Re: Question about Photon
- From: "Tom Potter" <tdp1001@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:01:56 +0800
"hanson" <hanson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ff9gj.747$sH.521@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Tom Potter" <tdp1001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4780b5aa$0$26101$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tom Potter's photon
==============
A so-called photon is a cause or an affect that involves one unit of
action.
**Causes and effects occur in integer units of action, NOT energy.**
[1] The effective mass of a photon is: mass(photon) = h / (time * c^2)
where: "h" is Planck's Constant,
[2] "t" is the time is the time interval over which the "action" takes
place,
and "c" is a constant used to express time intervals in terms of some
quasi-stable space such as a King's body parts, Jo Blocks, Einstein's
measuring sticks, etc
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't know what your "so-called photon" is, Potter. But the concept
of photon is well defined and measured. The photon is a spin 1 boson
with GeV/c^2 = 0 and Electric Charge = 0 that mediates the
electromagnetic force.
[hanson]
Even without deliberations over whether the Potter photon
is due to some "affect" or some "effect" and also
notwithstanding Sam's adhoc GeV/c^2 = 0, Potter, your
[1] mass(photon) = h / (time * c^2) is dimensionally correct.
However, the issue arises in/with your very nebulous [2], the
"t" time interval over which the "action" takes place, & "c",
a constant to express time intervals... ["t" (self referential)?]
... **in terms** of some **quasi-stable space**, etc... ahaha...
So, Tom, if you take your explanation OUT of your tutorial
and add in instead even more gossamer, far reaching prose
and some additional evangelical poetry to boot, then your
definition may eventually approach the level of the BIG LIE...
which, if you then repeat it often enough will be accepted
as the real and immutable truth...
So, follow the example of the leaders, your beloved Chosen
people "in terms of some quasi-stable space" and you too
will turn out to be loved, just like them, especially by Tom Potter...
I was hoping that someone would be sharp enough
to notice that I mentioned that space is "quasi-stable",
and I was not surprised to see that "hanson"
as usual, was the one to perceive the variation from
conventional wisdom.
Pure space is where the cross-correlation
between two points approaches one,
and this time interval is commonly multiplied
by a constant in order to equate it to
the "quasi-stable" space associated with
a King's body parts, and even marks on
a quartz rod that is held at a constant temperature.
I must mention that even "pure space"
is "quasi-stable" in that it is modulated by mass
and the presence of mass.
--
Tom Potter
http://www.geocities.com/tdp1001/index.html
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://notsocrazyideas.blogspot.com
http://groups.msn.com/PotterPhotos
.
- References:
- Question about Photon
- From: Ray
- Re: Question about Photon
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: Question about Photon
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Question about Photon
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: Question about Photon
- From: hanson
- Question about Photon
- Prev by Date: Some radon help. Better understanding pressure system.
- Next by Date: Re: Curing Einstein's Disease (is Copyrighted)
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about Photon
- Next by thread: Re: Question about Photon
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
