Regarding hhc314's Crackpot-Flake List: 2nd Continuation

From Osher Doctorow

Let's analyze some aspects of hhc314's crackpot-flake list based on
the ability to find differences between stimuli (or facts or theories
or ideas) and the ability to find similarities between stimuli (or
facts or theories or ideas), which are respectively called
Discrimination and Integration in psychology).

1) Me vs Pentcho Valev on proofs.

I use mathematical proofs of my theorems on probability (my main
focus), while Pentcho doesn't. Apparently hhc314 doesn't see any
difference in that.

2) Me vs Pentcho Valev on "Complete Incomprehensibility". I define
all probabilistic concepts (my main focus), while Pentcho doesn't do
anything or almost anything on probability and uses quite a few
undefined terms and even refers to unexplained plots in his fields of
interest. (Jim Black had claimed that my posts are completely
incomprehensible.)

3) Me vs Pentcho Valev on Topics.

I cover a wide variety of topics in Quantum Physics, GR, SR, Brane/M/
Superstring Theory, Cosmology, Classical Physics, while Pentcho
obsesses with Einstein and one or two authors in statistical
thermodynamics.

4) Me vs Pentcho Valev on arXiv.

I reference arXiv papers, usually by author, number, date, title, in
most of my postings, and about half of them are very recent ones,
while Pentcho doesn't do any of the above. ArXiv is the main online
depository of physics and mathematics papers since 1992. This doesn't
make any difference to hhc.

5) Me vs Pentcho on Other People's Threads.

Both I and and Pentcho don't troll, use profanity, use "snip crap"
expressions, or use one-worders or one-liners on other people's
sci.physics threads, unlike almost all the trolls & graffiti artists
who reply to my threads. Again, this escapes the notice of born-
yesterday hhc314.

Osher Doctorow
.