Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: "Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:49:31 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 19, 2:53 am, cliff wright <c.c.wri...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
cliff wright wrote:....
Hope we get more light and less heat if this discussion continues.
Regards Cliff Wright
A foot note to my last posting on this subject. Just today on my regular
"Sky and Telescope" update we have apair of apparent Neutron stars which
exceed Chandreskar's limit of 1.4 solar masses by a large margin. So now
what are we looking at?
Perhaps you might provide an online ref.
We also have news that Canada's David Dunlop observatory is under threat
of closure due to lack of funds.
Dunlop's is in such a polluted location and
with the sky-glow is pretty much useless.
Almost all of southern ontario is a mess,
I bought a home in Muskoka just for the
stars and winter snow. Algonquin park
might be ok for a scope, don't know.
Regards
Ken
.
- References:
- Update on LIGO.
- From: cliff wright
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: James
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: local host
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: Benj
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: cliff wright
- Re: Update on LIGO.
- From: cliff wright
- Update on LIGO.
- Prev by Date: Re: Cosmic explosion, but no gravitational waves
- Next by Date: Re: ENTROPY and the Direction of Time from the BIG BANG
- Previous by thread: Re: Update on LIGO.
- Next by thread: Re: Update on LIGO.
- Index(es):