Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
- From: "RH Nigl" <rhnigl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 04:06:33 -0500
<hhc314@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1194140806.105399.35690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Nov 3, 1:52 pm, "RH Nigl" <rhn...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Yes, I agree, everyone should read 'Gravity from the Ground Up', by
I believe these questions are opposite to current thinking
regarding the effect 'gravity' has on gamma-radiation. That
thinking (and testing), suggesting, (at least to me), that 'gravity'
as a force, somehow 'precedes' gamma-radiation.
My question is: Could the opposite condition be true?
To wit, could gamma-radiation affecting particles, at the
quantum level linking those particles inextricably to the
entire EM spectrum (in spacetime), actually cause 'gravity'?
That is, I mean, I think this notion is opposite to current
thinking, so, if true, please correct my misunderstanding.
And a couple of follow up questions: Could this suggested
'linkage' of particle to wave be hypothetically expressed
as the wave-particle duality?
Also, could gamma-radiation be considered a 'self-promulgating'
wave--a 'fundamental' force of sorts?
Thanks Sue,
R H Nigl
blogOptica
Huh? There is no connection between gravity and gamma emissions.
Buy a real physics textbook and read it, then do the problem sets.
Harry C.
Bernard F. Schutz (who writes advanced physics textbooks), 2003,
Cambridge University Press, 488 pages
Interesting 'insights' can be found there.
RHN
.
- References:
- Gamma-rays and Gravity
- From: RH Nigl
- Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
- From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Gamma-rays and Gravity
- Prev by Date: Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
- Next by Date: Re: Maxwell's derivation of the Speed of Light "c"
- Previous by thread: Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
- Next by thread: Re: Gamma-rays and Gravity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
