Re: comparative efficiency test


"Camilo" <camilogil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1194730566.552533.72740@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sounds like a daft method if you ask me - unless your motor is very low
rpm.

is daft but cheaper, I have no money to buy a dynamometer and
initially I wouldn´t need precision, also I was supposing a case (I
know there are electric motors with very high efficiency, close to
100%) ... anyway, the fact is, when I´ll need measuring precision
obviously I will use a dynamometer or torque meter but I just wanted
to know about a cheaper test (that I forgot to inform to you)

Cheap test, cheap result.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: comparative efficiency test
    ... initially I wouldn´t need precision, also I was supposing a case (I ... obviously I will use a dynamometer or torque meter but I just wanted ... to know about a cheaper test ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: BG Meters
    ... Due to my co-pay, these are no cheaper than any others for me, and are ... Lifescan and Precision have special deals ...
    (alt.support.diabetes)
  • Re: comparative efficiency test
    ... :> is daft but cheaper, I have no money to buy a dynamometer ...
    (sci.physics)
Quantcast