Defining "physical"
- From: Paul Holbach <paulholbachDELETETHENAME@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 07:21:12 -0700
I was looking for a definition of "physical" that is more technical
than the ones one finds in ordinary language dictionaries. What I
eventually came upon is the following:
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/physicalism/#9
"The theory-based conception:
A property is physical iff it either is the sort of property that
physical theory tells us about or else is a property which
metaphysically (or logically) supervenes on the sort of property that
physical theory tells us about."
"The object-based conception:
A property is physical iff it either is the sort of property required
by a complete account of the intrinsic nature of paradigmatic physical
objects and their constituents or else is a property which
metaphysically (or logically) supervenes on the sort of property
required by a complete account of the intrinsic nature of paradigmatic
physical objects and their constituents."
It seems that "physical" is much harder to define than most people
might think.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Defining "physical"
- From: tadchem
- Re: Defining "physical"
- From: Klueless
- Re: Defining "physical"
- From: Androcles
- Re: Defining "physical"
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Defining "physical"
- Prev by Date: A challenge
- Next by Date: Re: A challenge
- Previous by thread: A challenge
- Next by thread: Re: Defining "physical"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading