Re: JSH: So what do we do now?
- From: Randy Poe <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:29:52 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 19, 12:29 pm, JSH <jst...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It has now backed down to a corner where it's saying I have to be the
one to demonstrate,
Um, yeah. Anybody who claims something is new and
true, they "have to be the one to demonstrate". Wiles couldn't
just say "I have a proof that completes the proof of FLT" he
actually had to demonstrate it. He had to be the one to do so.
but with fundamental mathematics, why wouldn't
someone else exploit it?
Because there's nothing to exploit.
Naive method of factoring N: Just keep randomly guessing
at factors of N and doing trial division.
Your new improved method: Just keep randomly guessing
at parameters that might solve your equations and see
if any of them fit.
Improvement in run-time: zero.
Here's your first 4-digit trial: 2701. Show how you use your
method to factor it.
- Randy
.
- References:
- JSH: So what do we do now?
- From: JSH
- Re: JSH: So what do we do now?
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: JSH: So what do we do now?
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: JSH: So what do we do now?
- From: JSH
- JSH: So what do we do now?
- Prev by Date: Re: Cyberattacks against cities
- Next by Date: Re: Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe?
- Previous by thread: Re: JSH: So what do we do now?
- Next by thread: Re: JSH: So what do we do now?
- Index(es):