Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:16:10 GMT
On a sunny day (Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:06:39 -0600) it happened "local host"
<Dorkus@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in <fmon13$oom$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/sasp/Processing_Gain.html
Coherent integration increases SNR, helps you pull
signals out that are buried in noise.
Yes, and it says this:
<quote>
Each halving of the low-pass cut-off frequency adds another 3 dB to the
SNR. Since the signal is a dc component (zero bandwidth), this process can
be repeated indefinitely to achieve any desired SNR.
WRONG. google "Allen Variance" SNR is limited.
Yep. sample accuracy, and a whole lot of other stuff Wormley does not
know, because he _never_ designed a receiver, a sampling system, or any electronics
recently for that matter, all limit SNR quality.
Only a total know-nothing can claim to get any signal from noise.
Hey, I may seem pretty arrogant claiming LIGO is crap, crap science, bad physics,
and generally crap, not to forget crap, but really, I have predicted their null
now as long as I have been posting to this group.
While the Wormley has provided nothing but links with no hands on experience
and no real understanding.
He's a parrot.
Like all Einstein-reciters.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- References:
- Update on LIGO.
- From: cliff wright
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: James
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: local host
- Update on LIGO.
- Prev by Date: Re: Update on LIGO.
- Next by Date: Re: How to Replicate NoEinstein's M-M Invalidation (is Copyrighted.)
- Previous by thread: Re: Update on LIGO.
- Next by thread: Re: Update on LIGO.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading