JSH: So what do we do now?

I'm going to presume that some of you looked with a critical eye on my
posts about solving the factoring problem, and even if you find it
hard to believe that was accomplished, you may find that it is just a
very elegant little mathematical demonstration to use x^2 = y^2 mod p,
with z^2 = y^2 mod T, and find these laws just there that were never
known before.

And you may realize it could be the case that through accidents of
history and following each other's tails--which mathematicians are
very good at--they just never found that they could build a two system
approach to factoring, and using only one half of the system, they
concluded that factoring was a hard problem.

After all, the math is trivially easy for anyone with a few years of
any kind of college level math behind them, though the "mod" may be a
bit odd at first, it doesn't take long to read up on it and get up to
speed.

But then, now what should we do?

Let's say I just implement the damn thing and factor public keys, do I
call the FBI next? Or what?

Is there any way to force the math people to just go with the proof?

What if Bush people show up and simply decide to make a limited
problem go away? Like they cannot make people disappear. And as if
Bush has the morals to not just decide that one more big issue is too
much?

(Oh yeah, I do think that if any of you make a limited informing of
this result with the idea of keeping a small impact that you may not
live through the decision. Bush does not seem to have a sound moral
foundation, if you know what I mean.)

The alternative is a very public demonstration, like factoring RSA
public keys in posts on this newsgroup, but I project that afterwards
stock markets around the world would crumble, and what's happening now
with them would look like the good 'ol days.

I need another solution. If you believe me of course. If you don't
then other people will decide the fate of the world for you.

At this rate it may be my decision alone.


James Harris
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH: Funding, real world, not fantasy
    ... >I notice that you're not posting on factoring any more and you've ... >deleted at least one of your posts from sci.crypt. ... Such as factoring by the Collatz Conjecture. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: What puzzles me, discovery ignored
    ... James has just pointed me at your work on his general Diophantine ... looking at your posts was your interest in generating a solution ... The proper answer for factoring is: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: A solution to the factoring problem
    ... then Bush has no reason to take you out. ... rogue trading to hide the fact that JSH's factoring algorithm is ... problem and word has trickled up to Bush by now. ... And that goes again to the intelligence services. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: So what do we do now?
    ... public keys in posts on this newsgroup, ... For those who think that is a dodge, ... I want to make is--these are fundamental relations. ... Are they applicable to factoring? ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: JSH: So what do we do now?
    ... public keys in posts on this newsgroup, ... Are they applicable to factoring? ... Math people have changed the rules, ... one to demonstrate, but with fundamental mathematics, why wouldn't ...
    (sci.physics)