Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:10:32 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 17, 2:16 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On a sunny day (Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:06:39 -0600) it happened "local host"
<Dor...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in <fmon13$oo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/sasp/Processing_Gain.html
Coherent integration increases SNR, helps you pull
signals out that are buried in noise.
Yes, and it says this:
<quote>
Each halving of the low-pass cut-off frequency adds another 3 dB to the
SNR. Since the signal is a dc component (zero bandwidth), this process can
be repeated indefinitely to achieve any desired SNR.
WRONG. google "Allen Variance" SNR is limited.
Yep. sample accuracy, and a whole lot of other stuff Wormley does not
know, because he _never_ designed a receiver, a sampling system, or any electronics
recently for that matter, all limit SNR quality.
Only a total know-nothing can claim to get any signal from noise.
Hey, I may seem pretty arrogant claiming LIGO is crap, crap science, bad physics,
and generally crap, not to forget crap, but really, I have predicted their null
now as long as I have been posting to this group.
Yea, you sure are a visionary to be posting on USENET and claiming
that something related to GR won't work.
Why don't you be more clever and explain why you think gravitational
waves don't exist despite the repeated indirect observations of their
emission and the lack of even one observational disproof of GR?
While the Wormley has provided nothing but links with no hands on experience
and no real understanding.
He's a parrot.
Like all Einstein-reciters.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Benj
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- References:
- Update on LIGO.
- From: cliff wright
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: James
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: local host
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Update on LIGO.
- Prev by Date: Re: Update on LIGO.
- Next by Date: Re: Update on LIGO.
- Previous by thread: Re: Update on LIGO.
- Next by thread: Re: Update on LIGO.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|