Re: Question about Radiative Heat Transfer in vacuum
- From: Douglas Eagleson <eaglesondouglas@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 12:52:40 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 8, 12:29 pm, Douglas Eagleson <eaglesondoug...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Jan 8, 11:04 am, nos...@xxxxxxxxxx (Paul Ciszek) wrote:
Say I have a Dewar, a double-walled container with vacuum between the
two walls. So far as I can tell, the rate of heat transfer from one
wall to the other is propotional to (T1^4-T2^4) and the width of the
gap doesn't figure into it at all. Is this true? What if the gap is
so narrow that it is on the order of the wavelength of light that makes
up the peak emission of the hotter surface? Would this have an effect
on the black body radiation?
--
Please reply to: | "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is
pciszek at panix dot com | indistinguishable from malice."
Autoreply is disabled |
A soliton as the vibration was allowed to model temperature. And to
alter the gap to conductive as opposed to radiative was the possible
implication of gap minimization.
At a certain small 1 angstrom like gap, the solitons will just jump to
the second dewar wall. And the difference was the result. A
conductive transfer was to alter the black body. A complete loss of
vacuum is the outcome, making the radiative outer wall now a new
spectrum.
A certain mass would cause the new spectrum.
fyi, a mass is inverted in the black cavity causing the finite
radiation to appear in relation to the cavity diameter. A perfect
symmetry.
frequency of the body as a mass obeys a debated frequency law. Most
methods fail to follow the data, ergo I debate the true issue not a
pap empreical formula. Intensity versus frequnecy i.e. the data.
A bodies temperature in relation to its mass is the issue. How does a
uncorrelated transfer effect? Remember a soliton is a simple
correlated dimension of heat.
So uncorellated as opposed to correlated solitons define temeprature.
Solid state physics is like this when it inverts a space dimension to
the effect. i.e. a mass to a matter. SO a round disk may have
harmonic exictations, like a hydrogen atom.
NON-harmonic state was to define the uncorrelated heat quanta.
Allowing the basic harmonic to describe temeprature in solid state as
radiative transfer. A sphere of mass was to transfer according to the
intensity plot. intensity versus frequency.
A one-dimensional osscilator then states the distribution. Look up
any osscilator and use the frequnecy distribution of the plain old
Schrodinger equation.
A nonconventional quantum theory is stated, but real data fitting.
.
- References:
- Question about Radiative Heat Transfer in vacuum
- From: Paul Ciszek
- Re: Question about Radiative Heat Transfer in vacuum
- From: Douglas Eagleson
- Question about Radiative Heat Transfer in vacuum
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about Radiative Heat Transfer in vacuum
- Next by Date: Re: Question about Radiative Heat Transfer in vacuum
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about Radiative Heat Transfer in vacuum
- Next by thread: Re: Question about Radiative Heat Transfer in vacuum
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|