Re: Layman's question about speed of light
- From: srp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:13:24 -0800 (PST)
On 11 déc, 05:08, Mark Conrad <non...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<1f4c8bd3-4833-4f56-aded-446fcf628...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
s...@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
My own view is that 50 years from now, the popular
facts will stick more closely to physical reality, since
I think the so unproductive Copenhagen interpretation
cannot possibly survive that long.
André Michaud
Whoops, hope my prior post was sent to you Andre,
It was.
just noticed that there are two almost identical
posts, except for the very last line of the post.
Noticed it also. Apparently someone who does not
believe that c is impossible to reach for massive
particles.
Cheers
André Michaud
Guess I better look closely at the headers whenever
I post in this NG from now on.
Mark-
.
- References:
- Layman's question about speed of light
- From: Mark Conrad
- Re: Layman's question about speed of light
- From: srp
- Re: Layman's question about speed of light
- From: Mark Conrad
- Re: Layman's question about speed of light
- From: srp
- Re: Layman's question about speed of light
- From: Mark Conrad
- Re: Layman's question about speed of light
- From: srp
- Re: Layman's question about speed of light
- From: Mark Conrad
- Layman's question about speed of light
- Prev by Date: Re: The massenergy of light
- Next by Date: Re: strange definition of temperature
- Previous by thread: Re: Layman's question about speed of light
- Next by thread: Re: Layman's question about speed of light
- Index(es):