Re: How to Replicate NoEinstein's M-M Invalidation (is Copyrighted.)

Eric Gisse wrote:
On Jan 8, 2:46 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Are you good at algebra? Then, you might enjoy seeing if you can
replicate NoEinstein's invalidation of the historic 1887 Michelson-
Morley interferometer experiment. Such was seeking to measure Earth's
velocity and direction in the cosmos. When the experiment was first
conducted, it was assumed that there was an energy form called ether--
even in the vacuum of space. If, by chance, light traveling in the
direction of motion of the Earth was slowed in passing through the
ether, then, the velocity of the Earth could be determined by how much
the light's velocity had slowed. And the direction of motion of the
Earth would correspond to the azimuth of the maximum slowing. But no
interference phase changes were seen at any azimuth. So, the
experiment was a failure... Many, especially A. A. Michelson, were
miffed to understand why the experiment didn't work.

I wonder if you understand that there has been more than one
interferometry experiment done since 1887.

To have been a failure, the M-M experiment is considered by many
to be the greatest scientific experiment of all time. Such is because
the explanations of Lorentz and FitzGerald that "all matter contracts
in the direction of motion" became the basis for Einstein's theories
of relativity.

This is fantastically wrong. The Michelson-Morley experiment is not
the basis for relativity - Maxwell's equations and the principle of
relativity are.

But what if matter doesn't contract in the direction of motion?

Then you will have to find an alternate explanation for atmospheric
muons - one experiment among many. Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction was
simply one explanation for why the MMX nulled.

Of course those men, and Einstein, would be wrong. The author of this
post, NoEinstein--who has a background in structural design--didn't

A background in _structural design_ ?

Goddamn you are wholly unqualified. Don't let that stop you, though.

believe that velocity could compress matter or make any structure or
material contract. But he had to find an alternative explanation for
WHY the experiment failed. His intuition told him that light, as with
sound, speeds up when shined in the direction of motion of the Earth,
and slows down when shined in the direction opposite to the Earth's
motion. Would those two assumptions--that were never considered by
others--yield negative results for the M-M experiment, and without
having to resort to... "contracting matter" due to velocity?

Apparently all that "structural design" experience never prepared you
for basic relativity. The contraction is equivalent to rotating a
ruler and noticing the ruler looks shorter at an angle.

Your mumbling about Einsteins intuition is wrong because Einstein
never made such assumptions. You are welcome to provide reference to a
published work quoting Einstein saying what you say he says.

NoEinstein's simple algebraic disproofs, that he is hereby inviting
others to replicate, will require an above average ability to
visualize the M-M apparatus moving at various angles relative to
Earth's velocity vector.

Your name is enough to immediately question the validity of the
conclusions.

[snip junk]

Especially since you don't even write down your calculations.

Respectfully submitted, -- NoEinstein --

You don't respectfully submit anything. You only intend to tear down
modern physics because you can't understand any of it with your
building background.

When will your assault on quantum mechanics begin?

Other posts of mine may be accessed by clicking my "profile".
__________

Lets see, he does not know physics, he does not know math, he
does not know proofs. The only question is whether noeinstein
is good for a laugh and a warning to students of what could
happen to them if they do not study. I guess he can be used
as a warning to scare the children.
.

Relevant Pages

  • A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
    ... it's length contracts along the axis of motion. ... Since the contraction was invoked to explain the ... Einstein: Relativity Demystified by ... Another reference is "Observation of Length by a Single Observer," by ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity: Entropy Increases as Velocity Increases!
    ... contracts along the axis of motion. ... should be obvious that length contraction along the axis of motion does ... Einstein: Relativity Demystified by ... Another reference is "Observation of Length by a Single Observer," by ...
    (sci.physics)
  • THE RELATIVITY OF THE INERTIAL PHENOMENA (GRVITY)
    ... The relativity of motion in space relative to the inertia phenomena is ... from the perspective of watching the universe from ... Inertial mass is relative to velocity in space, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • RHU Theory: The relativity of the inertial phenomena
    ... The relativity of motion in space relative to the inertia phenomena is ... from the perspective of watching the universe from ... Inertial mass is relative to velocity in space, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: c+v and c-v or not?
    ... bodies carried forward in the earth's motion undergo a deformation. ... But its true velocity (I mean this time, ... the amount of contraction being just sufficient to ... Light travelling between source and target has a constant speed c ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)