JSH: Relevance to physics field

My degree is in physics as I have my B.Sc. from Vanderbilt University,
so I have an interest in the vitality of the field. In the math field
"pure math" took over as a concept where opinion ruled for ideas not
checkable or difficult to check by people outside the field.

I suggest to you that given the ability to make claims backed up
primarily by others supporting those claims, mathematicians learned to
just lie about mathematics and the most dramatic proof now is the
solution to the factoring problem I've found and their refusal to
acknowledge it DESPITE the reality that denial is only a temporary
hedge against inevitable revelation.

So they claimed that factoring was a hard problem without being able
to prove it mathematically, and relied on the supposed inability of
anyone to find a simple solution.

Their lack of real expertise is betrayed by no one finding the
solution which I've posted, and by their refusal to acknowledge now
that it is extant.

Consider ten people known to be mathematicians where 9 of them claim
one thing is true, while 1 disagrees saying it's false. Will not the
weight of "expert opinion" prevail in a "pure math" area where
experiment cannot show which side is true?

Now then, what if the 9 are con artists who know this reality?

Their biggest export to physics is this concept of areas where the
majority can make up things in areas difficult to check, so you can
consider them the source for the popularity of "string theory"--an
area where experiment is suddenly out the window.

Sir Isaac Newton brought forward the modern scientific field by
pushing for experiments versus people idly speculating about how the
world worked, and now humanity is going backwards propelled by people
I can prove are con artists, who are just looking for an easy way to
make money.

I see them as a parasitic and not intelligent enough, or caring enough
to worry about stopping human progress, as if they spread, they can
take over all our basic sciences with this technique.

Given enough time they could reach a point where even experiment would
not be able to stop them as consider the scientific evidence used by
Dr. Halton Arp in the cosmology field to see how they can handle ANY
evidence used against those relying on the group to block knowledge.

Just to give you some sense of the scope and size of this radical
movement against human intellect, consider politics, where no evidence
matters, like with the US invasion of Iraq, and how easily that was
accomplished and maintained against the evidence.

We are witnessing today an attempt at a revolution in the way human
beings learn, which is a revolution against knowledge at all levels,
with people who have won most of the battles, and now can make up
science, math, and politics at will.

If they succeed in winning the war, then there is no future for
humanity.


James Harris
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: What Does SR stand For?
    ... Today, because of the evidence, no one could ... shown to be simple 3-D math. ... accordance with the equations of relativity. ... But we know that space exists and even in classical physics, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Wikipedia and me
    ... James Harris ... would publish a wrong math paper? ... I remind that I have a PHYSICS DEGREE. ... People calling themselves mathematicians ride on the coat-tails of past ...
    (sci.skeptic)
  • Re: Relevance to physics field
    ... In the math field ... pesky mathematicians, but Physicists lie too. ... evidence used against those relying on the group to block knowledge. ... which war, where? ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Gist of surrogate factoring theorem
    ... effort to hide it as that is the real math world. ... Mathematicians TELL people the factoring problem is ... I was trained for the discipline of physics. ... They didn't convince me, so I went looking, and I found the surrogate ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Atheists are the biggest fools on Earth
    ... Matt Silberstein wrote: ... At least there is scientific evidence for the Big Bang. ... Can you do enough calculus to understand Newtonian physics? ... Can you do the math to understand the Maxwell Equations? ...
    (talk.origins)