Re: Black holes have nothing in them.
- From: Sam Wormley <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:47:21 GMT
malibu wrote:
On Dec 24, 10:36 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:malibu wrote:Black holes have nothing in them.That's right.... the mass is gone... leaving a
region of warped space and time with properties
proportional to the mass that fell in.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/blackhole/expl-thorne.html
Here's what you posted earlier:
"TON Sci Fri: Attack of the Black Hole (aired Friday, Dec. 21, 2007)
http://www.sciencefriday.com/program/archives/200712215
Astronomers have captured an image of a jet of high energy
particles leaving a black hole at the center of one galaxy
to strike the edge of neighboring galaxy. The "death star"
galaxy and its victim make up the system 3C321, found about
1.4 billion light years away in the constellation Serpens
(coordinates RA 15h 31m 42.70s | Dec +24º 04' 25.00'')
Black hole jets can produce high levels of radiation,
potentially sparking new star formation in their path."
Now, I've been saying all along that as soon as
something falls into a black hole, it is ejected as
plasma- high energy particles. That's what
they do; they continually renew the star population.
The black hole is an extreme vortex that spins
particles right back up. Nothing stays in it for long.
John
Galaxy Model for the Atom
Could be you'll never understand the difference, John.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Black holes have nothing in them.
- From: malibu
- Re: Black holes have nothing in them.
- References:
- Black holes have nothing in them.
- From: malibu
- Re: Black holes have nothing in them.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Black holes have nothing in them.
- From: malibu
- Black holes have nothing in them.
- Prev by Date: FerroFluid Paper
- Next by Date: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
- Previous by thread: Re: Black holes have nothing in them.
- Next by thread: Re: Black holes have nothing in them.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|