hawking
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Newton's theory of "Universal Gravitation"
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Stellar Black Hole Oddities
  • From: srp
• Re: Explaining Physics-Stephen Hawking
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Possible Maxwell deamon implementation?
  • From: ivanb
• Re: Possible Maxwell deamon implementation?
  • From: Benj
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: Benj
• Re: Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: Jim Black
• Possible Maxwell deamon implementation?
  • From: ivanb
• Re: exp and log examples
  • From: CWatters
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: gans1973
• Re: Explaining Physics-Stephen Hawking
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Stellar Black Hole Oddities
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: Explaining Physics-Stephen Hawking
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Explaining Physics-Stephen Hawking
  • From: RP
• Re: Stellar Black Hole Oddities
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Stellar Black Hole Oddities
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Stellar Black Hole Oddities
  • From: Androcles
• Stellar Black Hole Oddities
  • From: Darrell Lakin
• Re: Physicists spot unusual charged meson
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The adventure of physics - 1500 free pages for download
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Two Mirrors Face to Face
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Two Mirrors Face to Face
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Physicists spot unusual charged meson
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Perpetual motion assumption (stay away unserious monopolian conservative, welcome clear mind)
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Explaining Physics-Stephen Hawking
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Two Mirrors Face to Face
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Nuclear News
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Physicists spot unusual charged meson
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: A little frog (alive !) and a water ball levitate inside a Ø32mm vertical bore of a Bitter solenoid in a magnetic field of about 16 Tesla at the Nijmegen High Field Magnet Laboratory.
  • From: CWatters
• Nuclear News
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Pulser Reactors Sets as Opposed to oNe Large Core.
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Pulser Reactors Sets as Opposed to oNe Large Core.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mass is gyroscopic momentum.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: (Molecular Magnetism and Levitation)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Newton's theory of "Universal Gravitation"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE OFFICIAL END OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Newton's theory of "Universal Gravitation"
  • From: srp
• Re: Pulser Reactors Sets as Opposed to oNe Large Core.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: (Molecular Magnetism and Levitation)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Mass is gyroscopic momentum.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Physicists spot unusual charged meson
  • From: Igor
• Re: THE OFFICIAL END OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: (Molecular Magnetism and Levitation)
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Physicists spot unusual charged meson
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Try having sex without the sun...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Newton's theory of "Universal Gravitation"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: exp and log examples
  • From: Klueless
• Re: Newton's theory of "Universal Gravitation"
  • From: malibu
• Re: exp and log examples
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gordon Freeman -- theoretical physicist !?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Pulser Reactors Sets as Opposed to oNe Large Core.
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Newton's theory of "Universal Gravitation"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Newton's theory of "Universal Gravitation"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• (Molecular Magnetism and Levitation)
  • From: kingoleo
• A little frog (alive !) and a water ball levitate inside a Ø32mm vertical bore of a Bitter solenoid in a magnetic field of about 16 Tesla at the Nijmegen High Field Magnet Laboratory.
  • From: kingoleo
• Re: exp and log examples
  • From: shalayka
• Newton's theory of "Universal Gravitation"
  • From: kingoleo
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Krow
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 20 November 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Explaining A Solid To A Youngster ?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: exp and log examples
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: exp and log examples
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• exp and log examples
  • From: Pol
• Virtual Phonon and Superconductivity
  • From: tontoko
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Quantum Computing not practical?
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: George
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: George
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: A method to reduce the size of nuclear reactor
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How to fix New York
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: The real twin paradox.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The real twin paradox.
  • From: colp
• Re: Explaining A Solid To A Youngster ?
  • From: Herbert Blenner
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Mass is gyroscopic momentum.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Mass is gyroscopic momentum.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: geophysics and physical geography
  • From: tadchem
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 20 November 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: George
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: George
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: George
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: THE OFFICIAL END OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: THE OFFICIAL END OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A method to reduce the size of nuclear reactor
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: THE OFFICIAL END OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE OFFICIAL END OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A method to reduce the size of nuclear reactor
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A method to reduce the size of nuclear reactor
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Explaining A Solid To A Youngster ?
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• The more you have the more you need.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: geophysics and physical geography
  • From: uri
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 847 November 20, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Explaining A Solid To A Youngster ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: George
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: George
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: George
• visit new google group
  • From: faraz_11
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Explaining A Solid To A Youngster ?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: The ballet never ends because the cooling never ends.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Explaining A Solid To A Youngster ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Sleep Hibernation in Deep Swimming
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: George
• Re: Explaining A Solid To A Youngster ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: George
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Mirrors
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: No Second Law == No life ( or death ), No motion.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 204.0: Gamma Distributions Fit Astrophysical Lensing Magnification
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Explaining A Solid To A Youngster ?
  • From: nottoooily
• T.J., I can't change myself and neither can you.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Explaining A Solid To A Youngster ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Sam Wormley's metaphysical “ point ”.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• The ballet never ends because the cooling never ends.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: No Second Law == No life ( or death ), No motion.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Let us learn the message which God coded into the Bible which He authorizes, by consistent qualifying "serpents-UFOnauts" to the category of animals having high intelligence and human appearance (PDE JP)
  • From: bob
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: THE MOTION ENIGMA
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Do you think we REALLY landed on the moon in 1969 ? I know this...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Cooling... it's what created us, the Universe, everything.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Cooling... it's what created us, the Universe, everything.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: God is evolution.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Making billions off ships from Zambia
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Explaining A Solid To A Youngster ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Explaining A Solid To A Youngster ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Explaining A Solid To A Youngster ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Theory of Everything?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Explaining A Solid To A Youngster ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Explaining A Solid To A Youngster ?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: No Second Law == No life ( or death ), No motion.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Explaining A Solid To A Youngster ?
  • From: Robert11
• Re: Metal Separation via Acids and Centrifuges - Possible?
  • From: Androcles
• Metal Separation via Acids and Centrifuges - Possible?
  • From: parlous2112
• Re: A method to reduce the size of nuclear reactor
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Androcles
• Making billions off imaginary ships from imaginary ship-yards.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Cooling... it's what created us, the Universe, everything.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: THE MOTION ENIGMA
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Some magnetic equivalents of electrical entities
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: New evidence for a 10-year-old conjecture
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: God is evolution.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A method to reduce the size of nuclear reactor
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Free energy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: THE MOTION ENIGMA
  • From: Mike
• Re: How to fix New York
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A Bright Idea for Sending and Receiving Radio Waves
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: THE MOTION ENIGMA
  • From: Igor
• Re: God is evolution.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Some magnetic equivalents of electrical entities
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: greysky
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How does the gravitational force escape from a Black Hole?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: God is evolution.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: John Bailey
• A new style reflecting telescope
  • From: tontoko
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Nov 19, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: RP
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: RP
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: RP
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE MOTION ENIGMA
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: THE MOTION ENIGMA
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: THE MOTION ENIGMA
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Does any mainstream physicist subscribe to aether theory?
  • From: George
• Re: THE MOTION ENIGMA
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: THE MOTION ENIGMA
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: THE MOTION ENIGMA
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: THE MOTION ENIGMA
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: THE MOTION ENIGMA
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: THE MOTION ENIGMA
  • From: tadchem
• THE MOTION ENIGMA
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Bert, was that your photo of the G=EMC^2 barn ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: RP
• Re: God is evolution.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: God is evolution.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Why My Theory on Light Speed is Reality Jeff look
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Center of the vortex.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Some magnetic equivalents of electrical entities
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Free energy
  • From: Gieniu
• Re: rotations piezo system
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Some magnetic equivalents of electrical entities
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: rotations piezo system
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Center of the vortex.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Bzzt, Uncle Al and academia: Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Some magnetic equivalents of electrical entities
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why are grocery store's ceilings so high?
  • From: Sue...
• Quantum Computing and Living Systems
  • From: Morpheal
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Androcles
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Krow
• Re: Center of the vortex.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: RP
• Re: Center of the vortex.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Center of the vortex.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Using waste hot water to heat up space/water
  • From: mutedHyperbole
• Re: Using waste hot water to heat up space/water
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: malibu
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: malibu
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Mike
• Re: Using waste hot water to heat up space/water
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: Why are grocery store's ceilings so high?
  • From: Benj
• Quantum Gravity 203.5: Eliminating the (HUP) Fluctuation Theory of Quantum Phase Transitions
  • From: OsherD
• Is E8 finally the Theory of Everything?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Using waste hot water to heat up space/water
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Using waste hot water to heat up space/water
  • From: mutedHyperbole
• Why are grocery store's ceilings so high?
  • From: mutedHyperbole
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: gans1973
• Re: Physicists spot unusual charged meson
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: How to fix New York
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: Physicists spot unusual charged meson
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Bzzt, Uncle Al and academia: Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: RP
• Drugs are the new obesity.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: /// Government COVERUP, Galatic Mass Radial Distribution FUNCTION determined! ++++++<<<
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Uncle Al
• To unite Quantum Mechanics with General Relativity...
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Mike
• Re: SOLUTION MANUALS OF VARIOUS EBOOKS
  • From: mxer254
• Re: SOLUTION MANUALS OF VARIOUS EBOOKS
  • From: mxer254
• Re: SOLUTION MANUALS OF VARIOUS EBOOKS
  • From: mxer254
• Re: SOLUTION MANUALS OF VARIOUS EBOOKS
  • From: mxer254
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Mike
• Re: How to fix New York
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How to fix New York
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Holy Moly -- Residual Electricity????
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Bert, did you send me the picture of the barn ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: RP
• Re: /// Government COVERUP, Galatic Mass Radial Distribution FUNCTION determined! ++++++<<<
  • From: Doctor Student
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: RP
• /// Government COVERUP, Galatic Mass Radial Distribution FUNCTION determined! ++++++<<<
  • From: Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• Re: Many-worlds essay
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: RP
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Looking for a solutions manual to University Physics, 12th ed.
  • From: estrella . adriana
• Re: Message to Stringers and the like: Show Me Your Anti Gravity Generator And I Will Have A CLoser Look At Your Theory
  • From: malibu
• Re: Quantum Gravity 203.4: Summary of d, P, P ' Relationships
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 203.4: Summary of d, P, P ' Relationships
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 203.4: Summary of d, P, P ' Relationships
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 203.4: Summary of d, P, P ' Relationships
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Message to Stringers and the like: Show Me Your Anti Gravity Generator And I Will Have A CLoser Look At Your Theory
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Message to Stringers and the like: Show Me Your Anti Gravity Generator And I Will Have A CLoser Look At Your Theory
  • From: malibu
• Re: YEARS of NO REFRUTATION, Radial Distribution of Galactic Mass, DETERMINED once and for all !!!
  • From: Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• Re: rotations piezo system
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: New evidence for a 10-year-old conjecture
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Message to Stringers and the like: Show Me Your Anti Gravity Generator And I Will Have A CLoser Look At Your Theory
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Message to Stringers and the like: Show Me Your Anti Gravity Generator And I Will Have A CLoser Look At Your Theory
  • From: malibu
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: God is evolution.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Sulfuric acid
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: gans1973
• rotations piezo system
  • From: Andrea Mazzolari
• Re: Why My Theory on Light Speed is Reality
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: ===>> BALDERDASH !!! NO you did NOT prove ANYTHING ! <=== stop wasting time !!!
  • From: Doctor Student
• Re: YEARS of NO REFRUTATION, Radial Distribution of Galactic Mass, DETERMINED once and for all !!!
  • From: Androcles
• ===>> BALDERDASH !!! NO you did NOT prove ANYTHING ! <=== stop wasting time !!!
  • From: Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Krow
• Re: How to fix New York
  • From: Tom Potter
• Message to Stringers and the like: Show Me Your Anti Gravity Generator And I Will Have A CLoser Look At Your Theory
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Lagrangian expressed with the differential form
  • From: tontoko
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: This should be cool
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: RP
• Re: Analogy at work- Category Dicotomy
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Mike
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Why My Theory on Light Speed is Reality
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: How to fix New York
  • From: nottoooily
• New evidence for a 10-year-old conjecture
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Mike
• Re: God is evolution.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A method to reduce the size of nuclear reactor
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Superstring Theory, Dark Energy, and MOND
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Superstring Theory, Dark Energy, and MOND
  • From: Eric Gisse
• “ God ” ( a.k.a. evolution ) makes his judgment.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: explosives
  • From: hanson
• A Passivator Field- Symmetric Field in Action as a Wind Power Generator
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Physicists spot unusual charged meson
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Analogy at work- Category Dicotomy
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: This should be cool
  • From: Greg Neill
• OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 16 Nov 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 203.3: d of P(A-->B) > = d of P ' (A-->B)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: This should be cool
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: God is evolution.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• This should be cool
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Physicists spot unusual charged meson
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Cosmic cooling never ends.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A method to reduce the size of nuclear reactor
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Superstring Theory, Dark Energy, and MOND
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Wind power
  • From: jimp
• Re: Superstring Theory, Dark Energy, and MOND
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Cosmic cooling never ends.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Physicists spot unusual charged meson
  • From: Igor
• Re: Wind power
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Superstring Theory, Dark Energy, and MOND
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Krow
• Re: Wind power
  • From: jimp
• Re: Many-worlds essay
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Long shot from left field
  • From: PD
• Re: Why My Theory on Light Speed is Reality
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Superstring Theory, Dark Energy, and MOND
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 202.0: Penrose and Random Tilings Link Physics Phases With Combinatorics and Golden Means
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 203.0: Phase Detection: Doctorow vs Dzhunushaliev
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 203.2: Phase Detector Reduces to 0 when A, B are in Same Phase, and Agreement with Fuzzy Multivalued Logic
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 203.2: Phase Detector Reduces to 0 when A, B are in Same Phase, and Agreement with Fuzzy Multivalued Logic
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Long shot from left field
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Real World Bernoulli's Principle Query
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Wind power
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Superstring Theory, Dark Energy, and MOND
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Superstring Theory, Dark Energy, and MOND
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Long shot from left field
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Long shot from left field
  • From: Androcles
• Physicists spot unusual charged meson
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 202.0: Penrose and Random Tilings Link Physics Phases With Combinatorics and Golden Means
  • From: bob
• Re: Quantum Gravity 203.0: Phase Detection: Doctorow vs Dzhunushaliev
  • From: bob
• Re: Long shot from left field
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why My Theory on Light Speed is Reality
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Global warming post #138 Lukewarm Fusion
  • From: Neil Bates
• Re: Wind power
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Long shot from left field
  • From: PD
• Re: How to fix New York
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Marketing X.EXE .
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Quantum Gravity 203.1: Derivation of d Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Global warming post #138 Lukewarm Fusion
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Viewpoint Matters
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Star Explosion Technology-or Nuclear 2D lobe compression
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Why My Theory on Light Speed is Reality
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Emil Rupp and scientific fraud, a cautionary tale
  • From: Eric Baird
• X.EXE is to advanced
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Viewpoint Matters
  • From: Richard777
• Viewpoint Matters
  • From: Richard777
• Re: How to fix New York
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How to fix New York
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Theory of Everything?
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Magnetic gas
  • From: Uncle Al
• Heat conduction and the complex error function?
  • From: erik . olof . nilsson
• Re: Wind power
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: z
• Re: Theory of Everything?
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Sleep Hibernation in Deep Swimming
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• A Plasmon Tube, for xrays to plasmon conversion.
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Theory of Everything?
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• A S, or the Xray Spectra Inverted
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: How to fix New York
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How Big can An Air-Plane Be?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Krow
• Re: How to fix New York
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How to fix New York
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: How to fix New York
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How to fix New York
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: Strange Space Weather over Africa
  • From: Sam Wormley
• How to fix New York
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Real World Bernoulli's Principle Query
  • From: nielloeb@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: New published issue of Journal of Physics Students (JPS)
  • From: jphysstu
• Re: Wind power
  • From: CWatters
• Quantum Gravity 203.0: Phase Detection: Doctorow vs Dzhunushaliev
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 202.0: Penrose and Random Tilings Link Physics Phases With Combinatorics and Golden Means
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Physics MCQ
  • From: Androcles
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: Le Chaud Lapin
• Re: Magnetic gas
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Physics MCQ
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Magnetic gas
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why My Theory on Light Speed is Reality
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: Wind power
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Real World Bernoulli's Principle Query
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Real World Bernoulli's Principle Query
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How Big can An Air-Plane Be?
  • From: Le Chaud Lapin
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wind power
  • From: Androcles
• Rigidity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How Big can An Air-Plane Be?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PROOF of/for Intelligent Design, Creationism and Creator
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A method to reduce the size of nuclear reactor
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A method to reduce the size of nuclear reactor
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Magnetic gas
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Magnetic gas
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Wind power
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Wind power
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Real World Bernoulli's Principle Query
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Magnetic gas
  • From: srp
• Re: Magnetic gas
  • From: ivanb
• Re: Wind power
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Wind power
  • From: Uncle Al
• Real World Bernoulli's Principle Query
  • From: nielloeb@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: A method to reduce the size of nuclear reactor
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Wind power
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Physics MCQ
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: PD
• Re: Can you change yourself ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How Big can An Air-Plane Be?
  • From: Le Chaud Lapin
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: Le Chaud Lapin
• Re: Holy Moly -- Residual Electricity????
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Strange Space Weather over Africa
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Magnetic gas
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quantum Gravity 202.0: Penrose and Random Tilings Link Physics Phases With Combinatorics and Golden Means
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Magnetic gas
  • From: srp
• Re: Wind power
  • From: jcon
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: hanson
• Re: Magnetic gas
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Magnetic gas
  • From: srp
• Re: Magnetic gas
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Wind power
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Wind power
  • From: p4o2
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Krow
• Re: How does the gravitational force escape from a Black Hole?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Magnetic gas
  • From: ivanb
• Re: What if?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• How Big can An Air-Plane Be?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A method to reduce the size of nuclear reactor
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Can you change yourself ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• X.EXE is a better in-box, a better Usenet.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• A method to reduce the size of nuclear reactor
  • From: tontoko
• motorola cell phones and child molestation in the bay area, ca ---- he ll confuse your children when they have to urinate if he has to.
  • From: nada
• Re: Physics MCQ
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physics MCQ
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Physics MCQ
  • From: Small Student
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 13 November 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: Le Chaud Lapin
• Introduction to the theory of gravitation
  • From: Michal Witkowski
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Anybody recognize this perturbation function?
  • From: mL
• Re: If, by pure fate, an attractive girl wants to live with you...
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Calc. energy harmonics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Calc. energy harmonics
  • From: CWatters
• Strange Space Weather over Africa
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why My Theory on Light Speed is Reality
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Jean-Piere Messager's Slander/
  • From: Clew
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Clew
• Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why My Theory on Light Speed is Reality
  • From: Igor
• Re: Quantum Gravity 201.1: Golden Mean Function From dy/dt = t^2 + 2ty + y^2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 201.1: Golden Mean Function From dy/dt = t^2 + 2ty + y^2
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 202.0: Penrose and Random Tilings Link Physics Phases With Combinatorics and Golden Means
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Universe could have a fifth less mass than current estimates
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: NANOWIRE GENERATES ITS OWN ELECTRICITY http://xrl.us/7d4m
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: help with question on the speed of light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Plasma Stuff
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Plasma Stuff
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Plasma Stuff
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: help with question on the speed of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: gans1973
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Why My Theory on Light Speed is Reality
  • From: nottoooily
• Why My Theory on Light Speed is Reality
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A Riverdance of majestic trees.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Getting others to selflessly earn you cash.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: LARSON-ian Binary Star Formation
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Structure of Atoms as Interpreted by Model Mechanics
  • From: PD
• Re: The Structure of Atoms as Interpreted by Model Mechanics
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Androcles
• Re: If, by pure fate, an attractive girl wants to live with you...
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: If, by pure fate, an attractive girl wants to live with you...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: Y.Porat
• Advanced Physics Forums
  • From: Admin
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 846 November 12, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: motorola cell phones and child molestation in the bay area, ca
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Calc. energy harmonics
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Plasma Stuff
  • From: rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: motorola cell phones and child molestation in the bay area, ca
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: LARSON-ian Binary Star Formation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Structure of Atoms as Interpreted by Model Mechanics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Structure of Atoms as Interpreted by Model Mechanics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Clever thermoelectric array
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: Calc. energy harmonics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Calc. energy harmonics
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Calc. energy harmonics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Calc. energy harmonics
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Inviting stress into your life... arms wide-open.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Calc. energy harmonics
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Aether and Being
  • From: Tenifer
• Re: The Structure of Atoms as Interpreted by Model Mechanics
  • From: PD
• Re: Calc. energy harmonics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Calc. energy harmonics
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• The Structure of Atoms as Interpreted by Model Mechanics
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Calc. energy harmonics
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Calc. energy harmonics
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Gravity 201.1: Golden Mean Function From dy/dt = t^2 + 2ty + y^2
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• A Riverdance of majestic trees.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: chemical potential energy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Clever thermoelectric array
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Mind v. Soul
  • From: Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 201.1: Golden Mean Function From dy/dt = t^2 + 2ty + y^2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Perhaps my pride is killing me.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Calc. energy harmonics
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Mind v. Soul
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• What if?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: help with question on the speed of light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: help with question on the speed of light
  • From: Igor
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Androcles
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Androcles
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Calc. energy harmonics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: chemical potential energy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: geophysics and physical geography
  • From: tadchem
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: jimp
• Re: The Aether and Being
  • From: Laurent
• Re: chemical potential energy
  • From: Taras_96
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Clew
• Re: geophysics and physical geography
  • From: uri
• Re: Calc. energy harmonics
  • From: CWatters
• Re: The Aether and Being
  • From: Laurent
• Re: The Queendom of Norway reminds me of Seattle.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How big a Cern To match a BH?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum entanglement and FTL
  • From: srp
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Aether and Being
  • From: Laurent
• With no hope on the horizon, people just want to smile.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Nov 12, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org
• geophysics and physical geography
  • From: uri
• Re: The Aether and Being
  • From: Tenifer
• Re: Quantum entanglement and FTL
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Calc. energy harmonics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Self-organization
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: help with question on the speed of light
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 201.0: dy/dt = t^2 + 2ty + y^2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How does the gravitational force escape from a Black Hole?
  • From: Doctor Student
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: Le Chaud Lapin
• Re: Calc. energy harmonics
  • From: Jim Slatter
• Re: chemical potential energy
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Quantum entanglement and FTL
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: help with question on the speed of light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: help with question on the speed of light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Quantum entanglement and FTL
  • From: Matt Menge
• Re: How big a Cern To match a BH?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: help with question on the speed of light
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: chemical potential energy
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Calc. energy harmonics
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Androcles
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 200.9: Chromatic Number Via Total Gaussian Curvature
  • From: OsherD
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Androcles
• Sci.Phyics is a group of people, not just a topic.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: CWatters
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: Androcles
• Re: chemical potential energy
  • From: Pmb
• Re: God is evolution.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Duration of fingerprints on paper
  • From: CWatters
• Re: chemical potential energy
  • From: CWatters
• There is no tomorrow, so an unjustified smile will have to do.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• The Queendom of Norway reminds me of Seattle.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Calc. energy harmonics
  • From: CWatters
• Re: A question that i can't seem to get right.
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Calc. energy harmonics
  • From: CWatters
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Calc. energy harmonics
  • From: Jim Slatter
• Re: ?Does God exist
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: God is evolution.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: CWatters
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: Androcles
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: jimp
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: CWatters
• Lies 3: Princeton, Chicago, Stanford, etc. Enter the Scene
  • From: OsherD
• Lies 2: "Can't Have Both Self-Defense and Jobs," and "Only One Theory is Correct"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Androcles
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• A question that i can't seem to get right.
  • From: skartch
• Intermission: How Lies Told Often Enough Become Believed
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Bert, what if WebTV/UPS were a bit faster ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How big a Cern To match a BH?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Assistance required developing Navier-Stokes equations for 5 dimensional cylindrical coordinates
  • From: Bill LaMar
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quantum Gravity 200.7: More Re Probability of Chromatic Polynomial
  • From: OsherD
• Re: chemical potential energy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: chemical potential energy
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Gravity 200.8: - x - (1 - x) + (2 - x) - (3 - x) = -2
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 200.8: - x - (1 - x) + (2 - x) - (3 - x) = -2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: 6-dimensional Maxwell's equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: chemical potential energy
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: help with question on the speed of light
  • From: panton_chrimaton
• Re: chemical potential energy
  • From: panton_chrimaton
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: jimp
• chemical potential energy
  • From: Taras_96
• Re: electricity
  • From: hanson
• Re: The Aether and Being
  • From: Laurent
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Evird
• Re: The Aether and Being
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The Aether and Being
  • From: Laurent
• Re: The Origin of the Universe
  • From: hanson
• Re: help with question on the speed of light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Clever thermoelectric array
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The Origin of the Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Androcles
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: Androcles
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: Androcles
• Re: help with question on the speed of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: CWatters
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: CWatters
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: gans1973
• Re: Clever thermoelectric array
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: help with question on the speed of light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Please Recommend Fluid Mechanics Book
  • From: Le Chaud Lapin
• Re: 6-dimensional Maxwell's equations
  • From: Androcles
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Androcles
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Androcles
• 6-dimensional Maxwell's equations
  • From: tontoko
• Re: Clever thermoelectric array
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: Quantum Gravity 200.7: More Re Probability of Chromatic Polynomial
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How big a Cern To match a BH?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Clever thermoelectric array
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 200.7: More Re Probability of Chromatic Polynomial
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Clever thermoelectric array
  • From: Benj
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Mind v. Soul
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Mind v. Soul
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Mind v. Soul
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Mind v. Soul
  • From: hanson
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 200.6: Probability of Chromatic Polynomial
  • From: OsherD
• Clever thermoelectric array
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Traveler
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Androcles
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Androcles
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Androcles
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: Androcles
• Re: help with question on the speed of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: help with question on the speed of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: help with question on the speed of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mind v. Soul
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Mind v. Soul
  • From: tadchem
• Re: help with question on the speed of light
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: help with question on the speed of light
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Mind v. Soul
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Duration of fingerprints on paper
  • From: Uncle Al
• Mind v. Soul
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: Duration of fingerprints on paper
  • From: Klueless
• Re: What's an easy way to convert price per sheet to price per hundred square feet or vice versa when comparing paper goods pricing at local stores?...
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: programing with science jobs
  • From: H.L
• Re: help with question on the speed of light
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: help with question on the speed of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How does the gravitational force escape from a Black Hole?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: Camilo
• Re: What works, works.
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Duration of fingerprints on paper
  • From: Richard Gott
• help with question on the speed of light
  • From: 911review,org
• What works, works.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• programing with science jobs
  • From: artem
• Re: Duration of fingerprints on paper
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is it: " Hope from delusion and nothing else. " ?
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Aether and Being
  • From: Benj
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• What's an easy way to convert price per sheet to price per hundred square feet or vice versa when comparing paper goods pricing at local stores?...
  • From: the zak
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Invitation to join the Stat Jobs group on Google
  • From: vincent64@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: electricity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Duration of fingerprints on paper
  • From: Richard Gott
• How big a Cern To match a BH?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Bert, what if WebTV/UPS were a bit faster ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Bert, what if WebTV/UPS were a bit faster ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: CWatters
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: CWatters
• Is it: “ Hope from delusion and nothing else. ” ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Uni Special Relativity Question: Please Help!!!!
  • From: xandergiles1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: gans1973
• Re: Uni Special Relativity Question: Please Help!!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Uni Special Relativity Question: Please Help!!!!
  • From: xandergiles1
• Re: The Aether and Being
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Aether and Being
  • From: Kettle Fish
• Re: 7000+ beautiful Russian women
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Bert, was it just the keyboard or the TV-top unit ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Evird
• Re: The Aether and Being
  • From: Tenifer
• Re: What if?
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: The Aether and Being
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: 7000+ beautiful Russian women
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: If big bang occured at a point on a spherical 2D surface.
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• The Aether and Being
  • From: Laurent
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: jimp
• Ray Tracing: Energetic cosmic rays linked to giant black holes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: Camilo
• Re: If big bang occured at a point on a spherical 2D surface.
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: gans1973
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: nottoooily
• Teaching "To Be Born A Human Being Is The Greatest Gift Of God's Love,..." 10-14-96
  • From: remicck
• 7000+ beautiful Russian women
  • From: my god
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: Androcles
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: Camilo
• OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 9 Nov 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: comparative efficiency test
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• comparative efficiency test
  • From: Camilo
• Re: If big bang occured at a point on a spherical 2D surface.
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: Androcles
• Re: If big bang occured at a point on a spherical 2D surface.
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: Unification of Physics
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Anybody recognize this perturbation function?
  • From: John Park
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: If big bang occured at a point on a spherical 2D surface.
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: If big bang occured at a point on a spherical 2D surface.
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: If big bang occured at a point on a spherical 2D surface.
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: If big bang occured at a point on a spherical 2D surface.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: Igor
• Re: If big bang occured at a point on a spherical 2D surface.
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Anybody recognize this perturbation function?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Anybody recognize this perturbation function?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Smile, protons, you're on camera
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: jimp
• Re: If big bang occured at a point on a spherical 2D surface.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Anybody recognize this perturbation function?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• If big bang occured at a point on a spherical 2D surface.
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Evird
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Evird
• Re: It's going to suck, at least at first, but I'll work it out.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: gans1973
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: Jim Black
• On the Fundamental Forces as Measures of Particle Exchange over Differing Scales of Time
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Cosmic collision explained without dark matter
  • From: Androcles
• Bert, was it just the keyboard or the TV-top unit ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: Benj
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 200.5: Dichromatic Polynomial Relates Chromatic Polynomial To Phase Transitions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Cosmic collision explained without dark matter
  • From: Traveler
• Re: pressurized tubular frame
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: Cosmic collision explained without dark matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment and Lorentz polarization
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 200.4: Vanishing Curvature at Saddle Points Yields Phase Transitions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Cosmic collision explained without dark matter
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Cosmic collision explained without dark matter
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Cosmic collision explained without dark matter
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Cosmic collision explained without dark matter
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Cosmic collision explained without dark matter
  • From: malibu
• Re: Mathematical proof antigravity is an allowed phenomena
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Cosmic collision explained without dark matter
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Cosmic collision explained without dark matter
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Universe could have a fifth less mass than current estimates
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Cosmic collision explained without dark matter
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Cosmic collision explained without dark matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Universe could have a fifth less mass than current estimates
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: jimp
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: Benj
• Re: The Orgin of Life
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: CWatters
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: CWatters
• Re: space shuttle landing trajectory?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: space shuttle landing trajectory?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Petro at $3 20
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: blast radius vs. land area
  • From: jimp
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: blast radius vs. land area
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Petro at $3 20
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: blast radius vs. land area
  • From: glamkowski
• Re: Intermittent Fusion Rocket
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Uncle Albert must be the happiest man alive.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: It's a Holy War now Bert.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Evird
• Re: space shuttle landing trajectory?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Regulate pendulum clock with quartz crystal?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: Sue...
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: tadchem
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: Sue...
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: Benj
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: CWatters
• Re: pressurized tubular frame
  • From: lethaldriver
• Re: YOU may be in a science mystery story!
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: YOU may be in a science mystery story!
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Well done Pete... not.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: YOU may be in a science mystery story!
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: YOU may be in a science mystery story!
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 200.3: Prime Number Phases
  • From: OsherD
• Re: YOU may be in a science mystery story!
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Intermittent Fusion Rocket
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Petro at $3 20
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Regulate pendulum clock with quartz crystal?
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: space shuttle landing trajectory?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: mrdarrett
• Re: Intermittent Fusion Rocket
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Regulate pendulum clock with quartz crystal?
  • From: Bill Bowden
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: space shuttle landing trajectory?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: airplane flight
  • From: Androcles
• Re: space shuttle landing trajectory?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• airplane flight
  • From: bob
• Re: space shuttle landing trajectory?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: blast radius vs. land area
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: space shuttle landing trajectory?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question for William J. Beaty
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Question for William J. Beaty
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Entangled particles and chemical reactions. Calling All Geese.
  • From: Huang
• Re: blast radius vs. land area
  • From: tadchem
• Question for William J. Beaty
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Intermittent Fusion Rocket
  • From: Uncle Al
• blast radius vs. land area
  • From: glamkowski
• Re: YOU may be in a science mystery story!
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Epistemology 501: Angular Mechanics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: God, I'd gladly pay you back next Tuesday.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Everyone has a different definition of God.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Intermittent Fusion Rocket
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: pressurized tubular frame
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Intermittent Fusion Rocket
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 6 November 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Weather question
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: McCullough's requested proof.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: gans1973
• Re: question on anticommutator
  • From: gans1973
• Re: pressurized tubular frame
  • From: Benj
• ★★★Information of ship Sale & Purchase&Building★★★
  • From: cargobroker200710@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• McCullough's requested proof.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: AZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZA...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: AZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZA...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$center of universe$$$$$$$$$$$$$
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Gravity"
  • From: Evird
• Re: Uncle Albert either can't or won't think.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 6 November 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Able-bodied people become misers to test their strength, I feel.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 2 Nov 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Intermittent Fusion Rocket
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Intermittent Fusion Rocket
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: pressurized tubular frame
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment and Lorentz polarization
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Entangled particles and chemical reactions. Calling All Geese.
  • From: Tenifer
• The miser in me is looking to lower my monthly expenses.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: pressurized tubular frame
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Epistemology 501: Angular Mechanics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Uncle Albert either can't or won't think.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• pressurized tubular frame
  • From: lethaldriver
• Net, exploitable energy drops.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Intermittent Fusion Rocket
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Intermittent Fusion Rocket
  • From: tontoko
• Re: space shuttle landing trajectory?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: space shuttle landing trajectory?
  • From: mrdarrett
• Able-bodied people become misers to test their strength, I feel.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: ctrpapa
• Re: YOU may be in a science mystery story!
  • From: greysky
• Uncle Albert either can't or won't think.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Okay ..... what the hell is this about?
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 6 November 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Okay ..... what the hell is this about?
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Okay ..... what the hell is this about?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Okay ..... what the hell is this about?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Okay ..... what the hell is this about?
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: space shuttle landing trajectory?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Okay ..... what the hell is this about?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Regulate pendulum clock with quartz crystal?
  • From: isw
• Re: Regulate pendulum clock with quartz crystal?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Free energy
  • From: Gieniu
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: jimp
• Re: a-level question help Please!?
  • From: OG
• Okay ..... what the hell is this about?
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: list of solution manuals
  • From: chengfh11
• Re: Regulate pendulum clock with quartz crystal?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Bert, why can't the WebTV guys fix your system for you ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: YOU may be in a science mystery story!
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: YOU may be in a science mystery story!
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Bill Gates was never the Richest man on earth
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Comet Holmes =~ foul play?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Covariant Derivatives, and Invariance of Vectors
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is at the root of man's Discontent and Malaise?
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Covariant Derivatives, and Invariance of Vectors
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 200.2: Curvature Phases
  • From: OsherD
• Covariant Derivatives, and Invariance of Vectors
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: The Onion God
  • From: guskz
• Re: Quantum Gravity 193.5: Converting Clifford Algebra and Physics To Probability Equations Via 2 --> 1 + P(A<-->B)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: YOU may be in a science mystery story!
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: jimp
• Possible quantum mechanical violations of the Second Law?
  • From: Robert Clark
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: Benj
• Re: YOU may be in a science mystery story!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Observed or not, exploitable energy drops.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: YOU may be in a science mystery story!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum Gravity 199.1: Riccati DE and The Chromatic Polynomial and Chromatic Number
  • From: bob
• Observed or not, exploitable energy drops.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 2 Nov 07 Washington, DC
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Defining "physical"
  • From: Lester Zick
• Re: Comet Holmes =~ foul play?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Rainbow phenom - between sun and myself?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Bert, why can't the WebTV guys fix your system for you ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: space shuttle landing trajectory?
  • From: Androcles
• space shuttle landing trajectory?
  • From: mrdarrett
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Rainbow phenom - between sun and myself?
  • From: djarvinen
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: Igor
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: The Onion God
  • From: Uncle Al
• Metrology on ~10 um scale- ideas?
  • From: cfdgrrl
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: YOU may be in a science mystery story!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Regulate pendulum clock with quartz crystal?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Uncle Albert's deepest humiliation.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Onion God
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: srp
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: YOU may be in a science mystery story!
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: YOU may be in a science mystery story!
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: Igor
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 2 Nov 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: question on anticommutator
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• The Onion God
  • From: RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Re: Petro at $3 20
  • From: Larry Snyder
• Re: Howdo the brain neurons compute?
  • From: hanson
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: srp
• Bert, why can't the WebTV guys fix your system for you ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: A challenge
  • From: Pranab
• Re: A challenge
  • From: Pranab
• Einstein Vs. Mr. DIALUPUSA.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: electricity
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: YOU may be in a science mystery story!
  • From: RH Nigl
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Evird
• Re: Comet Holmes =~ foul play?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: YOU may be in a science mystery story!
  • From: greysky
• Re: Regulate pendulum clock with quartz crystal?
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Petro at $3 20
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: electricity Is in conductor
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Nasa is yet another make-work welfare program.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Petro at $3 20
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A simple lightspeed experiment and Lorentz polarization
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Comet Holmes =~ foul play?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: srp
• YOU may be in a science mystery story!
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Howdo the brain neurons compute?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• The Simplest Accelerator
  • From: tontoko
• Re: Regulate pendulum clock with quartz crystal?
  • From: nottoooily
• Uncle Albert's deepest humiliation.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Regulate pendulum clock with quartz crystal?
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Regulate pendulum clock with quartz crystal?
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: wick's theorem question
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: question on anticommutator
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Regulate pendulum clock with quartz crystal?
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Rainbow phenom - between sun and myself?
  • From: Dwib
• Regulate pendulum clock with quartz crystal?
  • From: Bill Bowden
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: srp
• Re: question on anticommutator
  • From: gans1973
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• ethics in using energy without knowing its source?
  • From: ctrpapa
• Re: Remember Peter Lynds?
  • From: RP
• motorola cell phones and child molestation in the bay area, ca
  • From: nada
• Re: Unfication of Physics
  • From: Kettle Fish
• Re: Rainbow phenom - between sun and myself?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Comet Holmes =~ foul play?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Defining "physical"
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Rainbow phenom - between sun and myself?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The second law of thermodynamics is truly cosmic in scope.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Rainbow phenom - between sun and myself?
  • From: OG
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Epistemology 501: Angular Mechanics
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Epistemology 501: Angular Mechanics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• The second law of thermodynamics is truly cosmic in scope.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Epistemology 501: Angular Mechanics
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Remember Peter Lynds?
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: Remember Peter Lynds?
  • From: RP
• Re: Rainbow phenom - between sun and myself?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: djarvinen
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• Rainbow phenom - between sun and myself?
  • From: djarvinen
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Epistemology 501: Angular Mechanics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A challenge
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: Igor
• Nasa is yet another make-work welfare program.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 2 Nov 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Ohanians Physics
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: electricity Is
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Rent in many parts of China is 90 percent cheaper than Seattle.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Remember Peter Lynds?
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: A challenge
  • From: CWatters
• Rent in many parts of China is 90 percent cheaper than Seattle.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: A challenge
  • From: RP
• Re: A challenge
  • From: kunzmilan
• Re: Defining "physical"
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Defining "physical"
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Comet Holmes =~ foul play?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: US astronomers spot massive, record-setting stellar-mass black ...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Nasa should just hire Chinese and Russians.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Nuclear power is too expensive
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: electricity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Comet Holmes =~ foul play?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Comet Holmes =~ foul play?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: question on anticommutator
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A challenge
  • From: Pranab
• Re: A challenge
  • From: Pranab
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 2 Nov 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Thomas
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: srp
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Evird
• Re: Quantum Gravity 193.5: Converting Clifford Algebra and Physics To Probability Equations Via 2 --> 1 + P(A<-->B)
  • From: Huang
• Re: MORPHOGENESIS
  • From: Laurent
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Nov 05, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: What is at the root of man's Discontent and Malaise?
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: a-level question help Please!?
  • From: Sue...
• wick's theorem question
  • From: gans1973
• Re: program to draw atomic orbitals II
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: Thomas
• question on anticommutator
  • From: gans1973
• Re: a-level question help Please!?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a-level question help Please!?
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: RH Nigl
• a-level question help Please!?
  • From: paulreynolds245
• Re: program to draw atomic orbitals II
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Quantum Gravity 200.1: Singularities and Bureaucracy in Phase Theory of Quantum Gravity via Combinatorics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 200.0: Phase Theory of Quantum Gravity via Combinatorics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: RP
• Re: Ohanians Physics
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Ohanians Physics
  • From: Martin
• Re: Quantum Gravity 199.1: Riccati DE and The Chromatic Polynomial and Chromatic Number
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 199.0: The Chromatic Polynomial and Chromatic Number
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 193.5: Converting Clifford Algebra and Physics To Probability Equations Via 2 --> 1 + P(A<-->B)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Ohanians Physics
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: MORPHOGENESIS
  • From: Steve Baker
• Re: Minimum number of dimensions for physical space.
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Defining "physical"
  • From: Lester Zick
• Re: Experimental Discrepancy
  • From: tadchem
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Defining "physical"
  • From: tadchem
• Ohanians Physics
  • From: David Capstick
• MORPHOGENESIS
  • From: Laurent
• Re: World's Smallest Radio Fits in the Palm of the Hand . . . of an Ant
  • From: Edward Green
• program to draw atomic orbitals II
  • From: Martin
• Re: Defining "physical"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: RP
• Re: A challenge
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Experimental Discrepancy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A challenge
  • From: CWatters
• Re: The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Experimental Discrepancy
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: srp
• Re: Quantum Gravity 199.1: Riccati DE and The Chromatic Polynomial and Chromatic Number
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Experimental Discrepancy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Experimental Discrepancy
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: A challenge
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: Defining "physical"
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: A challenge
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A challenge
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A challenge
  • From: Pranab
• Re: A challenge
  • From: Pranab
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: A challenge
  • From: Pranab
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Defining "physical"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Defining "physical"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Defining "physical"
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Defining "physical"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Defining "physical"
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Problem in Relativity text book...
  • From: mL
• Re: Defining "physical"
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Experimental Discrepancy
  • From: Androcles
• Minimum number of dimensions for physical space.
  • From: Clifford Nelson
• Re: I need guidance in physics
  • From: srp
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: srp
• Experimental Discrepancy
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A challenge
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Problem in Relativity text book...
  • From: Androcles
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Eriw
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: srp
• Re: A challenge
  • From: RP
• ERICA,Igor,RP,PMB are WRONG about Coriolis & Magnetism similarity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: RP
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: A challenge
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: Problem in Relativity text book...
  • From: mL
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: RP
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: A challenge
  • From: Pranab
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: RP
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: RP
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A challenge
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: A challenge
  • From: Pranab
• Re: A challenge
  • From: Pranab
• Re: A challenge
  • From: Pranab
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A challenge
  • From: Pranab
• Re: A challenge
  • From: Pranab
• Re: A challenge
  • From: Pranab
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Problem in Relativity text book...
  • From: Androcles
• Seattle is wealthy.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: RP
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Defining "physical"
  • From: Klueless
• Re: Quantum Gravity 199.0: The Chromatic Polynomial and Chromatic Number
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Problem in Relativity text book...
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Tenifer
• Re: Quantum Gravity 193.5: Converting Clifford Algebra and Physics To Probability Equations Via 2 --> 1 + P(A<-->B)
  • From: Huang
• Re: OT: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 2 Nov 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OT: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 2 Nov 07 Washington, DC
  • From: jimp
• Re: electricity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Problem in Relativity text book...
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 199.2: Doctorow on Planar Graphs
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 193.5: Converting Clifford Algebra and Physics To Probability Equations Via 2 --> 1 + P(A<-->B)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Whats happening next Tuesday ?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: jimp
• Re: Problem in Relativity text book...
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: srp
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Bullets bounce off nanotubes
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Quantum Gravity 199.1: Riccati DE and The Chromatic Polynomial and Chromatic Number
  • From: OsherD
• Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: electricity
  • From: Benj
• Re: electricity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Whats happening next Tuesday ?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
  • From: Igor
• Re: A challenge
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: electricity
  • From: Benj
• Re: Spending less intrigues me, earning more bores me.
  • From: hanson
• Re: OT: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 2 Nov 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Whats happening next Tuesday ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Whats happening next Tuesday ?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Problem in Relativity text book...
  • From: srp
• Re: Quantum Gravity 193.5: Converting Clifford Algebra and Physics To Probability Equations Via 2 --> 1 + P(A<-->B)
  • From: Huang
• Quantum Gravity 199.0: The Chromatic Polynomial and Chromatic Number
  • From: OsherD
• Re: electricity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 193.5: Converting Clifford Algebra and Physics To Probability Equations Via 2 --> 1 + P(A<-->B)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A challenge
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Whats happening next Tuesday ?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Defining "physical"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Defining "physical"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Quantum Gravity 193.5: Converting Clifford Algebra and Physics To Probability Equations Via 2 --> 1 + P(A<-->B)
  • From: Huang
• Re: A challenge
  • From: kunzmilan
• Defining "physical"
  • From: Paul Holbach
• A challenge
  • From: Pranab
• $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$center of universe$$$$$$$$$$$$$
  • From: Divij Rao
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Eriw
• Bert-'s Typewriter out SORRY
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: electricity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: electricity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: electricity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Tragic mania.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: electricity
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: list of solution manuals
  • From: saqi
• The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• UnGenious Solutions ?
  • From: US of Apes (ZIQ)
• Re: Quantum Gravity 193.5: Converting Clifford Algebra and Physics To Probability Equations Via 2 --> 1 + P(A<-->B)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: ?Does God exist
  • From: Lester Zick
• Re: Whats happening next Tuesday ?
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: AZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZA...
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Quantum Gravity 197.1: Intuition Behind Curvature and Torsion As Causation
  • From: malibu
• Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition
  • From: hetware
• Re: Problem in Relativity text book...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Whats happening next Tuesday ?
  • From: Gordon Knot
• Re: Whats happening next Tuesday ?
  • From: jimp
• Re: OT: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 2 Nov 07 Washington, DC
  • From: jimp
• Whats happening next Tuesday ?
  • From: N
• OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 2 Nov 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nasa should just hire Chinese and Russians.
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Gravity 197.1: Intuition Behind Curvature and Torsion As Causation
  • From: local host
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: UK scientists working towards a redefinition of the kilogram
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: electricity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: I need guidance in physics
  • From: Magdy
• Re: electricity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: electricity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: AZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZA...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: electricity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Nasa should just hire Chinese and Russians.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: ?Does God exist
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: Tom Potter
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE --- Number 845 November 2, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: World's Smallest Radio Fits in the Palm of the Hand . . . of an Ant
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: World's Smallest Radio Fits in the Palm of the Hand . . . of an Ant
  • From: jimp
• Re: Nasa should just hire Chinese and Russians.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Bullets bounce off nanotubes
  • From: jimp
• Re: Bullets bounce off nanotubes
  • From: jimp
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Nasa should just hire Chinese and Russians.
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: jimp
• Re: UK scientists working towards a redefinition of the kilogram
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: I need guidance in physics
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: I need guidance in physics
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Eriw
• Re: Detecting IEDs...
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Impossibly ideal lasers in impossibly ideal vacuums.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Space Foreshortning (an original theory)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Problem in Relativity text book...
  • From: Front Office
• Re: US astronomers spot massive, record-setting stellar-mass black ...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Problem in Relativity text book...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Bullets bounce off nanotubes
  • From: CWatters
• Problem in Relativity text book...
  • From: mmm901
• Re: UK scientists working towards a redefinition of the kilogram
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: I need guidance in physics
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Bullets bounce off nanotubes
  • From: Tenifer
• Re: Gravitational mass/Inertial mass defn?
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Bullets bounce off nanotubes
  • From: Benj
• Tragic mania.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Quantum Gravity 193.5: Converting Clifford Algebra and Physics To Probability Equations Via 2 --> 1 + P(A<-->B)
  • From: Huang
• Quantum Gravity 197.1: Intuition Behind Curvature and Torsion As Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Bullets bounce off nanotubes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 198.0: Information Theory Decoding Inequality
  • From: local host
• Quantum Gravity 198.0: Information Theory Decoding Inequality
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How to Clear the School
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: Blackhole questions
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: I need guidance in physics
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: I need guidance in physics
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: nottoooily
• Re: I need guidance in physics
  • From: skybest
• Re: I need guidance in physics
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: electricity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The incentive to work.
  • From: Pmb
• How do the brain neurons compute?
  • From: Tenifer
• Re: AZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZ
  • From: Traveler
• Re: A simple question about satellites
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A simple question about satellites
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Proposal about the neutron
  • From: PD
• Re: Proposal about the neutron
  • From: Carlos L
• The incentive to work.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Gordon Knot
• Re: I need guidance in physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A simple question about satellites
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Bert, I'd love to hear about your wife and kids.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• The Untold Story of Phaeton (was: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces)
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: electricity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How to Clear the School
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Space Foreshortning (an original theory)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Proposal about the neutron
  • From: Carlos L
• Re: I need guidance in physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• I need guidance in physics
  • From: Magdy
• Re: Proposal about the neutron
  • From: Carlos L
• Re: What if?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Proposal about the neutron
  • From: tnlockyer@xxxxxxx
• Re: Space Foreshortning (an original theory)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Bert and T.J.'s outlandish, unverifiable claims.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A simple question about satellites
  • From: Thomas
• Re: electricity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: electricity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Looking for a technical term
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Pete, could you work ?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Proposal about the neutron
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Proposal about the neutron
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: electricity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: electricity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Covariance
  • From: Laurent
• Re: What if?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Eriw
• Re: What if?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What if?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Proposal about the neutron
  • From: PD
• Pete, could you work ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: What if?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: What if?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: When was the last time your physics knowledge earned you some money ?
  • From: Pmb
• When was the last time your physics knowledge earned you some money ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Isn't this the history of fields, including gravitomagnetism ?
  • From: Pmb
• Nasa should just hire Chinese and Russians.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Larry Snyder
• Quantum Gravity 197.0: Curvature and Torsion As Proposed Definitions Inside Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Bert and T.J.'s outlandish, unverifiable claims.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Quantum Gravity 193.5: Converting Clifford Algebra and Physics To Probability Equations Via 2 --> 1 + P(A<-->B)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 193.5: Converting Clifford Algebra and Physics To Probability Equations Via 2 --> 1 + P(A<-->B)
  • From: OsherD
• The parent's MessageID is in the child's header.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Quantum Gravity 193.5: Converting Clifford Algebra and Physics To Probability Equations Via 2 --> 1 + P(A<-->B)
  • From: Huang
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Proposal about the neutron
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Proposal about the neutron
  • From: Carlos L
• Re: Proposal about the neutron
  • From: Carlos L
• Re: Glazier v Wormley
  • From: RH Nigl
• Re: What if?
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: What if?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: LEO HighRise (starting at $1000/sf + 1% annual member fees)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Creationism Versus Evolution
  • From: Adam
• Re: What if?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: What if?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Looking for a technical term
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Isn't this the history of fields, including gravitomagnetism ?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Traveler
• What if?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Looking for a technical term
  • From: Herbert Blenner
• Re: Unravelling the mysteries of coiling ropes
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: My patience for " Usenet newbies " is limited.
  • From: Pmb