Re: How to Replicate NoEinstein's M-M Invalidation (is Copyrighted.)

On Jan 14, 2:22 pm, "Paul B. Andersen"
<paul.b.ander...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
NoEinsteinskrev:

To have been a failure, theM-Mexperiment is considered by many
to be the greatest scientific experiment of all time. Such is because
the explanations of Lorentz and FitzGerald that "all matter contracts
in the direction of motion" became the basis for Einstein's theories
of relativity.
But what if matter doesn't contract in the direction of motion?
Of course those men, and Einstein, would be wrong.

According to SR, the 'explanation' for the MMX null result is extremely
simple: the speed of light is isotropic, and nothing is contracting.
So the orientation of the interferometer doesn't affect the interference
pattern.

According to SR, matter doesn't contract.

--
Paul

http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/

Dear Paul: As a new visitor to my posts, thanks for replying. For
the past year I have been answering your same questions, though posed
by others. Reluctantly, I must tell you that I can't customize
replies "from square one" just for you. I simply don't have the
time. But I will reply to you if you will comment, later, after
reading some, or most of my earlier posts. Those should answer the
majority of your questions. Thanks again. -- NoEinstein --
.

Relevant Pages