Re: Evidence for the existence of gravity lensing elements (micro-black holes) inside the Sun, Moon and the Earth.

On 21 dec, 16:38, "LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx" <LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 21 dec, 14:38, "LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx" <LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On 21 dec, 14:11, "LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx" <LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Evidence for the existence of gravity lensing elements (micro-black
holes) inside the Sun, Moon and the Earth.

My former explanation for the "double gravity dip" before and after
solar eclipse measured by Wang and Yang in 1997
see:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/03/how-small-anomalies-...
is reason to explore the eclipse results made by others in the past.
As a result I conclude that not only the sun harbours gravity lensing
objects inside, but also the moon and perhaps even the earth.

My "double gravity dip" explanation was  based on the assumption that
Sunspots are gravity lensing micro black holes.
If we assume that the vacuum generates a (oscillating Higgs) pressure
gravity from outside the earth and the earth is able to decrease this
energy by changing Higgs particles into ( less energetic) gravitons
then, then we have a global idea about the principle of quantum
gravity based on boson scattering with fermions.
As a result I proposed that sunspots are micro black holes which are
able to concentrate the Higgs vacuum gravity energy in the shape of
dual bundles. The passage of the moon as a screening object of these
dual pushing gravity bundles gave a direct logic explanation.

However it is strange that I could find only one experiment with a
similar dual gravity decrease effect. It was only T. Kuusela who found
a comparable result with two gravity peaks  before and after the full
eclipse of 1991 in Mexico.
However, these dual gravity decreasing peaks had a different character
than the peaks measured by Wang and Yang in 1997.
Of interest is here the difference of 6 years, which is about the
difference between Maximum and Minimum Sunspot activity!! The year
1991 is close to a maximum and 1997 is close to a minimum of sunspot
activity.
My hypothesis is, that at sunspot minimum, the sunspots are located
close to each other in the form of a disc inside the sun and at
sunspot maximum they are more spread out sometimes hitting the surface
of the sun.
As a logical result, the gravity lensing effect will have different
shaped bundle profiles.
In the minimum sunspot activity period ( 1997 Wang  and Yang) there
are supposed to be two large bundles as described in my articlehttp://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/03/how-small-anomalies-...
In the maximum sunspot activity period, these bundles are supposed to
be spread out with incidental pencil like lensing effects due to the
cooperation of two incidental aligning sunspots.
This should be the explanation for the two pencil like "double gravity
dip" effects measured by T. Kuusela in 1991.
However, the short time these effects happened does indicate that ALSO
THE MOON SHOULD HARBOUR ONE OR MORE gravity lensing elements like
SUNSPOTS!!
As is stated before, my assumption is that sunspots are the former
nuclei Comets once smashed into the sun.
As a consequence, we may assume that also the moon and the earth
harbour sunspot alike ( Fermion friendly) micro black holes.
A second support for this hypothesis of interacting micro black holes,
is based on the measurements of T Kuusela done in march 29 2006.
In this report we find the evidence for an east west variation of  the
tilt meter, which is only measured inside the centre of the moon sun
eclipse line.
One tilt meter placed 60 km outside this propagation line did not
react at all.
A third support is that  20 -24 hour before the eclipse T. Kuusela
measured similar deviations ("we observed similar type of changes in
one of the measurement locations also 20-24 hours before and after the
eclipse") .http://users.utu.fi/kuusela/gravity/Report.pdf
I interprete this effect as a support for my proposal that two
sunspots if they are in line, are able to give an effect, which does
introduce the possibility of pencil alike lensing effects, if two
solar sunspots and one lensing black hole of the moon are in line.
See:

The hypothesis of Fermion friendly (Fermion repelling) black holes is
one of the key elements of my new physics theory, see:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/

This NEW black hole model is even the base for my explanation of the
so called pioneer anomaly. See:http://bp1.blogger.com/_ArDoWzECXSo/Reb9IJHVbCI/AAAAAAAAAEc/PuvylOrUc...
As a consequence there seem to be not only stellar anchor black holes
but even Galaxy anchor black holes, the base for galaxy form and
( quick) formation.

A possible indication for the influence of SOLAR anchor black holes,
could be found in the next article about the  evidence that the
gravitational constant varies
with orientation.

Experimental evidence that the gravitational constant varies
with orientation.
by Mikhail L. Gershteyn*†, Lev I. Gershteyn†, Arkady Gershteyn†, Oleg
V. Karagioz‡http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0202/0202058.pdf

For Galaxy form and formation based on cooperating galaxy anchor black
holes see:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006_04_01_archive.html-Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven -

- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -

Sorry I was a bit sloppy.
For the pencil shaped gravity decrease of .Kuusela, see
A review of conventional explanations of anomalous observations during
solar eclipses, page 8/12 by Chris Duifhttp://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0408/0408023.pdf- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven -

- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I wrote:-------
For the pencil shaped gravity decrease of T.Kuusela, see page 8/12 of
Chris Duif's overview.
http://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0408/0408023.pdf

The dual pencil alike gravity decrease are indications , that Tom van
Flanderns idea about gravity speed >C is supported by this graph.
Look at the two pencil peaks, tey are shifted to the right!! if we
make a comparison with the Wang and Yang graph.
Conclusion, if these two peaks are originated by the alined
interference of two sunspots with one lensing object located inside
the center of the moon, then the shift of the two peaks are a
confimation of the real position of the sun at that moment!! Leo Vuyk

.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast